Compton Identification Within Single ‘Pixels’ D. Scraggs, A. Boston, H. Boston, R. Cooper, J. Cresswell, A. Grint, A. Mather, P. Nolan University of Liverpool.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic 8. Gamma Camera (II)
Advertisements

Applications of Nuclear Physics Applications of Nuclear Physics (Instrumentation) Dr Andy Boston Frontiers of gamma-ray spectroscopy.
M. JONES 1, A.J. Boston 1, H.C. Boston 1, R.J. Cooper 1, M.R. Dimmock 1, L.J. Harkness 1 D.S. Judson 1 P.J. Nolan 1, D.C. Oxley 1, B. Pietras 1 M.J. Joyce.
D S Judson UNTF Forum Salford. Outline The Compton imaging process The PORGAMRAYS project What is it? How does it work? Detector description Spectroscopic.
Detector Characterisation Group
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
PET Design: Simulation Studies using GEANT4 and GATE - Status Report - Martin Göttlich DESY.
Chapter 8 Planar Scintigaraphy
Semiconductor detectors for Compton imaging in nuclear medicine
SmartPET: A Small Animal PET Demonstrator using HyperPure germanium Planar Detectors R. Cooper 1 st year PhD Student
High granularity to reduce the effect of the “prompt flash” radiation Polarization sensitivity Imaging capabilities for background suppression DESPEC (DEcay.
Fysisk institutt - Rikshospitalet 1. 2 Overview Gamma camera Positron emission technology (PET) Computer tomography (CT) Proton therapy Electrical impedance.
Pulse Shape Analysis with Segmented Germanium Detector Xiang Liu, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik 1.Motivation 2.Pulse properties 3.Analysis procedure 4.Some.
BME 560 Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
Gamma Camera Technology
Signal Processing of Germanium Detector Signals
Signal Analysis and Processing David Scraggs. Overview Introduction to Position Resolution Induced Charges Wavelet Transform Future Work Discussion.
Compton Camera David Scraggs. Code Aims Use two detectors in Compton scattering experiment Define cones from Compton interactions; cone surfaces define.
1 A Design of PET detector using Microchannel Plate PMT with Transmission Line Readout Heejong Kim 1, Chien-Min Kao 1, Chin-Tu Chen 1, Jean-Francois Genat.
Signal Analysis and Processing for SmartPET D. Scraggs, A. Boston, H Boston, R Cooper, A Mather, G Turk University of Liverpool C. Hall, I. Lazarus Daresbury.
Main detector types Multi Pixel Photon Counter (MPPC) and Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) How does it work? 1. Photon hits a pixel producing electron hole.
Signal Processing of Germanium Detector Signals David Scraggs University of Liverpool UNTF 2006.
Back Projection Reconstruction for CT, MRI and Nuclear Medicine
Anthony Sweeney Position Sensitive Detectors 9 Aberystwyth 2011.
Planar scintigraphy produces two-dimensional images of three dimensional objects. It is handicapped by the superposition of active and nonactive layers.
lecture 2, linear imaging systems Linear Imaging Systems Example: The Pinhole camera Outline  General goals, definitions  Linear Imaging Systems.
8/18/2015G.A. Fornaro Characterization of diffractive optical elements for improving the performance of an endoscopic TOF- PET detector head Student: G.
Depletion Region Dynamics of an AGATA Detector Steven Moon University of Liverpool UNTF 2010, University of Salford 14 th -16 nd April 2010.
Wednesday, May 9 th 2007Torsten Beck Fast Pulse Shape Analysis for AGATA-Germanium- Detectors Torsten BeckWednesday, 9. Mai 2007 Student seminar Wednesday,
Compton Camera development for the imaging of high energy gamma rays 1 Martin Jones UNTF 2010 Salford – April 14 th Martin.
SPECT imaging with semiconductor detectors
Fundamental Limits of Positron Emission Tomography
Paul Sellin, Radiation Imaging Group Time-Resolved Ion Beam Induced Charge Imaging at the Surrey Microbeam P.J. Sellin 1, A. Simon 2, A. Lohstroh 1, D.
A Front End and Readout System for PET Overview: –Requirements –Block Diagram –Details William W. Moses Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Department.
