Tutorial by Ma’ayan Fishelson Changes made by Anna Tzemach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tutorial #8 by Ma’ayan Fishelson. Computational Difficulties Algorithms that perform multipoint likelihood computations sum over all the possible ordered.
Advertisements

. Exact Inference in Bayesian Networks Lecture 9.
Gene linkage seminar No 405 Heredity. Key words: complete and incomplete gene linkage, linkage group, Morgan´s laws, crossing-over, recombination, cis.
Tutorial #1 by Ma’ayan Fishelson
SNP Applications statwww.epfl.ch/davison/teaching/Microarrays/snp.ppt.
METHODS FOR HAPLOTYPE RECONSTRUCTION
Tutorial #5 by Ma’ayan Fishelson. Input Format of Superlink There are 2 input files: –The locus file describes the loci being analyzed and parameters.
6- GENE LINKAGE AND GENETIC MAPPING Compiled by Siti Sarah Jumali Level 3 Room 14 Ext 2123.
Genetic linkage analysis Dotan Schreiber According to a series of presentations by M. Fishelson.
Lectures 8 – Oct 24, 2011 CSE 527 Computational Biology, Fall 2011 Instructor: Su-In Lee TA: Christopher Miles Monday & Wednesday 12:00-1:20 Johnson Hall.
Basics of Linkage Analysis
. Parametric and Non-Parametric analysis of complex diseases Lecture #6 Based on: Chapter 25 & 26 in Terwilliger and Ott’s Handbook of Human Genetic Linkage.
Linkage Analysis: An Introduction Pak Sham Twin Workshop 2001.
.. Likelihood Computation  Given a Bayesian network and evidence e, compute P( e ) Sum over all possible values of unobserved variables Bet1Die Win1.
. Learning – EM in ABO locus Tutorial #08 © Ydo Wexler & Dan Geiger.
. Learning – EM in The ABO locus Tutorial #8 © Ilan Gronau. Based on original slides of Ydo Wexler & Dan Geiger.
. EM algorithm and applications Lecture #9 Background Readings: Chapters 11.2, 11.6 in the text book, Biological Sequence Analysis, Durbin et al., 2001.
Tutorial #6 by Ma’ayan Fishelson Based on notes by Terry Speed.
An quick survey of human 2-point linkage analysis Terry Speed Division of Genetics & Bioinformatics, WEHI Department of Statistics, UCB NWO/IOP Genomics.
. Bayesian Networks For Genetic Linkage Analysis Lecture #7.
. Basic Model For Genetic Linkage Analysis Lecture #3 Prepared by Dan Geiger.
. Hidden Markov Models For Genetic Linkage Analysis Lecture #4 Prepared by Dan Geiger.
. Learning – EM in The ABO locus Tutorial #9 © Ilan Gronau.
Linear-Time Reconstruction of Zero-Recombinant Mendelian Inheritance on Pedigrees without Mating Loops Authors: Lan Liu, Tao Jiang Univ. California, Riverside.
Tutorial #11 by Anna Tzemach. Background – Lander & Green’s HMM Recombinations across successive intervals are independent  sequential computation across.
CASE STUDY: Genetic Linkage Analysis via Bayesian Networks
Reconstructing Genealogies: a Bayesian approach Dario Gasbarra Matti Pirinen Mikko Sillanpää Elja Arjas Department of Mathematics and Statistics
. Learning Parameters of Hidden Markov Models Prepared by Dan Geiger.
Gene linkage seminar No 405 Heredity. Key words: complete and incomplete gene linkage, linkage group, Morgan´s laws, crossing-over, recombination, cis.
Tutorial #5 by Ma’ayan Fishelson Changes made by Anna Tzemach.
Tutorial #5 by Ma’ayan Fishelson
General Explanation There are 2 input files –The locus file describes the loci being analyzed and parameters for the different analyzing programs. –The.
Linkage and LOD score Egmond, 2006 Manuel AR Ferreira Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston.
Lecture 5: Segregation Analysis I Date: 9/10/02  Counting number of genotypes, mating types  Segregation analysis: dominant, codominant, estimating segregation.
. Basic Model For Genetic Linkage Analysis Lecture #5 Prepared by Dan Geiger.
1 Mendelian genetics in Humans: Autosomal and Sex- linked patterns of inheritance Obviously examining inheritance patterns of specific traits in humans.
Genetic Mapping Oregon Wolfe Barley Map (Szucs et al., The Plant Genome 2, )
A gene is composed of strings of bases (A,G, C, T) held together by a sugar phosphate backbone. Reminder - nucleotides are the building blocks.
Non-Mendelian Genetics
Calculation of IBD State Probabilities Gonçalo Abecasis University of Michigan.
Introduction to Linkage Analysis Pak Sham Twin Workshop 2003.
Mendelian Heredity (Fundamentals of Genetics) CH9 pg 173.
Bayesian MCMC QTL mapping in outbred mice Andrew Morris, Binnaz Yalcin, Jan Fullerton, Angela Meesaq, Rob Deacon, Nick Rawlins and Jonathan Flint Wellcome.
1 Population Genetics Basics. 2 Terminology review Allele Locus Diploid SNP.
Recombination and Linkage
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Hadas Barkay Anat Hashavit.
Lecture 13: Linkage Analysis VI Date: 10/08/02  Complex models  Pedigrees  Elston-Stewart Algorithm  Lander-Green Algorithm.
Tutorial #10 by Ma’ayan Fishelson. Classical Method of Linkage Analysis The classical method was parametric linkage analysis  the Lod-score method. This.
Lecture 15: Linkage Analysis VII
FINE SCALE MAPPING ANDREW MORRIS Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics March 7, 2003.
Trees : Part 1 Section 4.1 (1) Theory and Terminology (2) Preorder, Postorder and Levelorder Traversals.
Genetic Theory Pak Sham SGDP, IoP, London, UK. Theory Model Data Inference Experiment Formulation Interpretation.
1 HMM in crosses and small pedigrees Lecture 8, Statistics 246, February 17, 2004.
Pedigree and linkage analysis
Practical With Merlin Gonçalo Abecasis. MERLIN Website Reference FAQ Source.
. Basic Model For Genetic Linkage Analysis Prepared by Dan Geiger.
Guy Grebla1 Allegro, A new computer program for linkage analysis Guy Grebla.
1 Trees : Part 1 Reading: Section 4.1 Theory and Terminology Preorder, Postorder and Levelorder Traversals.
Chapter 11. Chapter Summary  Introduction to trees (11.1)  Application of trees (11.2)  Tree traversal (11.3)  Spanning trees (11.4)
Lecture 17: Model-Free Linkage Analysis Date: 10/17/02  IBD and IBS  IBD and linkage  Fully Informative Sib Pair Analysis  Sib Pair Analysis with Missing.
Mendelian genetics in Humans: Autosomal and Sex- linked patterns of inheritance Obviously examining inheritance patterns of specific traits in humans.
Gonçalo Abecasis and Janis Wigginton University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
An quick survey of human 2-point linkage analysis
Error Checking for Linkage Analyses
Basic Model For Genetic Linkage Analysis Lecture #3
Balanced Translocation detected by FISH
Linkage Analysis Problems
Genetic linkage analysis
Tutorial #6 by Ma’ayan Fishelson
Gonçalo R. Abecasis, Janis E. Wigginton 
Presentation transcript:

Tutorial by Ma’ayan Fishelson Changes made by Anna Tzemach

The Given Problem Input : A pedigree + phenotype information about some of the people. These people are called typed. Output: the probability of the observed data, given some probability model for the transmission of alleles. founder leaf 1/2 typed

Q: What is the probability of the observed data composed of ? A: There are three types of probability functions: founder probabilities, penetrance probabilities, and transmission probabilities.

Suppose the gene frequency of d is 0.05, then: P(d/h) = 2 * 0.05 * 0.95 Founder Probabilities – One Locus Founders – individuals whose parents are not in the pedigree. We need to assign probabilities to their genotypes. This is done by assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. 1 d/h d-mutant allele h-normal allele Pr(d/h, h/h) = Pr(d/h) * Pr(h/h) = (2 * 0.05 * 0.95)*(0.95) 2 1 d/h 2 h/h Genotypes of different founders are treated as independent:

Founder Probabilities – Multiple Loci According to linkage equilibrium, the probability of the multi-locus genotype of founder k is: Pr(x k ) = Pr(x k 1 ) *…* Pr(x k n ) 1 d/h 1/2 Pr(d/h, 1/2) = Pr(d/h) * Pr(1/2) = 4 * Pr(d)*Pr(h) * Pr(1)*Pr(2) Linkage equilibrium Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium Example:

Penetrance Probabilities Penetrance: the probability of the phenotype, given the genotype. E.g.,dominant disease, complete penetrance: E.g., recessive disease, incomplete penetrance: d/d Pr(affected | d/d) = 0.7 Can be, for example, sex-dependent, age-dependent, environment-dependent. Can be, for example, sex-dependent, age-dependent, environment-dependent. d/d Pr(affected |d/d) = 1.0 d/h Pr(affected | d/h) = 1.0 d/h Pr(affected | h/h) = 0

Transmission Probabilities Transmission probability: the probability of a child having a certain genotype given the parents’ genotypes. Pr(x c | x m, x f ). If we split the ordered genotype x c into the maternal allele x cm and the paternal allele x cf, we get: Pr(x c | x m, x f ) = Pr(x cm |x m )Pr(x cf |x f ) The inheritance from each parent is independent.

