Kin Yip MSU, Oct. 1998 Efficiency-p t turn-on curve, offset & p t MC Simulation using UPG_GEANT with muons Study for the p t trigger thresholds in L1 (CFTTM)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Particle rate in M1 and M2 Muon Meeting
Advertisements

Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.

To figure out which tubes are working fine… Compare 24 to 2.6 and 2.51 to 2.6 by taking the ratio of counts. In general, 2.4 had the most problems, and.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
Quick Sort, Shell Sort, Counting Sort, Radix Sort AND Bucket Sort
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
27 Oct. 2000TGC Simulation video meeting1 Trigger Simulation Hisaya Kurashige KOBE Univ.
Percentiles A percentile is a measure of relative standing, meaning we get information about the position of a value relative to the rest of the data set.
Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,
1 Percentiles. 2 Seems like on a standardized test we don’t care much about the test score as much as the percentile. (OK not always – ACT, for example.)
Surplus Hits Ratio Leon R. C&A Meeting Oct. 31, 2001.
1 Level1 Central Track Trigger Physics Justification Proposed Implementation Costs and Schedule Meenakshi Narain Boston University / Dzero Collaboration.
Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
L1 CTT May 14, 2002 New Scheme for Tracking Marvin Johnson.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan.
Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006.
Aeration Strategy Simulations for Australian Wheat Storage Ben Plumier.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Computer Science Searching & Sorting.
Hit rate at high luminosity logical channels - ghosts – efficiency Toy Monte Carlo : # I have assumed a uniform particle distribution inside the TS # I.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
All DØ Meeting, 12/01/00 Central Fiber Tracker Light Guide Performance Thomas Nunnemann Fermilab 90 days before RunII … (a.k.a. 12/01/00)
+ Selection Sort Method Joon Hee Lee August 12, 2012.
SciFi Trigger Review: Physics Goals and Algorithms Kin Yip, Fermilab L1 Trigger Review, Jan. 22, 1999  Physics Ingredients  Min. P T  CFT Efficiencies.
 initially Treat data as N sorted collections that are each one datum long.  merge Merge each consecutive pair of collections to form sorted collections.
2-D & 3-D Random Walk Simulations of Stochastic Diffusion Bob Brazzle (Jefferson College)
Update on Diffractive Dijets Analysis Hardeep Bansil Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 10/04/2014.
Measures of Central Tendency Mean, Median, Mode, and Range.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Oct. 16, 1998Hobbs (thanks Hal)1 SMT Road Widths & Extra CFT Layers Current Situation Adding a 3rd CFT layer Using all 8 CFT layers Summary.
 Life Expectancy is 180 th in the World.  Literacy Rate is 4 th in Africa.
In the first pass, the first two numbers are compared. The shuttle sort compares the numbers in pairs from left to right exchanging when necessary.
+ GE2/1 Case Considerations Alexei Safonov. + CMS Muon Upgrades CMS Technical Proposal in its part related to muon systems lists following: MEX/1 electronics.
And a review of scientific notation 2.7 – Piecewice Functions.
Muon Efficiency and Fake Rate Two Dimension Fit Exclusive B->JPsiMuMu Analysis in CMSSW_3_1_2 1.
QCD Trigger Report Charge: 1)Plans for future and which triggers should never be prescaled? 2)Which triggers are currently used: purity and trigger studies.
Muon Trigger Performance Run12 PP510GeV Sanghwa Park (SNU/RIKEN)
Off-Detector Processing for Phase II Track Trigger Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen,
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm with STT
More technical description:
Bin Packing First fit decreasing algorithm
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data
Searches for double partons
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
Jean Ballet, CEA Saclay GSFC, 31 May 2006 All-sky source search
Shuttle Sort Example 1st pass Comparisons: 1
Average Cost = Cost / quantity
Bin Packing First fit decreasing algorithm
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Box and Whisker Plots 50% Step 1 – Order the series.
The Top Quark Discovery
STAR Analysis Meeting - BNL
Shell Sort and Merge Sort
Bin Packing First fit decreasing algorithm
Box and Whisker Plots 50% Step 1 – Order the series.
Box and Whisker Plots 50% Step 1 – Order the series.
Kinder Math Bee Counting Practice.
Bin Packing First fit decreasing algorithm
Word Problems Numerical Solutions
100MeV learning.
Box and Whisker Plots 50% Step 1 – Order the series.
Shuttle Sort Example 1st pass Comparisons: 1
Diego Tonelli Fermilab - for the CDF and DØ collaborations
Jianguo Bian, Guoming Chen,Jian Wang IHEP, Beijing 2011 Oct 7
X ⦁ X = 64 ±8 ±14 X ⦁ X ⦁ X =
A brief Update on secondary vertex tagged jets
Presentation transcript:

Kin Yip MSU, Oct Efficiency-p t turn-on curve, offset & p t MC Simulation using UPG_GEANT with muons Study for the p t trigger thresholds in L1 (CFTTM) using two different algorithms Only the factor of track equations (roads) is considered here Offset Equations sorted according to offsets ; Larger offsets  smaller p t ; Taking away equations with larger offsets at each time  inefficiencies at lower p t ;  not very sharp turn-on. P t Find the average p t for each equation from its max./min.; Equations sorted according to p t ; Taking away equations with lower p t by inspection  inefficiencies at lower p t  sharper turn-on.

Kin Yip MSU, Oct Track binning By offset ( in terms of fibers )

Kin Yip MSU, Oct P T binning yields sharper turn-on than offset binning

Kin Yip MSU, Oct L1 CFT binning complications >16000 CFT track equations for each Front-End Board ( 4.5° sector ) in probably 16 tracking PLD’s ; 1/p t No. of equations within a range of p t  1/p t  a lower p t bin/threshold has many more equations ! Assuming 4 p t bins, it’d be nice if each group of PLD can accommodate one p t bin/threshold ; but  half of the equations needed for PLD’s in the lowest p t bin,  Too many ! Leave no flexibility for future change.

Kin Yip MSU, Oct. 1998

Kin Yip MSU, Oct st Pt bin 2 nd Pt bin 3 rd Pt bin 4 th Pt bin

Kin Yip MSU, Oct Undecided ? I pick p t thresholds for the L1 trigger counts ( not directly related to L2 etc. ) as (1) GeV (2) GeV (3) GeV (4) > 10 GeV