Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment I: The System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Carolina’s Judicial Branch. Types of Crimes Misdemeanors: Less serious crimes. In NC misdemeanors carry less than 2 years in jail. Misdemeanors:
Advertisements

Structure of MS Government
NC Court System.
1. 2 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act First state in the nation to end felony sentencing for simple drug possession and low-level petty theft First.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Federal Courts Original Jurisdiction: Court hears cases for the first time. Appellate jurisdiction: Court hears cases on appeal, or cases that have.
California Politics, Summer 2002 [Click to advance] The Structure of California Government Legislative Branch Legislative Branch Executive Branch Executive.
The Judicial Branch Article III of the Constitution Judicial power
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
Supreme, Federal and State Court System 8 th Grade Social Studies LCJSMS Summit NJ 2013.
Judges and Courts Article V of the Texas Constitution describes the judiciary. This branch makes up the state’s court system. The Texas courts decide.
Georgia’s Judicial Branch. The state’s highest appellate jurisdiction court It is a court of review (Court for correction of errors of law – Not a trial.
GEORGIA’S JUDICIAL BRANCH SS8CG4 VOCABULARY. CIVIL LAW Involves disputes between individuals or groups of people. Typically, one group is seeking money.
The Judicial Branch November 10, 2014 Standard: SS8CG4
Texas and United States Governments
Warm Up: 11/26/12 Copy the following on a NEW notes page:
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges Law enforcement agencies Serves the purposes of: Supporting a system for the trial and punishment of.
Chapter 28.2 “The Judicial Branch of Texas”. The Judicial Branch is made up of courts and judges throughout the state.
 Standard The student with analyze the role of the Judicial Branch in the Georgia state government.  EQ How does the Georgia’s judicial system provide.
The Judicial System Interpreting the Law GA Studies.
 Which crimes were changed and how will those changes impact the State Courts?  How does the emphasis on the Accountability Courts movement affect prosecutors?
Unit 8 –Government Lessons 2, 3, and 4: Three Branches of Government Study Presentation Georgia Studies.
Unit 4– Judicial Branch in Georgia
The Judicial Branch.
State Government.
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
Chapter 12.4 The State Judicial Branch. Lower State Courts The state court system handles most of the nation’s legal matters. State courts interpret and.
Chapter 28-2: Texas Judicial Branch and Courts Systems
Georgia’s General Assembly  Meets each year for a 40 day session that starts the 2 nd Monday in January.  Can pass legislation on taxes, education, contracts,
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman.
10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt ABCDE.
The Courts What reporters need to know. Civil and criminal  Criminal law covers harms done against the people.  Examples: Murder, theft, reckless driving.
Judicial Branch Responsible for interpreting the laws of the state and making decisions or judgments on those interpretations.
 The United States has an adversarial court system. › This means that two opposing sides must argue their cases before a judge in order to find the truth.
Article III Judicial Branch. Rights of Individuals First amendment: Freedom of religion, assembly, petition, press, and speech Second amendment: Right.
North Carolina Judicial Branch Chapter 13 Section 3.
CHAPTER 15 Georgia Government Review. According to the constitution of Georgia where does power originate from?
1.REMAND: when a case is sent back to a lower court for retrial 2.Criminal Case: a law has been broken 3.Civil Case: a disagreement between two parties.
Chapter 28-2: Texas Courts Systems Guided Notes. Texas Judicial System A. Consists of : 1)Courts 2)Judges 3)Law enforcement agencies B. Serves the purposes.
Democracy and Constitutions The Texas System of Justice p
GEORGIA HISTORY 12/2/21012  INTRODUCTION TO: THE STATE LEVEL OF GEORGIA’S GOVERNMENT /CHAPTER 15 1) EXECUTIVE BRANCH 2) LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 3) JUDICIAL.
Texas Executive Branch Essential Questions: –Compare the principles and concepts of the Texas Constitution and U.S. Constitution –Describe the structure.
United States Texas The TEXAS Constitution says that our STATE government will also have Three Branches (Have had 7 Constitutions) EXECUTIVE BRANCH President.
North Carolina Courts. The Role of the Courts North Carolina courts resolve disputes, including lawsuits involving private disagreements, as well as criminal.
GEORGIA STUDIES GMAS REVIEW To assist you with key concepts and vocabulary.
The Court System in Texas
Government Governments are created to provide safety, order, and to serve the people. They depend on citizens taking active, responsible roles.
CRIME AND PUNISHMENT I: THE SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA COURTS.
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
The Legal System And The Law.
Legislative Branch Legislative Branch Senate House of Representatives
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
Legislative Branch Legislative Branch Senate House of Representatives
The Judicial Branch.
The nc court system.
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
The Judicial Branch November 10, 2014 Standard: SS8CG4
The Judicial Branch of Georgia’s Government
The State Judicial Branch
Government in Georgia.
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
Organization of NC State Courts
Lessons 2, 3, and 4: Three Branches of Government
Georgia Judicial System
Georgia’s Judicial Branch
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges
Georgia Studies Unit 8 – Judicial Branch in Georgia
Georgia’s Judicial System
Lessons 2, 3, and 4: Three Branches of Government
Presentation transcript:

Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment I: The System

Crime and Punishment I: The System How Criminal Justice Policy is Made Legislation by anecdote Initiatives lock in decisions How Justice Policy is Enforced Pyramid of courts Politics and the judicial branch Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave

How Criminal Justice Policy is Made Legislation by Anecdote. Key events that drive the news cycle often drive policy murder of Polly Klaas by two-time kidnapping convict Richard Allen Davis led to California’s “Three Strikes” law. Many gun control bills have been passed in the wake of mass shootings (Stockton playground led to assault rifle ban, Columbine led to gun-a-month).

How Criminal Justice Policy is Made In March, 1994, Assembly Bill 971 (Bill Jones and Jim Costa) passed 29-7 in the Senate and 63-9 in the Assembly. If a defendant has two prior convictions of violent or serious felonies, a third conviction of any felony automatically leads to a sentence of 25 years to life. A second conviction doubles your sentence. Predicted cost $2.8 billion for incarceration by 2003 and $21.3 billion in construction.

How Criminal Justice Policy is Made Locking in Decisions This legislative victory was locked in by the passage of Proposition 184 in the 1994 general election. It passed with 72% of the vote. Marc Klaas, Polly’s father, famously changed his position on the law when he learned of its scope. Bills to require that the third strike be serious or violent have failed.

How Justice Policy is Enforced Pyramid of Courts California Supreme Court – 7 Justices, 5,000 filings Courts of Appeal – 101 Justices, 20,000 filings Superior Courts – 789 Judges, 1 million filings Municipal Courts – 616 Judges, 16 million filings The People’s Court

How Justice Policy is Enforced Pyramid of Courts Municipal Courts hear misdemeanors and <$25,000 civil cases Misdemeanor convicts go to county jails for less than a year Superior Courts can hear felony cases and <$25,000 civil case Felony convicts go to state prisons for a year or more

How Justice Policy is Enforced Pyramid of Courts Appeals Courts and the Supreme Court do not hear the facts of the case, leaving this to the “trial courts,” and instead correct errors of law. Death penalty cases go straight to the Supreme Court on appeal. The Supreme Court also resolves open questions of law.

How Justice Policy is Enforced Politics and the Judicial Branch Appeals Court and Supreme Court justices are picked by the governor. Their selection must be confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, which has only rejected one (in 1940). When the justice’s term expires, voters in the state or appellate district have the chance to vote yes or no on the justice. Only three justices have ever lost.

How Justice Policy is Enforced Politics and the Judicial Branch Superior and Municipal Court judges either win an “open seat” (the old judge left when term expired) or are appointed by the governor (for a mid- term vacancy). In either case, there is an election at the end of the six year term. Any lawyer can run to fill the next term.

Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave #1. Transfer of discretion. Judges used to have broad discretion in making the punishment fit the crime. Under Three Strikes, district attorneys have the real discretion by deciding whether to charge a crime as a strike. Bowers (NYU Law Review) shows that San Francisco doesn’t charge nonviolent felonies as strikes, but San Diego leads the state in Three Strikes convictions.

Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave #2. There was a dramatic decrease in the crime rate during the 1990s. Advocates of Three Strikes point to deterrence and incarceration effects. Reduction may also result from drops in unemployment and the population proportion of year old males. Drop in counties like San Francisco equals drops in those like San Diego.

Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave #3. By 1999, 40,000 Californians were in prison on second strike charges, 5,000 for third strikes. This is 30% of the prison population, but not as large as expected. “Crimes against person” accounted for only 20% of second strike sentences and 40% of third strike cases. Primarily drug and property crimes.

Effects of the Tough on Crime Wave #4. Possible backlash against the sentence enhancements of early 90s. Proposition 215 (56%, 1996), the Medical Marijuana Act, allowed cultivation and possession of pot if doctor-recommended. Proposition 36 (61%, support 2000) mandated parole and drug treatment, but not incarceration, for those convicted of use or possession.

Discussion Questions Should we make policy by anecdote? If rejection of justices by the Commission on Judicial Appointment or by voters is so rare, do these apparent obstacles make a difference? What are the benefits and drawbacks of electing trial judges?