The Challenge of Meeting Open Space Needs in Utah Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Advertisements

From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
Peace Connectivity Network A Presentation By Brian Churchill, Phacet, 2004.
Interfacing Initiatives Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI)  Expansion of leadership and civic engagement to capitalize on innovative strategies 
The Mystic River Corridor Strategy Project Metropolitan Area Planning Council Boston Redevelopment Authority City of Chelsea City of Everett City of Malden.
Cardener River Corridor Guiding Principles Diversity of Economic Development Scale of Growth –Incentives for Infill and Re-use –Appropriate to existing.
Positioning Trails for Community Value. Why Bother Formally Positioning Trails? Improve perceptions held by citizens and elected officials so that the.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Statewide Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah.
Coconino Parks and Open Space Program Coconino County Parks & Recreation Vision To provide recreational opportunities by developing and managing regional.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Mountainland Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Bear River Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Southwestern Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
1 Utah State University’s Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Dr. Steve Burr Director Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Central Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Board.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Stakeholder Attitudes in Assessing Outdoor Recreational and Open Space Needs in Utah: A Rural--Urban Dichotomy Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Michael Butkus.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Wasatch Front Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
DATA VISUALIZATION NEEDS IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Trish Settles, AICP Principal Planner/Project.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
Sustainable Tourism development
The Economics of Rivers (with an emphasis on the Verde) Doug Von Gausig, Verde River Institute, May 16, 2014.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Blackstone Valley Prioritization Project Blackstone River-Users Conference September 18, 2012.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Visioning Process Counties and Towns of Culpeper, Fauquier, Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Bruce Dotson Tanya Denckla Institute.
 The SNC’s mission is to initiate, encourage and support efforts that improve the environmental, economic and social well- being of the Sierra Nevada.
© 2007 PMP. All rights reserved. Wednesday 18 th July South Northamptonshire Council Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study and Green Space Strategy.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Why things (supposedly) don’t happen in Hampton Roads Few coordinating bodies. Few coordinating bodies. Dillon Rule. Dillon Rule. 16 Independent cities.
Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Visioning Process Counties and Towns of Culpeper, Fauquier, Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Bruce Dotson Tanya Denckla Institute.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Uintah Basin Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Understanding and Improving Walkable Caribbean Urban Heritage: St Georges, Paramaribo, Bridgetown and East Port of Spain.
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
SCORP Keys to Success Involvement-Steering Committee Public Input-Surveys and Focus Groups Comprehensive Evaluation of Statewide Recreational Needs and.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Lancaster Open Space & Recreation Public Forum March 22, 2009.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Tug Hill Commission Watertown, New York. Tug Hill region of New York covers 2,100 square miles between Lake Ontario and the Adirondack Mountains.
Dawn Ganje, Marketing Management and Colleen MacRae, Polk County Collaborative – MACMH September 2006 Challenge and Opportunity:
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
Green Infrastructure An Introduction Georgia Urban Forest Council Quarterly Meeting Macon, Georgia August 19, 2010 Daniel Westcot, Senior Community Forester.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 10, 2009.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
T H E P O R T L A N D P L A N A Comprehensive Plan for Portland in 2040 September 2007.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
2015 CLARENDON TOWN PLAN Barbara Noyes Pulling Rutland Regional Planning Commission.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 3 – NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE ELEMENTS 1/09/2014.
RESOURCE POTENTIAL AND CONSERVATION VALUES. Traditional Land Use and Occupancy Archeology, Rare Features, Historic Sites Wildlife Habitat Value 2/15.
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
Office of Greenways & Trails
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI).
Presentation transcript:

The Challenge of Meeting Open Space Needs in Utah Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University

2 Rapid Growth Cities and communities experiencing growth rates exceeding the national average

3 A Number of Problems Lack of infrastructure Increased cost of living Changes in land values Lack of planning to manage growth Resulting environmental and social impacts Perceived decline in quality of life

4 Certainly True in the State of Utah High rate of in-migration Highest birthrate in the nation Concentrated growth-- sixth most urban state High rate of land and resource use Poor zoning regulations encouraging sprawl

5 The State of Utah A Metropolis More than four-fifths of Utah’s population now lives in a metropolis, --The Greater Wasatch-- a ten county region of urbanization.

