1 Today Capital structure M&M theorem Leverage, risk, and WACC Taxes and Financial distress, Reading Brealey and Myers, Chapter 17, 18.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Structure Decisions Chapter 15 and 16
Advertisements

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lecture 6: Debt Policy Changing a firm’s capital structure should not affect its value to shareholders. This chapter analyzes several possible financing.
Copyright © 2014 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Session 9 Topics to be covered: –Debt Policy –Capital Structure –Modigliani-Miller Propositions.
Capital Structure Theory Under Three Special Cases
Capital Structure Policy Capital Structure Policy (Ch16)
Capital Structure Decisions: Part I
Last Lecture.. Cost of Equity Cost of Preferred Stock Cost of Debt
McGraw-Hill © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Leverage and Capital Structure Chapter 13.
Key Concepts and Skills
Chapter Outline The Capital Structure Decision
Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Dividends and Dividend Policy Chapter Seventeen.
Chapter Outline Cash Dividends and Dividend Payment
Goal of the Lecture: Understand how to determine the proper mix of debt and equity to use to fund corporate investments.
Chapter 14 Distribution to Shareholders: Dividend & Share Repurchases
1 Today Financing decisions Financing patterns and stock market reaction Payout policy Reading Brealey and Myers, Chapter 16, 17.
Advanced Corporate Finance Lecture 08.1 and 09 Capital Structure and Bond Valuation (Continued) Fall, 2010.
Capital Structure Decision
Corporate Taxes Value of the firm and WACC
1 Copyright 1996 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc Capital Structure.
1 Today Raising capital Overview Financing patterns and the stock market’s reaction Reading Brealey and Myers, Chapter 14 and 15.
Capital Structure (Ch. 12)
DOES DEBT POLICY MATTER?
DOES DEBT POLICY MATTER?
16- 1 McGraw Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Sixth Edition Richard.
FINANCE IN A CANADIAN SETTING Sixth Canadian Edition Lusztig, Cleary, Schwab.
How much should a firm borrow?
Review Goal: M aximize Value of the Firm Past Topics Investment Decision (spending money) Financing Decision (raising money) Future Topics “Variations.
Raising capital Class 14 Financial Management,
How MUCH Should A CORPORATION BORROW?
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
Capital Structure Decisions
1 The Basics of Capital Structure Decisions Corporate Finance Dr. A. DeMaskey.
Topics in Chapter 15: Capital Structure
Click here for title Capital Structure: Limits to the Use of Debt.
Capital Restructuring
Capital Structure Decisions: The Basics
FIN 351: lecture 12 The Capital Structure Decision MM propositions.
EBIT/EPS Analysis The tax benefit of debt Trade-off theory Practical considerations in the determination of capital structure CAPITAL STRUCTURE Lecture.
Does Debt Policy Matter ? Principles of Corporate Finance Seventh Edition Richard A. Brealey Stewart C. Myers Slides by Matthew Will Chapter 17 McGraw.
Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy
FINANCIAL LEVERAGE AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE POLICY Chapter 16.
Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Corporate Finance 3e Ross, Thompson, Christensen, Westerfield and Jordan Slides.
© Prentice Hall, Chapter 14 Establishing a Target Capital Structure Shapiro and Balbirer: Modern Corporate Finance: A Multidisciplinary Approach.
Financing decisions (3) Class 17 Financial Management,
Financing decisions (2) Class 16 Financial Management,
McGraw-Hill © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Leverage and Capital Structure Chapter 13.
Financial Management FIN300 Leverage and Capital Structure.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No part of this document may be reproduced without written approval from Limkokwing University of Creative Technology 1-1 Chapter 10.
6- 1 Outline 6: Capital Structure 6.1 Debt and Value in a Tax Free Economy 6.2 Capital Structure and Corporate Taxes 6.3 Cost of Financial Distress 6.4.
Chapter 12: Leverage and Capital Structure
Chapter 17 Principles of Corporate Finance Eighth Edition Does Debt Policy Matter? Slides by Matthew Will Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Chapter 17 Principles of Corporate Finance Eighth Edition Capital Budgeting and Risk Slides by Matthew Will, adopted by Craig Mayberry Copyright © 2006.
Chapter 15 Debt and Taxes. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved The Interest Tax Deduction Corporations pay taxes on.
Does Debt Policy Matter?
Does Debt Policy Matter?
Capital Structure (1).
Capital Structure Debt versus Equity.
Chapter 16 Learning Objectives
Capital Structure: Limits to the Use of Debt
Capital Structure (1).
Capital Structure Decisions: The Basics
Capital Structure Byers.
Capital Structure Decisions
Capital structure (Chapter 15)
Capital Structure Decisions: Part I
Presentation transcript:

1 Today Capital structure M&M theorem Leverage, risk, and WACC Taxes and Financial distress, Reading Brealey and Myers, Chapter 17, 18

2 Financing decisions Key goal Ensure that funds are available for positive NPV projects, now and in the future Signaling, taxes, mispricing, issue costs, and corporate control also important Observations Firms follow a pecking order Different industries seem to have different target debt ratios Stock issues are bad news, but debt issues are either neutral or good news

3 Financial Decisions Two models Pecking-order theory Firms are worried primarily about selling undervalued shares. They sell equity only when they have no other choice, and there isn’t a specific target debt ratio. Trade-off theory Firms care mostly about taxes and distress costs. The tax benefits of debt dominate at low leverage, while distress costs dominate at high leverage. This trade-off leads to an optimal capital structure.

