TRIGGER EFFICIENCIES IN 20X. Semileptonic events 1 lepton from W 1 lepton from W p T gen >10 GeV, || 10 GeV, ||<2.4 At least 1 lepton p T >20 GeV,||

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

William Edson SUNY at Albany Anirvan Sircar Louisiana Tech University.

Advertisements

Leptoquark Searches at the Tevatron April 16th, 2004 XII th Deep Inelastic Scattering Workshop Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia For the CDF and DØ Collaborations.

NMSSM qqH 1, H 1 ->a 1 a 1 ->  project A. Nikitenko (CMS)

Study of the e + e   η  process at √s = 1 GeV (main systematic error in the e + e   e + e  η analysis)

Jet Veto Scale Factor for ZZ Analysis Haijun Yang, Lailin Xu, Bing Zhou ATLAS SM ZZ  Meeting February 2, 2012.

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.

Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,

VBF H  Progress Report Catalin & Tony February 21, 2007.

Overview of results on trigger efficiencies for ttbar CSA07 samples (Part of the work towards AN note: Trigger performance for top events: evaluation,

1 previously, when I calculated event selection efficiencies, I defined efficiencies as the following: efficiency in electron channel = (total number of.

The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.

1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS HEEPP Group Meeting 24 March 2007.

1 RS-1 G  750GeV 0.1 Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS.

W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.

Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.

1 Measuring the Top Quark Cross Section in the Semileptonic Channel Andrea Bangert.

Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan.

TRIGGER EFFICIENCIES IN 2_1_4 /RelValTTbar/CMSSW_2_1_4_IDEAL_V6_v1/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW- HLTDEBUG-RECO events.

Semileptonic events 1 lepton from W p T gen >10 GeV, ||20 GeV,||13,||

Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 9 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 9 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.

1 Techincolor and Heavy Top/B search Tulika Bose Meenakshi Narain (Brown University) Work done in the context of Les Houches 2007.

FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.

Ttbar jets E T >30 GeV, ||20 GeV, ||

Status: WW,ZZ->H->  Catalin, Kevin, Tony, Dovid.

Tevatron Non-SUSY BSM: Searches for Physics Beyond the SM and MSSM David Stuart University of California, Santa Barbara DIS 2007, Munich April 2007.

Ttbar jets E T >30 GeV, ||30 GeV, ||

Topological search for like-sign top quark pairs at CMS  motivated by FCNC and TechniColor models  also a signal for gluino pair production  based on.

Presentation Title Spike problem.

Charged Higgs Results from Tevatron Sudeshna Banerjee Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India For CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab, Chicago.

H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.

Trigger & Analysis Avi Yagil UCSD. 14-June-2007HCPSS - Triggers & AnalysisAvi Yagil 2 Table of Contents Introduction –Rates & cross sections –Beam Crossings.

Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,

Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.

M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004.

Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.

Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,

Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.

1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.

HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.

Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.

29 Sep QCD backgrounds in charged Higgs searches Alexandros Attikis University of Cyprus (UCY) for the CMS Collaboration cH ± arged 2010 Uppsala,

10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.

А. Тумасян научный руководитель А. Сирунян. Jet algorithms development perspectives within HCAL upgrade.

Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.

Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.

1 Reinhard Schwienhorst, MSU Top Group Meeting W' Search in the single top quark channel Reinhard Schwienhorst Michigan State University Top Group Meeting,

Cut flow for A/H  tau tau  lh. Overview We present an overview of the cuts used for the neutral MSSM A/H  tau tau  lh analysis for 1 fb -1 The statistical.

Doubly Charged Higgs Analysis in 3 leptons state Sungeun Lee Sungkyunkwan University 1.

UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting

 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.

Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.

AOD Analysis of the DC2 Coannihilation Model Sample Davide Costanzo Nov 5 th 2004 V. 3.0.

Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.

1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)

SUSY DILEPTON TRIGGER MONITORING

SUSY DILEPTON TRIGGER MONITORING

15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting

Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS

Stop->4 bodies signal samples with 2 leptons in final state

Bose-Einstein correlations in 8 TeV DATA with jets

Dijet+MET Events induced by Cosmic Ray Muons

Razor Triggers HLT MR450 Higher single lepton trigger thresholds bias low MR distribution – prevents side-band measurements as in 2010 data Solution:

Generation of samples for VBF H0-->ZZ*-->bbll

ttbar + jets AOD analysis

Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)

Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi

Study of Hb`b, c`c and gg in the `H channel

Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi

Presentation transcript:

TRIGGER EFFICIENCIES IN 20X

Semileptonic events 1 lepton from W 1 lepton from W p T gen >10 GeV, || 10 GeV, ||<2.4 At least 1 lepton p T >20 GeV,|| 20 GeV,||<2.0 2 jets (E T Raw >13,|| 13,||<2.4) Dileptonic events Dileptonic events 2 leptons from W 2 leptons from W p gen T >10 GeV || 10 GeV ||<2.4 At least 2 leptons p T >20 GeV, p T >15 GeV,|| 20 GeV, p T >15 GeV,||<2.0, opposite charge 2 jets (E T Raw >13,|| 13,||<2.4) Off-line selection Generator cuts cuts efficiencies reported  trig  trig  based on MC information  trig/off  trig/off  relative to the offline selection Trigger path name HLT threshold (GeV) HLT1MuonNonIso16 HLT1MuonIso11 HLT1ElectronRelaxed17 HLT1Electron15 HLT2MuonNonIso3,3 HLT2ElectronRelaxed12,12 HLTXElectronMuonRelaxed10,10 HLTXElectronMuon8,7 HLT1jet200 EVENT SELECTION 2

Final state bjjb 2_0_0Ideal2_0_0Startup N gen acceptance87.5± ±0.9  trig HLT1MuonNonIso77±175±1 HLT1MuonIso62±140±1  off/acc 79±178±1  trig/off HLT1MuonNonIso87±185±1 HLT1MuonIso 66 ±1 44±2 2_0_0 MUONS1_8_3(Ideal) ± ± ± ± ± ±0.9

Final state ebjjb 2_0_0Ideal2_0_0Startup N gen acceptance 87.1 ± ±0.9  trig HLT1ElectronRelaxed72±1 49± 1 HLT1Electron69±1 48± 1  off/acc 87.5± ±1  trig/off HLT1ElectronRelaxed79±1 56 ± 2 HLT1Electron74±1 54 ±2 1_8_3(Ideal) ± ± ± ± ± ±0.8 2_0_0 ELECTRONS

2_0_0 ideal ideal tt->bjjb HLT1MuonNonIso tt->ebjjb HLT1ElectronRelaxed

Final state bjjb 2_0_2Ideal2_0_2Startup N gen acceptance87±290±1  trig HLT1MuonNonIso82±276±2 HLT1MuonIso64±240±2  off/acc 81±281±2  trig/off HLT1MuonNonIso91±281±2 HLT1MuonIso 70 ±2 41±22_0_5Ideal2_0_5Startup ±189±1 78±277±2 64±238±2 81±280± 87±284±2 68 ±2 42 ±2 2_0_2 2_0_5 MUONS

Final state ebjjb 2_0_2Ideal2_0_2Startup N gen acceptance 88 ± 2 88±1  trig HLT1ElectronRelaxed75±2 53± 2 HLT1Electron71±2 51± 2  off/acc 87± 2 83±2  trig/off HLT1ElectronRelaxed 80 ±2 59 ± 2 HLT1Electron 75±2 57 ±2 2_0_5Ideal2_0_5Startup ± 1 84± 2 74±253±2 69±249±2 88±178±2 78 ±2 61 ±3 72±256±3 ELECTRONS 2_0_22_0_5

Final state ebjjb 2_0_5Ideal2_0_5Startup N gen acceptance 86± 1 84± 2  trig HLT1ElectronRelaxed74±253±2 HLT1Electron69±249±2 HLT1ElecEt15_L1R_NI 90± 1 HLT1ElecEt15_L1R_LI80±280±2  off/acc 88±178±2  trig/off HLT1ElectronRelaxed 78 ±2 61 ±3 HLT1Electron72±256±3 HLT1ElecEt15_L1R_NI 94 ± ±0.9 HLT1ElecEt15_L1R_LI 83± 2 87± 2 ELECTRONS 2_0_5

Final state bjjb 2_0_6Ideal N gen 1541 acceptance88.8±0.8  trig HLT1MuonNonIso78±1 HLT1MuonIso63±1 HLT4jet3062±1  off/acc 80±1  trig/off HLT1MuonNonIso87±1 HLT1MuonIso 67 ±1 HLT4jet3065±12_0_6 Final state ebjjb 2_0_6Ideal N gen 1452 acceptance 87.3± 0.9  trig HLT1ElecEt15_L1R_NI 88.2± 0.9 HLT1ElecEt15_L1R_LI79±1 HLT1ElectronRelaxed74±1 HLT1Electron69±1 HLT4jet30 85 ±1  off/acc 86±1  trig/off HLT1ElecEt15_L1R_NI 92.7 ±0.8 HLT1ElecEt15_L1R_LI 84± 1 HLT1ElectronRelaxed 80 ±1 HLT1Electron74±1 HLT4jet30 87 ±1

2_0_6 ideal ideal