EPAC June 2003 The EPAC June 2003 Questions 1. Clarify the Motivation for the Proposal. 2. How to ensure the e+ polarimeter works right away? 3. What is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLARIMETRY of MeV Photons and Positrons Overview Beam Characterization – undulator photons – positrons Basics of the Transmission Method – for photon.
Advertisements

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
1 Run 9 PHENIX Goals and Performance John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory June 4, 2009.
K. Potter RADWG & RADMON Workshop 1 Dec WELCOME TO THE 4th RADWG & RADMON WORKSHOP 1 December 2004.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) The International Polarized Positron Production Collaboration K.T. McDonald, J.C.
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
Positron Asymmetry and Polarization from the E166 September 2005 run Gideon Alexander, Erez Reinherz-Aronis.
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
K.T. McDonald DoE Review Aug. 10, E-166 Experiment E-166 is a demonstration of undulator-based polarized positron production for linear colliders.
5 th Rencontres du Vietnam - Aug. 7, 2004 Polarized Positrons…E166 A.W.Weidemann 1 Introduction (What, who) Motivation (Why) Experiment and Polarimetry.
E166 Collaboration J.C. Sheppard SLAC, October, 2003 E166 Background Test Simulations: Overview-what do we need J. C. Sheppard.
E166 “Polarized Positrons for Future Linear Colliders” John C. Sheppard E166 Co-spokesman SLAC: August 31, 2004.
K.T. McDonald DoE Review July 29, E-166 Experiment E-166 is a demonstration of undulator-based polarized positron production for linear colliders.
Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons Status Report on E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons K.T. McDonald Princeton University.
E166 Collaboration About 45+2 members from 16+1 institutions from all three regions (Asia, Europe, the Americas, and Daresbury) About 45+2 members from.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Sheppard/Pitthan June 26, 2015 Towards an Undulator Based NLC Positron Source Towards an Undulator Based NLC Positron.
K. LaihemE166 collaboration LCWS06 Bangalore March 12th 2006 The E166 experiment Development of a polarized positron source for the ILC. Karim Laihem on.
Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons An experiment in the 50 GeV Beam in the SLAC FFTB E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons.
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) K.T. McDonald, J.C. Sheppard, Co-Spokespersons SLAC Experimental Program Advisory.
E166 Collaboration About 45+2 members from 16+1 institutions from all three regions (Asia, Europe, the Americas, and Daresbury) About 45+2 members from.
EPAC June 2003 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons A proposal for the 50 GeV Beam in the FFTB E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Sheppard/Pitthan July 14, 2015 POWER Meeting June 8=9,2002 Durham, England POWER Meeting June 8=9,2002 Durham, England.
Parity Violation in Electron Scattering Emlyn Hughes SLAC DOE Review June 2, 2004 *SLAC E122 *SLAC E158 *FUTURE.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
LCG Meeting, May 14th 2003 V. Daniel Elvira1 G4 (OSCAR_1_4_0) Validation of CMS HCal V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Summer Students Lectures June 17, 2010.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Thia Keppel 9/24/12. Accelerator schedule excerpts (Arne Freyberger) Accelerator Run II: Beam in hall 3/2014, or maybe as early as 1/2014 (?) > 1.1 GeV/pass,
May 17, 2005Wednesday Experiment Meeting BNL, Upton Acceleration beyond 100 GeV  Goal To evaluate the spin dynamics beyond 100 GeV  What’s the impact.
CALICE Referees’ Review Andy White, Junji Haba DESY – PRC 71 April 2011.
EUROTeV WP4 Report Polarised Positron Source Jim Clarke, on behalf of the WP4 team DESY Zeuthen STFC (Daresbury and RAL) University of Durham University.
CesrTA Experimental Plan M. Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration November 17, 2008.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) The International Polarized Positron Production Collaboration K.T. McDonald, J.C.
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Hall C Commissioning: The Past (1996) First Exp: “by consensus” What Hampton Univ. wanted What ANL wanted.
MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 2014 Hall A Update Thia Keppel 1.
02/04/2009 AS-TAGL Mtg Global Design Effort 1 CesrTA Update Mark Palmer CLASSE.
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
Møller Polarimeter Status Update 1.Møller hardware status (detectors and targets) 2.Systematics for SANE 3.Plan Dave Gaskell SANE Collaboration Meeting.
WG3a Sources Update Jim Clarke on behalf of WG3a GDE Meeting, Frascati, December 2005.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Proton Polarimetry Proton polarimeter reactions RHIC polarimeters.
Deuteron polarimetry from 1.0 to 1.5 GeV/c Ed Stephenson, IUCF EDM discussion April 14, 2006 Based on work from: France:POMME B. Bonin et al. Nucl. Inst.
G0 Backward Angle Request: Q 2 = 0.23, 0.48 GeV 2 Main points G0 goal is to measure G E s, G M s and G A e over range of momentum transfers with best possible.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
Transverse polarization for energy calibration at Z-peak M. Koratzinos With valuable input from Alain Blondel ICFA HF2014, Sunday, 12/10/2014.
A N DY Status Commissioning with colliding beams L.C.Bland, for AnDY 27 March 2012 Time Meeting, BNL.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
CsI(Tl) Calorimeter and status of the E166 experiment E166 experiment CsI ( Tl) calorimeter construction. Test beam results vs. Geant4 simulation Schedules.
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Test of Hybrid Target at KEKB LINAC
Mott Polarimeter at CEBAF
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Data Taking and Samples
Status Report on E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons K.T. McDonald Princeton University EPAC Meeting SLAC, November 15, 2003.
E166 - LEPOL - Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC
A Cold SCU Phase-Shifter
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Kazuya Aoki For the PHENIX Collaborations. Kyoto Univ. / RIKEN
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

