Broad-Band Observations of Large Scale Jets in AGNs Jun KATAOKA (Tokyo Inst. of Tech.) Cen A: “diffuse” X-ray.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radio and X-ray emission in radio-quiet quasars Katrien C. Steenbrugge, Katherine M. Blundell and Zdenka Kuncic Instituto de Astronomía, UCN Department.
Advertisements

Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in 2003/2004 Presented By Manasvita Joshi Ohio University, Athens, OH ISCRA, Erice, Italy 2006.
X-ray and optical detection of the radio bent jet in 3C 17 Radio Galaxies in the Chandra Era F. Massaro & D. E. Harris, M. Chiaberge, P. Grandi, F. D.
Multi-Wavelength Polarizations of Western Hotspot of Pictor A Mahito Sasada (Kyoto University) S. Mineshige (Kyoto Univ.), H. Nagai (NAOJ), M. Kino (JAXA),
Particle acceleration in active galaxies – the X-ray view Martin Hardcastle (U. Herts) Thanks to many co-authors including Ralph Kraft (CfA), Judith Croston.
Active Galactic Nuclei Very small angular size: point like High luminosity: compared to host galaxies Broad-band continuum emission: radio to TeV Strong.
24-28 October 2005 Elena Belsole University of Bristol Distant clusters of Galaxies Ringberg Workshop X-ray constraints on cluster-scale emission around.
X-ray synchrotron radiation and particle acceleration Martin Hardcastle University of Bristol, UK with Diana Worrall & Mark Birkinshaw (Bristol), Dan Harris.
Radio Galaxies in X-Ray Light: Problems and Processes Dave De Young NOAO Radio Galaxies in the Chandra Era 8-11 July 2008.
Comparing the Jets in M87 & 3C273 D. E. Harris, SAO Biretta, Cheung, Jester, Junor, Marshall, Perlman, Sparks, & Wilson.
VLBI Imaging of a High Luminosity X-ray Hotspot Leith Godfrey Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics Australian National University Geoff Bicknell,
A Radio and X-ray Study of Particle Acceleration in Centaurus A’s Jet Joanna Goodger University of Hertfordshire Supervisors: Martin Hardcastle and Judith.
Svetlana Jorstad Connection between X-ray and Polarized Radio Emission in the Large-Scale Jets of Quasars.
July 4, 2006 P. Padovani, Unidentified  -ray Sources 1 The Blazar Sequence: Validity and Predictions Paolo Padovani (ESO) Blazar properties The Blazar.
Jets in Low Power Compact Radio Galaxies Marcello Giroletti Department of Astronomy, University of Bologna INAF Institute of Radio Astronomy & G. Giovannini.
Centaurus A Kraft, Hardcastle, Croston, Worrall, Birkinshaw, Nulsen, Forman, Murray, Goodger, Sivakoff,Evans, Sarazin, Harris, Gilfanov, Jones X-ray composite.
XMM results in radio-galaxy physics Judith Croston CEA Saclay, Service d’Astrophysique EPIC consortium meeting, Ringberg, 12/04/05.
The Long, Bright Extended X-ray Jet of OJ287 Alan Marscher & Svetlana Jorstad Boston University Research Web Page:
Astrophysical Jets Robert Laing (ESO). Galactic black-hole binary system Gamma-ray burst Young stellar object Jets are everywhere.
Models for non-HBL VHE Gamma-Ray Blazars Markus Böttcher Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA “TeV Particle Astrophysics” SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, July 13 – 17,
Moderator: Mitch Begelman Panelists: Stefi Baum Katherine Blundell Greg Madejski Paul Nulsen Łukasz Stawarz WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
Numerical Simulations of FRI jets Manel Perucho Pla Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie and J.M. Martí (Universitat de València)
Extragalactic Jets and GLAST Łukasz Stawarz KIPAC, Stanford University.
Cosmic Rays Discovery of cosmic rays Local measurements Gamma-ray sky (and radio sky) Origin of cosmic rays.
Radio lobes of Pictor A: an X-ray spatially resolved study G.Migliori(1,2,3), P.Grandi(2), G.C.G.Palumbo(1), G.Brunetti(4), C.Stanghellini(4) (1) Bologna.
Theory of TeV AGNs (Buckley, Science, 1998) Amir Levinson, Tel Aviv University.
Multi-wavelength AGN spectra and modeling Paolo Giommi ASI.
Radio-loud AGN energetics with LOFAR Judith Croston LOFAR Surveys Meeting 17/6/09.
The quasar PKS : Direct evidence for a changing orientation of the central engine. John Wardle (Brandeis), Dan Homan (NRAO), C. C. Cheung & Dave.
The luminous X-ray hotspot in 4C 74.26: jet dynamics at work Mary Erlund Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge, UK A.C. Fabian, K.M. Blundell, C. Moss and.
Jet/environment interactions in FR-I and FR-II radio galaxies Judith Croston with Martin Hardcastle, Mark Birkinshaw and Diana Worrall.
