April 2010 U.S. Army Space & Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command Forces Strategic Command Future Warfare Center Advanced Warfare Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airpower: the Industry Vision
Advertisements

C2 Integration Division Marine Corps Combat Development Command
AF Aerial Layer Network Approach
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
Navy’s Operational Authority for Naval Networks, Information Operations, and FORCEnet 2004 Strike, Land Attack & Air Defense Annual Symposium Vice Admiral.
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command *Unclassified – For Public Release - Unlimited* Simulation and Training Technology Center 25 July.
Distribution Statement A:: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is Unlimited Panel: The Power of Modularity and New Open Business Models Dr. Megan.
ADP & ADRP 3-09 “Fires” DOTD Doctrine Division 22 AUG 2012.
Leading 21st Century Simulation Solutions P rogram E xecutive O ffice S imulation, T raining and I nstrumentation Presented by Mr. John Wrigley Modeling.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
© 2006 Carnegie Mellon University Establishing a Network Centric Capability: Implications for Acquisition and Engineering Dennis Smith Complex System Symposium.
NATO Network Enabled Capabilities
UNCLASSIFIED Strike COI Spiral 1 Lessons Learned and Implementation JFCC Global Strike and Integration Col Bryan Bartels JFCC GSI J32, C2 Development.
United States Army Combined Arms Center TIER III SUPPORT.
CYBERSAFE Overview AFCEA C4ISR Symposium 28 April 2015
Geospatial Information Interoperability Exploitation-Portable (GIIEP)
4 March 2015 Steven Szilagyi PEO IWS D4
M I S S I O N The Army SBIR program is designed to provide small, high-tech businesses the opportunity to propose innovative research and development solutions.
KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports lessons learned,
C4ISR via OA Mike Danjczek November, 2014 Copyright GTS 2014.
Larry Burger, Director Future Warfare Center Space and Missile Defense - From Concept to Reality DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for public release; distribution.
CTTSO Overview John Morgan, Deputy Director for Science and Technology, CTTSO September 2010.
© 2013 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Systems Engineering: MITRE & SERC Dr. J. Providakes Director, SE Tech Center “The SERC-MITRE Doctoral.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
1 As a public interest company, MITRE works in partnership with the government to address issues of critical national
Air University: The Intellectual and Leadership Center of the Air Force Aim High…Fly - Fight - Win The AFIT of Today is the Air Force of Tomorrow. Distribution.
Army Net-Centric Data Strategy Center Of Excellence (ANCDS) Army Data Harmonization and Integration Working Group (ADHIWG) Sever Ciorlian ANCDS Team Lead.
Panel on Model Based Systems Engineering Observations from the DDR&E Rapid Capability Toolbox Study (2010) October 6, 2011 Michael McGrath, D.Sc.
Strategic Mobility 21 Focused on Making Decision Relevant Data A Logistics Multiplier in All Domains Strategic Mobility 21 Focused on Making Decision Relevant.
Navy Warfare Development Command
NC-BSI: 3.3 Data Fusion for Decision Support Problem Statement/Objectives: Problem - Accurate situation awareness requires rapid integration of heterogeneous.
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense _APBI_JPEO 1 INTRODUCTIONS Preparing Proposals and Responses to Solicitations.
Command & Control Capabilities
United States Joint Forces Command Importance of M&S on the
1 NDIA'S 4th Annual Interoperability & Systems Integration Conference Joint Battle Management Command and Control Roadmap Mr. Alex Urrutia JI&I/JBMC2 USJFCOM.
Pg 1 of 10 AGI AWarE/STK Integration Marc Neely Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Space and Missile Defense Command Battle.
FA50 Qualification Course
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency Acquisition Overview Mr. John D. Edell Director of Acquisition 15 June 2006.
Combined Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Conference 9-12 January 2007 The Technical Cooperation Program (TTCP) Concepts Briefing Ms. Kat.
MPE – Enabling ALL to securely SEE, DECIDE, ACT MPE - Highlights  Establish Core Implementation Working Group  Build Joining, Membership, and Exiting.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
Microsoft in Defence Michel van der Bel Vice President Microsoft International.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
Future of Mobility and Data Technologies for Land Systems Integration Mr. Matt Meltzer Vehicle System of Systems (SoS) Integration Supervisor Statement.
JNTC Joint Management Office
SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP
1 U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command / U.S. Army Forces Strategic Command U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command / U.S. Army Forces Strategic.
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense
USJFCOM 27 Jul EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Col David Brown, USAF JFIIT Commander UNCLASSIFIED Joint Fires Integration and Interoperability Team (JFIIT)
Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Marine Corps Systems Command
Integrated Development Environment (IDE) What need is the MATREX Architecture addressing? The MATREX architecture is designed to provide a robust, scalable.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
Why KM is Important KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports.
Multi-Purpose Reconfigurable Training System (MRTS) Overview
SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP
Pentagon to the People Brief
Program Executive Officer Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command
Presentation Title September 9, 2018
Simulation Initialization
Software, & Integration Realignment
13 November 2018.
Testing in the Context of the Operational Mission Mike Toole Army Future Combat Systems System Of Systems Test 4 March 2003.
Engineering Autonomy Mr. Robert Gold Director, Engineering Enterprise
AGCCC Battle Analysis Adjutant General School - Advanced Officer Training Division.
Steering Committee Brief to the DoD M&S Conference 2008
Defence Strategic Support Management
USASMDC/ARSTRAT 18 July 2019 Distribution Statement A:
Presentation transcript:

April 2010 U.S. Army Space & Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command Forces Strategic Command Future Warfare Center Advanced Warfare Environment (AWarE) An Innovative Approach to IAMD Command and Control. Distribution A: Approved for Public Release Distribution is Unlimited

Commanding General Deputy Commanding General for Operations Deputy to the Commander for Research, Development and Acquisition Director Future Warfare Center Operational Forces th Missile Defense Brigade (GMD) - 1 st Space Brigade - Astronaut Detachment - Ballistic Missile Defense Systems Manager - Space Personnel Proponency Office Innovative DOTMLPF Integration - Battle Lab - Directorate of Combat Development - Decision Support Directorate Research, Development and Acquisition Efforts - Technical Center - Test and Warfighter Solutions Center - USAKA/RTS and HELSTF - Contracting and Acquisition OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS MATERIEL

“Our military culture must reward new thinking, innovation, and experimentation.” - President George W. Bush, 11 December 2001 Space and Missile Defense Future Warfare Center Space and missile defense – from Concept to Reality Develop and integrate innovative DOTMLPF capabilities for Army and joint space, missile defense and high altitude. Mission: Mr. Larry Burger

Space and Missile Defense Future Warfare Center Director / Deputy Director Missile Capabilities Division Training & Doctrine Division Force Development Division Directorate of Combat Development Concepts & Wargames Division Experimentation Division Space Division Missile Defense Division SMD Battle Lab Studies & Analysis Division Decision Support Directorate Models & Simulations Division Information and Computational Engineering Division Innovative Ventures Office Operations Division JADO-H JT&E Office Joint Blue Force Tracking Division Space Capabilities Division Operations Division JADO-H: Joint Air Defense Operations - Homeland JT&E: Joint Test and Evaluation

Prototyping Rapid Capability Development In Support of Experimentation Experimentation Concept Development Core Competencies Mission The Space and Missile Defense Battle Lab (SMDBL) executes the Concept Development and Experimentation processes within the assigned missions including Space, High Altitude, and Missile Defense and Joint Blue Force Tracking. SMDBL produces Space, High Altitude, and Missile Defense technology prototypes in support of experimentation or rapid equipping initiatives by enabling the development of the best capabilities for the future warfighter and documenting those capabilities through the CDE process; superbly supporting the current warfighter with rapidly developed and transitioned Space, High Altitude, and Missile Defense technologies; and effectively and efficiently executing our business processes and human resource systems to maximize our personnel potential and utilization of the resources entrusted to our care.