EPAC June 2003 The EPAC June 2003 Questions 1. Clarify the Motivation for the Proposal. 2. How to ensure the e+ polarimeter works right away? 3. What is the Analyzing Power and its Uncertainty from Simulation? 4. What Precision in Polarimetry is Required? 5. What are the Benefits and Drawbacks of Two Shorter Runs vs. One Single Run of the Same Total duration? 1

EPAC June Clarify the Motivation for the Proposal (I) The reason for doing E-166 is to demonstrate that an undulator-based polarized positron source will produce a positron beam with sufficient polarization to justify the performance expectations and cost (of the polarized positron source) for the linear collider. Performance expectations are for positron polarization of about 60% and full positron intensity. The incremental cost of building a polarized positron source for the NLC/JLC or CLIC is estimated to be approximately 100M$ (it is significantly less to upgrade the TESLA baseline design). 2

EPAC June Clarify the Motivation for the Proposal (II) The concepts of the polarized positron source are all well understood but have never been brought together in a system test. E-166 puts the essential features of the polarized source together: an undulator to produce polarized photons, a conversion target, and polarimetry sufficient to characterize the positron polarization to 5%. A successful E-166 demonstration of polarized production is necessary and sufficient to move forward the acceptance of this concept within the accelerator community. 3

EPAC June How to ensure the e+ polarimeter works right away? There are 3 major components of the polarimeter: –(a) spectrometer –(b) analyzer magnet –(c) CsI calorimeter The spectrometer and the analyzer magnet will be built and delivered to SLAC in the summer of They will then be subjected to functional tests for about two months before installation and system integration in FFTB. 4

EPAC June How to ensure the e+ polarimeter works right away? The Detector components exist already. We will check the parts carefully on the component level in general. In particular: – for the CsI crystals, build on the extensive expertise and work of the Babar Collaboration for a dynamic calibration of the CsI crystals between a few MeV and the GeV range. –For the SiW calorimeter build on the extensive expertise and work of the Tennessee group (E-144, SLD) and their collaborators. Parasitic work in the FFTB, already started, on observing and controlling beam produced shower background will continue. 5

EPAC June What is the Analyzing Power and its Uncertainty from Simulation? (I) The analyzing power of the e + polarimeter is shown as a function of e + beam energy in Fig. 17 on page 23, and in Table 13 on page 50 in the E-166 proposal. It ranges from –(18.6  0.9)% at 3 MeV to –(13.9  0.6)% at 10 MeV. The indicated errors correspond to the finite simulation statistics of 10 Million events for each of the two spin configurations, or roughly 30 minutes of computing time. This statistical error of the simulation can be made negligible with extra computing time. 6

EPAC June What is the Analyzing Power and its Uncertainty from Simulation? (II) There will of course also be systematic errors associated with certain simplifications and approximations of the physical processes and the description of the polarimeter hardware. However, these should all be far smaller than the presumed dominating systematic error of DP/P = 0.05 associated with the uncertainty in the magnetization of the iron. 7

EPAC June What is the Analyzing Power and its Uncertainty from Simulation? (III) 8

EPAC June What is the Analyzing Power and its Uncertainty from Simulation? (IV) 9

EPAC June What Precision in Polarimetry is Required? The E-166 positron polarization is expected to be in the 40-70%. A precision of 5% is sufficient to make a meaningful measurement of this level of polarization. While a measurement with a relative accuracy of 10% is arguably adequate, 5 % matches the expected systematic error from the iron magnetization. 10

EPAC June What are the Benefits and Drawbacks of Two Shorter Runs vs. One Single Run of the Same Total duration (I)? Benefits: First run reveals problems which potentially take time to remedy (poorly understood result, inadequate diagnostics, broken equipment, insufficient shielding, …). Time between runs is used to make adjustments to better ensure ultimate success; success defined as a well understood measurement result that is in full agreement with modeling/simulations. Drawbacks: The time to tune-up the beam, reduce backgrounds, and commission equipment can use all available time in a short run. Beam will be tuned during the initial 3 weeks of installation, checkout and preliminary operations. A short run has the risk of being dominated by the tuning and start up, leaving little or no time to take measurements. 11

EPAC June 2003 Benefits and Drawbacks (II) A less defensible issue is a possible question of limited travel funds available within the collaboration for multiple trips to SLAC. This can be negotiated within the collaboration. There is the issue of possible interference with other experiments. This is not the primary responsibility of E-166 and which can be ameliorated in the scheduling process. 12