1 Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith. 2 Main obstacle to integrating genetic and EHR data No facility for dealing with time and instances (particulars)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Five Steps to Interoperability (in the domain of scientific ontology) Barry Smith.
Advertisements

Upper Ontology Summit Tuesday March 14 The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center.
Upper Ontology Summit Wednesday March 15 The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National.
Ontological analysis of the semantic types Anand Kumar MBBS, PhD IFOMIS, University of Saarland, Germany. BIOMEDICALONTOLOGYBIOMEDICALONTOLOGY.
Representing Part Relationships Between Developing Structures.
Who am I Gianluca Correndo PhD student (end of PhD) Work in the group of medical informatics (Paolo Terenziani) PhD thesis on contextualization techniques.
Earth to Major Tom Barry Smith
1 ANATOMY AND TIME Barry Smith. 2 SNAP AND SPAN 3 To understand relations between universals Reference to times and instances are important A derives.
1 An Ontology of Relations for Biomedical Informatics Barry Smith 10 January 2005.
The Role of Foundational Relations in the Alignment of Biomedical Ontologies Barry Smith and Cornelius Rosse.
1 Beyond Concepts Barry Smith
FMA: a domain reference ontology Comments on Cornelius Rosse’s talk Anita Burgun WG6 meeting, Rome 29 Apr- 2 May 2005.
Thomas Bittner and Barry Smith IFOMIS (Saarbrücken) Normalizing Medical Ontologies Using Basic Formal Ontology.
On the Application of Formal Principles to Life Science Data: A Case Study in the Gene Ontology Barry Smith * Jacob Köhler † Anand Kumar * *
Underlying Ontologies for Biomedical work - The Relation Ontology (RO) and Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) Thomas Bittner SUNY Buffalo
1 Logical Tools and Theories in Contemporary Bioinformatics Barry Smith
AN INTRODUCTION TO BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGY Barry Smith University at Buffalo 1.
Phenotype annotation using ontologies Chris Mungall (+ BS) Berkeley Bioinformatics and Ontologies Project (BBOP) National Center for Biomedical Ontology.
Tutorial on Ontology Design Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters.
1 BIOLOGICAL DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES & BASIC FORMAL ONTOLOGY Barry Smith.
1 Ontologies in Biomedicine: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly Barry Smith
1 A General Introduction to Biomedical Ontology Barry Smith
Anatomical Information Science Barry Smith
1 The OBO Relation Ontology Genome Biology 2005, 6:R46 based on the fundamental distinction between instances and universals takes instances and time into.
How to Organize the World of Ontologies Barry Smith 1.
Ifomis.org 1 Biomedical Ontology in Saarbrücken Barry Smith
The Logic of Biological Classification Barry Smith March 2004.
Ontological Foundations for Biomedical Sciences Stefan Schulz, Kornél Markó, Udo Hahn Workshop on Ontologies and their Applications, September 28, 2004,
1 Part III.The OBO Foundry Project: Towards Scientific Standards and Principles-Based Coordination in Biomedical Ontology Development.
1 How Ontologies Create Research Communities Barry Smith
Son of SN Barry Smith. The Virtues of Single Inheritance (= True Hierarchy) better coding clearer instructions better automatic reasoning better definitions.
From Knowledge Representation to Reality Representation Barry Smith.
1 The Future of Clinical Bioinformatics: Overcoming Obstacles to Information Integration Barry Smith Brussells, Eurorec Ontology Workshop, 25 November.
Semantic Relations in the Environmental Domain Gerhard Budin.
Standardization of Anatomy Parts and Wholes – From Function to Location Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany)
Linking Diseases and Genes through Informatics Knowledge Bases and Ontologies Joyce A. Mitchell, Ph.D. National Library of Medicine University of Missouri.
1 Semantic Network (SN) and Biomedical Ontology Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information.
Core 6 (University at Buffalo) Dissemination of Ontology Best Practices Barry Smith (PI) Fabian Neuhaus (Post-Doc) Werner.
1 HL7 RIM Barry Smith
Ontology of Disease and the OBO Foundry Chris Mungall NCBO GO Nov 2006.
Ontological Foundations of Biological Continuants Stefan Schulz, Udo Hahn Text Knowledge Engineering Lab University of Jena (Germany) Department of Medical.
Sharing Ontologies in the Biomedical Domain Alexa T. McCray National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Department of Health & Human Services.
1 How to Build an Ontology Barry Smith
2 3 where in the body ? where in the cell ?
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith 1.
D4FF55A0-6B6F BF422A9BA9 Present by: Xiao Chen On December 7, 2015.
Approach to building ontologies A high-level view Chris Wroe.
PATO and TO Barry Smith. HP: ! tachycardia =def. Process: GO: cardiac muscle contraction Quality: PATO: increased rate HP = Human.
1 The OBO Relation Ontology: Preliminaries Barry Smith
1 The Logic of Biological Classification Barry Smith
Big Data that might benefit from ontology technology, but why this usually fails Barry Smith National Center for Ontological Research 1.
Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith August 26, 2013.
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
Upper Ontology Summit The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center for Ontological Research National.
1 Simple Rules for a Tool and Data Ontology Barry Smith.
Ifomis.org 1 Ontology and Its Applications II Barry Smith
Ontology III Cristian Cocos (CLIStFX). Recap What Why (interoperability, “Tower of Babel,” the problem of “human idiosyncrasy”) Upper-Level Ontology,
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U Discovery Seminar /UE 141 MMM – Spring 2008 Solving Crimes using Referent.
Introduction to Ontology Introductions Alan Ruttenberg Science Commons.
1 The Future of (Biomedical) Ontology: Overcoming Obstacles to Information Integration Barry Smith (IFOMIS) Manchester
1 Standards and Ontology Barry Smith
What is an ontology and Why should you care?
UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS (UMLS)
Co-Champions: Ram D. Sriram (NIST) Leo Obrst (MITRE)
Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith.
Ontological analysis of the semantic types
Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith.
Standardization of Anatomy Parts and Wholes – From Function to Location Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany)
Standardization of Anatomy Parts and Wholes – From Function to Location Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany)
Semantic Network (SN) and Biomedical Ontology
Presentation transcript:

1 Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith

2 Main obstacle to integrating genetic and EHR data No facility for dealing with time and instances (particulars) in current ontologies

3 Why not? Because ontologies are about word meanings (‘concepts’, ‘conceptualizations’) cf. dictionaries

4 meningitis is_a disease of the nervous system unicorn is_a one-horned mammal A is_a B =def. ‘A’ is more specific in meaning than ‘B’

5 UMLS-SN: Bacterium causes Experimental model of disease HL7: Individual Allele is_a Act of Observation GO: Menopause part_of Death

6 Biomedical ontology integration will never be achieved through integration of meanings or concepts the problem is precisely that different user communities use different concepts

7 Idea: move from associative relations between meanings to strictly defined relations between the entities themselves

8 Foundational Model of Anatomy

9 The Gene Ontology Open source Cross-Species Components, Processes, Functions No logical structure Highly error-prone But: NOT trans-granular No relation time or instances

10 New GO / OBO Reform Effort OBO = Open Biomedical Ontologies

11 New OBO Relation Ontology suite of relations for biomedical ontology Consistency with the Relation Ontology now criterion for admission to OBO ontology library Under review by Genome Biology

12 The concept approach can’t cope at all with relations like part_of = def. composes, with one or more other physical units, some larger whole contains =def. is the receptacle for fluids or other substances

13 Key idea To define ontological relations like part_of, develops_from it is not enough to look just at classes / types: we need also to take account of instances and time (= link to Electronic Health Record)

14 Kinds of relations : is_a, part_of,... : this explosion instance_of the class explosion : Mary’s heart part_of Mary

15 part_of for component classes is time-indexed A part_of B =def. given any particular a and any time t, if a is an instance of A at t, then there is some instance b of B such that a is an instance-level part_of b at t

16 C c at t C 1 c 1 at t 1 C' c' at t derives_from (ovum, sperm  zygote... ) time instances

17 transformation_of c at t 1 C c at t C 1 time same instance pre-RNA  mature RNA child  adult

18 transformation_of C 2 transformation_of C 1 =def. any instance of C 2 was at some earlier time an instance of C 1

19 C c at t c at t 1 C 1 embryological development

20 C c at t c at t 1 C 1 tumor development

21 The Granularity Gulf most existing data-sources are of fixed, single granularity many (all?) clinical phenomena cross granularities

22 transformation_of C c at t c at t 1 C 1

23 Not only relations we applied the same methodology to other top-level categories in ontology, e.g. process function boundary act, observation tissue, membrane, sequence

24 Advantages of the methodology of enforcing commonly accepted coherent definitions promote quality assurance (better coding) guarantee automatic reasoning across ontologies and across data at different granularities yields direct connection to times and instances in EHR