Software and System Engineering Integration Sponsor Overview Kristen Baldwin Deputy Director, Software Engineering and System Assurance Office of the Under.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
NDIA SoS SE Committee Topics of Interest May 25, 2009.
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
Parts Management Reengineering TLCSM Executive Council Update Gregory Saunders, Director Defense Standardization Program Office 05 Oct 06.
Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) Program Update Colonel Ric Sherman, United States Army Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for.
DoD Software Issues and Gap Identification Kristen Baldwin Deputy Director, Software Engineering and System Assurance OUSD(AT&L) April 18, 2007.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
IT Governance Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and Agriculture.
Using Parametric Software Estimates During Program Support Reviews Chris Miller Office of the Deputy Director, Software Engineering and System Assurance.
Systemic Analysis of Software Findings Scott Lucero Office of the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) Software Engineering and.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Issues and Recommendations Emanating from the Management Issues Group of.
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
DoD Software Engineering and System Assurance New Organization – New Vision Kristen Baldwin Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Deputy Director, Software.
System-of-Systems Cost Modeling: COSOSIMO July 2005 Workshop Results Jo Ann Lane University of Southern California Center for Software Engineering.
1 Perform Assess Policy and Guidance Acquisition Program Improvement Model Acquisition Programs Acquisition Workforce Human Capital Strategic Planning.
Recent Trends in DoD Systems and Software Engineering Processes Bruce Amato Acting Deputy Director, Software Engineering and Systems Assurance Office of.
1 DoD Systems and Software Engineering Taking it to the Next Level 25 Oct 2006 Mark D. Schaeffer Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office of the.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Integrating Systems and Software Engineering: Complex Systems Workshop 29.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
NDIA SE Division Meeting February 13, Developmental Test and Evaluation Committee Beth Wilson, Raytheon Steve Scukanec, Northrop Grumman Industry.
A National Resource Working in the Public Interest © 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. KM at MITRE Jean Tatalias KM TEM, December 2007.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
DoD Parts Management Reengineering Defense Standardization Program Office Industry Day, 8 May 2007 PMRWG Final Report.
Software System Engineering: A tutorial
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
© CGI Group Inc. CONFIDENTIAL Effective Teaming Between State and Local Government February 2015.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
© MCR, LLC MCR Proprietary - Distribution Limited Earned Value Management Application, Guidance, and Education Neil F. Albert President/CEO MCR, LLC
Revitalization of Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense.
IRM304 CDR Course Manager: Denny Involved Competency Leads: 26 (Cybersecurity)-Denman, 19 (Measurement)-Denny, 7 (DBS)-Corcoran [Capability Planning],
1 Clinger Cohen Act (CCA) (Title 40): An Emerging New Approach to Oversight – Overview and Program Pilot June 27, 2006 Mr. Edward Wingfield Commercial.
From the Installation and Certification Group to the Engineering and Development Section Patrick Grenard Chief, Engineering & Development, IMS Vienna International.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
Software Engineering - I
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Improving Air Force Scheduling Processes and Tools – A Demonstration.
DoD Logistics Human Capital Strategic Planning Overview June 26, 2007.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
CENTER FOR JOINT & STRATEGIC LOGISTICS Mr. Randy Helms 31 March 2010 National Defense University Briefing for the Joint Logistics Education and Training.
0 Enabling Strategic Acquisition in DoD Small Business Opportunities in eGov Transformation May 7, 2004 York, PA Mark E. Krzysko Defense Procurement and.
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
Evidence about the Benefits of CMMI ® What We Already Know and What We Need to Know Joe Jarzombek, PMP Deputy Director for Software Assurance Information.
OUSD(AT&L) Systemic Analysis of Support Assessments 19 November 2003 Kristen Baldwin (703) x109 Scott Lucero (703) x114.
All Contents © 2007 Burton Group. All rights reserved. Measuring Enterprise Architecture Success Information Technology Conference 2009 April 15-16, 2009.
Industry Day DoD Parts Management Reengineering LMI McLean, VA May 8, 2007 Parts Standardization and Management Committee (PSMC )
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Project Management Career Development Program (PMCDP) development-program Linda Ott.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
UNCLASSIFIED The Open Group 01/07/10 Page-1 Kick-off Meeting for The Open Group Acquisition Cyber Security Initiative Ms. Kristen Baldwin Director, Systems.
Enterprise Solution Services Assessing the IT environment Oversaw 2014 Texas Legacy System Study report (HB 2738, 83R) Identified 4,130 business applications.
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering
Mgt Project Portfolio Management and the PMO Module 8 - Fundamentals of the Program Management Office Dr. Alan C. Maltz Howe School of Technology.
Chapter 24: Architecture Competence
DSMC-Executive Program Management Courses
PMI Chapter, IT Governance, Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and.
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Lecture 17 ATAM Team Expertise
Improving Mission Effectiveness By Exploiting the Command’s Implementation Of the DoD Enterprise Services Management Framework - DESMF in the [name the.
IS4550 Security Policies and Implementation
Where is Your Organization on the Accessibility Maturity Scale
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Digital Artifacts and the Need for Portability
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
WBB Corporate Capabilities
INCOSE Digital Artifacts Challenge Team
Presentation transcript:

