PANNA Pesticide Database ©Pesticide Action Network North America 1999–2007 www.pesticideinfo.org Susan Kegley, Stephan Orme, Tony Choi, and Brian Hill.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Board Monitoring and Special Studies Related to 303d Listing and TMDLs Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Advertisements

O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Urban Runoff Management: So Far, So Good. So What? Geoff Brosseau The RMP 2007 Annual Meeting Perspectives on the Impact of the Clean Water Act on San.
Craig L. Carlisle Senior Engineering Geologist San Diego Water Board Update.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Pollution Risk to Watersheds in Loudoun County GIS 200 May 11, 2009.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Tools for Linking Management Measures to Water Quality Information Center for the Environment Mike Byrne March 6, 2001.
Watershed Characterization System (WCS) and its Modeling Extensions
1 National Hydrography Dataset Applications Overview Symposium on Terrain Analysis for Water Resources Applications Austin, Texas December 16, 2002.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS National Hydrography Dataset Stewardship in West Virginia George Heleine USGS NHD POC Region.
Idaho State Department of Agriculture Division of Agricultural Resources Gary Bahr November 19, 2003 Idaho’s Pesticide and Water Quality Program Gary Bahr.
Climate Change Science Program Climate Policy & Voluntary Programs Mercury & Water Quality Pesticides & Other POPs Local & Regional Air Quality Intercontinental.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Region 1 & 2 IR Workshop October 28,  The Water Quality Framework is a new way of thinking about how EPA’s data and information systems can be.
Digital Watershed: Institute of Water Research Michigan State University A Nationwide Web Application Tool for Effective Watershed Management.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research TMDL Science Needs and the Role of Research Douglas J. Norton USEPA Office of Water October 2005 Douglas J.
SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.
January 2002 Géraud Servin 1 of 12 Terrestrial Ecosystem Monitoring Sites.
GIS in Watershed Analysis. Why watershed Analysis with GIS? Concepts Important datasets Analysis Tools.
NHD Products and Applications InterMountain GIS 2014 NHD Workshop April 7, 2014.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning.
Modeling bacteria flow from wildlife in the Leon River Basin, TX Sonny Kwon.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey North American Encyclopedia of Life Web-based resource to enable federal data usage, integration,
Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup West Palm Beach November 2006.
David Nail USGS Geospatial Liaison to Indiana March 13 th, 2007 Update on National Hydrography Data.
Advisory Committee Kickoff Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California July 29, 2003 CAL/EPA.
SWAMP Statewide Monitoring Programs Statewide Monitoring Programs Regional Monitoring Programs Regional Monitoring Programs Infrastructure & Tools Infrastructure.
Environmental Stewardship Program. Objectives Keep growers informed Promote the industry’s environmental stewardship efforts Advance efforts in sustainability.
Pesticides and Urban Water Quality in California. A Stormwater Perspective Dave Tamayo, Environmental Specialist Sacramento County Stormwater Program Chair,
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.
Addressing the Sediment Problem in Sonoma Creek Watershed Rebecca Lawton 1, Deanne DiPietro 1, Laurel Collins 2, Arthur Dawson 1 1 Sonoma Ecology Center,
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
San Francisco Estuary Partnership PCBs in Caulk Project Overview PCBs in Caulk Project Overview October 26, 2010.
K aren Worcester Staff Environmental Scientist with thanks to M. Thomas, D. Paradies, L. Harlan, and P. Meertens California Central Coast Regional Water.
Toxic Releases in California: Industrial Facility Releases vs. Pesticide Use ( )
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) in California and SWAMP's Statewide Strategy California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Freshwater.
Development of a Water Quality Monitoring Program A joint effort by SFEI and the North Bay Watershed Association Presentation to NBWA Watershed Council.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Data Flow CEDEN GeoTracker DPR PUR SWAMP USGS NWIS Water Quality Goals CCAMP Staging Database CCAMP Websites System is intended to be set up using routine.
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Tools for Tracking Healthy Watersheds
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
UC ANR Pesticide Use Report (PUR) Analysis Workgroup
National Hydro Data Programs
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Central Valley Monitoring Directory
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Vineyards and Water Quality
Presentation transcript:

PANNA Pesticide Database ©Pesticide Action Network North America 1999– Susan Kegley, Stephan Orme, Tony Choi, and Brian Hill

Goals Consolidate and integrate existing data on pesticides Make pesticide information available and accessible to all Provide a resource for scientists, advocates, regulators, IPM managers and the public

WaterPIC Objectives Harmonize datasets under one roof Accelerate analysis of pesticide impacts on the environment, including use trends Facilitate a greater understanding of relationships between pesticide use and environmental impacts in water Create an easy to use and easy to understand tool for regulators, scientists, watershed groups, and the general public

WaterPIC Datasets DPR Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR) data Water quality monitoring data –USGS –DPR –CA Water Boards: SWAMP (next iteration) Geospatial information –RWQCB TMDL watershed delineations –CalWater watershed delineations –USGS HUC watersheds delineations –303d TMDL List of impaired waterways and rivers, lakes, streams (next iteration) Aquatic toxicity –EPA AQUIRE data Water quality criteria –U.S. EPA, CA, Canada, other countries

WaterPIC Potential Uses Facilitates development of water quality monitoring programs Provides a first approximation correlation between pesticide use and water pollution Provides temporal trend analysis Facilitates TMDL development Helps growers evaluate BMPs (Ag Waiver) Highlights data gaps

WaterPIC Acknowledgments –Funders: USEPA Region 9, True North Foundation, San Francisco Foundation –Tony Choi (Placer Data) –Stephen Orme –Brian Hill –USEPA, DPR, USGS, RWQCB: data source providers –Advisory Board U.S. EPA: John Ungvarsky, Debra Denton Water Board: Bill Johnson USGS: Kathy Kuivila SFEI: Meg Sedlak Public interest groups: Lara Cushing (CEH), Sejal Choksi (WaterKeepers), Paola Ramos (LIF), Lena Brook (CWA) Consultant: Kelly Moran, TDC Environmental

Next Steps Internationalization of the site User interface update Add urban uses to WaterPIC Add “organic approved” tag

Support David B. Gold Foundation Bauman Foundation Clarence E. Heller Foundation U.S. EPA, Region IX Global IPM Facility HIVOS-Dutch International Biodiversity Fund US AID Californians for Pesticide Reform True North Foundation Other funders and supporters of PAN North America