6 The Greater Wasatch lBy % increase in GW-- 1.6M to 2.7M people Adding 43,000 people every year 84% increase in developed land (590 square miles) lBy Five million people in Utah

7 A Perceived Quality of Life Amenity Values Values placed on the natural resource amenities of: Clean Air and Water Scenic Beauty & Aesthetics Wildlife & Habitat Outdoor Recreation

8 Critical to These Natural Resource Amenities l Protection and preservation of Open Space: Undeveloped land that retains most, if not all of its natural characteristics; or Land that is managed for the sustainable development of natural resources.

9 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project l Purpose: Identify open space needs, priorities, and initiatives for each of the seven Planning Districts in Utah. l Focus on issues related to: outdoor recreation amenity values ecological services

10 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Seek input from key stakeholders: land management and planning professionals; state and local officials; community leaders and residents. l Identify action strategies for addressing open space needs.

11 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Three Phase Process 1.Utah’s Great Outdoors Conference 2.Statewide Key Informant Mail Survey 3.Public Meetings-- Presentations of Findings and Opportunities for Stakeholder Input

12 Utah’s 7 Planning Districts and 29 Counties l Bear River l Wasatch Front l Mountainland l Uintah Basin l Central l Southeastern l Southwestern

13 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Utah’s Great Outdoors Conference l 176 participants in 19 different groups responded to these two questions: What are the most pressing outdoor recreation and open space needs in your region of the state for the next 20 years? What are the most pressing outdoor recreation and open space needs for specific towns and communities in your region for the next 20 years?

14 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Utah’s Great Outdoors Conference Results: l Question # items identified: “Preserve the wetlands and wildlife areas surrounding the Great Salt Lake.” l Question # items identified: “Small communities have insufficient funds for purchase of critical lands or development of recreation facilities.”

15 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Statewide Key Informant Survey l To further validate and prioritize the importance of outdoor recreation and open space needs for each Planning District that were identified at the Conference. l To obtain stakeholder attitudes toward 25 open space protection tools.

16 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Statewide Key Informant Survey l 287 Surveys Mailed l 182 Returned l 63% Response Rate Utah’s Great Outdoors A survey conducted by Utah State University’s Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism and the Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Spring 1999

17 Statewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs l Statewide Cooperation/partnerships in planning for and provision of open space Trails/corridors for recreation and access Education for children and adults directed at proper use, minimizing impacts, and importance of open space Developing access and managing open space

18 Statewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs l Northern Utah Water quality and quantity, wetlands, riparian areas, and wildlife habitat Protecting access to mountain canyons and public lands Open space protection in urban, suburban, and developing areas Land acquisition-- identification and funding

19 Statewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs l Rural Utah Long-term, reliable funding for development and maintenance Long-range planning-- cooperation and assistance Specific projects with economic benefits Community quality of life as one result of economic benefits Historic/heritage sites

20 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Public Meetings l Present prioritized listing of outdoor recreation and open space needs for each Planning District. l Seek out stakeholder comments on these findings. l Ask participants to identify existing and potential projects addressing outdoor recreation and open space needs.

21 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Public Meetings l Presentations: To approximately 350 individuals at 19 different meetings throughout the state; Association of Governments (AOG) meetings in each Planning District; Travel Region meetings; City/County Councils meetings; Special Groups (e.g. Public Lands Forum)

22 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Results of Public Meetings l Over 300 specific outdoor recreation and open space projects identified for the seven Planning Districts in Utah. l A broader picture of the social and political context in which open space planning must occur in Utah.

