TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.

Advertisements

1 Progress report on Calorimeter design comparison simulations MICE detector phone conference Rikard Sandström.

12/5/2008NuMu Collaboration Friday Meeting 1 Status Report on MANX Proposal Draft Bob Abrams Muons, Inc.

FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.

TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.

Particle ID in the MICE Beamline MICE Collaboration Meeting 30 March Paul Soler, Kenny Walaron University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.

1 EMCal & PID Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 26/6-05.

1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.

Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.

30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.

1 Downstream PID update Rikard Sandström PID phone conference

March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Upstream Particle Identification Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.

KEK Analysis Report Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2006/06/10 MICE CM15.

Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.

1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.

1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.

1 PID status MICE Analysis phone conference Rikard Sandström.

TJR 10/30/031 MICE Beam rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 10/30/03.

1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.

11-FEB-2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline TOF Analysis Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Techology February 11, 2004.

1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.

K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.

MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.

Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.

1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.

TJR August 2, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis1 MICE Beamline Analysis JUNE04 Including a proposal for a JUNE04A Configuration Tom Roberts Illinois Institute.

Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.

Controls Review  Want to record a full configuration of the experiment at every possible “event”, including controls data.  Event trigger = accelerator.

TJR 7/30/031 Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 7/30/03.

March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline Performance with New Magnet Descriptions Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.

1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.

June 22, 2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline Rate Dependency on Pi+ Momentum, and Downstream PiD Distributions Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology June 22,

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn October 15, 2003.

Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.

Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.

RF background simulations MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.

May 12, 2004 TJR1 Effects of Downstream Iron Shield Position on MICE Good- Mu+ Rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology May 12, 2004.

May 12, 2004 TJR1 Effects of Upstream ParticleID Counters on MICE Good-Mu+ Rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology May 12, 2004.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.

Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.

24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk2 24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk3 CKOV – Threshold Cherenkov detectors (aerogel) TOF – Three Time.

Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.

1 Beamline DayTimePresenterTopic Thurs9:00C.BoothMICE Target Wed16:00K.TilleyRecent Beamline Design Work Wed16:30T.RobertsMICE Beamline Performance + Emittance.

Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.

Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.

MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.

TJR 01/21/2003Slide 1 Simulations of the Study 2 Cooling Channel with Realistic Absorber Windows Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology.

1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.

MICE PID size &scraping MICE CM16, RAL, Oct V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for R. Sandrstrom and others contributing to this effort Yagmur, Holger,

TJR August 2, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis1 MICE Beamline Analysis JUNE04 Including a proposal for a JUNE04A Configuration Update – August 03, 2004 (new.

Controls for Particle ID/tracking in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Needed for particle ID/tracking M. A. Cummings May.

MICE: The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment MOPLT106 Abstract The provision of intense stored muon beams would allow the properties of neutrinos.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.

March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.

PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.

KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.

Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.

- MICE - The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction: Aims And Concept o Design o Infrastructure: Hall,

Analysis meeting: Beam momentum measurements using TOFs Tuesday, 22 January 2008 Slide 1 of 10 Beam momentum measurement using.

Calorimeter design & simulations for Stage I Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE PID phone conference

Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.

CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.

MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore 01/19.

Muons, Inc. Feb Yonehara-AAC AAC Meeting Design of the MANX experiment Katsuya Yonehara Fermilab APC February 4, 2009.

MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.

C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

TOF Software and Analysis Tools

Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick

Design of the MANX experiment

Update on GEp GEM Background Rates

Presentation transcript:

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT042 Outline Summary of the SEPT04 beamline design Summary of this simulation Summary of rates Upstream PID distributions Downstream PID disributions Summary of PID Counter Losses

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT043 Summary of the SEPT04 Beamline Design π + central momentum (B1)390 MeV/c μ + central momentum (B2)220 MeV/c μ + mean momentum in Tracker1 – design 206 MeV/c μ + mean momentum in Tracker1 – achieved 183 MeV/c* Diffuser thickness (Pb)0.76 cm Design input emittance6 π mm-rad * The intent of the design is for 206 MeV/c in Tracker1, but various energy losses were not accounted for in the design; this is the actual value achieved.

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT044 Summary of this Simulation A significant improvement in realism: –First guess of the beamline vacuum, windows, air gaps, etc. –More detailed implementation of Tracker1 and Tracker2 Vacuum with windows 5 planes, 1.5 mm scintillator each, located as in the TRD (Sept 04) –TRD (Sept 04) configurations for everything except a few minor things (absorber and RF window shapes, RF Cavity size, Cherenkov2 modeled as a circle)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT045 Summary of Rates DescriptionLAHETMARSGeant4 TOF TOF Tracker Tracker TOF Good μ Values are events per millisecond of Good Target and good RF. Good μ + = TargetDet & TOF0 & TOF1 & Tracker1 & Tracker2 & TOF2 & TOF1(μ + ) & TOF2(μ + )

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT046 TOF0 Distributions (Every blue dot lies right on top of a red dot.)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT047 Cherenkov1 Distributions (Every blue dot lies right on top of a red dot.)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT048 TOF1 Distributions (Every blue dot lies right on top of a red dot.)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT049 Downstream PID Distributions Same simulation, except: –The downstream IronShield is physically removed –Its effect on the magnetic field remains –TOFX is added to the trigger; it is 1.5 by 1.5 meters, 1 mm thick, made of Air, located 1mm ahead of where the downstream IronShield would have been. –TOF2 is extended to be 1.5 by 1.5 meters –Cherenkov2 is extended to be 1.5 meters in diameter –Calorimeter is extended to be 2.0 by 2.0 meters –Relaxed Trigger: Good mu+ requires only 14 hits out of 18 counters (i.e. nothing after TOFX is required, no cut on particle type)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT0410 TOFX Distributions – 1 (Every blue dot lies right on top of a red dot.)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT0411 TOFX Distributions – 2

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT0412 TOF2 Distributions (Every blue dot lies right on top of a red dot.)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT0413 Cherenkov2 Distributions (Every blue dot lies right on top of a red dot.)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT0414 Calorimeter Distributions (Every blue dot lies right on top of a red dot.)

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT0415 PID Counter Losses CounterTRD (Sept 04) Size Lost Good mu+ per 2353 Good mu+ TOF0480 by 4800 Cherenkov1400 by 4000 TOF1480 by 4800 Downstream IronShieldr = 2501 TOF2480 by 4808 Cherenkov2r = 425 *0 Calorimeter1200 by * Circle inscribed in the octagon. (Losses were determined by histogramming X and Y or R for each counter and counting tracks that exceed the TRD size.) (Remember the relaxed Trigger considers mu->e decays to be “Good mu+”.)