Approximation of Attractors Using the Subdivision Algorithm Dr. Stefan Siegmund Peter Taraba.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Automated Theorem Proving Lecture 1. Program verification is undecidable! Given program P and specification S, does P satisfy S?
Advertisements

Fixed point iterations and solution of non-linear functions
Lecture 5 Rendering lines 1.Steps of line rendering 2.Scan-conversion for line segments 3.A1 tutorial CP411 Computer Graphics Fall 2007 Wilfrid Laurier.
Advanced Iso-Surfacing Algorithms Jian Huang, CS594, Spring 2002 This set of slides are developed and used by Prof. Han-Wei Shen at Ohio State University.
Hamiltonian Chaos and the standard map Poincare section and twist maps. Area preserving mappings. Standard map as time sections of kicked oscillator (link.
Kick-off Meeting, July 28, 2008 ONR MURI: NexGeNetSci Distributed Coordination, Consensus, and Coverage in Networked Dynamic Systems Ali Jadbabaie Electrical.
Computational Methods in Physics PHYS 3437
Lecture 13: Mapping Landmarks CS 344R: Robotics Benjamin Kuipers.
November 4, 2014Computer Vision Lecture 15: Shape Representation II 1Signature Another popular method of representing shape is called the signature. In.
Snakes - Active Contour Lecturer: Hagit Hel-Or
CS Peter Schröder Subdivision I: The Basic Ideas.
Advanced Computer Graphics (Spring 2005) COMS 4162, Lectures 18, 19: Monte Carlo Integration Ravi Ramamoorthi Acknowledgements.
Lecture 2: Numerical Differentiation. Derivative as a gradient
1 EE 616 Computer Aided Analysis of Electronic Networks Lecture 12 Instructor: Dr. J. A. Starzyk, Professor School of EECS Ohio University Athens, OH,
The infinitely complex… Fractals Jennifer Chubb Dean’s Seminar November 14, 2006 Sides available at
Towards SPFD-based Technology Mapping Algorithm Alan Mishchenko Portland State University October 17, 2000.
Dynamical Systems Analysis III: Phase Portraits By Peter Woolf University of Michigan Michigan Chemical Process Dynamics and Controls.
09/09/02 Dinesh Manocha, COMP258 Properties of Bezier Curves Invariance under affine parameter transformation P i B i,n (u) = P i B i,n ((u –a)/(b-a))
Revision.
Almost Invariant Sets and Transport in the Solar System
1 EE 616 Computer Aided Analysis of Electronic Networks Lecture 12 Instructor: Dr. J. A. Starzyk, Professor School of EECS Ohio University Athens, OH,
II. Towards a Theory of Nonlinear Dynamics & Chaos 3. Dynamics in State Space: 1- & 2- D 4. 3-D State Space & Chaos 5. Iterated Maps 6. Quasi-Periodicity.
CMSC 414 Computer and Network Security Lecture 6 Jonathan Katz.
1 Representing Curves and Surfaces. 2 Introduction We need smooth curves and surfaces in many applications: –model real world objects –computer-aided.
Conjugacy and Dynamics in Thompson’s Groups Jim Belk (joint with Francesco Matucci)
CS Subdivision I: The Univariate Setting Peter Schröder.
Chapter 16 Integration of Ordinary Differential Equations.
Composition Operators Associated with Linear Fractional Transformations in Complex Spaces Fiana Jacobzon, Simeon Reich and David Shoikhet ORT BRAUDE COLLEGE.
Lecture 7: Taylor Series Validity, Power Series, Vectors, Dot Products, and Cross Product.
Isosurface Extractions 2D Isocontour 3D Isosurface.
4.6 Numerical Integration Trapezoid and Simpson’s Rules.
Local and Local-Global Approximations Local algebraic approximations – Variants on Taylor series Local-Global approximations – Variants on “fudge factor”
1 Memory Management Memory Management COSC513 – Spring 2004 Student Name: Nan Qiao Student ID#: Professor: Dr. Morteza Anvari.
Robustness in Numerical Computation I Root Finding Kwanghee Ko School of Mechatronics Gwnagju Institute of Science and Technology.
On a Generalization of the GCD for Intervals in R + Stan BaggenJune 4, 2014 or how can a camera see at least 1 tone for unkown T exp.
The Analytic Continuation of the Ackermann Function What lies beyond exponentiation? Extending the arithmetic operations beyond addition, multiplication,
AP Calculus 2005: 240,000 Currently growing at ~13,000/year.
Applications of Neural Networks in Time-Series Analysis Adam Maus Computer Science Department Mentor: Doctor Sprott Physics Department.
too.
Tanja Magoč, François Modave, Xiaojing Wang, and Martine Ceberio Computer Science Department The University of Texas at El Paso.
1 Complex Images k’k’ k”k” k0k0 -k0-k0 branch cut   k 0 pole C1C1 C0C0 from the Sommerfeld identity, the complex exponentials must be a function.
What lies between + and  and beyond? H.P.Williams London School of Economics.
Today’s class Roots of equation Finish up incremental search
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 12: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
1 Challenge the future Chaotic Invariants for Human Action Recognition Ali, Basharat, & Shah, ICCV 2007.
Model-based learning: Theory and an application to sequence learning P.O. Box 49, 1525, Budapest, Hungary Zoltán Somogyvári.
Asymptotic behaviour of blinking (stochastically switched) dynamical systems Vladimir Belykh Mathematics Department Volga State Academy Nizhny Novgorod.
Application: Multiresolution Curves Jyun-Ming Chen Spring 2001.
1 Ch. 2: Getting Started. 2 About this lecture Study a few simple algorithms for sorting – Insertion Sort – Selection Sort (Exercise) – Merge Sort Show.
Introduction to Scientific Computing II Molecular Dynamics – Algorithms Dr. Miriam Mehl Institut für Informatik Scientific Computing In Computer Science.
Ordinary Differential Equations
Curve Simplification under the L 2 -Norm Ben Berg Advisor: Pankaj Agarwal Mentor: Swaminathan Sankararaman.
Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.
GENERAL THEOREMS,INCREASE AND DECRESE OF A FUNCTION,INEQUALITIES AND APPROXIMATIONS.
Date of download: 10/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis
Isosurface Extractions (II)
Set Oriented Numerical Methods for the
Dimension Review Many of the geometric structures generated by chaotic map or differential dynamic systems are extremely complex. Fractal : hard to define.
Chapter 2 ERROR ANALYSIS
Class Notes 19: Numerical Methods (2/2)
Calculus II (MAT 146) Dr. Day Wednesday May 2, 2018
MATH 175: Numerical Analysis II
By: Bahareh Taghizadeh
Complexity and Rea) Computation
TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY OF FIBRATIONS AND COVERING MAPS
10.4 Integrals with Discontinuous Integrands. Integral comparison test. Rita Korsunsky.
Computational Mechanics of ECAs, and Machine Metrics
Introduction to Scientific Computing II
Presentation transcript:

Approximation of Attractors Using the Subdivision Algorithm Dr. Stefan Siegmund Peter Taraba

What is an attractor? Attractor is a set A, which is Invariant under the dynamics attraction AB Example: Lorenz attractor

Subdivision Algorithm for computations of attractors Dellnitz, Hohmann 1.Subdivision step 2.Selection step

1. SELECTION STEP

2. SUBDIVISION STEP A

1.Subdivision step 2.Selection step In the Subdivision Algorithm we combine these two steps

Global Attractor A Let be a compact subset. We define the global attractor relative to by In general p q p,q – hyperbolic fixed points & heteroclinic connection Q is 1-time map

We can miss some boxes That’s why use of interval arithmetics (basic operations, Lohner algorithm, Taylor models) will ensure that we do not miss any box

Example – Lorenz attractor

Interval analysis Discrete maps work also with basic interval operations Lohner algorithm More complex continuous diff. eq. (Lorenz …) does not work well with Lohner Algorithm Taylor models with rotation without rotation Still too big, because we cannot integrate too long

Box dimension

Possible problems: 01 We have to take map or in continuous time enlarge There exist such such that we get only those boxes, which contain A hyperbolic

Disadvantage of this limit is that it converges slowly Method I

This approximation is usually better (converges faster) Method II

Why should we use Taylor models? 1. we will not miss any boxes, we will get rigorous covering of relative attractors 2. there is a hope we can get closer covering of attractor 3. we will get better approximation of dimension

2. there is a hope we can get closer covering of attractor Memory limitations Computation time limitation we can not continue in subdivision

3. we will get better approximation of dimension Wrapping effect of Taylor methods

Also

wrapping effect we are still not “completely close” to attractor condition not fulfilled Subdivision step Dimension Method II Method III