The jet of Mrk 501 from millions of Schwarzschild radii down to a few hundreds Marcello Giroletti INAF Istituto di Radioastronomia and G. Giovannini, G.
Blazars and Neutrinos C. Dermer (Naval Research Laboratory) Collaborators: A. M. Atoyan (Universite de Montreal) M. Böttcher (Rice University) R. Schlickeiser.
High energy Astrophysics Mat Page Mullard Space Science Lab, UCL 6. Jets and radio emission.
Extended X-ray Emissions from the Radio Galaxies Centaurus B and Fornax A Makoto Tashiro 1, Naoki Isobe 2, Masaya Suzuki 1 Kouichi Ito 1, Keiichi Abe 1,
Hirotaka Ito Waseda University Collaborators Motoki Kino SISSA ISAS/JAXA ISS Science Project Office Naoki Isobe ISAS/JAXA ISS Science Project Office Nozomu.
Helically Twisted Shocks in the M87 Jet Philip Hardee 1, Andrei Lobanov 2 & Jean Eilek 3 1 The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA 2 Max-Planck.
Lunch discussion on motivations for studying blazar variability Greg Madejski, SLAC Parts of this presentation use slides by Benoit Lott and Jun Kataoka.
Quasar large scale jets: Fast and powerful or weak and slow, but efficient accelerators? Markos Georganopoulos 1,2 1 University of Maryland, Baltimore.
1 Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland (Stern, Poutanen, 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1217; Stern, Poutanen, 2007, MNRAS, submitted, astro- ph/ ) A new.
Acceleration and Energy Transport in the AGN jets: from sub-pc to kpc scale Jun Kataoka Tokyo Institute of Technology - Acceleration site in the universe.
Magnetic fields and particle content in FRII radio sources Judith Croston CEA Saclay, Service d’Astrophysique, France URJA2005, Banff, 12 th July 2005.
Radio galaxy Elliptical Fanaroff-Riley type I “Misaligned” BL Lac (~ 60  ) Distance 3.5 Mpc Parameter Value  (J2000) 201   (J2000) -43 
Broadband Properties of Blazars
3D Crab Model and comparison with Chandra result Pulsar Wind Nebulae and Particle Acceleration in the Pulsar Magnetosphere Shibata, S., Tomatsuri, H.,
BL LAC OBJECTS Marco Bondi INAF-IRA, Bologna, Italy.
Probing the Inner Jet of the Quasar PKS 1510  089 with Multi-waveband Monitoring Alan Marscher Boston University Research Web Page:
Multi-Zone Modeling of Spatially Non-uniform Cosmic Ray Sources Armen Atoyan Concordia University, Montreal FAA60 Barcelona, 7 November 2012.
Jets Two classes of jets from X-ray binaries
Jet-Environment Interactions in FRI Radio Galaxies Robert Laing (ESO)
The Quasar : A Laboratory for Particle Acceleration Svetlana Jorstad IAR, Boston U Alan Marscher IAR, Boston U Jonathan Gelbord U. Durham Herman.
Modeling the Emission Processes in Blazars Markus Böttcher Ohio University Athens, OH.
Galaxies with Active Nuclei Chapter 14:. Active Galaxies Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei (pl. of nucleus).  “active galactic.
ICRR 17/9/2001 Gamma-ray emission from AGN Qinghuan Luo School of Physics, University of Sydney.
AGN: Linear and Circular Polarization
Fermi LAT Discovery of Gamma-rays from the Giant Radio Lobes of Centaurus A C.C. Teddy Cheung (NRC/NRL) Lukasz Stawarz (ISAS/JAXA) Yasushi Fukazawa (Hiroshima)
VHE  -ray Emission From Nearby FR I Radio Galaxies M. Ostrowski 1 & L. Stawarz 1,2 1 Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University 2 Landessternwarte.
Abstract We present multiwavelength imaging and broad-band spectroscopy of the relativistic jets in the two nearby radio galaxies 3C 371 and PKS ,
Jets at different scales and the connection with accretion L. Maraschi and F.Tavecchio INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera.
Multi - emission from large-scale jets Fabrizio Tavecchio INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera.
A new model for emission from Microquasar jets Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) In collaboration with Piergiorgio Casella (Southampton) March 2010.
A deep view of the iron line and spectral variability in NGC 4051 James Reeves Collaborators:- Jane Turner, Lance Miller, Andrew Lobban, Valentina Braito,
C.C. Teddy Cheung NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and Eureka Scientific Inc.* Radio Galaxies in the Chandra Era 8 July 2008 *Chandra.
A smoothed hardness map of the hotspots of Cygnus A (right) reveals previously unknown structure around the hotspots in the form of outer and inner arcs.
Radio Loud and Radio Quiet AGN
Gamma Rays from the Radio Galaxy M87
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)
How to classify a Gamma -ray source as a Blazar
The origin nuclear X-ray emission in the nuclei of radio galaxy-FR Is
Presentation transcript:

Broad-Band Observations of Large Scale Jets in AGNs Jun KATAOKA (Tokyo Inst. of Tech.) Cen A: “diffuse” X-ray

Outline  Brief introduction Multiband study of large-scale jets. Toward nature of “bright” X-ray jets Sub-pc to Mpc connection (from “blazars” to “Rad Gal”) Comparative study of knots, hotsopts, and lobes Observation of jet structures Non-standard Sync emission and acceleration Merits/demerits of beamed IC/CMB Jet contents

AGN Jet: introduction B.Hsub-pckpc ~ Mpc low power (FRI, BL Lac) high power (FRII, QSO) Blazars (small  ) radio galaxies (large  )  Viewing angle is a key to identify various classes in AGNs.  Blazars’ emission come from the most inner part of the jet, via the internal-shock in sub-pc jet.  Large scale jets in powerful radio galaxies (FR II/QSO) extend to Mpc scale: internal and/or external-shock ?

Direct measurement via superluminal motion  jet > (   app +1) 1/2 X-ray GeV  TeV  optical ERC SSC LEHE LE peak (synchrotron) HE peak (Inv. Comp) “Well-defined” double peaks over two decades in freq. u e and u B can be determined uniquely, by comparing LE/HE B ~ 0.1 G, R ~ 0.01 pc,  jet ~ 10, u e ~ 10 u B superluminal motion Rapid time variability as short as 1 day: R ~ ct var  “Blazar” region (sub-pc~ pc jet) Kubo+ 98 JK 00

