Web-based Transdisciplinary Training: Problem Solving and Response to Intervention Presented to Nebraska RtI Consortium February 23, 2007 Kathy L. Bradley-Klug,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Instructional Decision Making
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Campus Improvement Plans
Goose Creek CISD Response to Intervention Training Part I.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Special Education Administration at a Crossroads: Training Special and General Education Administrators to Provide Educational Programming for All Students.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
project DATA. Agenda Entry task Welcome and introductions project DATA –Background –Purpose and.
AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
The Individual Development Plan: Promoting Professional Dispositions in Preservice Teacher Preparation Presented by: Gregg Gassman, Southern Oregon University.
TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
+ What DL Support Services are available for Minnesota ABE? Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Teaming with Kansas: An Early Childhood Personnel Development Partnership Kansas Technical Assistance System Network ( TASN) Quarterly Meeting February.
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida PS/RtI Train the Trainers Regional Meetings.
Goose Creek CISD Special Education Districtwide Staff Development Conference February 15, 2013.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
DECEMBER 19, 2013 PRESENTATION TO THE TRSD SCHOOL BOARD Timberlane District Action Plans.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Response to Intervention: Core Components and Resources Related to Implementation Marie Fisher March 3, 2012.
Problem Solving and RtI ASCA Conference Denver, 2007 Rich Downs School Counseling Consultant Student Support Services Project Florida Department of Education.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
2013 Common Block Development Evaluation and Feedback February 26, 2014.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
 Developing a State Model for Student Support Services Personnel Evaluations Bureau of Exceptional Education & Student Services & Division of Educator.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Amendments to the District ESE Policy and Procedures that outline Virtual education guidelines appear in blue. "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding."
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Response to Intervention
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
February 21-22, 2018.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

Web-based Transdisciplinary Training: Problem Solving and Response to Intervention Presented to Nebraska RtI Consortium February 23, 2007 Kathy L. Bradley-Klug, Ph.D. University of South Florida

Overview of Presentation Background & Development of the Training Background & Development of the Training Description of the Training Module Description of the Training Module Overview of the Website Overview of the Website Outcomes of the Training Outcomes of the Training Institutionalizing the Training Institutionalizing the Training Future Directions Future Directions

Background & Development of the Training Developed in response to the Florida State Improvement Grant Request for Application Developed in response to the Florida State Improvement Grant Request for Application To develop a transdisciplinary preservice training module on response to intervention To develop a transdisciplinary preservice training module on response to intervention To create a training module in the Fall of 2005 and pilot module in Spring 2006 To create a training module in the Fall of 2005 and pilot module in Spring 2006

Preservice Programs Involved School Psychology School Psychology School Counseling School Counseling Social Work Social Work

Problem Solving A process that uses the skills of professionals from different disciplines to develop and evaluate intervention plans that improve significantly the school performance of students A process that uses the skills of professionals from different disciplines to develop and evaluate intervention plans that improve significantly the school performance of students

Problem Solving: What It Is and Is Not What it is…. What it is…. –A process designed to maximize student achievement –A method focused on outcomes –A method to ensure accountability and intervention evaluation –It is all about student progress, regardless of where or who that student is What it is not… What it is not… –A way to avoid special education placements –A less expensive way of schooling

The Problem Solving Process Identify Desired (Replacement) Behaviors Identify Desired (Replacement) Behaviors Set Expectation Level Set Expectation Level Brainstorm Reasons Why Behavior is Not Occurring (Generate Hypotheses) Brainstorm Reasons Why Behavior is Not Occurring (Generate Hypotheses) Collect Data to Support Reasons Collect Data to Support Reasons Develop Interventions Based on Data Develop Interventions Based on Data Evaluate Effectiveness of Interventions (RtI) Evaluate Effectiveness of Interventions (RtI)

Response to Intervention: Definition A systematic and data-based method for identifying, defining, and resolving students’ academic and/or behavioral difficulties A systematic and data-based method for identifying, defining, and resolving students’ academic and/or behavioral difficulties

Needs Assessment How are we currently addressing problem solving/RtI in the preparation of preservice personnel in our school psychology, school counseling, and social work programs? How are we currently addressing problem solving/RtI in the preparation of preservice personnel in our school psychology, school counseling, and social work programs? What is our implementation plan? What is our implementation plan? How will we monitor outcomes? How will we monitor outcomes?