Performance limits of a 55  m pixel CdTe detector G.Pellegrini, M. Lozano, R. Martinez, M. Ullan Centro Nacional de Microelectronica, Barcelona, 08193,
PET/SPECT Phantom. Side View of Phantom Image Resolution Intrinsic resolution FWHM Intrinsic resolution FWHM Field of view Field of view Measurement:
Pedro Arce Introducción a GEANT4 1 GAMOS tutorial Compton Camera Exercises
Nuclear Medicine: Tomographic Imaging – SPECT, SPECT-CT and PET-CT Katrina Cockburn Nuclear Medicine Physicist.
Development of a Segmented Planar Germanium Imaging Detector
Medical applications of particle physics General characteristics of detectors (5 th Chapter) ASLI YILDIRIM.
Electron tracking Compton camera NASA/WMAP Science Team  -PIC We report on an improvement on data acquisition for a Time Projection Chamber (TPC) based.
Goddard February 2003 R.Bellazzini - INFN Pisa A new X-Ray Polarimeter based on the photoelectric effect for Black Holes and Neutron Stars Astrophysics.
Timing in Thick Silicon Detectors Andrej Studen, University of Michigan, CIMA collaboration.
Compton imaging with the PorGamRays Detector D S Judson Imaging 2010, Stockholm, 8 th -11 th June 2010.
PSA: ADAPTIVE GRID SEARCH The Method Experimental Results Optimization aspects Roberto Venturelli (INFN Padova - IPSIA “Giorgi” Verona) SACLAY, 05-may-06.
Lecture 12  Last Week Summary  Sources of Image Degradation  Quality Control  The Sinogram  Introduction to Image Processing.
Steven Moon, A.J. Boston, H. Boston, J. Cresswell, L. Harkness, D. Judson, P.J. Nolan PSD9, Aberystwyth, Wales th September 2011 Compton imaging.
PGRIS: Towards portable Compton Camera Imaging
Nuclear Medicine Physics and Equipment 243 RAD 1 Dr. Abdo Mansour Assistant Professor of radiology
Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation 242 NMT 1 Dr. Abdo Mansour Assistant Professor of radiology
Room-Temperature Semiconductors: From concepts to applications Zhong He Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences Department The University of Michigan,
Seoul National University Han-wool Ju CUNPA Kick-off Meeting Aug.22-23, 2013.
Monte Carlo Simulation on Performance of Double–scattering Compton Camera J. H. Park a, H. Seo a, Y. S. Kim a, C. H. Kim a, *, J. H. Lee b, C. S. Lee b,
Andy Boston Imaging devices for medicine and security.
Simulations in Medical Physics Y. TOUFIQUE*, R.CHERKAOUI EL MOURSLI*, M.KACI**, G.AMOROS**, *Université Mohammed V –Agdal, Faculté des Sciences de Rabat,
Hybrid Detector(s) for Complete Gamma Ray Spectroscopy S. S. Bhattacharjee, R Raut, S S Ghugre, A K Sinha UGC-DAE Consortium For Scientific Research, Kolkata.
Advanced Gamma Tracking Array Andy Boston The Advanced Gamma Tracking Array
Chapter-5 Positron emission tomography (PET)
Characterisation of a pixellated CsI detector for the Distinguish Project. 1 Martin Jones The University of Liverpool
AGATA Advanced Gamma Tracking Array
Development of a Compton Camera for online range monitoring
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
Thomas Woodroof Dr Jonathan Bridge, School of Engineering
Image quality and Performance Characteristics
Detailed simulations of a full-body RPC-PET scanner
SIGMA: a detector for γ-ray spectroscopy & imaging Dr Laura AGATA/GRETINA Collaboration Meeting
Application of Nuclear Physics
Preliminary Compton Imaging results of the AGATA C001 detector
AGATA week Uppsala, July 2008
MCP PET Simulation (7) – Pixelated X-tal
Presentation transcript:

Compton Identification Within Single ‘Pixels’ D. Scraggs, A. Boston, H. Boston, R. Cooper, J. Cresswell, A. Grint, A. Mather, P. Nolan University of Liverpool C. Hall, I. Lazarus Daresbury Laboratory A. Berry, T. Beveridge, J Gillam, R. Lewis University of Monash Introduction References Pulse Processing and Interaction Classification Possible Interaction Signals SmartPET Specifics Scintillation detector arrays are the current medium of choice for nuclear medicine, driven by availability, affordability and a proven ability to produce results. However, semiconductor detectors offer superior energy resolution, allowing very precise photonic measurements. This becomes a very interesting property when exploited by advanced digital electronics allowing the use of Pulse Shape Analysis [1] (PSA) and Gamma Ray Tracking (GRT). The SmartPET project couples planar germanium detectors, with superb energy resolution, to digital electronics for the production of a combined PET/SPECT scanner. The scanner is currently at a prototype and further development stage. Results thus far include: PET imaging of a point source ~ 1mm spatial resolution Successful uncollimated SPECT imaging in Compton camera mode. [1] K. Vetter et al, NIM A452 (2000) 223, [2] I Lazarus, private communication, [3] I. Y. Lee NIM A463 (2001) 250, [4] WaveLab, Donoho et al Funding Many thanks to the Medical