Crash Recovery Lecture 24 R&G - Chapter 18 If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things that you have to do is to learn about heavy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crash Recovery R&G - Chapter 20
Advertisements

Crash Recovery John Ortiz. Lecture 22Crash Recovery2 Review: The ACID properties  Atomicity: All actions in the transaction happen, or none happens 
Transaction Management: Crash Recovery, part 2 CS634 Class 21, Apr 23, 2014 Slides based on “Database Management Systems” 3 rd ed, Ramakrishnan and Gehrke.
CS 440 Database Management Systems Lecture 10: Transaction Management - Recovery 1.
1 Crash Recovery Chapter Review: The ACID properties  A  A tomicity: All actions of the Xact happen, or none happen.  C  C onsistency: If each.
Jianlin Feng School of Software SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY
Database Management Systems, 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke 1 Crash Recovery Chapter 18.
Crash Recovery R&G - Chapter 18.
ARIES: Logging and Recovery Slides derived from Joe Hellerstein; Updated by A. Fekete If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things.
Crash Recovery, Part 1 If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things that you have to do is to learn about heavy equipment. Robert.
5/13/20151 PSU’s CS …. Recovery - Review (only for DB with updates…..!)  ACID: Atomicity & Durability  Trading execution time for recovery time.
1 Crash Recovery Chapter Review: The ACID properties  A  A tomicity: All actions of the Xact happen, or none happen.  C  C onsistency: If each.
© Dennis Shasha, Philippe Bonnet 2001 Log Tuning.
Introduction to Database Systems1 Logging and Recovery CC Lecture 2.
1 Crash Recovery Chapter Review: The ACID properties  A  A tomicity: All actions in the Xact happen, or none happen.  C  C onsistency: If each.
COMP9315: Database System Implementation 1 Crash Recovery Chapter 18 (3 rd Edition)
Chapter 20: Recovery. 421B: Database Systems - Recovery 2 Failure Types q Transaction Failures: local recovery q System Failure: Global recovery I Main.
Database Management Systems, 2 nd Edition. R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke 1 Crash Recovery Chapter 20 If you are going to be in the logging business, one.
Transaction Management: Crash Recovery CS634 Class 20, Apr 16, 2014 Slides based on “Database Management Systems” 3 rd ed, Ramakrishnan and Gehrke.
ICS 421 Spring 2010 Transactions & Recovery Asst. Prof. Lipyeow Lim Information & Computer Science Department University of Hawaii at Manoa 3/4/20101Lipyeow.
Crash Recovery CS 186 Spring 2006, Lecture 26 & 27 R&G - Chapter 18 If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things that you have to.
Review Lecture 30. Administrivia Office hours 1:30 – 2:15 today Final Exam May a.m. Location: 22 Warren Topics since Midterm 2 –Transactions,
Database Management Systems 1 Logging and Recovery If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things that you have to do is to learn about.
1 Crash Recovery Yanlei Diao UMass Amherst April 3 and 5, 2007 Slides Courtesy of R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke.
Recovery with Aries. Locking Lock and Unlock take DB resources as arguments: DB, a relation, tuple, etc. Lock and Unlock take DB resources as arguments:
Slides derived from Joe Hellerstein; Updated by A. Fekete
CPSC 461. Goal Goal of this lecture is to study Crash Recovery which is subpart of transaction management in DBMS. Crash recovery in DBMS is achieved.