Proposal for Training Collaborative agreement (formal) between School Psychology, School Counseling, & Social Work Collaborative agreement (formal) between School Psychology, School Counseling, & Social Work Stand alone, web-based competency module Stand alone, web-based competency module Module access through USF School Psychology Program website Module access through USF School Psychology Program website

Application Process Application collaboratively written by faculty across the three disciplines Application collaboratively written by faculty across the three disciplines Submitted in June 2005 Submitted in June 2005 Funded in August 2005 Funded in August 2005

What Our Trainees Should Be Able To Do Understand the “big ideas” associated with NCLB and IDEA 2004 Understand the “big ideas” associated with NCLB and IDEA 2004 Collaborate and communicate effectively Collaborate and communicate effectively Apply the basic steps of the problem-solving process Apply the basic steps of the problem-solving process Understand concepts related to universal, strategic, and intensive intervention/assessment practices Understand concepts related to universal, strategic, and intensive intervention/assessment practices Accurately identify the needs of students at-risk for school failure Accurately identify the needs of students at-risk for school failure

What Our Trainees Should Be Able To Do Collect high frequency, unobtrusive data that accurately reflect student performance Collect high frequency, unobtrusive data that accurately reflect student performance Determine if a student is in an “effective” instructional or social environment Determine if a student is in an “effective” instructional or social environment Facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions Facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions Implement a response to intervention paradigm Implement a response to intervention paradigm

Field Advisory Panel Met with Directors of School Psychology, School Counseling, and Social Work from surrounding school districts Met with Directors of School Psychology, School Counseling, and Social Work from surrounding school districts Meetings held in August 2005 (planning) and January 2006 (evaluation) Meetings held in August 2005 (planning) and January 2006 (evaluation) FAP members received reimbursement for mileage and copies of Response to Intervention Policy Considerations and Implementation (NASDSE, 2005) for distribution to district personnel FAP members received reimbursement for mileage and copies of Response to Intervention Policy Considerations and Implementation (NASDSE, 2005) for distribution to district personnel

Field Advisory Panel How would the mission of this grant best meet your district’s needs? How would the mission of this grant best meet your district’s needs? – What content would be essential? – How would this training opportunity help to increase communication and collaboration across disciplines in your district?

Field Advisory Panel What barriers do you perceive with this training opportunity? What barriers do you perceive with this training opportunity? How could your practitioners apply this training to recertification requirements? How could your practitioners apply this training to recertification requirements?

Finalized Training Module Four components of training module Four components of training module Must proceed through each component in order presented Must proceed through each component in order presented Must meet mastery level standard (100%) on evaluation before moving to next component Must meet mastery level standard (100%) on evaluation before moving to next component Certificate of Completion issued upon successful completion of training Certificate of Completion issued upon successful completion of training

Outline of Training Module Each component contains the following sections: Each component contains the following sections: –Knowledge:  recommended readings –Skill:  PowerPoint presentation with comprehensive notes –Evaluation:  Assessment of knowledge and skills

Outline of Training Module Component 1 Component 1 –Problem solving & RtI: Conceptual background Component 2 Component 2 –Steps of the problem solving model Component 3 Component 3 –Response to intervention Component 4 Component 4 –Virtual case studies

Overview of the Website Now that you have the background and an understanding of the developmental process, the Web-based Transdisciplinary Training: Problem Solving and Response to Intervention module will be presented in detail. Now that you have the background and an understanding of the developmental process, the Web-based Transdisciplinary Training: Problem Solving and Response to Intervention module will be presented in detail. You can access the training module through the web at: You can access the training module through the web at: Select ‘Create a New Account’ and then select a User ID and Password Select ‘Create a New Account’ and then select a User ID and Password

Outcomes of Training 16 students across three programs completed training module 16 students across three programs completed training module Understanding of problem solving and RtI increased from 50% to 100% Understanding of problem solving and RtI increased from 50% to 100% 56% agreed or strongly agreed to recommend the course to a colleague 56% agreed or strongly agreed to recommend the course to a colleague

Outcomes of Training 38% agreed or strongly agreed the training improved their understanding of how a school psychologist, school counselor, and social worker can collaborate to solve students’ problems 38% agreed or strongly agreed the training improved their understanding of how a school psychologist, school counselor, and social worker can collaborate to solve students’ problems Positive feedback was received across training components on selection of readings, PPT presentations, notes, and evaluations Positive feedback was received across training components on selection of readings, PPT presentations, notes, and evaluations

Outcomes of Training Time to complete training ranged from hours Time to complete training ranged from hours School district personnel in Florida using training to update skills of inservice school psychologists School district personnel in Florida using training to update skills of inservice school psychologists

Institutionalizing the Training School Psychology: Competency-based component for first year students School Psychology: Competency-based component for first year students Social Work: Newly developed elective for students interested in school social work Social Work: Newly developed elective for students interested in school social work School Counseling: Competency added to internship requirements School Counseling: Competency added to internship requirements

Future Directions Development of formal course for continuing education at university and state level Development of formal course for continuing education at university and state level Collaborative presentations at regional, state, and national professional meetings Collaborative presentations at regional, state, and national professional meetings Collaborative publications across disciplines Collaborative publications across disciplines Revision of training as literature and research advance Revision of training as literature and research advance

“Scholars have called for school psychology to adopt a more scientific paradigm in which decisions are based on an experimental, rather than correlational discipline. RTI is exactly that. It is not an intervention, model, or tool, but instead is a commitment to data-based resource allocation and targeted interventions.” (Burns, 2007, p. 39)

Contact Information Kathy L. Bradley-Klug, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Coordinator Graduate Programs in School Psychology University of South Florida