Radio Gal. (kpc~Mpc jet) Proper motions are often difficult to observe. Smooth Sync between radio and optical. Parameters degenerate as L sync ∝ u e u B V. Lack of variability prevent us imagine size of distant sources. Pictor-A 3C273 3C123 3C33 radio optical radio optical radio  where  ~ R =  cos   cos  2+  Jet/c-jet provides only weak constraint (e.g.,  jet ~ 2 for M87). Physics of kpc/Mpc jets are much more unclear! jet c-jet

Why large scale jets important? L kin ~  R 2 c   jet (u e + u B ) L rad ~ 4  R 2 c (u B + u rad ) L kin L rad    BLK 1   Only ~ 1% of kinetic energy would be converted into radiation in sub-pc jet, as also implied from an internal shock scenario.  An ideal laboratory for jet interaction, heating, and large-scale structure formation of hotspots and lobes. Chandra : Wilson+ 00 Jet model : Begelman & Cioffi 89 FR II (Cygnus A) hotspot Jet-knot hotspot Jet-knot Recent X-ray observations adds NEW clues to jet physics!

ホット スポット ノット ローブ radio optical X-ray M87 (FR-I) X-ray jets: Data Sample 44 radio galaxies detected with Chandra/XMM by Dec (see by D.Harris for mosthttp://hea- recent information. # of detected source reached to 75 as of June 2006!) radio X-ray 3C219(FR-II) 56 jet-knots, 24 hotspots, 18 radio lobes (ASCA+SAX). 13 FR-I, 13 FR-II, 14 QSOs, 4 blazars. Nearest: Cen A (z = ), Farthest: GB1508 (z = 4.3) Marshall+ 02; Comastri and many !

Radio-to-X-ray Comparison xx RR 5GHz 1keV knot hotspot lobe  5GHz spectral index  R ≈ A “canonical” Sync. spectrum. 1keV spectral index  x ≈ High-E end of Synchrotron (FR-I) “beamed “IC/CMB” or SSC? radio X-ray M87 (FR-I) (QSO/blazar) 3C273 (QSO/blazar) syncIC/CMB? e.g., Tavecchio+ 00, Celotti+01

“Beamed” IC/CMB : Method knot hotspot lobe L 1keV /L 5GHz 1 Prediction for B eq,  =1 Rel. beaming radio X-ray F  Too bright X-ray jet-knots could be explained by considering an appropriate beaming factor as L IC/CMB ∝  3 or L SSC ∝  -5/2.  Calculate “expected” X-ray fluxes for IC/CMB (or SSC for hotspots) production of X-rays in a homogenous region, under u e = u B. JK + Stawartz 05  Only jet-knots are bright in X-rays, in the sense L 1keV /L 5GHz > 1. We expect that...

Beamed IC/CMB : Results 0.1 Beaming factor  jet-knot hotspot lobe Magnetic field B eq  G  Distribution of B eq that can reproduce the radio/X-ray luminosities. B-field is significantly enhanced in the hotspot? JK+Stawartz 05 (also Hardcastle+04, Croston+05) For the hotspots and radio lobe,  1 is expected, as expected from the “terminal point” of the jet. (assumption of u e = u B is valid.)  10 required  10 required for most of the jet-knots. Maybe jets are relativistic even on kpc-Mpc scales? also see, Sambruna+04

Warning Signal (1) : beaming? PKS0637, 3C273 Not only powerful QSOs ( e.g.,PKS0637, 3C273 ), but also several FR-II Pictor AWilson+ 01, 3C303; JK+ 03 etc … jets are “bright” in X-rays (Pictor A; Wilson+ 01, 3C303; JK+ 03 etc …). The X-ray enhancement due to relativistic beaming is hardly expected, as viewing angles of FR II are generally large! If we give up “u e ~ u B ” assumption, the magnetic field must be as small as B ~ 0.01 B eq, meaning that u e ~ 10 8 u B for extreme cases!  jet = 30  jet = 10  jet =  [deg] Beaming factor   = 10 blazarsRadio galaxies Wilson+ 01 “bright” X-ray jets in FR-II Pictor A

prediction from IC/CMB:  u CMB (1+z) 4  2 “Distant jets should be brighter in X-rays” L 1keV /L 5GHz Redsft: z LXLX LRLR Warning Signal (2) : z-dependence? No such trend ?… large variations even in same objects. JK & Stawarz 05, see also Marshall+ 05 ( e.g., Hardcastle 06) “deceleration” ?, but many difficulties! ( e.g., Hardcastle 06)

