Report on fitting FINAL new data: e- CC (175pb -1 : P=0.30, 71pb -1, P=-0.27, 104pb -1 )(DESY-08-177) e- NC (169pb -1, P=+0.29, P=-0.27)(DESY-08-202) Now.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Luca Stanco - PadovaEW and NP at HERA, Photon EW at HERA Luca Stanco – INFN Padova on behalf of ZEUS and H1 collaborations and RELATED NEW PHYSICS.
Advertisements

Inclusive measurements at HERA from low to high x Olaf Behnke (DESY) on behalf of ISMD2013, Chicago, USA 17 th September
High Energy neutrino cross-sections HERA-LHC working week Oct 2007 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford Updated predictions of high energy ν and ν CC cross-sections.
Low-x and PDF studies at LHC Sept 2008 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford At the LHC high precision (SM and BSM) cross section predictions require precision Parton.
ZEUS high Q 2 e + p NC measurements and high-x cross sections A.Caldwell Max Planck Institute for Physics On behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration Allen Caldwell.
Structure Functions at HERA Max Klein (H1, DESY Zeuthen) Status and Future RADCOR 02 Kloster Banz Introduction -F2 at.
Measurement of FL at HERA Have we seen anything beyond (N)NLO DGLAP? AM Cooper-Sarkar for the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations Why measure FL? How to measure.
Precision Measurement of F 2 with H1 Workshop on DIS and QCD, Florence, Max Klein for the H1 Collaboration Towards today The Measurement Results.
Quark *) Distributions with the LHeC 1 Max Klein DESY, Meeting on QCD at the LHeC Project Scenarios Statistics Systematics Light Quarks Heavy.
XXXIV Meeting on Fundamental Physics April 2-7, 2006; El Escorial, Madrid - Spain Enrico Tassi Calabria University and INFN Electroweak.
HERAPDF0.2 and predictions for W/Z production at LHC PDF4LHC A M Cooper-Sarkar 29 May 2009 Motivation Some of the debates about the best way of estimating.
H1/ZEUS fitters meeting Jan 15 th 2010 Am Cooper-Sarkar Mostly about fitting the combined F2c data New work on an FFN fit PLUS Comparing HERAPDF to Tevatron.
HERAPDF0.2 and predictions for W/Z production at LHC PDF4LHC A M Cooper-Sarkar 29 May 2009 Motivation Some of the debates about the best way of estimating.
Legacy of HERA A M Cooper-Sarkar INT 10-3 October Combination of ZEUS and H1 data and PDF fits to these data: 1.Inclusive cross-sections HERA-1.
25 th of October 2007Meeting on Diffraction and Forward Physics at HERA and the LHC, Antwerpen 1 Factorization breaking in diffraction at HERA? Alice Valkárová.
Sept 2003PHYSTAT21 Our treatment of systematic errors.
M.KapishinDiffraction using Proton Spectrometers at HERA 1 Results on Diffraction using Proton Spectrometers at HERA Low-x Meeting: Paphos, Cyprus, June.
Tobias Haas: Recent results from HERA The Dynamics of Proton Structure: Recent Results from HERA 23 August, 2005 Tobias Haas Deutsches Elektronensynchrotron.
CDR, JPhysG39(2012) High Precision DIS with the LHeC A M Cooper-Sarkar For the LHeC study group The LHeC- a Large Hadron-Electron Collider ~
Why are PDF’s important for ATLAS Durham, Sep 18 th 2006 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford SM CSC notes UK effort Min bias Glasgow, Sheffield W/Z cross-section.
Update on fits for 25/3/08 AM Cooper-Sarkar Central fit: choice of parametrization Central fit: choice of error treatment Quality of fit to data PDFs plus.
The New HERAPDF Nov HERA SFgroup AM Cooper-Sarkar Appears compatible with HERAPDF0.1 when doing fits at Q20=4.0 GeV2 But humpy gluon is Chisq favoured.
ZEUS PDF analysis 2004 A.M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford Low-x 2004 New Analysis of ZEUS data alone using inclusive cross-sections from all of ZEUS data from HERA-I.
Update of ZEUS PDF analysis A.M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford DIS2004 New Analysis of ZEUS data alone using inclusive cross-sections from all of HERA-I data –
May 14 th 2008 averaging meeting A M Cooper-Sarkar Look at the HERA-I PDFs in new ways Flavour break-up High-x Compare to ZEUS data alone/ H1 data alone.
Predictions for high energy neutrino cross-sections from ZEUS-S Global fit analysis S Chekanov et al, Phys Rev D67, (2002) The ZEUS PDFs are sets.
PDF fitting to ATLAS jet data- a first look A M Cooper-Sarkar, C Doglioni, E Feng, S Glazov, V Radescu, A Sapronov, P Starovoitov, S Whitehead ATLAS jet.
PDF fits with free electroweak parameters Overview of what has happened since March’06 Collaboration meeting Emphasis on the NC couplings au,vu,ad,vd and.
ICHEP'06, V. Chekelian, NC DIS at HERA1 Vladimir Chekelian (MPI for Physics, Munich) e  p 27.5 GeV 920 GeV  s = 318 GeV DIS & NC & Polarisation.
