Application of the Enthalpy Method: From Crystal Growth to Sedimentary Basins Grain Growth in Metal Solidification From W.J. Boettinger  m  10km “growth”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 15: Capillary motion
Advertisements

Louisiana Tech University Ruston, LA Slide 1 Energy Balance Steven A. Jones BIEN 501 Wednesday, April 18, 2008.
Heat Transfer with Change of Phase in Continuous Casting Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford ANSYS Users Group Meeting September 28, 2010.
2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft E. A. Brener Institut für Festkörperforschung, Pattern formation during diffusion limited transformations in solids.
The Challenge of Using Phase-Field Techniques in the Simulation of Low Anisotropy Structures A.M. Mullis Institute for Materials Research University of.
Alloy Solidification Def. Partition coefficient k
Reading: Text, (p40-42, p49-60) Foken 2006 Key questions:
Effect of Subsidence Styles and Fractional Diffusion Exponents on Depositional Fluvial Profiles Vaughan Voller: NCED, Civil Engineering, University of.
Moving Boundaries in Earthscapes Damien T. Kawakami, V.R. Voller, C. Paola, G. Parker, J. B. Swenson NSF-STC
National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics Modeling physical and ecological dynamics of channel systems that shape Earth’s surface Moving boundary problems.
Solidification and Grain Size Strengthening
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 12 – MULTI- DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL MODELS.
National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics Modeling physical and ecological dynamics of channel systems that shape Earth’s surface Moving boundary problems.
~0.5 m Computational grid size Process ~5 mm REV Modeling Microsegregation In Metal Alloys – Vaughan Voller, University of Minnesota 1 of 14 Can we build.
Engineering H191 - Drafting / CAD The Ohio State University Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Lab 4P. 1Autumn Quarter Transport Phenomena Lab 4.
Validation and Verification of Moving Boundary Models of Land Building Processes Vaughan R. Voller National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics Civil Engineering,
Modeling of Micro segregation in Metal Alloys Vaughan R. Voller University of Minnesota.
16/12/ Texture alignment in simple shear Hans Mühlhaus,Frederic Dufour and Louis Moresi.
Voller, University of Minnesota Application of an Enthalpy Method for Dendritic Solidification Vaughan R. Voller and N. Murfield.
An Enthalpy—Level-set Method Vaughan R Voller, University of Minnesota + + speed def. Single Domain Enthalpy (1947) Heat source A Problem of Interest—
James Sprittles ECS 2007 Viscous Flow Over a Chemically Patterned Surface J.E. Sprittles Y.D. Shikhmurzaev.
Computational grid size ~0.5 m Process ~5 mm REV Maco-Micro Modeling— Simple methods for incorporating small scale effects into large scale solidification.
National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics an NSF Science and Technology Center MOVING BOUNDARY PROBLEMS ON THE EARTHS SURFACE V.R. Voller+,
Session III: Computational Modelling of Solidification Processing Analytical Models of Solidification Phenomena V. Voller QUESTION: As models of solidification.
An Enthalpy Based Scheme for Simulating Dendritic Growth V.R. Voller 4d o (blue) 3.25d o (black) 2.5d o (red) Dendrite shape with 3 grid sizes shows reasonable.
An Analysis of Heat Conduction with Phase Change during the Solidification of Copper Jessica Lyn Michalski 1 and Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete 2 1 Hamilton.
GROWING NUMERICAL CRYSTALS Vaughan Voller, and Man Liang, University of Minnesota We revisit an analytical solution in Carslaw and Jaeger for the solidification.
ABSTRACT Many new devices and applications are being created that involve transporting droplets from one place to another. A common method of achieving.
1 MODELING DT VAPORIZATION AND MELTING IN A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
Evaporation Slides prepared by Daene C. McKinney and Venkatesh Merwade
NTNU Short Course on solidification at IISc October – November 2012 Lars Arnberg, NTNU 1.Introduction – basic concepts 29/10 1.Nucleation - grain refinement.
G.B. McFadden and S.R. Coriell, NIST and R.F. Sekerka, CMU Analytic Solution of Non-Axisymmetric Isothermal Dendrites NASA Microgravity Research Program,
James Sprittles BAMC 2007 Viscous Flow Over a Chemically Patterned Surface J.E Sprittles Y.D. Shikhmurzaev.
Growing Numerical Crystals Vaughan Voller, SAFL Feb
Schmid's Law F r = F cos λ A 0 = Acos ψ τ r = σ cos ψ cos λ.
Byeong-Joo Lee Byeong-Joo Lee General Background ※ References: 1. W.D. Kingery, H.K. Bowen and.
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,
A MULTI-SCALE/MULTI-PHYSICS MODELING FRAMEWORK FOR SOLIDIFICATION SYSTEMS Vaughan R Voller Saint Anthony Falls Lab University of Minnesota Acknowledgments.
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION LIJIAN TAN NICHOLAS ZABARAS Date: 24 July 2007 Sibley School.
An Enthalpy Model for Dendrite Growth Vaughan Voller University of Minnesota.
Microsegregation Models and their Role In Macroscale Calculations Vaughan R. Voller University of Minnesota.
Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice Inverse approach for identification of the shrinkage gap thermal resistance in continuous casting of metals.
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,
Numerical Simulation of Dendritic Solidification
FREE CONVECTION 7.1 Introduction Solar collectors Pipes Ducts Electronic packages Walls and windows 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection (1)
Convection in Flat Plate Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi A Universal Similarity Law ……
Lecture Objectives -Finish Particle dynamics modeling -See some examples of particle tracking -Eulerian Modeling -Define deposition velocity -Fluid Dynamics.
National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics an NSF Science and Technology Center V.R. Voller+, J. B. Swenson*, W. Kim+ and C. Paola+ +
Phase Change Analysis Chapter 9. Training Manual Inventory # March 15, Chapter Overview Phase Change –Terminology –Theory –Material Properties.
INTRODUCTION TO CONVECTION
Modelling of the motion of phase interfaces; coupling of thermodynamics and kinetics John Ågren Dept of Materials Science and Engineering Royal Institute.
Key Issues in Solidification Modeling—
Crystal Growth General Formalism    Phase growing into  with velocity v : f ( “site factor” ) : fraction of sites where a new atom can be incorporated.
NTNU 1 Solidification, Lecture 3 1 Interface stability Constitutional undercooling Planar / cellular / dendritic growth front Cells and dendrites Growth.
Counter-current flows in liquid-liquid boundary layers II. Mass transfer kinetics E. Horvath 1, E. Nagy 1, Chr. Boyadjiev 2, J. Gyenis 1 1 University.
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE MODELING OF SOLIDIFICATION OF MULTICOMPONENT ALLOYS LIJIAN TAN Presentation for Thesis Defense.
Lecture 7 Review of Difficult Topics MATLS 4L04: Aluminum Section.
Convection Heat Transfer in Manufacturing Processes P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Mode of Heat Transfer due to.
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES Materials Process Design and Control.
CONVECTION : An Activity at Solid Boundary P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi Identify and Compute Gradients.
Phase Transformation by Dr.Srimala.
A Mesh-less method for solutions of the Stefan Problem
A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering
Numerical Simulation of Dendritic Solidification
Growth Kinetics Byeong-Joo Lee Microstructure Evolution POSTECH - MSE
Transient Heat Conduction
Q qsat qres Defines q-1 everywhere. q qsat qres Defines q-1 everywhere.
Modeling Phase Changes in Finite Element Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Application of the Enthalpy Method: From Crystal Growth to Sedimentary Basins Grain Growth in Metal Solidification From W.J. Boettinger  m  10km “growth” of sediment delta into ocean Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta Vaughan Voller University of Minnesota

