Simulation of electron beam halo in the Hall D tagger Richard Jones University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Advanced GAmma Tracking Array

Advertisements

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 Discussion of the detector material budget  What is the thickness of our inner detectors.

Diamond Radiator Assessment Report on the CHESS run May 1-7, 2009 Richard Jones, Igor Senderovich, Franz Klein, Pawel Nadel-Turonski GlueX collaboration.

Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.

Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.

Microscope Performance at elevated dark rates Richard Jones University of Connecticut collaboration GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, Feb. 2-4,

Active Collimator Test in Hall B Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting September ,

Beam Position Stabilization Using an Active Collimator in Hall D at Jefferson Lab Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration.

Electron Beam Simulation for GlueX Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration meeting April 27-29, 2006 presented by.

Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.

The Hall D Photon Beam Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Photon Beamline-Tagger ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged.

April 6th 2009Olympus Meeting at DESY, F.Brinker1 Vacuum system Available beam scraper Beam dimensions, Target cell Machine Studies on February 7 th 2009.

Photon Tagging in the Hall D Beamline James McIntyre University of Connecticut 13 May GlueX Graduate Student Workshop Newport News, VA.

GlueX Luminosity Limits Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, May 8-10, Design luminosity 2.Physics.

The GlueX Photon Beam Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Photon Beamline-Tagger ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged.

GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, October 25-27, 2007 GlueX Simulations Status Report Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News,

VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.

The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.

Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.

Tagging Near the End-Point Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, May 8-10, Current design capabilities.

6-5 The Central Limit Theorem

July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.

5/10/20101GlueX Col meeting, A. Gasparian1 The PrimEx HyCal Calorimeter A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC Outline  HyCal calorimeter.

GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.

The Hall D Photon Beam Overview Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagged Photon Beam ReviewNov , 2008, Newport News presented by GlueX.

Software Overview David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 26, 2007 David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 26, 2007.

Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.

Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.

MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.

GEANT Study of Electron ID and  0 Rejection for Containerized detectors Compare detectors in shipping containers to idealized continuous detector with.

The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.

PS Booster Studies with High Intensity Beams Magdalena Kowalska supervised by Elena Benedetto Space Charge Collaboration Meeting May 2014.

I.V. Bazarov, ERL advisory mtg, Sept 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS and Education (CLASSE)

R.T. Jones, Newport News, May The GlueX Simulation Framework GEANT4 Tutorial Workshop Newport News, May 22-26, 2006 R.T. Jones, UConn Monte Carlo.

August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.

PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)

LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.

Review of GlueX FCAL Design Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration meetingSept , Newport News as presented by Scott Teige,

Future Software Needs HDGeant4 project status MC simulation on the OSG Exploiting cheap GPUs for PWA Richard Jones – University of Connecticut GlueX Collaboration.

ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1 Primary vertex with TPC-only tracks Andrea Dainese INFN Legnaro Motivation: TPC stand-alone analyses.

EIC Compton detector update October 24 th 2014 Alexandre Camsonne.

ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.

Preliminary results for the BR(K S  M. Martini and S. Miscetti.

1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?

Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.

HDGeant4 Development Report major hurdles overcome in geometry geometry validation complete particles now tracking in magnetic field remaining milestones.

Hall D Tagger and Beamline Review, Nov , 2008, Newport News1 Question Question: How can you reliably extract the polarization of the collimated beam.

Proposal for the study to define what is really necessary and what is not when the data from beam, ND and SK are combined A.K.Ichikawa 2008/1/17.

Status of E14 G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. E14 Experiment Step-by-step approach to precise measurement of Br( K L    ) KEK-PS E391a J-PARC E14 (Step-1) J-PARC.

Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.

Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.

Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.

Tagger microscope beam test results and readiness for construction what we learned from construction of the prototype and the parasitic beam tests in Hall.

R. Miyamoto, MEBT Lattice Optimization, ESS AD Beam Physics Internal Review 1 MEBT Lattice Optimization Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) For Beam Physics Group,

ECAL Alignment with e and π data D. BOUMEDIENE LPC Clermont-Ferrand CALICE meeting – Argonne 19/03/2008.