Software and System Engineering Integration Sponsor Overview Kristen Baldwin Deputy Director, Software Engineering and System Assurance Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition, Technology and Logistics

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 2 ODUSD (A&T) Organization USD, Acquisition Technology & Logistics DUSD, Acquisition & Technology Dir, Joint Advanced Concepts Dir, Systems and Software Engineering Dir, Portfolio Systems Acquisition Industrial Programs Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy Small Business Programs Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Acquisition University

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 3 Director, Systems & Software Engineering Deputy Director Enterprise Development Deputy Director Developmental Test & Evaluation Deputy Director Software Engineering & System Assurance Deputy Director Assessments & Support Systems and Software Engineering An Organizational Construct New Focus on Software and Assurance Acquisition program excellence through sound systems and software engineering

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 4 DoD Center of Excellence Establishing a DoD Engineering Center of Excellence OSD Software Engineering and System Assurance Support Acquisition Success Improve State-of-the-Practice of Engineering Leadership, Outreach and Advocacy Foster Resources to Meet DoD Needs OSD Software Engineering and System Assurance Support Acquisition Success Improve State-of-the-Practice of Engineering Leadership, Outreach and Advocacy Foster Resources to Meet DoD Needs

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 5 Recap of Activities Documented software issues, needs –Software Industrial Base Study completed –NDIA Top Software Issues Workshop Report –Defense Software Strategy Summit Report Created partnerships –Established network of DoD software POCs –Chartered the NDIA Software Committee and Expert Panel –Bi-weekly software collaboration exchanges with Government, Academia, and Industry –Restructured the US-UK-AUS Trilateral Working Group Performed gap analysis –Identified ongoing software initiatives; mapped them to issue areas –Two outcomes: 1.Identified initiatives that deserve cross-DoD attention 2.Identified gaps where attention is needed Common Goal: Provide visibility to key initiatives; Focus attention on gaps

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 6 Top Software Issues* 1.The impact of requirements upon software is not consistently quantified and managed in development or sustainment. 2.Fundamental system engineering decisions are made without full participation of software engineering. 3.Software life-cycle planning and management by acquirers and suppliers is ineffective. 4.The quantity and quality of software engineering expertise is insufficient to meet the demands of government and the defense industry. 5.Traditional software verification techniques are costly and ineffective for dealing with the scale and complexity of modern systems. 6.There is a failure to assure correct, predictable, safe, secure execution of complex software in distributed environments. 7.Inadequate attention is given to total lifecycle issues for COTS/NDI impacts on lifecycle cost and risk. *NDIA Top Software Issues Workshop August 2006

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 7 DoD Software -- What We’re Seeing* Software systemic issues are significant contributors to poor program execution –Software requirements not well defined, traceable, testable –Immature architectures, COTS integration, interoperability, obsolescence (electronics/hardware refresh) –Software development processes not institutionalized, planning documents missing or incomplete, reuse strategies inconsistent –Software test/evaluation lacking rigor and breadth –Schedule realism (compressed, overlapping) –Lessons learned not incorporated into successive builds –Software risks/metrics not well defined, managed *Based on ~65 program reviews to date

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 8 DoD Software Challenges Challenges System Complexity – DoD systems are software intensive, upwards of 90% of functionality controlled by software Net-centric – DoD systems must interoperate in a net-centric environment Changing operational threat – user need changes well inside of typical acquisition cycle times Software Role Software is an enabler for systems to overcome the challenges -- cannot treat it as a standalone element of the system… Yet, we find software continues to be separate from the systems engineering practices Solution How do we encourage the behavior to overcome this issue? –Knowledge and awareness (ie. PM, milestone decision authority, chief SE) –Processes and tools (ie. Standards, development environments, SE technical practices)

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 9 Project Summary: Integrating Systems and Software Engineering Statement of Work –Evaluate current DoD SysE, SwE processes and standards Identify deltas, issue areas, recommendations –Evaluate ICM for integration applicability –Evaluate relevant DoD guidance, education, and training Provide recommendations based on evaluations Key Milestones –October 19. Draft Results to Date briefing –October USC Workshop –December 31. Final Report

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 10 Overcoming the software challenges Can we answer questions: How much programmatic risk are we taking on with respect to software? How is our SE planning considering SW in schedule, technical reviews, etc? How is our design making SW/HW trades? –Initial trades –Requirements changes over time Warnings for this Workshop… Don’t solve the greater Congressional and DoD acquisition issues Don’t get lost in SoS definitions and Governance issues Focus on What the engineering community can do to keep our leadership informed of SW risk and opportunity Making sure SE/SW is a cohesive approach throughout all technical and management practices

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, DUSD(A&T) Slide 11 IS&SE Workshop Objectives: Identify Biggest issues and opportunities –In technology –In management Inhibitors to progress and how to overcome them –What’s working –What could work? What else is needed –Technology/management research –Education and training –Regulations, specifications and standards –Other? What is the right approach to better integration of SE and SW across the lifecycle?