Optimistic Concurrency Control & ARIES: Database Logging and Recovery Zachary G. Ives University of Pennsylvania CIS 650 – Implementing Data Management.
DatabaseSystems/COMP4910/Spring03/Melikyan1 Crash Recovery.
DURABILITY OF TRANSACTIONS AND CRASH RECOVERY These are mostly the slides of your textbook !
Logging and Recovery Chapter 18 If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things that you have to do is to learn about heavy equipment.
ARIES: Logging and Recovery Slides derived from Joe Hellerstein; Updated by A. Fekete If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things.
1 Crash Recovery Lecture 23 Ramakrishnan - Chapter 20 If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things that you have to do is to learn.
ARIES: Database Logging and Recovery Zachary G. Ives University of Pennsylvania CIS 650 – Implementing Data Management Systems February 9, 2005 Some content.
ARIES, Concluded and Distributed Databases: R* Zachary G. Ives University of Pennsylvania CIS 650 – Implementing Data Management Systems October 2, 2008.
© Dennis Shasha, Philippe Bonnet 2001 Log Tuning.
Motivation for Recovery Atomicity: –Transactions may abort (“Rollback”). Durability: –What if DBMS stops running? (Causes?) crash! v Desired Behavior after.
Implementation of Database Systems, Jarek Gryz 1 Crash Recovery Chapter 18.
1 Logging and Recovery. 2 Review: The ACID properties v A v A tomicity: All actions in the Xact happen, or none happen. v C v C onsistency: If each Xact.
Database Applications (15-415) DBMS Internals- Part XIV Lecture 25, April 17, 2016 Mohammad Hammoud.
1 Database Systems ( 資料庫系統 ) January 3, 2005 Chapter 18 By Hao-hua Chu ( 朱浩華 )
SIMPLE CONCURRENCY CONTROL. Correctness criteria: The ACID properties A A tomicity: All actions in the Xact happen, or none happen. C C onsistency: If.
© Dennis Shasha, Philippe Bonnet 2001 Log Tuning.
DURABILITY OF TRANSACTIONS AND CRASH RECOVERY
CS 440 Database Management Systems
Crash Recovery The slides for this text are organized into chapters. This lecture covers Chapter 20. Chapter 1: Introduction to Database Systems Chapter.
Crash Recovery R&G - Chapter 20
Database Applications (15-415) DBMS Internals- Part XIII Lecture 22, November 15, 2016 Mohammad Hammoud.
Slides derived from Joe Hellerstein; Updated by A. Fekete
CS186 Slides by Joe Hellerstein Enhanced by Alan Fekete
Crash Recovery Chapter 18
Database Applications (15-415) DBMS Internals- Part XIV Lecture 23, November 20, 2016 Mohammad Hammoud.
Ali Ghodsi and Ion Stoica,
Database Systems (資料庫系統)
Crash Recovery R&G - Chapter 20
Crash Recovery Chapter 18
Crash Recovery The slides for this text are organized into chapters. This lecture covers Chapter 20. Chapter 1: Introduction to Database Systems Chapter.
Introduction to Database Systems
Recovery I: The Log and Write-Ahead Logging
Recovery II: Surviving Aborts and System Crashes
Crash Recovery Chapter 18
Kathleen Durant PhD CS 3200 Lecture 11
Crash Recovery, Part 2 R&G - Chapter 18
Crash Recovery The slides for this text are organized into chapters. This lecture covers Chapter 20. Chapter 1: Introduction to Database Systems Chapter.
Database Applications (15-415) DBMS Internals- Part XIII Lecture 25, April 15, 2018 Mohammad Hammoud.
RECOVERY MANAGER E0 261 Jayant Haritsa Computer Science and Automation
Crash Recovery Chapter 18
Database Applications (15-415) DBMS Internals- Part XIII Lecture 24, April 14, 2016 Mohammad Hammoud.
Slides derived from Joe Hellerstein; Updated by A. Fekete
Crash Recovery Chapter 18
Presentation transcript:

Crash Recovery Lecture 24 R&G - Chapter 18 If you are going to be in the logging business, one of the things that you have to do is to learn about heavy equipment. Robert VanNatta, Logging History of Columbia County

Review: The ACID properties A Atomicity: All actions in the Xact happen, or none happen. C Consistency: If each Xact is consistent, and the DB starts consistent, it ends up consistent. I Isolation: Execution of one Xact is isolated from that of other Xacts. D Durability: If a Xact commits, its effects persist. Recovery Manager helps with atomicity and durability

Motivation Atomicity: –Recovery manager needs to undo actions of aborted transactions. Durability: –Recovery manager needs to recover database if DBMS crashes crash! v Desired state after system restarts: –T1 & T3 should be durable. –T2, T4 & T5 should be aborted (effects not seen). T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 Abort Commit

Assumptions Concurrency control is in effect. –Strict 2PL, in particular. Updates are happening “in place”. –i.e. data is overwritten on (deleted from) the actual page copies (not private copies).

Buffer Mgmt Plays a Key Role Steal policy – allow buffer manager to ‘steal’ buffer- pool frames with uncommitted updates. –Better performance! –But, complicates recovery; some uncommitted disk pages may make it to disk. No Steal policy – don’t allow buffer-pool frames with uncommited updates to overwrite committed data on disk. –Useful for ensuring atomicity without UNDO logging. –But can cause poor performance.

Buffer Mgmt Plays a Key Role Force policy – make sure that every update is on disk before commit. –Provides durability without REDO logging. –But, can cause poor performance. No Force policy – don’t require buffer-pool frames with uncommitted updates to be written to disk before commit –Much better performance! –But complicates recovery; some uncommitted disk pages might make it to disk.

Buffer Management summary Force No Force No Steal Steal No REDO No UNDO UNDO No REDO UNDO REDO No UNDO REDO Force No Force No Steal Steal Slowest Fastest Performance Implications Logging/Recovery Implications

Preferred Policy: Steal/No-Force This combination is most complicated but allows for highest performance. NO FORCE (complicates enforcing Durability) –What if system crashes before a modified page written by a committed transaction makes it to disk? –Write as little as possible, in a convenient place, at commit time, to support REDOing modifications. STEAL (complicates enforcing Atomicity) –What if the Xact that performed updates aborts? –What if system crashes before Xact is finished? –Must remember the old value of P (to support UNDOing the write to page P).

Basic Idea: Logging Record REDO and UNDO information, for every update, in a log. –Sequential writes to log (put it on a separate disk). –Minimal info (diff) written to log, so multiple updates fit in a single log page. Log: An ordered list of REDO/UNDO actions –Log record contains: –and additional control info (which we’ll see soon).

Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) The Write-Ahead Logging Protocol:  Must force the log record for an update before the corresponding data page gets to disk.  Must force all log records for a Xact before commit. (or, a transaction is not committed until all of its log records including its “commit” record are on the stable log.) #1 (with UNDO info) helps guarantee Atomicity. #2 (with REDO info) helps guarantee Durability. This allows us to implement Steal/No-Force Exactly how is logging (and recovery!) done? –We’ll look at the ARIES algorithms from IBM.

WAL & the Log Each log record has a unique Log Sequence Number (LSN). –LSNs always increasing. Each data page contains a pageLSN. –The LSN of the most recent log record for an update to that page. System keeps track of flushedLSN. –The max LSN flushed so far. WAL: Before page i is written to DB log must satisfy: pageLSN i  flushedLSN LSNspageLSNs RAM flushedLSN pageLSN Log records flushed to disk “Log tail” in RAM flushedLSN DB

Log Records prevLSN is the LSN of the previous log record written by this Xact (so records of an Xact form a linked list backwards in time) Possible log record types: Update, Commit, Abort Checkpoint (for log maintenance) Compensation Log Records (CLRs) –for UNDO actions End (end of commit or abort) LSN prevLSN XID type length pageID offset before-image after-image LogRecord fields: update records only

Other Log-Related State Two in-memory tables: Transaction Table –One entry per currently active Xact. entry removed when Xact commits or aborts –Contains XID, status (running/committing/aborting), and lastLSN (most recent LSN written by Xact). Dirty Page Table: –One entry per dirty page currently in buffer pool. –Contains recLSN -- the LSN of the log record which first caused the page to be dirty.

