Team Garlic Armageddon Final Presentation Kirstyn Johnson, Ryder Whitmire, Lenny Komow Lauren Persons, Dave Borncamp, Jon Pfohl December 1, 2009 Kirstyn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Advertisements

Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney October 14, 2008.
Space Debris Conceptual Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathan Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Launch Readiness Review Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin.
Pegasus MSF SatElysium Launch Readiness Review Jordan Burns, Brenden Hogan, Miranda Link, Cody Spiker, Chris Dehoyos, Hemal Semwal November 1 st, 2011.
Team Lightning Rod Launch Readiness Review Fall 2010 Rev C 11/2/2010 Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
Dynamo Team Careful Harry Glenda Alvarenga J.J. Busse Emily Eggers Adam Kemp Gabrielle Massone Dalton Smith Corey Wilson Launch Readiness Review.
Team 7, Final Presentation December 1, Mission Overview Send up petri dishes containing bacteria Analyze the effects of temperature, pressure, and.
The Wright Stuff Conceptual Design Review Colton Hall, Brendan Lee, David Thomas, Zak Collins, Eli Nelson, Devin Bazata September 20th 2011 Fall 2011 Rev.
{ Dynamo Careful Harry Glenda Alvarenga J.J. Busse Emily Eggers Adam Kemp Gabrielle Massone Dalton Smith Corey Wilson.
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Cosmic Ray Detection If they’re out there, we’ll find them. *Space photos from Gateway to Space class launch in 2005 by team Hooligans* Joanna Gordon Shane.
Supernova Brigade Final Presentation Amanda Kuker, Michael Lotto, James Bader, Jordan Dickard, Blake Firner, Diana Shukis Rev
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
Teamo Supremo Final Presentation Kristen Brenner Kim Fornall Ahna Isaak Nick Martinez Wes Roos Bart Tofany RevD
Chouinard, John Getz, Jennifer Hewitt, Lisa Kim, Elise Salmons, Patrick Silva-Ortiz, Carlos.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn December 7, 2006.
Space Debris Critical Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathon Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth October 14, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev.
Final Presentation Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani December 5, 2006.
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Launch Readiness Review Katie Brissenden, Hannah Williams, Aram Podolski, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Cam Comeau November 5,
Garlic Armageddon BioSat Lauren Persons, Ryder Whitmire, Lenny Komow, Kirstyn Johnson, Jon Pfohl, Dave Borncamp October 6 th 2009.
GONS Final Presentation Steven Benedict Jake Danser Josh Hecht Brock Kowalchuk Erik Shuttlesworth Matthew Zemel December 4, 2007 Steven Benedict Jake Danser.
Team Garlic Armageddon BioSat Project Conceptual Design Review Lauren Persons, Ryder Whitmire, Lenny Komow, Kirstyn Johnson, Jon Pfohl, Dave Borncamp 9/22/09.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Conceptual Design Review Travis Dowdy, Jocelyn Mulkey, Hunter Hoopes, Taylor Smith, Kaitlyn Zimmitti, Jess Davidoff September.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Team Zephyr Launch Readiness Review Joseph Sheehey, Huy Le, Andrew Zizzi, Alex Morrow, Sam Evans, Logan Wright November 11, 2008.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
JAKE BINNEY JAMEY GRAHAM LOUISE MARTINEZ JACK OAKES MARCUS RAHIMPOUR ERIN TUCKER JAKE BINNEY JAMEY GRAHAM LOUISE MARTINEZ JACK OAKES MARCUS RAHIMPOUR ERIN.
Design Review Corinne Desroches Saad Alqahtani Charles MacCraiger Alexa Warly Connor Jacobson Kyle Skjerven Matt Busby.
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Conceptual Design Overview
SPIRIT of the Koala Project VOLT Critical Design Review Anthony Anglin, Colin Harkins, Dylan Cooper, Thomas Jefferies, Starteya Pais, Joao Mansur, Andrew.
Miscellaneous Notes: This is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here. Basically this.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
Hang Seven Launch Readiness Review Lucas Migliorini, Becca Lidvall, Paul Smith Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil Desai, Abby Caballero, Sierra Williams.
Team Victorious Secret Final Presentation Crawford Leeds Jacob Broadway Tanya Hardon Devan Corona Dylan Reed November 29, 2011.
Team Hang 7 Final Presentation Lucas Migliorini, Sierra Williams, Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Becca Lidvall, Abby Caballero, Paul Smith, Nikhil Desai.
James Bader, Jordan Dickard, Blake Firner, Amanda Kuker, Michael Lotto, Diana Shukis
Sam Bukowski, Emily Daugherty, Chris Lewin, Troy Hayes, Natalie Schaefer, Matt Vaninger November, 2011.
Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, Sydni Smith, and Shweta Maurya 5 November, 2009.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
Team Honey Badger R.A.H.D. Final Presentation Team Members: Kyle Daniels, Logan Harrop, Annie Kelly, Gabe Frank Jason Leng, Karyn Perdue, Josh Whipkey,
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: 2519S02 FOR
GEEN 2850 / REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: _01 FOR DESIGN CONCEPT OF THE CU Balloon Experimental Satellite (CUBESAT)
Zachary Cuseo, Sydni Smith, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, and Shweta Maurya 8 October 2009.
Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams November 11, 2008.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
Quinn Kostelecky, Vincent Staverosky, Gloria Chen, Roshan Misra, Jacqueline Godina, Raymond Auyeung Fall 2011 Rev C
Junk in a Box Final Presentation Frank Becky, Kyle Cummings, Jordan Haines, Villiam Klein, Matt Peoples, Ryan Scott and Aaron Young 4 December 2007.
Team Hubble Jr. Critical Design Review Ryan Del Gizzi, Evan Levy, Kyle Norman, Chris Everhart, Holly Zaepfel, Rachel Small October 17, 2006.
PROJECT SCREAM PROPOSAL Josh Yeaton Kevin Dinkel Chris Kopacz Conrad Schmidt Chris Warren Dillon Thorse
Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin Wong 05 October 2010.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Spring REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: 2500-SP03 FOR DESIGN CONCEPT OF THE Balloon Satellite (BalloonSat) PROPOSALS ARE.
Team S.H.I.E.L.D. Final Presentation
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Final Presentation
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
Team Thumbs Up Final Presentation
S^3 Launch Readiness Review
Space Debris Critical Design Review
Launch Readiness Review
Team Super 8: Sat Morpheus Final Presentation
Team SCREAM Launch Readiness Review
Presentation transcript:

Team Garlic Armageddon Final Presentation Kirstyn Johnson, Ryder Whitmire, Lenny Komow Lauren Persons, Dave Borncamp, Jon Pfohl December 1, 2009 Kirstyn Johnson, Ryder Whitmire, Lenny Komow Lauren Persons, Dave Borncamp, Jon Pfohl December 1, 2009 Rev

Mission Overview Mission Statement -Analyze affect of radiation and atmosphere on growth rate of bacteria Mission Objectives  Expose bacteria radiation  Determine amount of radiation the bacteria is exposed to  Determine how bacteria is impacted by radiation Mission Expectations -Bacterial recovery rates = low compared to control - Radiation Background -Why E. coli? -Easily accessible, anaerobic -Implications: Radiation effect on humans as space travel becomes more common Mission Statement -Analyze affect of radiation and atmosphere on growth rate of bacteria Mission Objectives  Expose bacteria radiation  Determine amount of radiation the bacteria is exposed to  Determine how bacteria is impacted by radiation Mission Expectations -Bacterial recovery rates = low compared to control - Radiation Background -Why E. coli? -Easily accessible, anaerobic -Implications: Radiation effect on humans as space travel becomes more common

Design

Actual Design

Functional Block Diagram

BalloonSat Function  All systems on before launch  Stores data for all inputs (temperature, pressure, accelerations, and geiger counter) every 60 ms  Radiation counts from Geiger counter were added up and stored in memory every 60 ms  Camera took picture every 20 seconds  All systems on before launch  Stores data for all inputs (temperature, pressure, accelerations, and geiger counter) every 60 ms  Radiation counts from Geiger counter were added up and stored in memory every 60 ms  Camera took picture every 20 seconds