Warning Signal (3) : offset? Many jet sources show “offsets” between radio and X-ray peaks, in most cases, X-ray peak intensities “precede” the radio. Siemiginowska+ 02 PKS Reality of one-zone model? (different jet structure?) X-rays emission process other than IC/CMB? offset Hardcastle+ 03 Cen A radioX-ray

Warning Signal (4) : jet speed? From the optical/radio measurements of jet/c-jet ratios in sub-pc/kpc scale jet, most probable values for the jet speed and inclination are: Scarpa & Urry 02 Giovannini+ 01 Wardle & Aaron 97,  = ,  20 deg  jet ≲ 5,  a few Even powerful QSO jets may NOT so fast on kpc-Mpc scales! Optical jetRadio jet

Stratified Jet? : IC/CMB Model High  (spine) Low  (layer) X-ray (IC) radio (Sync) Two-zone jet models (e.g., Celotti+ 01): “fast spine” + “slow layer (sheath)”. Not only CMB, but emission from slow layer contributes as “seed photons”. However…. X-ray spectra significantly softer than radio. in order to reproduce 3C273 knot-A,  spine ~ ! (see, Jester+ 06) Basic idea: slow layer fast spine Radio (sync) X-ray (inv Comp  Spine Layer radio X-ray freq F

3C120: “Non-standard” Sync ? Harris+ 04  Convex X-ray spectrum for k25.  Difficult to explain either by  conventional Sync or IC/CMB (Harris, Mossman, Walker 04)  model! (Harris, Mossman, Walker 04)

spitzer “New” Evidence for “Sync X-ray Jet”  IR imaging of the jet of 3C 273 by SPITZER clearly confirms that the optical jet emission is dominated by the 2 nd, high E component.  Both the radio and optical components are linearly polarized to a similar degree of ~ 15%, most likely Sync in origin.  Due to a smooth connection between optical and X-rays, X-ray jet is possibly Sync in nature (leptonic? hardronic? still under debate!) Uchiyama+ 06, poster #49

Sync X-ray bump in KN regime? Assuming electrons lose energy predominantly due to IC radiation. Dermer & Atoyan 02, Moderski+ 05   KN  max N(  ) Un-cooled electrons IC cross section reduces significantly in the KN regime compared to a canonical d  /dt ∝  -2 relation. Very high energy electrons,  KN  <  <  max, do not cool effectively, that may result in a “characteristic bump” observed in X-rays.

Turbulent Acceleration?  Accel. process in layer is quite different. t esc /t cool ~ 10 7 (B 100  G ) 3 (l 100pc ) 2  -1 where  = U B /U T Ostrowski 00, Stawarz & Ostrowski 02  If field is very turbulent  ~ 1 , electrons “pile-up” as it never escape from the region.  N(   max t acc ~ 3 e c c VAVAVAVA2 t esc ~ 3 L VAVAVAVA 2 e c ~ 5x10 9  8 B  V -2 A,8 [s] ~ 5x10 9  8 B  V -2 A,8 [s] ~ 6x10 15  8 -1 B 100  L 2 100pc [s] observed hump in X-rays? different spectra in spine/layer. spine layer  Again, stratified jet! – “spine” + “layer”. CR

Stratified Jet : Radio Observation of 3C353 3C353 A B  VLA observation of FR-II radio galaxy 3C353 at 8.4 GHz. “Flat topped” total intensity profile. The polarization “rails” at the edges of jets. (result from vector cancellation between polarized jet emission and orthogonally polarized lobe emission?) emission and orthogonally polarized lobe emission?)  Most of the jet emission comes from a thick outer layer, rather than the fast spine? 8.4GHz total polarized Angular distance (“) Swain+ 98 AB