 Thought Process:  Gap Analysis – Problem Statement  What are we trying to demonstrate?  How much can be done with available services?  What functionality needs to be added to acquire experimental observations?  “Best available” vice “good enough” tradeoffs  How do we do it?:  Leverage prior investment  Maintain core services in a government off the shelf (GOTS) prototyping platform  Organize community of the willing to participate  Provide value to our customer at minimal cost Prototyping Approach Part 1

 Platform Attributes:  Interoperable with community standards  Adaptable to meet the needs of the customer  Affordable, transportable  Easy to train and employ  Readily Available ~> Sustain Information Assurance (IA) Compliance  Non-Proprietary  Applications:  IAMD experimentation  Surrogate for Programs of Record  Interface Programs of Record  Tailored to specific functionality  Contingency requirements  Adapted to meet unique requirements  Rapidly deliver the capability Prototyping Approach Part 2

 Integrated set of Services/Functionality  Menu of applications  Leverage other customer funded applications  Flexibility built into a software backplane  Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) development environment  Communications interfaces and message protocol translators  Track management and Visualization services  Planner system interfaces and planner tools  Information Assurance planning, it begins with each planned change  Focused on the needs of the Integrated Air and Missile Defense Community  Member of the JIAMD Community of Interest (COI)  Member of the Common Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) XML Schema (CIXIS) Configuration Control Board (CCB)  In use by the US Army Air and Missile Defense Command’s (AAMDC) for air and missile defense attack planning and battle management tasks  Customer feedback used to tailor software What is AWarE

Windows-Based MS Office MS Tools CJMTK/ARC GIS FalconView BattleScape STK Communications SATCOM UHF VHF SHF Network Etc….. Tactical Feeds - USMTF - C2PC - Database - OTH Gold - JSTARS - NATO (MTI) (AGS) - DIS - PDU - Radar Feeds - TADIL-J - COT (XML) - CIXS (XML) - TIBS - TDDS Blue Red Shared Situational Awareness Intelligence Preparation Of BattleSpace Operational Control (Force & Engagement Operations) Advanced Warfare Environment (AWarE) Functional Overview Analysis System Activity Model Distributive, Collaborative Planning Distribution A: Approved for Public Release Distribution is Unlimited

 Case Study #1  Customer: TRADOC Capability Manager  Role: AMD Experimentation  Demonstrate engagement coordination and C2 functions over 3011C to multiple AMD systems  Available Functional Areas  Message Services  Track Management  Visualization (Map/Image/Terrain etc…)  Battlefield Geometries (Airspace Control Order)  Operating Environment  Coordination message sets  3011C Engagement Net  Result  TTP and CONOPS development for IAMD engagement coordination  Message sets and engagement capabilities incorporated into Government Owned baseline Prototyping Case Study #1 Air and Missile Defense Experimentation

 Case Study #2  Customer: AMD Headquarters  Role: Tailored distributed planning services to support deliberate and crisis action for homeland integrated air and missile defense  Functional Areas  Message Services  Terrain Analysis Services  Planning Interoperability Services (JEDA, ACO)  Track Management  Visualization (Map/Image/Terrain etc…)  Operating Environment  Simulated/Real Environment  Result  Planning services for HLD support  Web services and planning tools available to other customers Prototyping Case Study #2 Distributed IAMD Planning

 Case Study #3  Customer: US Army Composite AMD Battalion Headquarters (Patriot / Avenger)  Role: Manage three-dimensional Air and Missile Defense Battlespace for all threat sets and US Army Air and Missile Defense systems  Functional Areas  Force Operations and Engagement Operations  Track Management  Visualization (Map/Image/Terrain etc…)  Collaborative Physical Enclave  Voice Over IP Collaboration Systems  Operating Environment  Simulated/Real Environment  Result  Fielded Prototype  Low cost, high payoff leverage of COTS/GOTS technology Prototyping Case Study #3 Fire Coordination Cell (FCC)

Questions?

AWarE Tactical Communications Architecture Geometry Controller IAMD C2BMC THAAD Others … DIS-PDU3 rd Party …Tactical Feed Controller TIBS/TDDS AWarE BackPlane (XML - CIXS, CoT, CMF etc…) BattleScape ™ TADIL- J BFT STK® GCCS/C2PC Others … USMTF Data SourceData TranslatorData Bus Viewer/App FalconView CJMTK/ TIGER Others BattleVision®… Google Earth-KML