Transmission Probabilities – One locus The transmission is according to the 1 st law of Mendel. Pr(X c =d/h | X m =h/h, X f =d/h) = Pr(X cm =h | X m =h/h)*Pr(X cf =d | X f =d/h) = 1 * ½ = ½ 1 d/h 2 h/h 3 d/h We also need to add the inheritance probability of the other phase, but we can see that it’s zero !

Transmission Probabilities – One locus Different children are independent given the genotypes of their parents. Pr(X 3 =d/h, X 4 =h/h, x 5 =d/h | X 1 =d/h, X 2 =h/h) = = (1 * ½) * (1 * ½) * (1 * ½) 1 d/h 2 h/h 3 d/h 4 5 h/h

Transmission Probabilities – Multiple Loci Let’s look at paternal inheritance for example. We generate all possible recombination sequences (s 1,s 2,…,s n ), where s l = 1 or s l = -1. (2 n sequences for n loci). Each sequence determines a selection of paternal alleles p 1,p 2,…,p n where: and therefore its probability of inheritance is: We need to sum the probabilities of all 2 n recombination sequences.

Calculating the Likelihood of Family Data - Summary For a pedigree with m people: where x=(x 1,…,x m ) and g=(g 1,…,g m ). The likelihood of the data is the probability of the observed data (the known phenotypes), given certain values for the unknown recombination fractions.

Calculating the Likelihood of Family Data - Summary G i : genotype vector for individual i Founders: 1..k Non founders: i  m(i), f(i) Founder priors by Hardy-Weinberg Recombination probabilities Penetrances

Computational Problem Complexity disaster: Exponential in #markers Exponential in #individuals Performing a multiple sum over all possible genotype combinations for all members of the pedigree.

Elston-Stewart algorithm The Elston-Stewart algorithm provides a means for evaluating the multiple sum in a streamlined fashion, for simple pedigrees. More efficient computation Exponential in #markers Linear in #individuals

Simple Pedigree No consanguineous marriages, marriages of blood-related individuals (  no loops in the pedigree). There is one pair of founders from which the whole pedigree is generated.

Simple Pedigree There is exactly one nuclear family T at the top generation. Every other nuclear family has exactly one parent who is a direct descendant of the two parents in family T and one parent who has no ancestors in the pedigree (such a person is called a founder). There are no multiple marriages. One of the parents in T is treated as the proband.

“Peeling” Order Assume that the individuals in the pedigree are ordered such that parents precede their children, then the pedigree likelihood can be represented as: where is: –P(g i ), if i is a founder, or –, otherwise. In this way, we first sum over all possible genotypes of the children and only then on the possible genotypes for the parents. the genotypes of i’s parents

An Example for “Peeling” Order According to the Elston-Stewart algorithm: h(g i ) = P(x i |g i ) P(gi) h(g m,g f,g c ) = P(x c |g c ) P(g c |g m,g f )

Elston-Stewart “Peeling” Order As can be seen, this “peeling” order, “clips off” branches (sibships) of the pedigree, one after the other, in a bottom-up order

Elston-Stewart – Computational Complexity The computational complexity of the algorithm is linear in the number of people but exponential in the number of loci.

Variation on the Elston-Stewart Algorithm in Fastlink The pedigree traversal order in Fastlink is some modification of the Elston-Stewart algorithm. Assume no multiple marriages… Nuclear family graph : –Vertices: each nuclear family is a vertex. –Edges: if some individual is a child in nuclear family x and a parent in nuclear family y, then x and y are connected by and edge x-y which is called a “down” edge w.r.t. x and an “up” edge w.r.t. y.

Traversal Order Visit(w) { While w has an unvisited neighbor x reachable via an up edge: Visit(x); While w has an unvisited neighbor y reachable via a down edge: Visit(y); Update w; } One individual A is chosen to be a “proband”. For each genotype g, the probability is computed that A has genotype g conditioned on the known phenotypes for the rest of the pedigree and the assumed recombination fractions. The first family that is visited is a family containing the proband, preferably, a family in which he is a child.

Traversal Order - Updates If nuclear family w is reached via a down edge from z, the parent in w that nuclear families w and z share, is updated. If nuclear family w is reached via an up edge from z, then the child that w and z share is updated.

Example An example pedigree: The corresponding nuclear family graph:

Example 2 The corresponding nuclear family graph: An example pedigree: