1 previously, when I calculated event selection efficiencies, I defined efficiencies as the following: efficiency in electron channel = (total number of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron and muon reconstruction in single lepton tT events ( Analysis Note )  (short!) update of previous session  new definition of some observables.
Advertisements

Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.
First look of ME study on ttH(  bb) channel Univ. of Tokyo Y.Kataoka
Lepton Flavor Violation at LHCb The τ → μμμ decay Matt Jaffe Physics Department, Penn State University
Fully reconstructed SM 130 GeV Higgs  in the lepton+hadron channel First look at the samples Catalin, Kevin, Tony Univ. of Illinois.
Trigger studies of SM 130 GeV Higgs  in the lepton+hadron channel First pass at estimating trigger efficiency Higgs mass reconstruction Catalin Ciobanu,
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,
Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
September 27, 2005FAKT 2005, ViennaSlide 1 B-Tagging and ttH, H → bb Analysis on Fully Simulated Events in the ATLAS Experiment A.H. Wildauer Universität.
1 First look at new MC files First look at reconstruction output from the newly- generated “mock-data” MC files. –These contain the following improvements:
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
1 Measuring the Top Quark Cross Section in the Semileptonic Channel Andrea Bangert.
1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.
1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 9 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 9 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
1 Studies of W’  tb  Wbb  lvbb. 2 Why W' important? Many beyond-the-standard model theories have predicted W' Extra-dimension model Theories that have.
Topological search for like-sign top quark pairs at CMS  motivated by FCNC and TechniColor models  also a signal for gluino pair production  based on.
MCP checks for the H-4l mass. Outline and work program The problems: – Higgs mass difference from the  – Possible single resonant peak mass shift (with.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final LHC Kittikul Kovitanggoon * & Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University Michael Weinberger.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
1 Top ID in tt → 6-Jet channel Erik Devetak Edinburgh Collaboration Meeting ( )‏
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.
H 1 → a 1 a 1 → µ + µ - τ + τ - ATLAS Experiment: Search of Higgs Boson decaying into a 1 in Next to Minimal SuperSymmetric Model By: Hou Keong(Tim) Lou.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Reconstruction of t  bl. Ricardo GoncaloCSC ttH, H->bb; 11 Oct 062 The idea is (try to) to improve the reconstruction of the top decaying as t  bl –To.
28/4/2006Chris Collins-Tooth tth, (h → bb) with EventViews Chris Collins-Tooth, Christian Shaw 03-May-2006.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
1 Reinhard Schwienhorst, MSU Top Group Meeting W' Search in the single top quark channel Reinhard Schwienhorst Michigan State University Top Group Meeting,
Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
Missing ET with the First Data: Wl (l=e,)
Ch8.4 P-Values The P-value is the smallest level of significance at which H0 would be rejected when a specified test procedure is used on a given data.
ttH (Hγγ) search and CP measurement
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Philippe Doublet, LAL Roman Pöschl & François Richard, LAL
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Fake Jet Rejection: Sum Jt
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
tth, (h→bb) with EventViews
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Search for a New Vector Resonance in the pp WWtt+X Channel at LHC
The Top Chromo-magnetic Moment
Presentation transcript:

1 previously, when I calculated event selection efficiencies, I defined efficiencies as the following: efficiency in electron channel = (total number of selected events in electron channel / total number of generated events in the sample) efficiency in muon channel = (total number of selected events in muon channel / total number of generated events in the sample) now, since I can access the truth information, I know the exact numbers of events in electron channel and muon channel. the new efficiencies are defined as: efficiency in electron channel = (total number of selected events in electron channel / total number of electron events in the sample) efficiency in muon channel = (total number of selected events in muon channel / total number of muon events in the sample) W’  tb  Wbb  lnubb reconstructed event selection efficiency VS. reconstructed electron/muon P T cut electron channel muon channel

2 W’  tb  lnubb truth event selection efficiency VS. true electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel truth events are selected by: requiring an electron or a muon, a neutrino and 2 jets at truth level cuts for electrons: P T cut (variable on the x-axis), η cut: 0<|η|<1.37, 1.52<|η|< 2.47 cuts for muons: P T cut, |η| < 2.4 P T of neutrino > 25GeV transverse mass of W > 40GeV cuts for jets: P T > 20GeV, |η| < 4.5 at truth level, event selection efficiency increases with W’ mass.

3 W’  tb  Wbb  lnubb mass of truth W’ the following plots show the mass distributions of W’ at truth level the one on the left has linear y-axis, and the one on the right has y-axis in log scale for the samples with high W’ masses, they have long tails on the left of their peaks (extremely off-shell?) should I cut away the tails? e.g. for W’ mass = 2000GeV, should I ignore events that have W’ mass < 1750GeV and not to use them in my event selection efficiency calculations? linearlog

4 delta R distribution between truth W and truth top delta R distribution between truth electron and truth b coming from the top delta R distribution between truth muon and truth b coming from the top W’  tb  Wbb  lnubb delta R distributions at truth level

5 W’  tb  lnubb reconstructed event selection efficiency VS. delta R between truth lepton and truth b coming from top electron channelmuon channel the previous slide shows that, when W’ mass is very high, a lot of events have their electrons or muons being close to the b jets. so how is efficiency as a function of delta R? I calculate efficiencies from 10 different ranges of delta R: (1) dR<0.2, (2) 0.2<dR<0.4, (3) 0.4<dR<0.6, (4) 0.6<dR<0.8 (5) 0.8<dR<1.2, (6) 1.2<dR<1.6, (7) 1.6<dR<2.0 (8) 2.0<dR<2.5, (9) 2.5<dR<3.0, (10) 3.0<dR<4.0 I find out that all the events that have dR<0.2 are rejected. In the sample of W'mass=2000GeV, there are actually 84 electron events and 91 muon events that have dR<0.2, and all of them are rejected. The efficiency of 0.2<dR<0.4 is also significantly lower in electron channel W’ mass: 2000GeV