4 Trade-off theory

5 Financing decisions

6 M&M Theorem Why is MM useful? It tells us what is important … Does debt affect investment decisions? Does debt affect taxes? Can equity be issued at fair value? Are transaction costs or bankruptcy costs important? Impact of debt on ROE and risk Cost of debt relative to the cost of equity (r D vs. r E )

7 MM Theorem, cont.

8 Message 2 In general, financial transactions don’t create or destroy value as long as securities are sold at fair value. [Unless they affect taxes, investment decisions, etc.] Example Your firm needs to raise $100 million. Does it matter whether you decide to issue debt or equity?

9 Example

10 MM Theorem, cont.

11 MM Theorem, cont.

12 Example Your firm is all equity financed and has $1 million of assets and 10,000 shares of stock (stock price = $100). Earnings before interest and taxes next year will be either $50,000, $125,000, or $200,000 depending on economic conditions. The firm is thinking about a leverage recapitalization, selling $300,000 of debt and using the proceeds to repurchase stock. The interest rate is 10%. How would this transaction affect the firm’s EPS and cashflows to stockholders? Ignore taxes.

13 Example Current: A = $1 million; E = $1 million (10,000 shares); D = $0 Recap: A = $1 million; E = $700,000 (7,000 shares); D =$300,000

14 Example, cont.

15 Leverage, EPS, and ROE

16 MM Theorem, cont.

17 M&M Theorem, cont.

18 Example Your firm is all equity financed and has $1 million of assets and 10,000 shares of stock (stock price = $100). Earnings before interest and taxes next year will be either $50,000, $125,000, or $200,000. These earnings are expected to continue indefinitely. The payout ratio is 100%. The firm is thinking about a leverage recapitalization, selling $300,000 of debt and using the proceeds to repurchase stock. The interest rate is 10%. How would this transaction affect the firm’s EPS and stock price? Ignore taxes.

19 Example, cont.

20 How does borrowing affect stock price under no tax?

21 Example, cont.

22 Share price does not change!

23 Example - Macbeth Spot Removers - All Equity Financed M&M (Debt Policy Doesn’t Matter) Expected outcome

24 Shareholders would be better off if the company had equal proportions of debt and equity!? 10% interest rate debt!

25 Example cont. 50% M&M (Debt Policy Doesn’t Matter)

26 Leverage increase return on equity! How about investors buy one share and borrow to buy another share? M&M (Debt Policy Doesn’t Matter)

27 Example - Macbeth’s - All Equity Financed - Debt replicated by investors M&M (Debt Policy Doesn’t Matter)

28 Proposition I and Macbeth However, share price should be the same!! Macbeth continued

29 MM'S PROPOSITION I If capital markets are doing their job, firms cannot increase value by tinkering with capital structure. V is independent of the debt ratio. AN EVERYDAY ANALOGY It should cost no more to assemble a chicken than to buy one whole. No Magic in Financial Leverage

30 Debt and taxes Tax effects of financing Corporate taxes Interest is treated as an expense for corporate tax purposes, dividends are not Personal taxes Interest is taxed at the full income tax rate, while equity income is taxed at a lower rate Capital gains and international tax rules Overall, debt typically has tax advantages Lower overall taxes

31 Example In 2000, Microsoft had sales of $23 billion, earnings before taxes of $14.3 billion, and net income of $9.4 billion. Microsoft paid $4.9 billion in taxes, had a market value of $423 billion, and had no long-term debt outstanding. Bill Gates is thinking about a recapitalization, issuing $50 billion in long-term debt (rd = 7%) and repurchasing $50 billion in stock. How would this transaction affect Microsoft’s after-tax cashflows and shareholder wealth?

32 Microsoft

33 Microsoft

34 Debt and taxes

35 Debt and taxes

36 Leverage and firm value

37 Microsoft In 2000, Microsoft had EBIT of $14.3 billion. Microsoft paid $4.9 billion in taxes, had a market value of $423 billion, and had no long-term debt outstanding. Bill Gates is considering a recapitalization, issuing $50 billion in long-term debt (rd = 7%) and repurchasing $50 billion in stock. Recapitalization Interest expense = $50 × 0.07 = $3.5 billion Tax shield = $3.5 × 0.34 = $1.19 billion annually PV(tax shields) = 1.19 / 0.07 = 50 × 0.34 = $17 billion* VL = Vu + PV(tax shields) = $440 billion

38 Microsoft

39 Debt and taxes

40 Leverage and the cost of capital

41 Financing decisions Advantages of debt Taxes Signaling Corporate control Lower issue costs Should firms be 100% debt financed? What are the costs?

42 Financial distress Financial distress occurs when promises to creditors are broken or honored with difficulty. Sometimes financial distress leads to bankruptcy. Sometimes it only means skating on thin ice.

43 Financial distress Direct costs Managers’ time and effort Legal costs Professional fees Administrative costs Indirect costs Foregone positive NPV projects Loss of competitive position Lost customers Lost suppliers Asset fire sales and liquidation Loss of interest tax shields

44 Summary

45 Trade-off theory

46 Summary Financing checklist Taxes Does the firm benefit from interest tax shields? Signaling and mispricing Is our equity fairly valued? How will investor react? Expected distress costs What are our cash needs going forward (FCFs)? Cashflow volatility? How costly is it to cut back on expenditures? Customer and supplier concerns? Is renegotiation possible? Asset sales? Financially strong competitors?

47 Summary Who should have low debt? Firms with high costs of financial distress Assets cannot be sold easily, high intangibles, high growth options, time-sensitive investment Firms with risky earnings and cashflows High probability of distress Firms with financially strong competitors Predatory pricing, exploiting downturns Firms with low earnings and cumulative losses Tax shields small

48 Summary Target: Single A rated debt Tax shields Prob of default and credit spreads: AAA vs. A vs. BBB Access to credit markets Regulation International capital markets Competitors Bond covenants

49 Bond ratings

50 Bond ratings