Checkpointing Conceptually, keep log around for all time. Obviously this has performance/implementation problems… Periodically, the DBMS creates a checkpoint, in order to minimize the time taken to recover in the event of a system crash. Write to log: –begin_checkpoint record: Indicates when chkpt began. –end_checkpoint record: Contains current Xact table and dirty page table. This is a `fuzzy checkpoint’: Other Xacts continue to run; so these tables accurate only as of the time of the begin_checkpoint record. No attempt to force dirty pages to disk; effectiveness of checkpoint limited by oldest unwritten change to a dirty page. –Store LSN of most recent chkpt record in a safe place (master record).

The Big Picture: What’s Stored Where DB Data pages each with a pageLSN Xact Table lastLSN status Dirty Page Table recLSN flushedLSN RAM LSN prevLSN XID type length pageID offset before-image after-image LogRecords LOG Master record

Example GDE Page 1 LSN:2 ABC Page 2 LSN:4 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 1.T1 update 2 (DEF) (assume written to disk) 2.T2 update 3 (KLM) 3.T2 update 1 (QRS) 4.T1 update 2 (WXY) 5.T2 commit 6.T1 update 4 (RST) 7.SYSTEM CRASH LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN: T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end 16 14T1 update 4 OPQ RST SYSTEM CRASH KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 To disk GDE Page 1 LSN:2 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT DEF Page 2 LSN:11

Crash Recovery: Big Picture v Start from a checkpoint (found via master record). v Three phases. Need to do: –Analysis - Figure out which Xacts committed since checkpoint, which failed. –REDO all actions. (repeat history) –UNDO effects of failed Xacts. Oldest log rec. of Xact active at crash Smallest recLSN in dirty page table after Analysis Last chkpt CRASH A RU

End result – goal of recovery GDE Page 1 LSN:2 ABC Page 2 LSN:4 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 1.T1 update 2 (DEF) 2.T2 update 3 (KLM) 3.T2 update 1 (QRS) 4.T1 update 2 (WXY) 5.T2 commit 6.T1 update 4 (RST) 7.SYSTEM CRASH KLM Page 3 LSN:12 QRS Page 1 LSN:2 T1 aborts Roll back updates if they made it to disk. T2 commits Re-apply updates if needed

Recovery: The Analysis Phase Re-establish knowledge of state at checkpoint. –via transaction table and dirty page table stored in the checkpoint Scan log forward from checkpoint. –End record: Remove Xact from Xact table. –All Other records: Add Xact to Xact table, set lastLSN=LSN, change Xact status on commit. –also, for Update records: If page P not in Dirty Page Table, Add P to DPT, set its recLSN=LSN. At end of Analysis… –transaction table says which xacts were active at time of crash. –DPT says which dirty pages might not have made it to disk

Analysis GDE Page 1 LSN:2 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 Xact IDLast LSNState T1 11 U ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 GDE Page 1 LSN:2 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM 13 12T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT Xact Table T2 12 U T2 13 U T1 14 U T2 15 C 1. Create entries the Xact table with xacts active at time of crash.

Analysis GDE Page 1 LSN:2 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 Xact IDLast LSNState ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 GDE Page 1 LSN:2 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 Page IDrec LSN LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM 13 12T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT Xact Table Dirty Page Table T1 14 U Create entries in the Dirty Page table with pages that might not have made it to disk.

Phase 2: The REDO Phase We Repeat History to reconstruct state at crash: –Reapply all updates (even of aborted Xacts!), redo CLRs. Scan forward from log rec containing smallest recLSN in DPT. Q: why start here? For each update log record or CLR with a given LSN, REDO the action unless: –Affected page is not in the Dirty Page Table, or –Affected page is in D.P.T., but has recLSN > LSN, or –pageLSN (in DB)  LSN. (this last case requires I/O) To REDO an action: –Reapply logged action. –Set pageLSN to LSN. No additional logging, no forcing!

Redo GDE Page 1 LSN:2 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 Xact IDLast LSNState ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 GDE Page 1 LSN:2 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 Page IDrec LSN LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM 13 12T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT Xact Table Dirty Page Table T1 14 U Step 1. Find lowest rec LSN in Dirty Page Table.