Flavour break-up July7th 2008 Our aim was modest: 1)To alter fc=0.15 to fc=0.09 following investigations of the charm fraction 2)To take into account the.
DIJET (and inclusive-jet) CROSS SECTIONS IN DIS AT HERA T. Schörner-Sadenius (for the ZEUS collaboration) Hamburg University DIS 06, April 2006 Tsukuba,
 Introduction  The ZEUS PDF fit: an overview  Impact of future HERA data on the ZEUS fit - end of current HERA-II running scenario - additional studies.
HERA-LHC workshop 21 st -24 th March 2005 Claire Gwenlan (with the help of Sasha Glazov, Max Klein, Gordana Lastovicka-Medin, Tomas Lastovicka)  Introduction.
NLO QCD fits How far can we get without jet data/HERA-II data? A. M. Cooper-Sarkar March-04 Collaboration Meeting ZEUSNOTE Extended ZEUS-S fits.
More on NLOQCD fits ZEUS Collab Meeting March 2003 Eigenvector PDF sets- ZEUS-S 2002 PDFS accessible on HEPDATA High x valence distributions from ZEUS-Only.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
High Q 2 Structure Functions and Parton Distributions Ringberg Workshop 2003 : New Trends in HERA physics Benjamin Portheault LAL Orsay On behalf of the.
Further investigations on the fits to new data Jan 12 th 2009 A M Cooper-Sarkar Considering ONLY fits with Q 2 0 =1.9 or 2.0 –mostly comparing RTVFN to.
J.Feltesse1 Measurement of F L the longitudinal structure function at HERA Low x meeting, Lisbon, Portugal 28 June 2006.
Treatment of correlated systematic errors PDF4LHC August 2009 A M Cooper-Sarkar Systematic differences combining ZEUS and H1 data  In a QCD fit  In a.
In the context of the HERA-LHC workshop the idea of combining the H1 and ZEUS data arose. Not just putting both data sets into a common PDF fit but actually.
11 QCD analysis with determination of α S (M Z ) based on HERA inclusive and jet data: HERAPDF1.6 A M Cooper-Sarkar Low-x meeting June 3 rd 2011 What inclusive.
DIJET (and inclusive-jet) CROSS SECTIONS IN DIS AT HERA T. Schörner-Sadenius (for the ZEUS collaboration) Hamburg University DIS 06, April 2006 Tsukuba,
1 Introduction to Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) Rik Yoshida Argonne National Laboratory CTEQ summer school 07 May 30, 2007.
H1 and ZEUS Structure functions at HERA α s and PDFs Summary/Outlook Tomáš Laštovička (H1 collaboration) DESY Zeuthen, Charles University Prague at LLWI2003,
H1 QCD analysis of inclusive cross section data DIS 2004, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, April 2004 Benjamin Portheault LAL Orsay On behalf of the H1 Collaboration.
Future of DIS: PDF studies at LHC April 18 th DIS 2007 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford At the LHC high precision (SM and BSM) cross section predictions require.
H1 and ZEUS Combined PDF Fit DIS08 A M Cooper Sarkar on behalf of ZEUS and H1 HERA Structure Function Working Group NLO DGLAP PDF fit to the combined HERA.
D Parton Distribution Functions, Part 2. D CT10-NNLO Parton Distribution Functions.
Costas Foudas, Imperial College, Jet Production at High Transverse Energies at HERA Underline: Costas Foudas Imperial College
MSTW update James Stirling (with Alan Martin, Robert Thorne, Graeme Watt)
1 ZEUS Results E. Tassi - Calabria Univ. and INFN DIS 2009 Workshop - Madrid.
N. RaicevicMoriond QCD Structure Functions and Extraction of PDFs at HERA Nataša Raičeviċ University of Montenegro On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.
R. Yoshida, 20 May Prospects and status of HERA II R. Yoshida Argonne National Laboratory, USA for H1 and ZEUS Collaborations CIPANP 2003, New York.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
1 A M Cooper-Sarkar University of Oxford ICHEP 2014, Valencia.
1 Proton Structure and Hard QCD AM Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford Phys Rev D93(2016)
Hadron Structure from inclusive and exclusive cross-sections in ep scattering On behalf of ZEUS and H1 A M Cooper-Sarkar Oxford HS07 H1 and ZEUS published.
AM Cooper-Sarkar PDF4LHC July 4th 2010 HERAPDF fits update We have more combined H1 + ZEUS data: The low energy run data which was used to measure FL has.
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
News from HERAPDF A M Cooper-Sarkar PDF4LHC CERN March
- Structure of Matter and QCD
HERA I - Preliminary H1 and ZEUS QCD Fit
ATLAS 2.76 TeV inclusive jet measurement and its PDF impact A M Cooper-Sarkar PDF4LHC Durham Sep 26th 2012 In 2011, 0.20 pb-1 of data were taken at √s.
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
An Introduction to HERA Physics
ZEUS High Q2 data from HERA-II +PDF fits
- Structure of Matter and QCD
ZEUS fits-report request for preliminary April 3rd 2006
- Structure of Matter and QCD
Presentation transcript:

Report on fitting FINAL new data: e- CC (175pb -1 : P=0.30, 71pb -1, P=-0.27, 104pb -1 )(DESY ) e- NC (169pb -1, P=+0.29, P=-0.27)(DESY ) Now add CCe+ (134pb-1: P=0.32, 78pb-1, P=-0.36, 56pb-1)(R Ciesielski) Then add NCe+ ( 113pb-1 : P=0.32, 71pb-1, P=-0.36, 42pb-1) (M Wlasenko) Improvement to PDF uncertainties Electroweak parameter fits: M W, M W / G F,M W / g Electroweak NC couplings: au ad vu vd ZEUS fits-report -High Q2 session April 2009 A.M.Cooper-Sarkar and C. Gwenlan

PDFs from the new fit compared to published ZEUS-JETS fit – central values of the PDFs do not change much….. Adding New NC and CCe- data to ZEUS-JETS fit → ZEUS-pol fit (NEW) This takes 577 data points up to 828 data points (NEW) Dataset  2/ndp ndp CC-ve poln CC+ve poln NC-ve poln NC+ve poln Quadratic  2 Remember we have shown this before with preliminary e- data- this is now final

The xu v PDF uncertainties are reduced at high-x ….. as expected since NC and CC e- cross-sections are both u dominated However some other uncertainties increase marginally- this can always happen when OFFSETing correlated errors (NEW) The d-flavour sector is less well known- NOTE the scale difference- hence we look forward to CCe+ data

PDFs from the new fit compared to ZEUS-pol fit – central values of d-valence shift a little….. Adding New CCe+ data to ZEUS-pol fit This takes 828 data points up to 893 data points Dataset  2/ndp ndp CC e-p P= CC e-p P= NC e-p P= NC e-p P= CC e+p P= CC e+p P= Quadratic  2 Note only statistical errors so far on CCe+p

The xd v PDF uncertainties are reduced at high-x ….. as expected since CC e+ cross-sections are d dominated Very marginal improvement in high-x Sea as well The d-flavour sector is improved with the addition of CCe+ data

PDFs from the new fit compared to All that came before – central values shift very little Adding New NCe+ data to ZEUS-pol +Cce+p This takes 893 data points up to 1073 data points Dataset  2/ndp ndp CC e-p P= CC e-p P= NC e-p P= NC e-p P= CC e+p P= CC e+p P= NC e+p P= NC e+p P= Quadratic  2 Note only statistical errors so far on CCe+p And only stat. +uncorreated sys. On NCe+p

