Non-Pointing Photon Work at UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP ATLAS RPV/Long-lived Physics Group November 19 2008 Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard Photon ID performance in GMSB susy samples Helen Hayward University of Liverpool.
Advertisements

Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
A Package For Tracking Validation Chris Meyer UC Santa Cruz July 6, 2007.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
First Thoughts About Backtracking Performance Assessment and Validation Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz July Validation Meeting.
For the BaBar and Belle Collaborations CKM 2008: 5 th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle Rome, Italy, September 9-13, 2008 Bruce A. Schumm.
From GMSB to Photons plus Missing E t : Some Thoughts on Model Independence SUSY/E t Miss “Kickoff” Meeting February 5, 2010 Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
GMSB Trigger Efficiency and Data Stream Issues Non-pointing Photon Meeting September Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
Basic Philosophy of SUSY Photons+MET Selection Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC SUSY 2011 Data Workshop 17 March 2011 n.b.: We are becoming a general photon +
Background studies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics May 6 th, 2010.
First Thoughts About Backtracking Validation Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz October 3, 2007 Inner Detector Software Meeting.
Intended Contributions from the SCIPP (UC Santa Cruz) Group ATLAS e  Workshop June Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP, for Alan Litke, Jason Nielsen (faculty)
First Look at Conversions for Non-Pointing Photons US ATLAS Egamma Meeting March Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
SLEPTON MASS RECONSTRUCTION AND DETECTOR RESOLUTION Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz ALCPG Workshop, Snowmass Colorado August 14-28,
GMSB2 Trigger Efficiency vs. Decay Radius for Some 3- Jet Triggers Non-pointing Photon Meeting August Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
Thoughts on B-Field Uniformity for the SD Tracker SID Tracking Meeting October 22, 2004 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz March 2001 Baseline Thanks to Harry.
First Thoughts About Backtracking Validation Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz October 3, 2007 Inner Detector Software Meeting.
Preliminary Results on Conversions Non-pointing Photon Meeting January Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
FORWARD SELECTRON PRODUCTION AND DETECTOR PERFORMANCE Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz SLAC LCWS05 Special Recognition: Troy Lau, UCSC.
RESMDD'02 pCT: Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, SCIPP INITIAL STUDIES on PROTON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY USING SILICON STRIP DETECTORS L. Johnson, B. Keeney, G. Ross,
Tracking Efficiency and Momentum Resolution Analysis Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting March 13, 2007.
Update on Secondaries and Backtracking Validation Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz February 22, 2008 Inner Detector Software Meeting.
Hasty Overview of Photon + MET Studies in the Context of GMSB Bruce Schumm Joint SUSY/UED Meeting 23 November 2010.
Update from the Photons + MET Group Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 26 August 2010 SUSY/MET Meeting.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
First Look at Conversions for Non-Pointing Photons US ATLAS Egamma Meeting March Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
Snapshot of Photon + MET Trigger Studies Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC SUSY-EtMiss Subgroup Meeting 24 November 2010.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
Update on Conversions SCIPP ATLAS Meeting February Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Trigger efficiencies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics April 19 th,
Further Update on Conversions ATLAS Informal Two Photon Meeting February Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
Tracking Simulation Studies at UC Santa Cruz Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP LCWS07 DESY May 30-Jun Tracking Validation Studies Non-prompt tracks with SiD.
Update from the Photons + MET Group Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 26 August 2010 SUSY/MET Meeting.
Some Thoughts and Pleas from the SCIPP (UC Santa Cruz) Group US ATLAS e  Forum Meeting June Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP, for Alan Litke, Jason Nielsen.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Cluster Finding Comparisons Ron Cassell SLAC. Clustering Studies This report studies clustering in the EM calorimeter, using SLIC simulated ttbar events.
4/04/2001Calorimeter shaking -Andrea Venturi - April '01 ALEPH week 1 New ideas and old doubts about the calorimeter shaking procedure Andrea Venturi INFN.
SUSY with Photons and MET: Introduction and thoughts about Diphoton and Single Photon Analyses Annecy DESY/University of Hamburg Liverpool University Tokyo.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort FCAL Clustering Meeting 24 June 2015 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
FCAL Collaboration Highlights and Report on the UCSC/SCIPP SiD Simulation Effort SiD Collaboration Meeting SLAC January 2015 Bruce Schumm UC Santa.
FCAL Collaboration Highlights and Report on the UCSC/SCIPP SiD Simulation Effort SiD Collaboration Meeting SLAC January 2015 Bruce Schumm UC Santa.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
Electron Calibration and Performance ( ) N. Benekos (MPI), R. Nikolaidou (Saclay), S. Paganis (Sheffield) Contributions from: A. Farbin (CERN) +
VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel Jaspreet Sidhu ATLAS Toronto meeting
Report on the UCSC/SCIPP BeamCal Simulation Effort SiD Optimization Meeting 22 October 2014 Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics.
Status of Analysis Software Kanglin He For Analysis Software Group.
(Di-)Photon + MET Status and Plans for 5 fb -1 Analysis Who plans to contribute? DESY (Ehrenfeld, Wildt, Vankov) Annecy (Przysiezniak-Frey) Penn (Williams,
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
VXDBasedReco TRACK RECONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE STUDIES Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz ALCPG Workshop, Snowmass Colorado August 14-28,
Photon + MET Analysis Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 05 August 2013 SUSY Review Talk.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Current Status of e-ID based on BDT Algorithm Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li, T. Dai, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) BNL Analysis Jamboree March.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Photon Reconstruction Efficiencies in Higgs → γγ Events Neil Cooper-Smith RHUL ATLAS UK Higgs Meeting - Durham 11/01/07.
Reconstruction of converted photons E. Tournefier LAPP meeting Feb. 2,2012 Algorithm for the reconstruction of converted photons Performances studies:
Converted photons efficiency
Converted photons efficiency
W→τν Note & Tau candidates in first data
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

Non-Pointing Photon Work at UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP ATLAS RPV/Long-lived Physics Group November Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP

Initial goal: include conversions in reconstruction Mauro Donega, UPenn Conversion radius resolution may be good enough to provide an independent constraint on GMSB parameters Pointing accuracy of reconstructed conversion may be quite good Reconstructed radius of material-induced conversions

However: conversions only available in release 14, so must migrate analysis to new release (using ; not ideal, but workable for conversions)  Intermediate goal: develop release 14 DPD for non-pointing photon analysis First step: migrate non-standard photon identification to release 14 via isEMMasks (applied in EVPhotonInserter)

Default vs. Non-Pointing Gamma Selection (?) Mask Bit Default CriterionNP  selection 0  rangeYES 1Hadronic leakageYES 4Middle energyYES 5Middle ratio 37NO 6Middle ratio 33NO 7Middle widthNO 8Strips energy ratioYES 9E 2,max NO 10  E 2,max NO 111 st sample widthNO 121 st sample shapeNO 13Weighted width NO 14IsolationYES  Non- pointing photon mask is 0x4113

Raw photon container Default selection Non-pointing selection IsEM flag for 50 GMSB events, for various photon ID requirements. Shown is a decimal representation of a bitwise record of failed photon/electron ID criteria

Next steps for UCSC work: Need to have at least a crude validation between release 13 and 14 on signal MC  truth matching also needs to be explored (GHIT vs. proximity) Establish “non-pointing photon DPD” (private package) Add in conversions, explore efficiency and conversion radius resolution Understand if and how conversion information can enhance understanding of GMSB parameters. Plan to begin every-other-weekly phone/EVO meetings with non-pointing photon group