National Survey of Student Engagement—Technology and Diversity Indicators for Student Success Indiana State University College of Education.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A Review of the Evidence of Students Civic Learning in College Prepared for the Presidents Trust by Carol Schneider, Association of American College &

Advertisements

College Life Top Ten List 10. Students only spend 16% of their time on academics According to Arum & Roksa 2011.

Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.

Student Engagement Task Force Cindy Horn and John Thorp, Co-Chairs December 15, 2005.

1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.

Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.

Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.

2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.

Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.

DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.

Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Survey Results—Faculty, Students, Alumni Women’s Commission March 30, 2007.

Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.

Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.

First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.

NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.

Quality Enhancement Plan: Year Four Implementation.

GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)

Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.

Global Awareness and Student Engagement Allison BrckaLorenz Jim Gieser Program presented at the 2011 ASHE Annual Conference in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.

Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self-Evaluations Findings from the 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2006 Senior Surveys Cathy Sanders Director.

© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 1 CHAPTER 5 Sociocultural Diversity.

National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.

2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015

Assessment of Student Learning Faculty In-service June 5, 2006.

Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.

Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.

Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.

Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.

National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.

 Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.

Climate for Minorities at UK A Summary of Various Survey Findings (1997 – 2001)

Helping Freshmen Succeed February 2013 Scott Belobrajdic Assistant Vice Chancellor for Enrollment Management Rendleman Hall 1313 X 2043.

APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.

NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.

Volunteers! Volunteer Issues Committee of Literacy Action Network Summer Institute August 15, 2013 What‘s the big deal?

Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.

ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.

National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.

Measuring the Gap Between Faculty and Student Perceptions of Engagement: Results from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement University Assessment Office.

NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.

Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.

Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.

1 The Multicultural Climate at MSU- Mankato William E. Sedlacek University of Maryland

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.

Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.

Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) Results June Scores range from one to four.

1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.

Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.

UnIversity Uncovered Formations of Gender & HE Pedagogies Funded by the Higher Education Academy.

Admissions Updates was a GREAT year!

Building Leadership Capacity to Remove Racial Barriers to Student Achievement.

The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.

The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.

Results of the Developmental Assets Survey of Arlington Youth Presentation to the Advisory Council on Instruction October 14, 2009.

The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.

STUDENT DIVERSITY AND HOW IT RELATES TO STUDENT SUCCESS Dr. Michael Conyette.

The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.

NSSE Data Conversations

Student Success and Inclusivity

Dissertation Findings

NSSE Results for Faculty

Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services

Your Institutional Report Step by Step

How can ECU’s Race Equality Charter tackle degree awarding rates

Giving Diverse & Underserved Students a Leg up on Student Success

2013 NSSE Results.

Presentation transcript:

National Survey of Student Engagement—Technology and Diversity Indicators for Student Success Indiana State University College of Education

Included Diverse Perspectives In Class Discussions or Writing Assignments Teacher candidates are exposed to more diverse perspectives in class discussions or writing assignments—more so as they are seniors than when they are freshmen, suggesting that diversity in perspective increases as teacher candidates progress through the teacher education program.

Had Serious Conversations With Students of a Different Race or Ethnicity Than Your Own Senior teacher candidates increase in having serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity, suggesting that teacher candidates engage in conversations with students other than their own race or ethnicity more as they gain experience in the teacher education program.

Had Serious Conversations With Students Who Are Very Different From You In Terms of Their Religious Beliefs, Political Opinions, or Personal Values Senior teacher candidates have fewer conversations with students who are very different from them in personal values and beliefs.

Encouraging Contact Among Students From Different Economic, Social, Racial or Ethnic Backgrounds Senior teacher candidates feel less certain that the institution encourages contact among students from different backgrounds than freshman teacher candidates.

Using Computers in Academic Work Senior teacher candidates report that they use computers in academic work more than freshman teacher candidates.

Using Computing and Information Technology Senior teacher candidates report that they use computing and information technology more often than freshman teacher candidates

Understanding People of Other Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds Senior teacher candidates report that the institution contributes to a better understanding of people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds when compared to freshman teacher candidates; in addition, the average response rate for senior teacher candidates is higher than all non-teacher candidates and higher than the total for the entire university.