WOLF MY DEEP SELF MADE ME DO IT. SUSAN WOLF (born 1952) Student of Tom Nagel Rebuts Nagel’s views.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Free Will.
Advertisements

Knowledge as JTB Someone S has knowledge of P IFF: 1. S believes P 2. S is justified in believing P 3. P is true.
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
DETERMINISM VS. FREE WILL
An Argument that Abortion is wrong
Support For Morality As A Social Contract
Libertarianism A Libertarian, such as Taylor:
“Why Abortion is Immoral” Donald B. Marquis  Marquis holds that to resolve the morality of abortion it is necessary to first determine why it is that.
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Moral Relativism.
CAN I KILL MY YOUNGER SELF? Time Travel and the Retro-Suicide Paradox Peter B. M. Vranas The University of Michigan 15 September 2000.
Section 1.3 The Laboratory of the Mind Thought Experiments.
This is not the Title of our Seminar
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
Philosophy 223 Relativism and Egoism. Remember This Slide? Ethical reflection on the dictates of morality can address these sorts of issues in at least.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 6 Ayer and Emotivism By David Kelsey.
360 Business Ethics Chapter 4. Moral facts derived from reason Reason has three properties that have bearing on moral facts understood as the outcomes.
The tripartite theory of knowledge
Metaethics and ethical language Michael Lacewing Michael Lacewing
The Problem of Evil II Mackie on the logical problem and Swinburne’s theodicy.
T5 Program Inquiry Based Teaching Rob Schadt Jim Wolff Srikrishna S. Ramachandra June 3, 2008 Rob Schadt Jim Wolff Srikrishna S. Ramachandra June 3, 2008.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
Solving Linear Equations Adapted from Walch Education.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil By David Kelsey.
Ethics—The Basics by John Mizzoni
Scientific Method Lab.
Pragmatism, Functionalism, Peirce, and James The theory of evolution is beginning to do very good service by its reduction of all mentality to the type.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Phil 360 Chapter 2. Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development Pre-conventional – Punishment and reward Conventional – Community, family, peer, etc. role.
Free Will Theories  Agency Theory: we define ourselves as agents through free choices: this we experience (and is what our theory should explain)  Person.
Section 1.3 The Laboratory of the Mind
Conceptions of Health & Disease ISD I – E/H/HL Session 1 April 14, 2003.
From Last time Noonan argues that because the fetus is a human being, and human beings have a right to life, then Abortion is immoral. Warren argues that.
The Nature of Morality General Overview “We are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live” (Plato in the Republic ca. 390B.C.)
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 9 Appendix.
11/8/2015 Nature of Science. 11/8/2015 Nature of Science 1. What is science? 2. What is an observation? 3. What is a fact? 4. Define theory. 5. Define.
Ted Honderich. The Man Born 30 January, 1933 Canadian-born British philosopher Currently chairman of the Royal Institute of Philosophy. Main work on five.
The importance of free will Human autonomy and dignity Value of deliberation Deserving praise and condemnation Moral responsibility.
David Frost. FREE WILL AND CAUSAL DETERMINISM 1)Are free will and causal determinism incompatible? FREE WILL AND CAUSAL DETERMINISM.
Critical Thinking, Decision Making & Problem Solving.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
By Dale G. Basgall Sunday, February 19, After review of this, and I am only speaking about myself and Roy is willing to entertain the concept from.
Richard Taylor: ON THE ORIGIN OF GOOD AND EVIL
Economics: The World Around You
Lecture 8 Ultimate Responsibility. Topics for this lecture: What does FW imply? An open future? Or that I am the origin of the action? Methodological.
Animals and Persons. Ethical status for animals Kantian and utilitarian ethics traditionally extended to all people, but only people Kant: all rational.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1 By David Kelsey.
All even numbers are divisible by 2 Even numbers are numbers that end with either 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8.
Subjectivism. Ethical Subjectivism – the view that our moral opinions are based on our feelings and nothing more. Ethical subjectivism is a meta-ethical.
Free Will and Determinism Chapter Three Think pp
MORALITY AND GOD Can you have a morality without a deity?
Compatibilism: Problems and Developments Knowledge and Reality Lecture 7.
Philosophy of Science Lars-Göran Johansson Department of philosophy, Uppsala University
Relativism, Divine Command Theory, and Particularism A closer look at some prominent views of ethical theory.
The evidential problem of evil
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Economics: The World Around You
Lecture 01: A Brief Summary
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Conscience F Murphy.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
DETERMINISM VS. FREE WILL
Machine Learning Course.
Philosophy Sept. 14th Objective Opener
Making Moral Decisions
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1
Contemporary Moral Issue
INFORMATIVE ABOUTNESS
What is God God = df ‘a single divine being that has all of the following properties: a) All-Powerful b) All-knowing c) Perfectly Good d) Eternal e) First.
God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error
Presentation transcript:

WOLF MY DEEP SELF MADE ME DO IT

SUSAN WOLF (born 1952) Student of Tom Nagel Rebuts Nagel’s views

[Background 1] For centuries philosophers studied the FREE-WILL PROBLEM But this problem seems to be insoluble: If determinism is true, then only one course of events is possible. If indeterminism is true, then our actions are not caused, hence not caused by us. Either way: there is no free will.

[Background 2] So the Free-Will Problem has been largely replaced by the Moral Responsibility Problem: Under what conditions can someone be justifiably held morally responsible for their actions? Wolf: Moral Responsibility Problem.

Deep Self View – Origins (502-3) From Frankfurt, Watson, & Taylor Agent is Responsible for Action  1) Action is under control of will. 2) Will is under control of Deep Self. Kleptomaniacs, the brainwashed, etc., Deep Self does not control will, so do not satisfy 2. Animals, infants, machines do not have deep self, so do not satisfy 2.

OBJECTION 1 (504L) “Who, or what, is responsible for this deeper self?” [Assumption: if we are not responsible for deep self, we are not responsible at all.] REPLY: 1)This objection implies self-creation needed for responsibility, which is logically impossible. (505L-506R) 2) As long as we can “revise ourselves,” that is enough.

OBJECTION 2 JoJo (who has been raised to be immoral) meets conditions 1 & 2, but still is not responsible. (505-7) REPLY: Add another condition 3) Deep Self is sane – its values are not “seriously mistaken, misguided, or bad.” (508L)

OBJECTION 3 There is no justification for values in definition of sanity. [Sanity is a matter of fact, not a matter of value.] REPLY: justification is 1) “intersubjective agreement” 2) “success in getting around in the world and satisfying our needs.” (509)

OBJECTION 4 Since concept of sanity is explicitly normative, then any wrong action will count as evidence of insanity [removing responsibility]. (510) REPLY: 1) Possible that deep self is sane but does not use this ability. [i.e., wrong action results from willful inattention] 2) Sane Deep Self view does not solve all the problems of responsibility.