Compton Data Analysis Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.

July Ops StayTreat: Transverse Emittance (T. Satogata)p. 1 Synchrotron Radiation Emittance Growth Arc focusing very flexible: separate power supplies.

Analysis of    production ► Data taking ► Reaction identification ► Results for double polarization observable F ► Summary Based on data taken in the.

DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.

Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.

Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac

Forward Tagger Simulations

Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo

Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC

Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation

B Tagging Efficiency and Mistag Rate Measurement in ATLAS

Report on p0 decay width: analysis updates

Injector Setup for G0 and HAPPEX & Lessons Learned

Studies on orbit corrections

CEPC Injector Linac beam dynamics

Presentation transcript:

Simulation of electron beam halo in the Hall D tagger Richard Jones University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007

Review GlueX electron beam requirements were documented in gluex-doc-646. CASA has compared these requirements with the 12 GeV machine design and identified two places where more study is required: 1.electron beam halo 2.vertical electron beam emittance we asked for (based on early CASA model)now it looks more like (current CASA model) 2.5 mm  r 10 mm  r 2.8 mm  r 5.6 mm  r

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, axis beam emittance spec. Vertical emittance directly affects the tagging efficiency, feeds into maximum rate compatible with tagging. The tagged beam parameters in the CDR assume  y is as good as the current CASA model says it can be! A detailed study is needed to show the impact of a larger vertical emittance on GlueX physics output. we asked for (based on early CASA model)now it looks more like (current CASA model) 2.5 mm  r 10 mm  r 2.8 mm  r 5.6 mm  r

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 New results on halo issue CASA has made available new results from a ray-tracing simulation of electrons in the 12 GeV machine.

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 GlueX sensitivity Original estimate (July, 2006) was based on some brutal assumptions regarding the shape of the halo. 1.uniformly distributed out to r = 25 mm 2.same energy, direction distribution as core beam Criterion was halo-related backgrounds in the tagging counters should contribute <1% to their rates. Result: CASA estimate: 3 · beyond ±5 mm boundary beyond the 5  ellipse

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 A new GlueX MC simulation CASA has now provided an estimate for the shape of the halo at the Hall D radiator crystal. Tasks for extracting a new tagger bg estimate: 1.create a 5-dimensional model for the halo 2.implement the model in a MC generator 3.couple the generator to the tagger simulation and run 4.extract normalized hit rates in the tagging counters f(x,y,p x,p y,p z )

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, scenarios machine element alignment error:  0.3 mm (very good)  0.6 mm (OK)  1.0 mm (not good)

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, scenarios actual measurements of transverse profile of the 6 GeV beam (Hall C, 5  a)

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, scenarios main consequence of misalignment is more halo 1.central core beam size is unchanged. 2.shape of the halo distribution is unchanged.

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, scenarios main consequence of misalignment is more halo 1.central core beam size is unchanged. 2.shape of the halo distribution is unchanged.

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, scenarios main consequence of misalignment is more halo 1.central core beam size is unchanged. 2.shape of the halo distribution is unchanged.

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 Compare “data” with model MC data from CASA ray-tracing simulation xy projection of 5d halo model (this study)

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 Compare “data” with model MC data from CASA ray-tracing simulation x  x projection of 5d halo model (this study)

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 Compare “data” with model MC data from CASA ray-tracing simulation y  y projection of 5d halo model (this study)

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 Comparison in projections MC data from CASA for the 0.3mm case GlueX model derived for the 0.3mm case

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 Comparison in projections MC data from CASA for the 0.3mm case GlueX model derived for the 0.3mm case

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 What has changed? truncation at r = 1.2 cm main change: truncation at r = 1.2 cm (m)

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 What has changed? truncation at r = 1.2 cm main change: truncation at r = 1.2 cm

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007 Results for 0.3 mm scenario

GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, scenarios factor of ~4 each step