The xu v PDF uncertainties are reduced at high-x ….. as expected since NC e+ cross-sections are u dominated The u-flavour sector is further improved with the addition of NCe+ data

ALL New NC/CC e- and e+ compared to ZEUS -JETS

Electroweak parameter fits Now let M W be a free parameter of the fit, together with the PDF parameters How does M W enter the fit? In the factor G F 2 M W 4 /(Q 2 +M W 2 ) ± 0.7 ± ± 0.66 ± 0.95 ZEUS-jets RTVFN including NEW CC/NC e-data ZEUS-jets RTVFN including NEW CC/NC e-data and NEW CC/NC e+ data 77.6 ± 1.4 ± ± 2.0 ± (PDF) ± 1.82(exp) (model) ZEUS HERA-I data done by this method ZEUS DESY fit to dσ/dQ2 data H1 HERA-I data done by this method Value of M W (=80.4 SM) Specifications of the fit Little correlation between EW and QCD sector of fit

Now consider fits to electroweak NC couplings as well as PDF parameters F 2 0 = Σ i A i 0 (Q 2 ) [xq i (x,Q 2 ) + xq i (x,Q 2 )] xF 3 0 = Σ i B i 0 (Q 2 ) [xq i (x,Q 2 ) - xq i (x,Q 2 )] A i 0 (Q 2 ) = e i 2 – 2 e i v i v e P Z + (v e 2 +a e 2 )(v i 2 +a i 2 ) P Z 2 B i 0 (Q 2 ) = – 2 e i a i a e P Z + 4a i a e v i v e P Z 2 The unpolarised cross-section is given by σ 0 = Y + F Y - xF 3 0 The polarised cross-section is given by σ P = Y + F 2 P + Y - xF 3 P P Z >> P Z 2 (γZ interference is dominant) v e is very small (~0.04). unpolarized xF 3  a i, polarized F 2  v i The total cross-section : σ = σ 0 + P σ P F 2 P = Σ i A i P (Q 2 ) [xq i (x,Q 2 ) + xq i (x,Q 2 )] xF 3 P = Σ i B i P (Q 2 ) [xq i (x,Q 2 ) - xq i (x,Q 2 )] A i P (Q2) = 2 e i v i a e P Z - 2 v e a e (v i 2 +a i 2 ) P Z 2 B i P (Q2) = 2 e i a i v e P Z - 2 a i v i (v e 2 +a e 2 ) P Z 2

SM formalism a i = T3 i, v i = T3 i – 2e i sin 2 Ə W Let a i and v i be free as well as PDF parameters. Perform fits with 4 NC EW parameters free NC and CCe+p data now included. Improvement is NOT due to extra statistics but due to NOT trying to compromise between two close by mimina anymore. Contours show that errors are now much less asymmetric wrt central values of the fit. auadvuvd SM value EW param 0.50±0.13± ±0.45± ±0.12± ±0.28± EW param 0.60±0.06± ±0.20± ±0.07± ±0.15±0.11

au/vu ad/vd au/ad vu/vd contours: Final HERA-II e- We look forward to NC e+ polarised data to improve this.

au/vu ad/vd au/ad vu/vd contours: Final HERA-II e- plus Prel CC and NCe+ NC e+ polarised data do improve this - it is not just statistical it is resolving a double minimum problem –hopefully the systematics will cover the SM!

Comparison with other experiments

Summary We have now repeated our preliminary work of Summer 2007 using the FINAL e- CC and NC data CCe+ improves the d-valence And MW NCe+ improves the u-valence further And the NC EW couplings For DIS re-do with just the CCe+ latest version and don’t include NC EW contour update (and probably not MW update either at this stage.

Can also fit BOTH G F and M W remember GF SM= ×10-5 Or we can fit a more general formalism: fit g and M W in g 2 / (Q 2 + M W 2 ) 2 such that g 2 =G F 2 M W 4 = for standard model G F =1.141 ± ± ×10 -5 G F =1.175 ± ± ×10 -5 M W =79.5 ± 1.3 ± 2.6 M W =77.2 ± 1.1 ± 2.0 g= ± ± g= ± ± M W =79.5 ± 1.3 ± 2.6 M W =77.2 ± 1.1 ± 2.0 This is the most general way to present our data Purple is with new NC/CC e- Red adds prel.NC/CCe+