The problem—simulate the growth of a crystal into an undercooled melt contained in an insulated cavity How does solidification proceed? Why do we get a dendritic shape? Solid-liquid interface with time The Classic Stefan Problem -with curvature dependent Phase change temperature

seed T 0 < 0 H = cT + fL Initial liquid at a temperature below equilibrium solidification temperature T = 0 seeded with solid at solidification temperature H = 0 + fL, 0 < f < 1 Liquid layer adjacent to seed uses latent heat to heat up to T = 0 T = T 0 < 0 Negative gradient into liquid removes residual latent heat and drives solidification If a solute is present the equilibrium temp and gradient slope will be lower—resulting in a slower advance for the solidification How does solidification proceed?

Why do we get a dendritic shape? Initial seed with radius  anisotropic surface energy liquidus slope T o < T m Surface of seed is under-cooled due to curvature (Gibbs-Thompson) and solute (Not Shown kinetic) Capillary length ~10 -9 for metal With dimensionless numbers Angle between normal and x-axis Anisotropic term makes under cooling less in preferred growth directions As crystal grows the sharper temp grad at tip drives sol harder BUT the increased tip curvature holds it back A steady tip operating Velocity is reached

Alain Karma and Wouter-Jan Rappel Phase Filed Current Approaches (Pure Melt) Thermodynamic equation –minimizing free energy across a diffusive interface -1 < phase marker < 1 Heat equation with source H. S. Udaykumar, R. Mittal, Wei Shyy Interface Tracking Juric Tryggvason Zhao and Heinrich Kim, Goldenfeld, Dantzig And Chen, Merriman, Osher,andSmereka Level Set Solve for level set Using speed function from Stefan Cond. Maintain distance function properties by re-in Solve heat con. Use level set to mod FD at interface

Enthalpy Method-First Proposed by Eyres et al 1947 For Crystal Growth by K H Tacke, 1988 A function of f if 0 < f < 1 (f determines curvature) In this work: use iterative sol. Include anisotropy and solute liquid fraction 0 in solid 1 in liquid-a physical level set