Research Council for their support of this project and many others projects; the results of which have been used by the author. SmartPET utilises double sided orthogonal strip planar germanium detectors with a 5mm pitch. Total crystal dimensions are 74mm by 74mm by 20mm through depth. The actual active area presented to radiation is 60mm by 60mm, allowing a guard ring of 7mm width. The guard ring prevents electric field lines warping at the edge of the active area. The raw granularity of the detector is thus 5mm by 5mm by 20mm through depth. Strip signals are processed by 80MHz, 14bit GRT4 VME modules. Analysis of strip signal waveforms gives an increased resolution of interaction position. The detectors are housed in a rotating gantry which allows both PET and SPECT configurations to be achieved. PET configuration requires the source to be placed between both detectors, simultaneous interactions then define a line of response (LOR). Whilst in SPECT configuration the source is required to be placed on one side of both detectors in composite. One detector then acts to scatter a photon into the second detector via Compton scattering. A cone surface is then defined on which the source must lie. Single detector crystal and electrode configuration. The strips create 5x5mm effective pixels Detectors 1 and 2 sitting in rotating gantry. Detectors are shown in PET mode Schematic of PET mode, in which the source lies on LOR. Right: Intersecting cones from Compton reconstruction define possible source locations The most probable interaction of a photon above 200keV in Germanium is Compton scattering. Fortunately, Compton scattered events can be easily rejected; unless the scatter occurs within a single ‘pixel’, in which case no Compton suppression is currently possible. SmartPET relies upon PSA to improve upon the raw granularity of the detectors. This is a valid and very useful technique which has been proven to work. Unfortunately, PSA applied to a signal which is the result of a Compton interaction will invariably result in a mean position of interaction and not an initial position of interaction, thus resulting in image blurring. Signals resulting from Compton scattering through depth show discontinuities on their leading edges. This is due to the cessation of collection of one particular assortment of charges and the continued collection of other charges. Photons scattering parallel to electrode planes should not show discontinuities and are therefore expected not to be distinguished from their photoelectric alternatives. It has been possible to extract Compton scattered events and study their discontinuities for the purpose of developing a method to initially remove and then include scattered photons in images. Above: Compton scattered signal showing considerable discontinuity. Compton scattered signal not showing any perceptible discontinuity The analysis of signals as filtered by the trigger pattern of the electrodes is insufficient to reject all Compton scattered events. PSA analyses points along the signal but cannot differentiate between the signals shown previously, where one is clearly very different from the other. A possible solution to the raw analysis of signals is prior pulse processing. By transforming the signals into the frequency domain discontinuities become apparent and manageable. An appropriate form of signal processing for SmartPET signals is the wavelet transform, in which a small oscillatory wave ( ) is used to probe the original signal ( ) over a range of frequencies ( ) at specific locations ( ). Frequency is represented by wavelet scale. The wavelet transform is defined as: and contains wavelet coefficients for the various convolutions between the mother wavelet over various scales or frequencies and locations. A large coefficient measures a good match between the wavelet and signal at that particular location and frequency. Scale Signal Location Coefficient The two peaks at low scale or high frequency show a signal discontinuity, and can be used to indicate that the signal does indeed originate from a Compton scatter. Unless some other non-photoelectric phenomenon occurred. Applying this method to data has proved very encouraging. Of definite Compton event signals the technique correctly identified Indeed, scatters parallel to electrode planes will not show any discontinuities. It is also intuitive that scattering through depth has a significantly more adverse effect on image quality, given the larger variance of mean interaction positions. A detector coincidence scan is currently being performed to create a test group of photoelectric signals. If the technique works an adaptive grid will be constructed to recover useful information from Compton signals. A wavelet transform of the first signal shown previously was performed [4]