Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project: An Overview of Project Goals and Organization Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Uncompahgre Partnership Native Plant Program Landscape Scale Collaboration & Restoration in Western Colorado.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
BLM Plant Conservation Program: Its Role in Sage Grouse Conservation
An Introduction and Progress Report. An Extraordinary Time growing demand for scientific expertise significant organizational change new need for partnerships.
US Geological Survey US Department of the Interior National Wetlands Research Center Lafayette, Louisiana.
An Entity Relationship Model of Wildlife Habitat Associations Southwest Regional GAP Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004, Las Vegas,
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Depicting uncertainty in wildlife habitat suitability models using Bayesian inference and expert opinion Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado,
Santa Fe County Focal Species Workshop Thank you all for participating with a special thanks to: –Santa Fe County –NM Department of Game and Fish –The.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America How does the surrogate species effort relate to other ongoing efforts? Birds of Management.
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
W.G. Kepner and D.F. Bradford 29 April 2004 Regional Gap Analysis Program for Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado, and Arizona.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Land Cover Mapping for the Southwest Regional GAP Analysis Project Tenth Biennial Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, RS-2004, Salt.
Land Cover Mapping Background: Training Data and Classification Methods Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE.
Lessons Learned: Land Cover Mapping for the Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project John Lowry Utah Project Coordinator SWReGAP College of Natural Resources.
SEReGAP Land Cover Mapping Summary and Results Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004, Las Vegas, Nevada:
A COMPARISON OF APPROACHES FOR VERIFYING SOUTHWEST REGIONAL GAP VERTEBRATE-HABITAT DISTRIBUTION MODELS J. Judson Wynne, Charles A. Drost and Kathryn A.
Development, implementation and lessons learned from the Northwest Forest Plan Michael W. Collopy Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science.
John Lowry RS/GIS Laboratory College of Natural Resources Utah State University Resource Management Tools & Geospatial Conference, Phoenix, AZ April 18-22,
Gap Analysis: GIS, maps and a new view of regional conservation Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004,
Projected Benefits of Regional Gap Analysis in Support of State Wildlife Agency Development of Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategies Southwest.
A Regional Approach to Stewardship Mapping for the Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project Southwest Regional GAP Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico,
Pre-Processing Techniques for SWReGAP Land Cover Analysis Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004, Las.
Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project Stewardship Andrea E. Ernst Scott Schrader Veronica Lopez Julie Prior-Magee Kenneth Boykin Bruce Thompson Don Schrupp.
W.G. Kepner, P. Comer, D. Osborne, D. Semmens, and K. Gergely US-IALE 2004, SW ReGAP Special Session 31 March 2004 The Southwest Regional Gap Analysis.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
PILOT STUDY ON THE USE OF LANDSCAPE SCIENCES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A Science Framework for International Cooperation Committee on the Challenges.
The Great Lakes Aquatic Gap Analysis Project Overview Jana Stewart U.S. Geological Survey.
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Daniel Oppenheimer Tamarisk Coalition May 20, 2014.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
National Boundaries Group Update to Coordination Group Laura Waggoner, US Census Bureau and Robert Pierce, US Geological Survey, Co-Chairs March 18, 2014.
Cheatgrass Management Plan for NM. MANAGEMENT PLAN OUTLINE INTRODUCTION MISSION STATEMENT – GOAL SCOPE OF THE CHEATGRASS PROBLEM POLICY AND DIRECTION.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Reclamation provides water to more than 31 million people and is the second largest producer of hydroelectric power in the west We are a water management.
Improving Coverage and Management Effectiveness of the Protected Area System in the Republic of Moldova Maria NAGORNII Head of the Analysis, Monitoring.
MESH UK Workshop 19 October 2006 Introduction Dr Paul Gilliland Marine Policy Adviser and MESH Partner Lead Natural England.
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center Council for Data Integration Meeting Sept 16, 2009 U.S. Department of the.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey History of the Southwest Biological Science Center A Short Overview.
Atlin/Taku Land Use Planning Update Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #3 March 6, 2009.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Geospatial Liaisons - Supporting NHD Stewardship NHD Workshop April 14, 2009.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Challenge Grant Update: Linking the Network of Natural Heritage Biodiversity Data to the Environmental Information Exchange Network.
Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research an intergovernmental organization for global change research socio-economic implications international.
An Overview of the 2007 Mojave Network Meeting June 28, 2007 Lake Mead National Recreation Area National Park Service Mojave Network.
Overcoming Chance Agreement in Classification Tree Modeling: Predictor Variables, Training Data, and Spatial Autocorrelation Considerations Southwest Regional.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
Climate Change Education and Initiatives at Northern Arizona University and the Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals William M. Auberle, P.E.,
Contributions of Southeast GAP to the National Land Cover Dataset 2001 Todd Earnhardt 1, Jason Lee 2, Kevin Kleiner 3, Elizabeth Kramer 2, Amy Silvano.
Evolution of the Hopi Mobility Committee Northern Arizona Mobility Management.
1 Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Region James Goldstein Tellus Institute.
Renewable Energy in California: Implementing the Governors Renewable Energy Executive Order California Energy Commission Department of Fish and Game Fish.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Collaborative in Conservation An Initial Framework and Example Nick Salafsky Foundations of Success & Conservation Measures Partnership *** Note: This.
Rangeland NRI: 2002 and Beyond Presentation given to NRCS State Conservationists NRI Exec. Committee Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Strengthening the Science-Management Bond in the Wildlife Profession Eric Hellgren Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida.
Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research Metadata Training Neil Cobb, Director Paul Heinrich, FGDC Metadata Trainer Kirsten Ironside,
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Presentation transcript:

Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project: An Overview of Project Goals and Organization Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004, Las Vegas, Nevada: Transdisciplinary Challenges in Landscape Ecology Julie Prior-Magee Julie Prior-Magee USGS - Biological Resources Discipline

The Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project Gap Analysis Project A Multi-agency Initiative SWReGAP USGS BRD USGS EDC US EPA BLM CDOW USU NMSU NAU CSU

The Gap Analysis Program Presentation Topics n What is GAP – mission, objectives, and products n SWReGAP – project organization, responsibilities, and timeline n Benefits of a regional approach

What Is GAP? A “gap” is the lack of representation or under- representation of an element of biodiversity (plant community or animal species) in an area intended for its long term maintenance. Gap analysis is a process to keep common species common by plugging the gaps in our network of lands managed for biodiversity.

The Gap Analysis Program Mission Statement “To promote conservation of biodiversity through information... by providing conservation assessments of natural communities and native species,.. and to facilitate the application of this information to land management.”

The Gap Analysis Program GAP Objectives 1) map the distributions of natural communities using NVCS – LAND COVER MAPPING 2) map predicted habitat of native animal species – ANIMAL HABITAT MODELING 3) map the degree of management for biodiversity maintenance of land tracts and water bodies focusing on intent – STEWARDSHIP MAPPING 4) analyze the representation of biotic elements in the conservation network to identify “gaps” in long-term security – GAP ANALYSIS 5) provide this information to the public and those entities charged with land use research, policy, planning, and management.

The Gap Analysis Program Analyses: Animals Who are the land stewards and how well is the animal species protected? % USFS: 53.0% % BLM: 0.85% % Protected: 7.3%

The Gap Analysis Program Products of GAP Digital products on CD-ROM and the Internet:   Land Cover GIS Coverage   Animal Habitat GIS Coverages   Stewardship/Ownership GIS Coverages   Analyses of “gaps” and general representation   Areas of species richness   Ancillary data used in modeling   A report of methods and results

The Gap Analysis Program The Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project (SWReGAP) maps according to biogeographic zones rather than state boundaries to achieve a regional seamless biotic data set. Work is coordinated as a regional effort among 5 state-based institutions, NatureServe, and other cooperators. NMCFWRU Las Cruces USU Logan EPA Las Vegas CPFS Flagstaff CDOW & BLM NSTC Denver NREL/CSU

The Gap Analysis Program State Project Principle Investigators and NatureServe Cooperator: AZ: Kathryn Thomas, USGS Colorado Plateau Field Station, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff. CO: Don Schrupp, Colorado Division of Wildlife; Lee O’Brien, NREL, Colorado State University; Dianne Osborne, BLM-NSTC. NV: William Kepner and David Bradford, EPA – National Exposure Research Lab, Las Vegas. NM: Ken Boykin, USGS Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces. UT: Doug Ramsey and John Lowry, Utah State University; Collin Homer, USGS EROS Data Center. NatureServe: Regional plant ecology coordination – Pat Comer and Keith Schulz Who is SWReGAP?

The Gap Analysis Program Project Components and Responsibilities   Land cover mapping is coordinated by the RS/GIS Lab at Utah State University.   Animal habitat modeling is coordinated by the NMCFWRU at New Mexico State University.   Stewardship mapping and analysis are also coordinated by the NMCFWRU.   Individual state labs work cooperatively through the regional labs to produce regionally consistent and seamless data sets for the Southwest.

The Gap Analysis Program Project Timeline 1998First organizational workshops held. 1999Planning workshop held and initial GAP funds distributed. Regional and State coordinators hired Primary landsat imagery acquired along with field data. Regional animal habitat modeling methods established. Land cover mapping and animal habitat modeling work ongoing Land cover mapping and animal modeling continues. Stewardship mapping begins in Land cover mapping and stewardship mapping will be complete in September Animal modeling will be complete in March Analysis completed, report written, and data published by fall 2005.

The Gap Analysis Program Some SWReGAP Vital Statistics l Project area: 530, 415 sq mi, 339,465,600 ac - 93% of the size of Alaska l BLM lands: 31% of area l USFS lands: 14% of area l State lands: 7% of area l Tribal lands: 9% of area

The Gap Analysis Program Benefits of Regional SWReGAP Partnership  Consistent data provides a common base for interagency analysis (regional consistency spatially and thematically with NVCS).  Regional data will allow regional planning as a context for site-level management and NEPA compliance.  A high quality data set will permit regional assessments of landscape health and trends and reveal patterns only visible at that scale.  It provides a sampling frame for finer-scale data collection and study.

The Gap Analysis Program Contacts  Regional Coordinator: Julie Prior-Magee  SWReGAP website:  National GAP website: or search “gap analysis” Contains all GAP contacts, state project status and links, and state data.  The National GAP Office: 208/