Changes in Satellite Design and Experiment ProposalFinal Measure radiation and other atmospheric conditions (i.e. temperature) Measured radiation Fly two plates inoculated with bacteriaFlew one plate inoculated with bacteria and a pressure tube with bacteria in nutrient broth One testing method for bacteria: replica plating Two testing methods: replica plating and spectrophotometric analysis Satellite design: part of satellite would not have been protected by insulation All of the satellite was heated with insulation on all parts

Results and Analysis

Bacteria: Predicted Replica Plating –Smaller colony size and obliteration of certain colonies in experimental plate Spectrophotometry –Growth curve of experimental sample shifted to the right, i.e. longer to obtain the same ABS value

Bacteria: Replica Plating Analysis Result: the original plate of the control group showed the expected growth of E. coli, and its replica showed a similar, but to a lesser degree, amount of growth. Unexpected Result: during the replication and incubation process, contamination had occurred, as the replica plate had a large number of foreign cultures growing in it; did not seem to affect the results Conclusion: all of the E. coli transferred to the replica plate was killed due to radiation

Bacteria: Spectrophotometric Analysis Result: the density of the bacteria that was in the satellite took a longer time to replicate, but only took about 31 hours to catch up to the control bacteria

Temperature Analysis: HOBO External Result: when the flight began, the temperature steadily dropped from about 10°C to around -60°C; the satellite was in the troposphere, the lowest level of Earth’s atmosphere -between 30 and 50 minutes after activation, most likely in the part of the atmosphere known as the tropopause -warming trend continues through the stratosphere, shown in the graph roughly between 50 and 90 minutes

Temperature Analysis: HOBO Internal -Shows the same general trend as the AVR temperature data, but slightly different temperature values -lowest temperature was at about -10 °C, not low enough to kill bacteria

Temperature Analysis: AVR -gave a minimum temperature of -11.4°C -temperature not low enough to freeze the water in the pressure tube, conclude that temperature was a little factor in hindering bacterial growth

Radiation: Predicted As the altitude increases, expect to see the radiation intensity increase; a positive correlation between altitude and intensity

Radiation Analysis -As time increases, radiation intensity (counts/min) also increases -Radiation at apogee (≈95,000 ft) was about 60 times greater than at 5,400 ft. above seal level (Boulder elevation)

Humidity Analysis First spike in graph correlates with spike in temp. sensor – payload was launched. Second spike in humidity also correlates with second spike in the temp. graph – Satellite in the stratosphere, the peak representing balloon burst. Humidity steadily increasing at end since temperature is rising – Later in the day

Accelerometer Analysis The acceleration was roughly constant, but spiked at launch and increased significantly at burst.

The acceleration in the Y axis was negative for the ascent because the satellite spun the entire time. After burst, the acceleration was closer to zero because the satellite was not spinning.

Pressure Analysis

Failure Analysis  Failure of Pressure Sensor  Initial data not consistent with what pressure should be at ground. We took it to the electronics center to test in a pressure environment to repeat the failure. We recorded a constant pressure regardless of the change in the environment.  Failure of Pressure Sensor  Initial data not consistent with what pressure should be at ground. We took it to the electronics center to test in a pressure environment to repeat the failure. We recorded a constant pressure regardless of the change in the environment.

Pressure Data: Before Flight

Picture Analysis Time Stamp- 12:00:53 am Time Stamp- 12:09:52 am All Systems On Satellite Launch

Picture Analysis (cont’d) Time Stamp- 1:36:00 am Time Stamp- 2:10:22 am Burst of Balloon Satellite Landing All of the time stamps correlate with accelerometer and temperature data, confirms what time the events occurred

Conclusions The amount of penetrating radiation present at 95,000 feet is almost sixty times greater than at 5,400 feet above sea level (the elevation of Boulder, CO). The radiation present was of sufficient potency to kill off a large portion of the bacteria, evidenced by the annihilation of E. coli colonies on the replica plate, but not enough to completely kill and sterilize the entire satellite, as seen in the pressure tube experiment Despite the amount of radiation damage incurred, the bacteria was still able to recover after about 31 hrs