Governing Equations With additional dimensional numbers Governing equations are Chemical potential Continuous at interface concentration If 0 < g < 1

In a time step Solve for H and C (explicit time integration) Calculate curvature and orientation from current nodal g field Calculate interface undercooling If 0 < g < 1 then Update f from enthalpy as Check that calculated liquid fraction is in [0,1] Update Iterate until At end of time step—in cells that have just become all solid introduce very small solid seed in ALL neighboring cells. Required to advance the solidification Numerical Solution Use square finite difference grid, set length scale to Very Simple—Calculations can be done on regular PC Initial condition— Circle r = 2.5do Typical grid Size 200x00 ¼ geometry ON A FIXED UNIFORM GRID

Verification 1 Looks Right!! k = 0 (pure),  = 0.05, T 0 = -0.65,  x = 3.333d 0 Enthalpy Calculation Dimensionless time  = 0 (1000) 6000 k = 0 (pure),  = 0.05, T 0 = -0.55,  x = d 0 Level Set Kim, Goldenfeld and Dantzig Dimensionless time  = 37,600

Verification 2 Verify solution coupling by Comparing with one-d solidification of an under-cooled binary alloy Constant T i, C i k = 0.1, Mc = 0.1, T 0 = -.5, Le = 1.0 Compare with Analytical Similarity Solution—Rubinstein Carslaw and Jaeger combo. Concentration and Temperature at dimensionless time t =100 Symbol-numeric sol. Front Movement Red-line Numeric sol. Covers analytical

Verification 3 Compare calculated dimensionless tip velocity with Steady state operating state calculated from the microscopic solvability theory

Verification 4 Check for grid anisotropy Solve with 4 fold symmetry twisted 45 o Then Twist solution back  x =.36do  x =.38do Dimensionless time  = 6000

k = 0.15, Mc = 0.1, T 0 = -.65  = 0.05,  x = 3.333d 0 Result: Effect of Lewis Number All predictions at Dimensionless time  =6000

k = 0.15, Mc = 0.1, T 0 = -.55, Le = 20.0  = 0.02,  x = 2.5d 0 Dimensionless time  = 30,000 Result: Prediction of Concentration

Conclusion –Score card for Dendritic Growth Enthalpy Method (extension of original work byTacke) Ease of CodingExcellent CPUVery Good (runs shown here took between 30 minutes and 2 hours on a regular PC) Convergence to known analytical sol. Excellent Convergence to known operating state Good (further study with finer grid required) Grid AnisotropyReasonable (further study with finer grid required) Flexibility to add more physics Excellent (adding solute only required 10% more lines)

Fans Toes Shoreline Two Sedimentary Moving Boundary Problems of Interest Moving Boundaries in Sediment Transport

NCED’s purpose: to catalyze development of an integrated, predictive science of the processes shaping the surface of the Earth, in order to transform management of ecosystems, resources, and land use The surface is the environment!

Research fields Geomorphology Hydrology Sedimentary geology Ecology Civil engineering Environmental economics Biogeochemistry Who we are: 19 Principal Investigators at 9 institutions across the U.S. Lead institution: University of Minnesota

1km Examples of Sediment Fans Moving Boundary How does sediment- basement interface evolve Badwater Deathvalley

Sediment mass balance gives Sediment transported and deposited over fan surface by fluvial processes From a momentum balance and drag law it can be shown that the diffusion coefficient is a function of a drag coefficient and the bed shear stress  when flow is channelized = cont. Convex shape

sediment h(x,t) x = u(t) bed-rock ocean x shoreline x = s(t) land surface   A Sedimentary Ocean Basin

An Ocean Basin Melting vs. Shoreline movement

Experimental validation of shoreline boundary model ~3m

Base level Measured and Numerical results ( calculated from 1 st principles) 1-D finite difference deforming grid vs. experiment +Shoreline balance

An Ocean Basin Melting vs. Shoreline movement

Limit Conditions: A Fixed Slope Ocean q=1   s(t)  similarity solution  Enthalpy Sol. A Melting Problem driven by a fixed flux with SPACE DEPENDENT Latent Heat L =  s Depth at toe

h(x,y,t) bed-rock ocean y shoreline x = s(t) land surface  (x,y,t) A 2-D Front -Limit of Cliff face Shorefront But Account of Subsidence and relative ocean level Enthalpy Sol. x y Solve on fixed grid in plan view Track Boundary by calculating in each cell

 s(t)   Hinged subsidence

A 2-D problem Sediment input into an ocean with an evolving trench driven By hinged subsidence

With Trench

No Trench Trench Plan view movement of fronts

Models can predict stratigraphy “sand pockets” = OIL The Po Shoreline position is signature of channels WHY Build a model

Shoreline Tracking Model has been Latent Heat a function of Space and time Enthalpy methods can generate models for distinct moving boundary systems Crystal Growth in undercooled pure melt Phase change temperature a function of interface