23 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident 1. Two broad types of open space needs: Specific Purpose Projects individual trails water projects visitor centers heritage sites parks wildlife habitat General Concerns funding education partnerships planning

24 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident 2. There are two different orientations toward open space values. Some major differences in opinion exist between stakeholders in urban/suburban and rural planning districts regarding the purpose and value of open space.

25 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident l Urban/Suburban stakeholders emphasize protection of open space for non-use or intrinsic values, along with recreational and access needs. For community aesthetics and amenities For controlling growth and development For providing ecological services -wildlife habitat -wetlands/riparian protection -water quality

26 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident l Stakeholders in rural areas are more concerned with the use value or instrumental value of open space. To help meet local economic needs through outdoor recreation and tourism development To retain public access for recreation To retain traditions of multiple use of natural resources on public lands

27 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident l Key challenge to successful, long-term, statewide funding and planning efforts… …is providing opportunities to enhance both the use and environmental protection roles of open space simultaneously.

28 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident l Need to meet recreational access/use and wildlife/habitat protection needs simultaneously, whenever and wherever appropriate and possible.

29 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l Linking these two orientations is possible. l Will require an explicit and balanced effort to bring these together. l Especially important to encourage support and collaboration with rural areas of the state.

30 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident 3. Open space linear corridors and water-related resources are critical. Linear corridors mentioned most often: -trails and paths -bikeways -OHV routes Corridors implied by projects identified for: -parkways-riparian corridors -riverways -wildlife corridors -canyon protection & access -corridors linking communities & towns

31 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident Water-related projects are considered important throughout the state. In rural areas, focus is on providing or improving reservoir and river recreation. In urban/suburban areas, water quality, wetlands/riparian protection, and wildlife habitat are of equal or greater importance.

32 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l To enhance long-term benefits from statewide coordination and funding will require Specific Purpose Projects to be designed to simultaneously meet recreational development and use goals along with natural resource and environmental protection goals.

33 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l Many types of linear recreation lands and open space, such as greenways, need to be viewed in a wildlife context as providing corridors for migration and access to other habitat blocks.

34 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident 4. Funding, funding, funding… Stakeholders throughout the Planning Districts view funding as a key role for state agencies. Not simply providing funds, but also providing technical advice and coordination for identifying and acquiring funds.

35 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l Provide a larger portion of funds to rural Planning Districts. Distributing funds on per capita basis is problematic. Many urban/suburban residents travel to rural areas of the state for recreation. Tourists visit many of the rural areas. Puts a higher level of pressure on rural resources and infrastructure.

36 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes & Recommendations l Long-term and consistent sources of funding important for rural areas. l Long-term resource protection and amenity/ecological service values are statewide concerns. l Funding should be used to encourage Planning Districts to help protect these broader social values.

37 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident 5. Local Control--State Coordination In general, stakeholders see great value in statewide coordination of open space planning and funding efforts, but at the same time want to retain local control.

38 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l Focus on projects that meet local needs. Large pool of existing and potential open space projects in all planning districts. Priorities can be identified by local stakeholders. Local needs should be a starting point for statewide planning and funding priorities.

39 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l But also emphasize that such projects must meet broader state needs. Funding criteria should recognize both use and non-use values of open space. Funding should help meet local needs as well as broader state level needs. Open space planning and funding must be a joint effort between local and state agencies and stakeholders.

40 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes & Recommendations l Planning and funding criteria for a project might include evidence that it: Meets both local and state level needs; Has local community support; Is part of larger scale planning efforts;

41 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes & Recommendations l Planning and funding criteria for a project might include evidence that it: Meets objectives related to amenity and ecological service values... even if the project focuses on use; Is part of a collaboration or partnership; Has an educational component.

42 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes & Recommendations l New methods for combining human values of open space and wildlife/habitat protection in project planning, funding, and implementation are needed. l Will require more collaborative efforts in social and ecological research.

43 The Challenge of Meeting Open Space Needs in Utah Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University 5220 Old Main Hill Logan, Utah (435)