Lessons Learned  Spectrophotometric analysis of bacterial growth is superior to replica plating technique  More effective to do multiple pressure tubes for spectrophotometric analysis  Need to ensure that the bacteria stays warmer, make sure there are no other confounding variables

Ready to Fly Again Payload should be stored in a cool environment not exposed to excessive light Bacteria cultures must be grown a day before flight A spectrophotometer must be acquired before flight for use on the ground Electronics can be activated by flipping the power switch followed by the G-switch right before launch Need to ensure that Geiger counter still works properly Will need to correct problems with the pressure sensor

RequirementsDone? 1. Aditional experiment that collects science data, analyzableYes 2. Analog Sensor input shall not exceed 5VYes 3. After Flight, balloonsat will be ready to fly againYes 4. Flight string interface tube is non metal, through center of balloonsat and secured to box so that it won’t interfere with flight string Yes 5. Internal temperature of balloonsat will remain above -10 degrees C during flightYes 6. Total weight shall not exceed 850 gramsYes 7. Team shall acquire ascent and descent rates of the flight stringYes 8. Design shall allow for a HOBO H Yes 9. Design shall allow for external temperature cableYes 10. Design shall allow for a Canon A570IS Digital CameraYes 11. Design shall allow for AVR microcontroller board and batteries weighing 150 grams including batteriesYes 12. Design shall allow for an active heater system weighing 100 grams with batteriesYes 13. Balloonsat shall be made of foam coreYes 14. Parts list and budget shall include spare partsYes 15. Balloonsat shall have contact information written on the outside along with a US flagYes 16. Proposal, design, and other documentation units shall be in metricYes General Mission Requirements Matrix

Requirements (cont’d) RequirementsDone? 17. Launch is November 7 th 2009, 6:50 AM in Windsor, CO. Everyone is expected to show for Launch. Only one team member is required to participate in recovery. Launch and recovery shall be completed by 3:00 PM Yes 18. No one shall get hurtYes 19. All hardware is the property of the Gateway to Space program and must be returned in working order at the end of the semester Yes 20. All parts shall be ordered and paid by Chris Koehler’s CU MasterCard by appointment to minimize reimbursement paperwork. All teams shall keep detailed budgets on every purchase and receipt shall be turned in within 48 hours of purchase with team name written on it along with a copy of the Gateway order form Yes 21. All purchases made by team individuals shall have receipts and must be submitted within 60 days of purchase or reimbursement will be subject to income taxes Yes 22. Have fun and be creativeYes 23. Absolutely nothing alive will be permitted as payloads, with the exception of yellow jackets, mosquitoes, fire ants, earwigs, roaches, or anything you would squish if you found it in your bed Yes 24. Completion of the final report (extra credit if team video is included)Yes

Appendix

Mass Budget

Monetary Budget

Message to Next Semester This class is going to be a lot of work, but very rewarding. If you are looking for a class where you can make something without having to put much effort into it, then you should look somewhere else. For every hour you spend working on your satellite it ’ s a safe bet that you will be spending at least two more writing about it. This class involves a lot of writing. It ’ s not busy work, though, as it thoroughly prepares you for real life presentations and proposals. You are going to have to know your stuff and be prepared for all sorts of problems along the way. Though Chris says it every day, Time is not on your side! Try to finish everything at least a week before flight, so you have time to run at least two or three full length flight simulations. Testing everything is crucial. On the other hand, you will have a blast. Chris is an amazing teacher, and will make you love every class. Groups can sometimes be tough to work with, but if you work at it, you can make great friends. If you do have group problems, try to work it out As Soon As Possible! Having one poor worker in the group can drag the rest of the group ’ s morale down too. At the same time, you all can have a lot of fun together. Launch day will be unforgettable. There ’ s nothing like seeing the satellite you worked so hard on soar through the sky, to disappear behind the clouds. A few tips on that note: use anti-fog on the lens of your camera, and for goodness sakes, don ’ t forget to turn your AVR board on! As a final note, try to pick something that you know you will have fun working on. If you are willing to work hard for a great reward, then Gateway to Space is right for you!