Academic Assessment Diverse Learners. Considerations for Multicultural Students RPrevious academic exposure RAcculturation and language RPrevious life.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Curriculum Based Measurements
Advertisements

Progress Monitoring: Data to Instructional Decision-Making Frank Worrell Marley Watkins Tracey Hall Ministry of Education Trinidad and Tobago January,
Assessment types and activities
Reading Assessment: GORT- 4 (Gray Oral Reading Test -4)
Fairness in Testing: Introduction Suzanne Lane University of Pittsburgh Member, Management Committee for the JC on Revision of the 1999 Testing Standards.
Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Progress Monitoring. Progress Monitoring Steps  Monitor the intervention’s progress as directed by individual student’s RtI plan  Establish a baseline.
You can use this presentation to: Gain an overall understanding of the purpose of the revised tool Learn about the changes that have been made Find advice.
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Normative-Based Testing Options and Procedures
F Why can’t this student read?
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
Cognitive Assessment Diverse Learners. 1996: Most common Tests for Bilinguals  WISC (mostly done in all english)  Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt  Draw-a-Person.
Chapter 5: Assessment of Children with Language Impairments: Basic Principles.
English Language Learners Assessing Language Proficiency.
Please check, just in case…. Announcements 1.Standardized Test Description due in two weeks. 2.Questions about upcoming assignments? Make an appointment.
CAPELL Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English Language Learners English Language Learners and Special Education: A Resource Handbook.
Special Education Evaluation of English Language Learners (ELLs)
GETTING TO KNOW YOUR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELLs)
August 23, ELLs at CV are a diverse group National origin Educational background Attitudes about school Experience with technology Speaking ability.
TEST ACCOMMODATIONS 2013 English Language Learners (ELLs) 1 Presented by: Leyda Sotolongo Title III Coordinator ESOL Department.
Woodcock-Johnson ® III Test of Achievement The Chalkboard Group Members: Adalene Hu, Audrey Chen, Marlena Torkis, Karryn Kam, Lynnette Fang, Toh Jasmine,
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ESL (English as a Second Language) and ELL (English Language Learners)
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
ESL Phases & ESL Scale Curriculum Corporation 1994.
Creating Assessments with English Language Learners in Mind In this module we will examine: Who are English Language Learners (ELL) and how are they identified?
Considerations in Determining Primary Disability Speech Language Impairment or Specific Learning Disability.
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Administering the Kindergarten.
Chapter 6 ~~~~~ Oral And English Language Learner/Bilingual Assessment.
A Three-Tiered Model: early intervention for students “at- risk” for learning difficulties CASP Convention 2004 Allan Lloyd-Jones Special Education Consultant.
MODULE 4 – Topic 403 Intervention Analysis Toolkit for Learners who are Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Module 4: Effective Instructional Practices.
Spoken Languae CHAPER 7. Define the following: Communication Communication Speech Speech Language Language.
Elise Hardin & Erika Kroskos
Parent Information Presentation. To nurture potential in all students. To challenge those with advanced learning capabilities through differentiation.
Woodcock Johnson Results Before the WJIII test results are discussed, a brief explanation of scores is offered. In order to find out what scores are high,
Assessment Parents Due Process Title 6 and ELL Using Assessment to Identify Evaluating Formally –Diagnostic –Progress monitoring –Screening Evaluating.
MODULE 3 – Topic 305 Toolkit for Learners who are Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Module 3: Assessing and Monitoring Student Progress Culturally.
Determining educational success Ralph Leverett and Kris Wolfe an expansion of the S.I.F.T.E.R.
Universal Screening Rosemary Santos John Staumont Lydia Narcisse Sylvia Cadena.
Chapter 5: Assessment of Children with Language Impairments: Basic Principles.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapters 6 and 8.
Chapter 2 ~~~~~ Standardized Assessment: Types, Scores, Reporting.
1 RTI: Family Connections and Culturally Responsive Assessment.
Developing English Language and Literacy. Demographics.
RTI: Response RTI Assessment Tools for ELLs. ACHIEVEMENT TOOLS Measuring Response to Intervention.
Comprehensive Evaluations. Overview OBJECTIVES: Review Comprehensive Evaluation Process Provide Information On Selected Topics  Specific Learning Disability.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
Leadership Presentation Alex Price PPS /10/2011.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Assessment Parents Due Process Title 6 and ELL Using Assessment to Identify Evaluating Formally –IQ –Achievement Evaluating Informally –tying into instruction.
Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 7e © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. English Language Learners Assessing.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
What is ACCESS for ELLs ? State assessment: Guidelines are the same as for other state testing programs. Quiet secure environments. Trained administrators.
Directions: This is a Power Point presentation about ESL. The information is used for staff development and there is a short quiz at the end.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
AAPPL Assessment Follow Up June What is AAPPL Measure? The ACTFL Assessment of Performance toward Proficiency in Languages (AAPPL) is a performance-
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
Identifying and Supporting English Learners with
CHAPTER 8: Language and Bilingual Assessment
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
CHAPTER 11: Assessing Academic Achievement: General Strategies
Data Usage Response to Intervention
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
CHAPTER 12: Assessing Reading Achievement
Relationship between Standardized and Classroom-based Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Academic Assessment Diverse Learners

Considerations for Multicultural Students RPrevious academic exposure RAcculturation and language RPrevious life and academic experiences R“Steps must be taken so that students are not assigned to special education classes because of their lack of English language proficiency rather than because they have a disability” (U.S. Dept of Ed., 2000). RPrevious academic exposure RAcculturation and language RPrevious life and academic experiences R“Steps must be taken so that students are not assigned to special education classes because of their lack of English language proficiency rather than because they have a disability” (U.S. Dept of Ed., 2000).