Redo GDE Page 1 LSN:2 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 Xact IDLast LSNState ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 GDE Page 1 LSN:2 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 Page IDrec LSN LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM 13 12T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT Xact Table Dirty Page Table T1 14 U Step 2. Scan forward and redo all redoable log records.

Redo GDE Page 1 LSN:2 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 Xact IDLast LSNState ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 GDE Page 1 LSN:2 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 Page IDrec LSN LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM 13 12T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT Xact Table Dirty Page Table T1 14 U Reapply LSN 11 T1 update 2 (DEF) DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 2. Reapply LSN 12 T2 update 3 (KLM)

Redo GDE Page 1 LSN:2 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 Xact IDLast LSNState ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 GDE Page 1 LSN:2 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 Page IDrec LSN LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM 13 12T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT Xact Table Dirty Page Table T1 14 U Reapply LSN 13 T2 update 1 (QRS) DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 4. Reapply LSN 14 T1 update 2 (WXY) GDE Page 1 LSN:2 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 WXY Page 2 LSN:14

Redo GDE Page 1 LSN:2 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 Xact IDLast LSNState ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 GDE Page 1 LSN:2 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 Page IDrec LSN LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM 13 12T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT Xact Table Dirty Page Table T1 14 U Reapply T2 commit (and we’ll write dirty pages to disk.) DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 QRS Page 1 LSN:13 QRS Page 1 LSN:13

Phase 3: The UNDO Phase We undo actions of all active but not committed xacts at the time of the crash. – May even need to undo some of what we did in REDO phase! ToUndo={lastLSNs of all Xacts in the Trans Table} a.k.a. “losers” Repeat: –Choose (and remove) largest LSN among ToUndo. –If this LSN is a CLR and undonextLSN==NULL Write an End record for this Xact. –If this LSN is a CLR, and undonextLSN != NULL Add undonextLSN to ToUndo –Else this LSN is an update. Undo the update, write a CLR, add prevLSN to ToUndo. Until ToUndo is empty. v CLRs will help us remember where we are in case of system crash during recovery.

Undo GDE Page 1 LSN:2 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 Buffer Frame 1Buffer Frame 2Buffer Frame 3 Xact IDLast LSNState ABC Page 2 LSN:4 DEF Page 2 LSN:11 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 WXY Page 2 LSN:14 HIJ Page 3 LSN:6 KLM Page 3 LSN:12 OPQ Page 4 LSN:8 RST Page 4 LSN:16 Last LSN LSNPrevXactIDTypepageIDBeforeAfter 11 nullT1 update 2 ABC DEF 12 nullT2 update 3 HIJ KLM 13 12T2 update 1 GDE QRS 14 11T1 update 2 DEF WXY 15 13T2 commit and end BEGIN_CHKPT END_CHKPT Xact Table ToUndo T1 14 U Add last LSN for all transactions in Xact table QRS Page 1 LSN:13 2. Recursively Process each last LSN in To Undo table. DEF Page 2 LSN:11 16 undoNextLSN=nullT1 CLR 2 DEF ABC ABC Page 2 LSN:16 ABC Page 2 LSN:4

What happens if there is a crash during recovery? Analysis phase –All analysis work is lost; redo from beginning Redo phase –Some changes may have been applied; no need to do them again –Check if pageLSN >= LSN of log record Undo phase –CLR log records tell where to pick up Undo activity; for each CLR record, if undoNextLSN != null, add undoNextLSN to ToUndo list. (e.g. we can pick up where we left off with the Undo work.)

Summary of Logging/Recovery Recovery Manager guarantees Atomicity & Durability. Use WAL to allow STEAL/NO-FORCE w/o sacrificing correctness. LSNs identify log records; linked into backwards chains per transaction (via prevLSN). pageLSN allows comparison of data page and log records.

Summary, Cont. Checkpointing: A quick way to limit the amount of log to scan on recovery. Recovery works in 3 phases: –Analysis: Forward from checkpoint. –Redo: Forward from oldest recLSN. –Undo: Backward from end to first LSN of oldest Xact alive at crash. Upon Undo, write CLRs. Redo “repeats history”: Simplifies the logic!