Can problem-based learning in interdisciplinary teams work effectively online? Ian Hutt Bland Tomkinson University of Manchester.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Advertisements

Engaging Learners at Multiple Levels: Innovations to support the development of professional practice in e-learning Adrian Kirkwood, Robin Goodfellow &
Welsh Assessment and Feedback Practitioners Event Tuesday 5 May 2009 Assessment of Problem Based Learning in Initial Teacher Education and Training Russell.
Distance, Blended & Flexible Learning Available Support and Role of the eLearning Team Ian Hutt EPS eLearning Team.
Evaluating the Use of Social Media to Increase Engagement in Public Health Units Dr Basia Diug 1 & Assoc/Prof Dragan Ilic 1 1 Medical Education Research.
Web 2.0 Collaborative Learning Tools By Dr Ken Ryba.
Creative Communication: Building and supporting active learning communities online Karen Hardin Director of Distance Learning Asst. Professor, MM Design.
Barry Spencer eLearning Barry Spencer eLearning Development Coordinator Bromley College.
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2010 – 2011 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
ESCalate seminar, Swansea Metropolitan University 3 June 2008 Digital tools for blended learning
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2008 – 2009 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
1 Positive Learning Outcomes Through Problem-Based Learning Willie Yip Department of Computing.
How Far Has Web 2.0 Enabled Personalisation? A Tale of Two Projects Neil Currant, University of Bradford and Leeds Metropolitan & Christopher Murray, University.
Tutor experiences of training, support and teaching in Elluminate for the 2009B presentations of L120, L203 and L211 Dr Simon J Cross Learning and Teaching.
1 University of York Department of Health Sciences Computer Skills Review By Ian Cole Lecturer in C&IT.
eLearning project Pg. Dip Course: Understanding Assessment Anne Cox School of Education and Training University of Greenwich.
1 A Course on Multimedia QoS Networking: Transition to Hybrid Offering and Comparative Evaluation Martin Reisslein, Jana Reisslein, and Patrick Seeling.
How was the course organized? Faculty present: Lectures, small groups, and labs. Students prepare: Problem-based learning issues, journal article reports,
ACCESS TO SKILLS ASC TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 1. WELCOME TO A UNIQUE LEARNING OPPORTUNITY... You have been invited by the Pharmacy Guild SA to participate.
Student experience and expectations of technology Associate Professor Michael Sankey Director, Learning Environments and Media.
Learning Development and Innovation Overview and Updates Steve Wyn Williams March 2013.
Let’s FACE it – we can change the world!  Deb Avery  St Nicholas Diocesan School, Pietermaritzburg  Grade 8 English Home Language – integrated with.
Predicting Competitors’ Actions.
The Uses of Blackboard in IDARI
1.Rationale for using and engaging with wikis 2.Preparation for using wikis 3.Purpose and uses of wikis 4.Wiki to aid in assessment 5.Outcomes from using.
Indicators of Family Engagement Melanie Lemoine and Monica Ballay Louisiana State Improvement Grant/SPDG.
Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Akram R. Jabur Materials Eng. Dept. University of Technology.
Damien Raftery Lecturer & eLearning Development Officer Teaching & Learning Centre Institute of Technology Carlow Using Google Docs to support Project-based.
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Innovative Approaches to Offsite Monitoring and TA Provision Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
1. Blogs – Wikis – Journals Presentations (PowerPoint) Interviews Group Work Tests – Quizzes – Labs Discussions 2.
OnlineTechnology Zaka Khan Faculty, BSCPA, University of Toronto Brad Olmstead Standards Company, Canadian Forces Health Services Training Centre Ming-Ka.
You Tube as a Learning Tool BARBARA FRALINGER RUSSELL OWENS PRESENTED BY LAUREL POWELL.
Using virtual collaboration tools for designing innovative education scenarios Gabriel Dima University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, Romania.
Gouri Banerjee, Ph. D. Dept. Math & IT, Emmanuel College Boston, Massachusetts. 1 Gouri Banerjee Blended Learning Environments, 2010.
Facilitating Learning in Professional Experience: Mentoring for Success Module 1 - An Introduction.
Step 4 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013. Training Overview Introduction Walk Through Step 4 Scheduled FET Trainings & Completion Dates for FET Step(s) Question(s)
Students’ perceptions on using blogs for reflective learning in higher educational contexts Presenters : Irshad Ali and Dr Kevin Byard.
How to be a driving force in eLearning The 2nd Promise Conference Francisca Soares PORTUGAL Prague, September 15th – 19th 2004.
 To attain an administrative position that would allow me to apply my leadership, problem solving and collaboration skills to effectively manage my school.
21st CENTURY LEARNING.
1 ‘Masterclass’ Tackling complex problems of sustainable development Rosemary Tomkinson Academic Support, Teaching Innovation and Development Adviser Faculty.
+ Collaborative Learning & Technology: Scaffolding for Group Work in Online Courses With Dr. Julia Parra.
What works online. What do you like online? List the things that make it easy for you when you are online.
Learning Platforms. Overview Learning Platforms LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) DEFINITION DESCRIPTION OF ANGEL LMS LEARNING PROCESSES.
Enhancing Student-Centered, Project- Based Learning through a Blended Learning Model Jamie Rogers Associate Professor - Institute of Engineering Co-Coordinator.
An Evaluation of Professional Development for One-to-One Instruction at Pantego Christian Academy Steven R. Newby Kristi Fairbanks Marilyn Dardenne.
Why are Croatian Higher Education Institutions Present on Social Networks? Kruno Golubić / University Computing Centre / University of Zagreb
QED 522 – ICT FOR ENGAGED LEARNING ICT FOR ENGAGED LEARNING QED 522 GROUP MEMBERS : Chua Ze Jun Phua Pei Juan Loh So Boey.
Reflections on the Peer-to-Peer Learning Process Warren Van Wicklin (WBI consultant) December 1, 2009.
ISTE Standards 1 & 2 Ashley Holien & Ellen Burns.
Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress Amy Gaumer Erickson & Monica Ballay December 3, 2012.
Case Study: Intranet Design for Blended Learning Activities Bram Moreinis Game Face Web Design The Empowered Teacher
Using 21st Century Tools to Teach the Arts Nancy Mangum, K-5 Instructional Technology Coordinator Robert Sox, K-5 Administrator Wake County Public School.
HFID Pam Darvirris Amy Dyer Heena Mutha Ben Small Assessing Value Through Testing Team Fresh City.
INTRODUCTION TO ONLINE FACILITATION- DAY TWO Anna N Perry.
Winning with wikis and blogs: Models for effective delivery of student online activities E-Learning Development Team University of York Simon Davis and.
Using technology to support learning through group work Bland Tomkinson Visiting Lecturer, School of MACE.
1 The Development of Web-based Resources to Support Students Undertaking Problem-based Learning Carolyn Gibbon Project Manager University of Central Lancashire.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Teaching and Learning Online What Makes Sense When Moving Courses Online.
Pedagogical reflections of PBL: A case study of an undergraduate sports studies module Mark Mierzwinski & Dr Steven Cock Department of Psychology and Sport,
ONLINE TO DISTANCE ED Susan Wagner – TAMU Beth McNeill - TAMU.
Access, Digital & Distributed Learning
Professor Rebecca Strachan Sanaa Aljabali
Light up your learning and keep it burning
E-Learning & Virtual Classroom
Developing the Guided Learner Journey
Undergraduate Survey Data
Instructor Provided Questions
Presentation transcript:

