Population substructure Most organisms do not occupy a continuous range in time and space.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 16 Table of Contents Section 1 Genetic Equilibrium
Advertisements

1 BI3010H08 Population genetics Halliburton chapter 9 Population subdivision and gene flow If populations are reproductible isolated their genepools tend.
Lab 4: Inbreeding and Kinship. Inbreeding Causes departure from Hardy-Weinburg Equilibrium Reduces heterozygosity Changes genotype frequencies Does not.
Brian Kinlan UC Santa Barbara Integral-difference model simulations of marine population genetics.
Population Structure Partitioning of Genetic Variation.
Migration. Q1. What would be the trend for allele frequencies of populations that that are large vs. very small? A.Large populations will have a greater.
Chapter 19 Evolutionary Genetics 18 and 20 April, 2004
What causes geographic populations to become differentiated? Natural Selection? Genetic Drift? (limited gene flow)
Modeling Populations forces that act on allelic frequencies.
Section 3 Characterizing Genetic Diversity: Single Loci Gene with 2 alleles designated “A” and “a”. Three genotypes: AA, Aa, aa Population of 100 individuals.
Population Genetics I. Evolution: process of change in allele
Population Genetics (Ch. 16)
Population Genetics A.The Hardy-Weinberg principle B.Factors that can change allele frequencies.
Conservation Genetics: Lessons from Population & Evolutionary Genetics.
From population genetics to variation among species: Computing the rate of fixations.
Modeling evolutionary genetics Jason Wolf Department of ecology and evolutionary biology University of Tennessee.
Genetic Drift LIFS 691 Advanced Evolution. Genetic Drift Random changes in allelic frequencies arising from stochastic processes in populations of finite.
Quantitative Genetics
Population Genetics. Population genetics is concerned with the question of whether a particular allele or genotype will become more common or less common.
Hardy Weinberg: Population Genetics
Chapter 23 Population Genetics © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Genetic Variations Lakshmi K Matukumalli. Human – Mouse Comparison.
Lecture 12: Effective Population Size and Gene Flow October 5, 2012.
Maintaining Genetic Variation (Population Equilibrium) Populations have TWO competing factors: Remaining stable (not evolving) vs Changing (evolving)
Population Genetics and Speciation Chapter 16. Variation of Traits within a Population  Microevolution: is the evolution that occurs within a population.
Chapter 16 Section 1: Genetic Equilibrium. Variation of Traits In a Population Population Genetics Population Genetics –Microevolution vs. macroevolution.
1 1 Population Genetics. 2 2 The Gene Pool Members of a species can interbreed & produce fertile offspring Species have a shared gene pool Gene pool –
Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. – Theodosius Dobzhansky Evolution Charles Darwin in later years.
1 Random Genetic Drift 2 Conditions for maintaining Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium: 1. random mating 2. no migration 3. no mutation 4. no selection 5.infinite.
Deviations from HWE I. Mutation II. Migration III. Non-Random Mating IV. Genetic Drift A. Sampling Error.
The plant of the day Bristlecone pine - Two species Pinus aristata (CO, NM, AZ), Pinus longaeva (UT, NV, CA) Thought to reach an age far greater than any.
Bottlenecks reduce genetic variation – Genetic Drift Northern Elephant Seals were reduced to ~30 individuals in the 1800s.
Lab 7. Estimating Population Structure. Goals 1.Estimate and interpret statistics (AMOVA + Bayesian) that characterize population structure. 2.Demonstrate.
Chapter 16 Table of Contents Section 1 Genetic Equilibrium
The Hardy-Weinberg principle is like a Punnett square for populations, instead of individuals. A Punnett square can predict the probability of offspring's.
Lecture 12: Effective Population Size and Gene Flow
NEW TOPIC: MOLECULAR EVOLUTION.
Mader: Biology 8 th Ed.. Population Genetics Genetic diversity in populations changes over generations Forces that cause populations to evolve Allele.
Mammalian Population Genetics
Lab 4: Inbreeding and Kinship. Inbreeding Reduces heterozygosity Does not change allele frequencies.
The plant of the day Pinus longaevaPinus aristata.
By Bryce Perry and Cecil Brown
Robert Page Doctoral Student in Dr. Voss’ Lab Population Genetics.
Gene350 Animal Genetics Lecture August 2009.
Evolution The two most important mechanisms of evolution are
Bottlenecks reduce genetic variation – Genetic Drift
ALLELE FREQUENCY. ALLELE FREQUENCY HARDY - WEINBERG A population that is not changing genetically is said to be at Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium The assumptions.
Population Genetics And Speciation.
III. Modeling Selection
A Genetic Analysis of the Local Rana sylvatica Population
Evolution and Populations –Essential Questions p
Population Genetics.
Why study population genetic structure?
Chapter 19: Population genetics
Deviations from HWE I. Mutation II. Migration III. Non-Random Mating
Mechanisms of Evolution
Measuring Evolution of Populations
Variety of mating systems
Modes of Natural Selection
Chapter 4 Population Genetics
Diversity of Individuals and Evolution of Populations
And now for a brief reminder, using Jon Herron’s AlleleA1 program ...
Quantifying the distribution of variation
Hardy Weinberg: Population Genetics
Genetic drift in finite populations
Mammalian Population Genetics
Modern Evolutionary Biology I. Population Genetics
Random Genetic Drift : Chance as an Evolutionary Force
Hardy-Weinberg Lab Data
Presentation transcript:

Population substructure Most organisms do not occupy a continuous range in time and space

Toads and roads Panmictic A=a=p=q=0.5 initially What will happen to the frequency of A and a, assuming that both alleles are neutral and the toad population is finite?

Toads and roads Panmixia within each subpopulation A=a=p=q=0.5 initially in all subpopulations What will happen to the frequency of A and a, assuming that both alleles are neutral and each toad subpopulation is finite?

Toads and roads Subpopulations can diverge in allele frequencies even if there is random mating within each subpopulation. This population differentiation is due to random genetic drift. The result of population subdivision is reduced heterozygosity and deviation from HWE among subpopulations.

Wright’s Fixation Index (F ST ) Sewall Wright

Hierarchical F statistics I = individual S = subpopulation T = total population (assumed panmictic) F IS can be thought of as: F Proportional loss of heterozygosity due to recent common ancestry F ST can be thought of as: Proportional loss of heterozygosity due to population subdivision and subsequent random genetic drift Proportion of total genetic variance found among populations rather than within them F IT can be thought of as: Proportional loss of heterozygosity due to recent common ancestry and population substructure

Hierarchical F statistics H I = observed heterozygosity (usually with molecular markers) averaged among individuals within a subpopulation H S = expected (HWE) heterozygosity for each subpopulation, averaged across all subpopulations (2pq) H T = expected (HWE) total heterozygosity based on allele frequency and without reference to any population substructure (2pq) F IS = (H S -H I )/H S F ST = (H T -H S )/H T F IT = (H T -H I )/H T AA: p 2 + pqF ST Aa: 2pq – 2pqF ST aa: q 2 + pqF ST

Hierarchical F statistics According to Sewall Wright: F ST ranges from = no genetic differentiation; panmixia 0.00–0.05 = little genetic diff = moderate genetic diff = great genetic diff = very great genetic diff 1 = complete genetic differentiation Plant mating systemNF ST Selfing Mixed (animal) Mixed (wind) Outcrossing (animal) Outcrossing (wind) From Hamrick and Godt (1989)

Hierarchical F statistics According to Sewall Wright: F ST ranges from = no genetic differentiation; panmixia 0.00–0.05 = little genetic diff = moderate genetic diff = great genetic diff = very great genetic diff 1 = complete genetic differentiation OrganismF ST Human ‘races’0.069 Yanomamo villages0.077 House mouse0.113 Jumping rodent0.676 Drosophila equinoxialis0.109 Horseshoe crab0.076 From Hartl & Clark, Principles of Population Genetics

Drugs metabolized by N-acetyltransferase –Nydrazid (anti-TB) –Sulfonamides (antibiotic) –Procanbid (antiarrhythmic) –Hydralzaine (antihypertensive) –Caffeine Price Evans DA. N-acetyltransferase in pharmacogenetics of drug metabolism. In Kalow W, ed. Pharmacogenetics of drug metabolism. International encyclopedia of pharmacology and therapeutics. New York: Pergamon Press, 1992: 43: From Anne Chung

Racial differences in human populations Why is this observation interesting to evolutionary biologists? Why is this observation interesting to physicians and drug companies? Why is this observation interesting (and contentious) to society? What evolutionary and non- evolutionary mechanisms could explain this observation?

American Anthropological Association (Am Anthropol 1998; 100: ) It has become clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups.... Throughout history whenever different groups have come into contact, they have interbred. The continued sharing of genetic materials has maintained humankind as a single species.... Any attempt to establish lines of division among biological populations is both arbitrary and subjective.

Does “race” have biological meaning? Is shared skin color a good surrogate for shared ancestry? How could shared ancestry in human populations be determined?

Is shared skin color a good surrogate for shared ancestry? Can the genetic distance tree above be reconciled with the statement from the AAA? Should human population structure be considered during drug development/testing? What evolutionary and non-evolutionary mechanisms could explain variation in drug response among human populations?

Migration and F ST At equilibrium, F ST = 1/(4Nm + 1) What is Nm, in biological terms? What effect does migration have on population differentiation due to genetic drift?