M87 : Jet Launching Site ~ 30 R g  VLBI observations of M87: evidence for Jet formation, and collimation at ~ R g scales. Jet are formed by an accretion disk?  Another important discovery: evidence for “limb-brightening” in jets even at sub-pc scale. Junor+ 99

Diffuse + knots Diffuse only Diffuse X-ray Emission of Cen-A Jet  A deep Chandra observation of Centaurus A. JK+ 06, see also Hardcastle 03 Nearest AGN (d L = 3.4Mpc, 1” = 18 pc). An ideal laboratory for investigating the transverse jet structure.  41 jet-knots of 0.5”~4” size were detected and REMOVED. “Holes” after removing the jet-knots were interpolated by surrounding pixels. Finally obtain an X-ray jet image for DIFFUSE emission only.

Some fraction of extended emission may be explained by the pile-up of small scale knots. biased region N(>L) ∝ L -0.5 (L < L brk ) L -1.4 (L > L brk ) L total =  N(>L) dL L min L max L tota l < 8.1x10 38 erg/s …… vs. X-ray Jet total : L jet = 1.6 x10 39 erg/s Diffuse or Unresolved? Need Log-N/Log-S study! “Really diffuse” emission accounts for ~50% of total luminosity. Unresolved small scale knots should be < 20 %. L X-ray (erg/s) log N(>L) JK+ 06

Transverse Profile of X-ray Jet 20° 50° 50” 80”  =36° JK+ 06 Jet center  Clear detection of “double-horn” structure in the transverse direction.  Hints of extremely hard spectra at very edges of the jet?  Spectral index is almost uniform across/along the jet,  X ~ 1. already modified by sync loss, while cooling time is very short; t syn ~ 20 B -3/2 E -1/2 [yr] Need for cont. accel. over jet volume! 100  10keV

 spine  layer  ~ 50° observer  spine =1.3  spine =3  spine =5 IF limb-brightening of the diffuse X-ray emission is (1) due to the varying Doppler enhancements, and (2) emissivity is uniform along the jet, we obtain  layer ~ 1/sin  ~ 1.3, where  ~ 50deg is the jet viewing angle. Stratified X-ray Jet in Cen A? To reproduce the observed “double-horn” structure,  spine > 3   layer =1.3 Oversimplified assumption, but consistent with stratified jet scenario.

Jet Content (1) In both hotspots & lobes, we expect u e ~ u B. Even for jet-knots, u e >> u B is NOT required, as long as giving up IC/CMB scenario. Hardcastle & Worrall 00 Thermal pressure [pa] Min. pressure [pa] over pressured Lobe length (kpc) Thermal P/non-th P over pressured Indeed. studies of pressure balance within the lobes suggest P thermal > P non-th, meaning significant contribution of hidden protons. This is, however, NOT exclusively to leptonic jet!

Jet Content (2) IF jets are moving with relativistic speed at kpc-Mpc scale  BLK ~ 10  “bulk-Comp” of CMB photons is expected just in IR band. Uchiyama+ 05 NOT observed for PKS … Beamed IC/CMB invalid? pure e - e + jet unfavorable? Sikora & Madejski 00 (see the discussion in Sikora & Madejski 00 for Blazars)

Summary Recent observations confirm that almost all jet structures (jet-knots, hotspots, lobes) are strong “X-ray emitters”. Lobes and hotspots well support an assumption of u e ~ u B, whereas “too bright” X-ray jets challenge a conventional, one-zone IC/CMB. Indeed, various evidence for “non-standard” spectra and “stratified jets” are being obtained very recently. These observations more strongly favor Sync origin of X-ray emission, and these may be related with an  “exotic” particle acceleration in jet boundary shear layer.