Marco Del Negro, Frank Schorfheide, Frank Smets, and Raf Wouters (DSSW) On the Fit of New-Keynesian Models Discussion by: Lawrence Christiano.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample
Advertisements

Computational Statistics. Basic ideas  Predict values that are hard to measure irl, by using co-variables (other properties from the same measurement.
CHAPTER 21 Inferential Statistical Analysis. Understanding probability The idea of probability is central to inferential statistics. It means the chance.
AP Statistics – Chapter 9 Test Review
Models with Discrete Dependent Variables
Slide 1 EE3J2 Data Mining EE3J2 Data Mining Lecture 10 Statistical Modelling Martin Russell.
QM Spring 2002 Business Statistics Introduction to Inference: Hypothesis Testing.
Hypothesis Testing Steps of a Statistical Significance Test. 1. Assumptions Type of data, form of population, method of sampling, sample size.
458 Fitting models to data – II (The Basics of Maximum Likelihood Estimation) Fish 458, Lecture 9.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Ch. 9 Fundamental of Hypothesis Testing
Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e © 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-1 TUTORIAL 6 Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing.
© 1999 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap Chapter Topics Hypothesis Testing Methodology Z Test for the Mean (  Known) p-Value Approach to Hypothesis Testing.
1 BA 555 Practical Business Analysis Review of Statistics Confidence Interval Estimation Hypothesis Testing Linear Regression Analysis Introduction Case.
Review for Exam 2 Some important themes from Chapters 6-9 Chap. 6. Significance Tests Chap. 7: Comparing Two Groups Chap. 8: Contingency Tables (Categorical.
Marshall University School of Medicine Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology BMS 617 Lecture 6 – Multiple comparisons, non-normality, outliers Marshall.
Section 9.1 Introduction to Statistical Tests 9.1 / 1 Hypothesis testing is used to make decisions concerning the value of a parameter.
The horseshoe estimator for sparse signals CARLOS M. CARVALHO NICHOLAS G. POLSON JAMES G. SCOTT Biometrika (2010) Presented by Eric Wang 10/14/2010.
Inference for a Single Population Proportion (p).
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions.
CHAPTER 16: Inference in Practice. Chapter 16 Concepts 2  Conditions for Inference in Practice  Cautions About Confidence Intervals  Cautions About.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Sampling Distributions.
Lecture 7 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. Lecture Goals After completing this lecture, you should be able to: Formulate null and alternative hypotheses.
1 Statistical Distribution Fitting Dr. Jason Merrick.
CHAPTER 14 Introduction to Inference BPS - 5TH ED.CHAPTER 14 1.
AP STATISTICS LESSON 10 – 2 DAY 1 TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Learning Lateral Connections between Hidden Units Geoffrey Hinton University of Toronto in collaboration with Kejie Bao University of Toronto.
Various topics Petter Mostad Overview Epidemiology Study types / data types Econometrics Time series data More about sampling –Estimation.
1 Chapter 10: Introduction to Inference. 2 Inference Inference is the statistical process by which we use information collected from a sample to infer.
Week 71 Hypothesis Testing Suppose that we want to assess the evidence in the observed data, concerning the hypothesis. There are two approaches to assessing.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 8 Introduction to Statistical Inferences.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 17.
Chap 8-1 A Course In Business Statistics, 4th © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. A Course In Business Statistics 4 th Edition Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis.
MATH 2400 Ch. 15 Notes.
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms: Null Hypothesis, Rejection Region, and Type I and II errors.
Chap 8-1 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests.
Ex St 801 Statistical Methods Inference about a Single Population Mean.
"Classical" Inference. Two simple inference scenarios Question 1: Are we in world A or world B?
Logic and Vocabulary of Hypothesis Tests Chapter 13.
9.3/9.4 Hypothesis tests concerning a population mean when  is known- Goals Be able to state the test statistic. Be able to define, interpret and calculate.
9.1 Notes Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. In hypothesis testing there are 2 hypothesis for each problem, the null hypothesis and the alternate hypothesis.
BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 151 Thinking about Inference.
Statistics What is the probability that 7 heads will be observed in 10 tosses of a fair coin? This is a ________ problem. Have probabilities on a fundamental.
Machine Learning 5. Parametric Methods.
Education 793 Class Notes Inference and Hypothesis Testing Using the Normal Distribution 8 October 2003.
Least Squares Estimate Additional Notes 1. Introduction The quality of an estimate can be judged using the expected value and the covariance matrix of.
From the population to the sample The sampling distribution FETP India.
Introduction to Basic Statistical Methods Part 1: “Statistics in a Nutshell” UWHC Scholarly Forum March 19, 2014 Ismor Fischer, Ph.D. UW Dept of Statistics.
+ Unit 5: Estimating with Confidence Section 8.3 Estimating a Population Mean.
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 8&9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms variance and standard error of a sample mean, Null Hypothesis,
Bootstrapping James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Chapter 11: Categorical Data n Chi-square goodness of fit test allows us to examine a single distribution of a categorical variable in a population. n.
Class Seven Turn In: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 For Class Eight: Chapter 20: 18, 20, 24 Chapter 22: 34, 36 Read Chapters 23 &
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter 10.
Data Modeling Patrice Koehl Department of Biological Sciences
Logic of Hypothesis Testing
Step 1: Specify a null hypothesis
(5) Notes on the Least Squares Estimate
LECTURE 09: BAYESIAN ESTIMATION (Cont.)
Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing
P-values.
Sampling Distributions
Sampling Distributions
When we free ourselves of desire,
Chapter 9: Hypothesis Tests Based on a Single Sample
Statistical Assumptions for SLR
Significance Tests: The Basics
Estimating a Population Proportion
Basic Practice of Statistics - 3rd Edition Introduction to Inference
Tests of Significance Section 10.2.
Presentation transcript:

Marco Del Negro, Frank Schorfheide, Frank Smets, and Raf Wouters (DSSW) On the Fit of New-Keynesian Models Discussion by: Lawrence Christiano

Objective: Provide a scalar measure of the fit of a Dynamic, Stochastic, General Equilibrium Model (DSGE). Apply measure of fit to an empirically important example.

Consider a vector autoregression (VAR): Least squares estimation:

DSGE model implication for VAR –DSGE model parameters – θ Hybrid model

Models: Marginal likelihood: Best fit: Finding: Conclusion: ‘Evidence of model misspecification’

Questions Although the marginal likelihood is a sensible way to assess fit in principle… –Compromises are required for tractability –How compelling are the assumptions about likelihood function, priors… How severe is the evidence against the model when –Even if DSGE model were true, unrestricted VAR might fit better in a small sample Is the Hybrid model useful?

DSSW Assume the Likelihood of the Data is Gaussian Fit a four-lag, 7 variable VAR using US data, 1955Q4-2006Q1. Compute skewness and kurtosis statistics for each of 7 VAR disturbances

There is strong evidence against normality assumption

Prior on VAR Parameters Gaussian Likelihood is a function only of VAR parameters: How do DSGE model parameters enter? –They control the priors on VAR parameters:

Prior on VAR Parameters… Density In case DSGE model Is true Density in case DSGE model is false

Prior on VAR Parameters… Do DSSW priors fairly capture notion that DSGE model might be false? Another possibility: –If preferred DSGE model is false, some other DSGE model is true. –Must specify a prior over alternative DSGE models. Induced priors over VAR parameters likely to be different from Normal/Wishart assumption of DSSW –Problem: Most likely, could not even describe alternative DSGE models, much less assign priors to them! Presumably, this would lead us even further away from DSSW. These concerns about the DSSW priors would be mere quibbles if their approach were the only one to assessing model fit. –But, there are other approaches –More on this later…

And DSGE Model Fit Priors for DSGE: Marginal likelihood:

Questions How severe is the evidence against the model when To answer this, studied multiple artificial data samples generated from a simple DSGE model

Simple (Long-Plosser) Model Setup: Experiment:

Results Doing DSSW calculations on artificial data Implications –DSSW evidence of misspecification occurs 1/3 of the time, even though DSGE model is true. –Misspecification of likelihood seems not to matter.

Interpretation of Results Why do DSSW find evidence against DSGE model, even when the model is true? One answer: In finite samples, unrestricted VAR often fits substantially better than true VAR implied by DSGE.

Interpretation of Results… Interior typically occur in samples where VAR fits substantially better than true model

Conclusion DSSW rule: –‘We have evidence of misspecification whenever the peak of the marginal likelihood function is attained at a finite value.’ –with high probability, this rule leads to overly pessimistic assesment of models. What can we learn from about fit of DSGE models? –Requires doing simulation experiments in more elaborate models. –Poses significant computational challenges.

Conclusion…. Marginal likelihood provides a sensible measure of fit in principle, however –Assumptions required for tractability render marginal likelihood hard to interpret. –The hybrid model is selected by marginal likelihood criterion – why should it be taken seriously? A less sophisticated, but more transparent and easy to interpret measure of fit: –Out of Sample Root Mean Square Errors.

Most likely Model, Other model Prior on model 2: P(M 2 ) Prior on model 1: P(M 1 )

Prior on VAR Parameters… The alternative priors would presumably be very different (e.g., multimodal). In practice, we don’t know what other model might be true (this is a basic fact about research!) –How would we even think of priors in this case? –Robust control? Placing priors on VAR parameters conditional on model being false seems very difficult. –Is the DSSW approach the right one? If DSSW approach were the only way to assess model fit, concerns about plausibility of prior would have less force –But, there are other approaches –More on this later…