Elizabeth F. Broady Sarah J. Hickman Hanover College

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Predictors of How Often and When People Fall in Love Clara & Peter.
Advertisements

Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Poster-within-a-poster: Improving Male-female Communication Regarding Sexual Overtures Sarah Frost 1, Carol.
Adolescent Sexual Behavior Melissa A. Thomas Adolescent Risk Taking (Psych 4900) Weber State University.
The Effects of Body Esteem and Self-Consciousness on Frequency of Sexual Behavior Holly Heindselman Rachel Yates Hanover College 2008.
Sex and Mating Strategy Differences in Jealousy Sarah L. Strout, Sarah E. Bush, & James D. Laird: Clark University Abstract Previous research focused on.
AGE VARIATION IN MATING STRATEGIES AND MATE PREFERENCES AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS Danielle Ryan and April Bleske-Rechek, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
The relationship between level of religious devotion and marital satisfaction Amanda Caddell Kevin Utt.
Contemporary Adolescence Love and Sexuality. Love relationship sequence Same-gender groups go to places in hopes to find opposite-gender groups Social.
Infidelity in Heterosexual Couples: Demographic, Interpersonal, and Personality-Related Predictors of Extradyadic Sex Kristen P. Mark, M.Sc., 1 Erick Janssen,
Sex Differences in Feelings of Guilt Arising from Infidelity Fisher, M., Voracek, M., Rekkas, V., & Cox, A. (2008). Sex Differences in Feelings of Guilt.
The Oral Sex Void: What Married Men Do Leanna Wolfe, Ph.D.
Ashley Adams & Whitley Holt Hanover College
Social Acceptability of Sport Fan Aggression Based on Gender and Age Jeannie Curry Amy Manning Noelle Smith Martha Young.
Predictors and Consequences of Involvement in Age-Discrepant Romantic Relationships Amy Bender Hanover College 2007.
Kelsey Grossman Laura Jimenez
Effects of Vocal Characteristics on Perceived Gender and Sexual Orientation Ricky McGee & Levi Hamner Hanover College.
The Nature of Adolescents’ Non-romantic Sexual Relationships and Their Link With Well-being Catherine M. Grello Deborah P. Welsh University of Tennessee.
Infidelity and Cyber Sex Survey
O Does humor impact relationship satisfaction? o Four different styles of humor (Martin, Puhlik-Doris, Larsen, Gray, & Weir, 2003)  Humor which enhances/protects.
By Kelly Bauer, Lindsay Marsh, and Jackie Martin.
The Relationship Between Emotions and Attitudes towards Relationships After Short-Term Exposure to Sexually Explicit Material Heather Morgan Saffron Redwine.
The Effects of Co-Education on Levels of Benevolent Sexism in College-Age Males Sarah Kemp & Ruth Hudgens Hanover College.
Genetic Factors Predisposing to Homosexuality May Increase Mating Success in Heterosexuals Written by Zietsch et. al By Michael Berman and Lindsay Tooley.
Social Science Department
VOCATION AS CALLING: THE ROLE OF GENDER IN VOCATIONAL DISCERNMENT AND ACTION AMONG FIRST-YEAR COLLEGE STUDENTS Cindy Miller-Perrin Don Thompson Research.
Sex on the Brain? An Examination of Frequency of Sexual Cognitions as a Function of Gender, Erotophilia, and Social Desirability From Journal of Sex Research.
Predicting Marital Success with PREPARE: A Predictive Validity Study Article by B.J Fowers and D.H Olson Presentation by: Aylin Atabek Elissa Vaidman Qiana.
Evolutionary Psychology, Workshop 4 Mate Preferences.
The Dirt on Grit: Examining Relations with School Adjustment, School Performance, and Theories of Intelligence Whitney Borton and Jackie Grelle Hanover.
Peers, Parents, Media, and Education: Influences on Sexual Behavior Danelle Pattison And Jessica Rouse Hanover College.
Sexuality Vocabulary.  Gender: the way people perceive maleness or femaleness  Gender role: the accepted behaviors, thoughts and emotions of a specific.
Pre-college Electrical Engineering Instruction: Do Abstract or Contextualized Representations Promote Better Learning? Dr. Roxana Moreno, University of.