Considerations for All Students RDo sensory or communication impairments make test inaccessible or limit students from responding to questions? RDo test materials or methods of responding limit ability to respond? RDoes the student know the examiner? RAre instructions understood by student? RIs the recording technique required of the student on the test familiar? RDo sensory or communication impairments make test inaccessible or limit students from responding to questions? RDo test materials or methods of responding limit ability to respond? RDoes the student know the examiner? RAre instructions understood by student? RIs the recording technique required of the student on the test familiar?

Normative-based Achievement Assumptions RStudent is like the normative sample. RStudent has had opportunity to learn RContent measured RLanguage used by the test RSkills demanded of the test RTest is measuring ability and not experience RStudent is like the normative sample. RStudent has had opportunity to learn RContent measured RLanguage used by the test RSkills demanded of the test RTest is measuring ability and not experience

Standards for Testing Individuals of Diverse Language Backgrounds RTesting practice designed to reduce threats to reliability and validity. RLanguage proficiency should be determined prior to test administration. RLanguage proficiency should be evaluated across different language tasks. RAny linguistic modifications recommended by test publishers should be in the test manual RTesting practice designed to reduce threats to reliability and validity. RLanguage proficiency should be determined prior to test administration. RLanguage proficiency should be evaluated across different language tasks. RAny linguistic modifications recommended by test publishers should be in the test manual

Standards for Testing Individuals of Diverse Language Backgrounds RWhen a test is recommended for this population, then developers should provide the info needed for test use and interpretation. RWhen translating a test, describe methods used in establishing the adequacy of the translation and evidence for reliability and validity data for the translated test’s scores. RWhen an interpreter is used in testing, the interpreter should be fluent in both languages, should have expertise in translating,and should have a basic understanding of the assessment process. RWhen a test is recommended for this population, then developers should provide the info needed for test use and interpretation. RWhen translating a test, describe methods used in establishing the adequacy of the translation and evidence for reliability and validity data for the translated test’s scores. RWhen an interpreter is used in testing, the interpreter should be fluent in both languages, should have expertise in translating,and should have a basic understanding of the assessment process.

Group Project RLook at the tests described on pages RDescribe the pros and cons of each test within the group. RConsider which normative based test to give to a child with a 5th grader with L5 profile who has received bilingual education. RLook at the tests described on pages RDescribe the pros and cons of each test within the group. RConsider which normative based test to give to a child with a 5th grader with L5 profile who has received bilingual education.

CBM: Spanish Materials RBrigance Diagnostic Assessment of Basic Skills, Spanish RK-6 RReadiness, Speech, Word Recognition, Oral Reading, Reading, Comp., Word Analysis, Listening, Writing, Alphabetizing, Numbers and Computation, and Measurement RDIBELS has a Spanish version that is like the English version. This can be found on the DIBELS website. RBrigance Diagnostic Assessment of Basic Skills, Spanish RK-6 RReadiness, Speech, Word Recognition, Oral Reading, Reading, Comp., Word Analysis, Listening, Writing, Alphabetizing, Numbers and Computation, and Measurement RDIBELS has a Spanish version that is like the English version. This can be found on the DIBELS website.

CBM Considerations RExtent to which curriculum is culturally representative of the student. RStudent’s previous participation in bilingual education/ ESL RKnown or suspected sensory or communicative impairments RInformation on formal former education. RHow often has the child moved and how often does child attend school? RExtent to which curriculum is culturally representative of the student. RStudent’s previous participation in bilingual education/ ESL RKnown or suspected sensory or communicative impairments RInformation on formal former education. RHow often has the child moved and how often does child attend school?

CBM Considerations RStudents level of acculturation REnglish language proficiency RWhat skills are needed to answer the items that are not related to item performance. RExperiences outside of the school setting that support or detract from academic success. RStudents level of acculturation REnglish language proficiency RWhat skills are needed to answer the items that are not related to item performance. RExperiences outside of the school setting that support or detract from academic success.

Suggestions: Non-English and Non-Spanish Assessment RNormative assessment in achievement is pretty much not possible. RInformal methods or CBM methods should be utilized in combination with parent/ teacher interviews, class observations, and child interviews. RNormative assessment in achievement is pretty much not possible. RInformal methods or CBM methods should be utilized in combination with parent/ teacher interviews, class observations, and child interviews.

Written Expression Options RDevelop an age appropriate writing prompt (e.g., “I was walking down the street and suddenly I saw …”). RHave the child write a story based on this prompt. RHave a translator given a similar prompt in the native language. RWork with the translator to determine total number of words, grammar spelling, and understandability for BOTH language tasks. RDevelop an age appropriate writing prompt (e.g., “I was walking down the street and suddenly I saw …”). RHave the child write a story based on this prompt. RHave a translator given a similar prompt in the native language. RWork with the translator to determine total number of words, grammar spelling, and understandability for BOTH language tasks.

Reading Assessments RObtain basal readers for different levels in English and in the other language RHave the child read in each language. RScore fluency by marking reading end point after 1 min and 2 min. RAsk the child to retell the story to indicate passage comprehension. RBasic reading can be evaluated by the number of errors made while reading the passage. RObtain basal readers for different levels in English and in the other language RHave the child read in each language. RScore fluency by marking reading end point after 1 min and 2 min. RAsk the child to retell the story to indicate passage comprehension. RBasic reading can be evaluated by the number of errors made while reading the passage.

Math Assessments RBasic math: direct translation of instructions and actual items from a normative test (do not use norms). RApplied math: direct translation of items from a normative test (do not use norms). RDo an error analysis of types of problems and see if these carry across languages. RBasic math: direct translation of instructions and actual items from a normative test (do not use norms). RApplied math: direct translation of items from a normative test (do not use norms). RDo an error analysis of types of problems and see if these carry across languages.