The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003: Implications for Juvenile Justice Agencies Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody Kentucky Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE TASK FORCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE TASK FORCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING.
BEST PRACTICES: IMPLEMENTATION OF PREA IN THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice April 6, 2008 Washington,
Idaho Department of Correction Prison Rape Elimination Act Brent D. Reinke, Director.
Department Regulation No. C Attorney Visits
THE PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT. OF 2003, 115
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Prison Rape Elimination Act Sexual Abuse / Assault Prevention and Intervention.
Overview of the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) - What it Means for the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) This summary presentation is.
1 Overview of the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) These materials were developed by The Moss Group, Inc.under cooperative agreement #03P21G1Y4.
MCSO Department of Corrections Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Review 2008.
Iowa Department of Corrections For Contractors and Volunteers PREA.
PREA Prison Rape Elimination Act Community Confinement Audits.
BJS and the FY2013 and FY2014 Budget Implications Presented by William J. Sabol, Ph.D., Acting Director June 7, 2013 BJS Bureau of Justice Statistics www.
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
Tribal Law & Order Act Office of Tribal Justice US Department of Justice.
How the PREA Standards for Lockups Impact Local Law Enforcement November 5, :00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. EST Notice of Federal Funding and Federal Disclaimer.
Incidence of Sexual Violence on Campus Toll-Free Sexual Assault Hotline: (English) Toll-Free Sexual Assault Hotline: (Spanish)
1 Public Safety Advisory Committee April 24, 2013.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Sections V & VI. The Juvenile Court Process  1. Based on your reading, what factors do you believe might explain the disproportionate representation.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 The National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law July 10-15, 2005 Investigating Allegations of.
Training Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youthful in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice Lexington, KY.
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 11-16, 2004.
Developed by Brenda V. Smith and Jaime M. Yarussi under NIC Cooperative Agreement #06S20GJJ1 Criminal Law Responses to Staff Sexual Misconduct with Individuals.
Developed by Dan Dunne under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1.
Training Objectives Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Lexington, KY.
Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National Institute of Corrections American University Washington.
Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth In Custody Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth In Custody ACTION PLANNING Addressing Staff Sexual.
Developed by Brenda Smith under NIC Cooperative Agreement 06S20GJJ1 The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct.
Developed by Brenda V. Smith under NIC Cooperative Agreement #06S20GJJ1 Training Objectives Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders.
PREA Employee Training Notification of Curriculum Utilization August 2014 The Moss Group Inc. 1 The enclosed PREA Employee Training curriculum was developed.
Legal Responses to Staff Sexual Misconduct with Individuals in Custody: Elements of Good State Laws Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Offenders National.
Policy Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice Lexington, KY.
Investigating Allegations of Staff Sexual Misconduct With Inmates Action Planning The American University, Washington College of Law National Institute.
Management and Operational Practices Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody November 7-9, 2005 Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act Overview and Update Responding to Inmate on Inmate Sexual Violence.
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003) Law 12 MUNDY 2009.
To what extent is the justice system fair and equitable for youth?
Justice system statistics: an overview – including their use and misuse South Pacific Council of Youth and Children's Courts Jonathon Rees and Tony Jacques.
Custodial Sexual Misconduct – Statute – Sexual misconduct with offenders and juveniles. Iowa’s law is in the Sexual Abuse section of the Criminal.
Interstate Compact for Juveniles Amendment Training for Rules Effective April 1, 2014.
November 14, 2012 Models for Change Cross-Action Network Meeting
Prison Rape Elimination Act PREA A Brief Overview.
[JAIL NAME] Prison Rape Elimination Act Pamphlet This brochure was produced with support from Grant No RP-BX-0001 awarded by the Bureau of Justice.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) in Scotland 1.
CHAPTER LOCAL FACILITIES FOR DETENTION County to maintain county jail; location; agreements for detention of prisoners Duties of.
Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community.
New Jersey Department of Corrections
FERPA for the Financial Aid Office NCASFAA Fall Conference November 2012.
Working with Performance-based Standards Oregon Youth Authority.
Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Basics: What RSAT Programs Need to Know RSAT Webinar.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Eighth Regional Public Procurement Forum May, 22-25, 2012 Tirana
Criminal Justice BHS Law Related Education Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles LESSON OBJECTIVES 4-1 Analyze and define the legal doctrine of parens.
 International non-governmental organization founded in 1979 (International Year of the Child)  Forefront.
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 13-18, 2003.
Lets Talk About PREA NO!! Capacity Building Preventing Responding Monitoring Oregon and PREA More Oregon Statistics NPR-WORK OPR-WORK National PREA Conference.
The PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT (PREA)
Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) & Victim Advocacy
Sexual Assault Employee Training.
Purposes of the Convention
Correctional Ministry Matters
ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE Internal Occurrence Reporting and Investigation.
Older American Act Amendments of 2006
The Legal Environment of Human Resources Management
Presentation transcript:

The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003: Implications for Juvenile Justice Agencies Addressing Staff Sexual Misconduct with Youth in Custody Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice November 7-9, 2005 Lexington, KY

The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 Public Law  Makes important findings about the impact of prison rape on inmates, the economy and state and federal governments

PREA Purposes  Establish zero tolerance for the conduct  Make prevention a top priority  Develop national standards for detection, prevention, reduction and punishment  Increase available data and information on incidence in order to improve management and administration  Standardize definitions used for collecting date on the incidence of rape  Increase accountability of prison officials who fail to detect, prevent, reduce and punish prison rape  Protect 8 th amendment rights of federal, state and local prisoners  Establish grant programs  Reduce costs of prison rape on interstate commerce

Major Provisions  Section 4: Collection of prison rape statistics, data and research (BJS)($15MM for FY ) Surveys  Including prisons, jails, community corrections, boot camps, road camps, forestry programs, farms, youthful offender facilities, hospitals, drug treatment programs Federal, state and local officials are required to participate Review panel on prison rape with subpoena power Public hearings for 3 highest incidence systems and 2 lowest Report each year on 6/30

Major Provisions Continued  Section 5: Prison Rape Prevention and Prosecution (NIC) ($5MM for FY ) Information and Assistance through National Clearinghouse Training and Education Report due on 9/30 annually

Major Provisions Continued  Section 6: Grants to Protect Inmates and Safeguard Communities (DOJ) ($40MM) Protection of the community  $ to address overcrowding  Risk assessment tools  Mapping of concentration of inmates in communities  Policy and program development  Collaboration between corrections and community on reentry Protection of Inmates  Investigations  Prosecution  Prevention

Major Provisions Continued  Section 7: National Prison Rape Reduction Commission (with subpoena authority) 9 members Conduct legal and factual study of the effects of prison rape in the US Report in 2 years of initial meeting Recommended national standards Consultation with accreditation organizations Can’t impose something that would mandate substantial increased costs to agency Hold hearings

Major Provisions Continued  Section 8: Adoption and Effect of National Standards A year after National Prison Rape Reduction Commission issues report, AG publishes a final rule with standards 90 days after transmission to state departments of correction FBOP is immediately covered Possible reduction of 5% each year for failure to meet the standard Annual report on non-compliance

Major Provisions Continued  Section 9: Accreditation Organizations must adopt standards or lose federal funds  Section 10: Definitions Covers jails, police lockups, prisons Covers both adult and juvenile facilities, government and private Prison rape includes rape of inmate in actual or constructive custody

What does this mean?  Increased scrutiny at state, federal and local level on staff sexual misconduct with youth  Broadened concern about inmate on inmate and youth on youth misconduct  Data is your friend  Get ahead of the curve  You must take this seriously – it is not a backburner issue

How PREA Applies to Juvenile Justice Agencies -- Highlights  BJS Report  Data Collection  Hearings  Development of policies and procedures on youth on youth violence  Specific legislation to cover conduct by and against youth

Remember  Prior to the enactment of PREA juvenile justice agencies were liable for abuse of juveniles under their authority

Remember  PREA is a floor or springboard  Creates important visibility for issues  Creates national standards  Will not cover every possible situation  Will have to take charge for running of own agency –PREA won’t do it  Responsibilities preexisted enactment of PREA  Creates opportunities to do things and look at issues that should have been examined before