Can problem-based learning in interdisciplinary teams work effectively online? Ian Hutt Bland Tomkinson University of Manchester

Project Managing Humanitarian Aid Designed/taught by: Bland Tomkinson Unit leader: Paul Chan Management of Projects Programme (MACE) “Interdisciplinary Sustainable Development” (MSEC) Collaboration with Keele & Staffordshire Funded by NTFS

Project Managing Humanitarian Aid Social Constructivist Approach No formal lectures Small, interdisciplinary groups (~8 students) Solving “wicked problems” (scenarios) Facilitated discussions Group, individual and peer-assessed reports Issues of scalability and logistics Feasible for Distance Learning?

Online Groupwork PBL? Aftermath of the Indonesian Tsunami, 2004 Strategy for transitional accommodation Only online collaboration allowed

Structure & Tools Presentation Collaboration Assessment Online briefing material News websites Documentary (BoB) Group discussion forum File exchange Group Wiki Group Wiki report Reflective journal

Data Collection Submitted Reports – All groups and individuals successfully submitted Nominal Group Process – Groups generate +ve/-ve comments and vote – Blackboard/wiki scored strongly as a –ve Online Survey – 15 Qs, 5pt Likert scale – 62.5% response rate (15/24)

Technical / Training Q1. Technical problems prevented me from using Bb9 and the online tools effectively. (5/15 agree) Q2. I received sufficient instruction to be able to use Bb9 and the online tools effectively. (1/15 disagree)

Presentation Q3. The websites and other online resources presented through Bb9 provided useful background to the scenario. (1/15 disagree)

Collaboration - groupwork Q4. My group was able to collaborate effectively online.(3/15 disagree) Q8. I found that my group was able to engage effectively with the facilitator online.

Collaboration - tools Q6. The discussion groups and similar tools enabled my group to communicate even when we were not all online. (11/15 agree) Q5. The online tools provided enabled my group to hold effective online meetings. (5/15 agree)

Other Tools Q7. My group used additional online tools (e.g. Facebook) to collaborate online. (14/15 agree) Facebook:11 Skype: Mobile Phones:5 Google Docs:1

Preferences Q9. I prefer meeting online to meeting face-to- face. (3/15 agree) Q10. I contributed more to the online discussions than I would in a face-to- face meeting. (2/15 agree)

Creativity “I think It was a good experience, but a hard one ” “I found it hard to fulfil our commitment when collaborating online.” “Communicating through computer or other tools is time consuming” Q11. I feel that working online made our collaborations less creative. (10/15 agree)

Conclusions Limited success – All groups collaborated and submitted. – Effective group communication part of the challenge. – Students probably would not agree...! Lessons learned – Synchronous communication tool (Pronto) – Greater familiarity required