Literature Review Campbell & Wright (2010) Beliefs and practices of marriage. Emphasizing importance of committed partner. Beliefs of marriage remain stable.
Asian International Students Attitudes on Women in College Keyana Silverberg and Margo Hanson Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Stout.
Origins of Attraction MATTHEW CORRINET. Biological: Fischer et al. (2003)  “... used an fMRI... to investigate blood flow in the brains of 20 men and.
By Lindsay Ludwig and Amanda Nocton Hanover College.
Emotional Intelligence: The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence, Emotion Control, Affective Communication and Gender in University Students.
. Relationship between Types of Sex Education and High Risk Sexual Behavior Andrea M. Anderson & Kaitlyn Harlander Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University.
Introduction College Students’ Attitudes about Cohabitation Before Marriage Alexiss Jeffers and Dr. Lori Bica, Faculty Mentor (Psychology) Participants.
By: Deanna Duermit, Mikayla Mowzoon, Jenna Tioseco
Attractive Equals Smart? Perceived Intelligence as a Function of Attractiveness and Gender Abstract Method Procedure Discussion Participants were 38 men.
American Views of Homosexuality and Same Sex Marriage Survey of 1,191 American Adults.
The Long-term Effects of Divorce: Later in Life Sarah Loring & Amy Greenslade.
Self Confidence and Diversity at MIT Lizz Albany, Olivia Gierlich, Peter Lee, and Michael Plasmeier.
College Students’ Expectations for Hook-Ups. Amanda Smitley Hanover College.
Introduction Disordered eating continues to be a significant health concern for college women. Recent research shows it is on the rise among men. Media.
Buss 1989 Sex differences in mate preferences. Objectives Lesson 1  To understand the context, aims and procedures of Buss’s evolutionary study  To.
College Student’s Beliefs About Psychological Services: A replication of Ægisdóttir & Gerstein Louis A. Cornejo San Francisco State University.
Social Learning Theory and Tobacco Behaviors – A Tale of Two Studies Anne P. Hubbell New Mexico State University.
 qiOt9cg  The probability of dominant behaviors increases as the levels of drive rise.  Has been empirically proven.
Results Time 2 (Age 18-20) Target teen and their romantic partner engaged in an 8 minute hypothetical disagreement task interaction. Hostile, relationship-undermining.
Interesting Statistics About Sexual Behavior in America NOTE: These statistics are limited to cisgendered people and heterosexual sex unless otherwise.
An Implicit Measure of Victim/Perpetrator Responsibility: The Effect of Reputation Maria Crossman, Danielle DiFranco, Allyssa Lanza, Karinne Brobst (Professor.
Fisher, M., Voracek, M., Rekkas, P., & Cox, A. (2008). Sex differences in feelings of guilt arising from infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 3,
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com”   Ideals: mental constructs that represent an idea of traits we are attracted to in potential partners (Fletcher.
Women Control Male Romantic Partners to Pursue Extra Pair Partners INTRODUCTION MATE GUARDING AND MATE RETENTION Mate guarding controls with whom the female.
Who’s Cheating Who? Perceptions of Infidelity Across Gender and Sexual Orientation Holly M. Albers and Madeline G. Dugolenski University of Wisconsin,
If You’ve Done it Before, Will You Do it Again? Factors Affecting Willingness to Participate in Controversial Sexual Relationship Types Miranda Dempewolf,
Testosterone Levels in Women and Men Who are Single, in Long-Distance Relationships, or Same-City Relationships Sari M. van Anders and Neil V. Watson Department.
Moral Foundations Predict Adult Mating Desire
Interracial Marriage Dr. Marianne Dainton.
My, But We are Impressive
Sociosexuality and Perceptions of Partner Over Time
Sexual Consent: Changing the Gender Stereotype
Gender and Infidelity.
Presentation transcript:

Elizabeth F. Broady Sarah J. Hickman Hanover College Sex Differences in Relationships: Comparing Stereotypes to Self-reports Elizabeth F. Broady Sarah J. Hickman Hanover College

Browsing any self-help section of a bookstore, you are likely to find many titles aimed at solving relationship problems. Look closely, and most of the titles will be about men who cannot commit Men who can’t love, why men won’t commit…This is representative of how our culture views men and women in their relationships. Men are seen as commitment phobes and women are perceived as overly anxious to “tie the knot”. She wants a ring and I don’t wanna change a thing

Attitudes Toward Marriage In keeping with popular relationship views, women and men are perceived to be quite different. The general public perceives males as having more negative attitudes toward marriage and women as having more positive attitudes. However, we believe that males and females are much more similar when it comes to relationship attitudes and behaviors than our culture suggests.

Theoretical Perspectives Evolutionary theory Men may be more likely to cheat and show less commitment because the costs of pregnancy are lower (Buss & Schmitt, 1993; Cann, Magnum & Wells, 2001). Social role theory Women have been primarily responsible for work inside the home which has led them to develop more communal attitudes including more positive attitudes toward marriage (Eagly,1987) So … what does the literature have to say about sex differences in relationship attitudes and behaviors. Do they really exist? We narrowed down a couple of relevant theories and found that both evolutionary theory and social role theory suggest that sex differences should exist. Evolutionary theory suggests, for example, that men may be more likely to cheat and show less commitment to any particular relationship because the benefits of a pregnancy are relatively high and the costs relatively low for men – [Elaborate]. Social role theory similarly suggests that men and women will have different relationship attitudes and behaviors. For example, women are socialized to have more communal attitudes and are more likely to be involved in home life, which translates into more positive attitudes toward marriage and a greater commitment to intimate relationships.

Empirical Evidence Oliver and Hyde, 1993 Men have more sexual partners than women (d=.25) Men are more likely to engage in extramarital sex than women (d=.29) The popular media and some theories suggest that men and women really differ in their relationship attitudes and behaviors. The research suggests that some differences do exist. The empirical evidence is really beginning to suggest that men and women are more alike than different. In a Meta-Analysis Oliver and Hyde found that men have more sexual partners than women and me are more likely to engage in extramarital sex. However the effect sizes of .25 and .29 respectively are very small.

Graphical representation of effect size In a graphical representation of the effect size in the .2 range you can see that approximately 80-85% of the areas of distribution overlap. Several researchers in the past have argued for the gender differences hypothesis that men and women are psychologically vastly different. However, Results like these have led researchers like Hyde away from a Gender differences hypothesis to a The Gender Similarities Hypothesis.

Why stereotypes? Belle, 1985 We tend to focus on the differences when we are faced with two of anything So why are we using these stereotypes? Belle suggests that we tend to focus on the differences when we are faced with two of anything. This would explain why stereotypes remain or take over when differences, are in fact, small.

Hypotheses Males and females will not differ in their self-reported attitudes toward marriage, commitment, or fidelity Females will perceive males as having more negative attitudes toward marriage, lower commitment, and lower fidelity than males themselves report Males will perceive females as having more positive attitudes toward marriage, higher commitment, and higher fidelity than females themselves report Consistent with the gender similarities hypothesis, we hypothesize that males will not differ in their self-reported attitudes towards marriage, commitment, of fidelity or they will be very small. However, we believe that people will still have these stereotypes and that Females will perceive males as having more negative attitudes toward marriage, lower commitment, and higher infidelity than males themselves report. In addition, Males will perceive females as having more positive attitudes toward marriage, higher commitment, and lower infidelity than females themselves report

Variables of interest Attitudes toward marriage Commitment Fidelity We narrowed down three specific attitudes and behaviors that we wanted to investigate. Attitudes toward marriage, commitment, and infidelity.

Method Participants Procedure 133 (37 male, 96 female) Age range (18-47, M=21.5) Ethnicity 79.7% Caucasian, 7.2% African American Procedure Informed Consent Survey (counterbalanced) Debriefing

Questionnaire Attitudes Towards Marriage (Wallin, 1954) If you marry, to what extent will you miss the life you have had as a single person? Not at all (1) Very much (6) These are some example questions from our survey… Attitudes Towards Marriage (Wallin, 1954) If you marry, to what extent will you miss the life you have had as a single person? Not at all (1) Very much (6) Commitment Scale (Lund, 1985) I would rather spend my free time with my partner than doing other things or seeing other people. Not at all (1) Very much (6) Infidelity Scale I have had an emotionally intimate relationship with someone other than my partner. (sexual tension may have been present, but never acted upon). Never Once Twice More than twice Our Cronbach’s alphas were in the .8 to .9 range.

Questionnaire Commitment Scale (Lund, 1985) I would rather spend my free time with my partner than doing other things or seeing other people. Not at all (1) Very much (6)

Questionnaire Infidelity Scale I have had a purely physical relationship with someone other than my partner. Never Once Twice More than twice

Data Analysis Mixed Model ANOVA Between-subjects variable= Sex Within-subjects variable= Ratee Followed significant results with appropriate post-hoc comparisons We used a mixed model ANOVA The between subjects variable was sex, the within subjects variable was ratee. Which means that participants are rating themselves or the opposite sex We followed significant results with the appropriate post-hoc comparisons (we did a series of dependent t-tests)

Attitudes Toward Marriage NS These are our findings on the attitudes toward marriage variable. As we predicted there is no significant differences in attitudes toward marriage between men and women. Both sexes reported having relatively positive attitudes towards marriage.

Attitudes Toward Marriage p < .001 NS We found that females perceive males as having significantly more negative attitudes toward marriage than males themselves report

Attitudes Toward Marriage p < .001 NS NS In our comparison of female self-reports and males perceptions of female attitudes toward marriage, we found no significance…..

Commitment p= .001 NS NS

Fidelity p= .002 NS p=.003

Discussion Men and women showed no significant differences in their self-reported attitudes and behaviors Women viewed men as having more negative attitudes and behaviors than men self-reported Men were relatively accurate in predicting women’s attitudes Men viewed women more negatively in regards to fidelity than women self-reported Consistent with predictions, males and females showed no significant differences across the three variables….Also consistent with our hypotheses, women viewed men as having more negative attitudes and behaviors in regards to relationships. Inconsistent with our hypothesis, men were relatively accurate in their views of women’s relationship attitudes. However, in regards to fidelity, men viewed women more negatively than women reported themselves to be.

Discussion Women are more likely than men to discuss relationship issues (Brody & Hall, 1993) Popular media emphasizes that men have difficulty in relationships Women and men perceive themselves more positively than the opposite sex (Epley & Dunning, 2000) So why are we seeing these results. Women may be communicating their thoughts on these matters more than men are. This could explain why men are more accurate in their assessment of women and why women are not as accurate. As we mentioned before, there are several publications that promote the negative stereotypes of men that have become so common. If men aren’t talking, women are using these stereotypes as their alternative resource. One finding that didn’t fit with our hypothesis, we found that men and women perceived the opposite sex to be less faithful than they themselves reported to be. Epley and Dunning found that women and men perceive themselves more positively than the opposite sex because we tend to see others in a more negative light than we see ourselves.

Implications Stereotype inflation is a problem (Hyde, 2005) Couple conflict Communication Stereotype inflation is a problem when it comes to relationships. It can cause conflict within relationships when partners believe themselves to be different, when they are actually quite similar. The impact of media portrayal of these differences is affecting the way couples communicate. Self-help books and magazine articles are telling us that we “speak a different language” which can cause men and women give up on trying to solve problems through better communication. We are convinced that we can’t understand each other, so we don’t event ATTEMPT to understand each other. If we continue to polarize the sexes, our relationships with each other will suffer.