Uli Schäfer 1 JEM PRR Design changes Post-FDR tests FDR issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uli Schäfer Trigger Status JEP (JET/ENERGY PROCESSOR) Komponenten JEM0 (JET/ENERGY MODULE) -Hardware -Firmware JEM1 nächste Tests / Termine Production.
Advertisements

GOLD Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Uli Schäfer 1.
RAD Engineering BLM VME J2 Backplane Printed Circuit Board Backplane Crosstalk Comparison January 25, 2005.
TileCal Optical Multiplexer Board 9U VME Prototype Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (Universitat de Valencia-CSIC)
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and Test Results Hardware status JEM0 Hardware status JEM1 RAL test results.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans Hardware status JEM0 Hardware status JEM1 Plans.
5th April, 2005JEM FDR1 JEM FDR: Design and Implementation JEP system requirements Architecture Modularity Data Formats Data Flow Challenges : Latency.
JET Algorithm Attila Hidvégi. Overview FIO scan in crate environment JET Algorithm –Hardware tests (on JEM 0.2) –Results and problems –Ongoing work on.
GOLD Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Uli Schäfer 1.
GOLD Status and Phase-1 Plans Andi E. & Uli S. Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 BLT – status – plans BLT – backplane and link tester Recent backplane test results Test plans – week June 15.
Phase-0 topological processor Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Level-1 Topology Processor for Phase 0/1 - Hardware Studies and Plans - Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
JEM upgrades and optical data transmission to FEX for Phase 1 Andi E. & Uli S. Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options Upgrade will always be in 5 years time.
Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz L1Calo upgrade activities news – BLT hardware/firmware status.
Cluster Processor Module : Status, test progress and plan Joint Meeting, Mainz, March 2003.
Uli Schäfer JEM Plans Status (summary) Further standalone tests Sub-slice test programme JEM re-design Slice test.
Uli Schäfer JEM0 Status (summary) 3 JEM0s up and running: JEM0.0 used for standalone tests only (Mainz) JEM0.1 fully qualified module0 JEM0.2 (like JEM0.1.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM: Status and plans Pre-Production modules Status Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options.
5th April, 2005JEM FDR1 Energy Sum Algorithm In all stages saturate outputs if input is saturated or arithmetic overflow occurs Operate on 40Mb/s data.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM1: Status and plans Hardware status Firmware status Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM: Status and plans Pre-Production modules Status Plans.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans Firmware -Algorithms -Tools -Status Hardware -JEM1 -Status Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM: Status and plans JEM1.2 Status Test results Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM1: Status and plans JEM1.1 Status Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 CP/JEP backplane test module What’s the maximum data rate into the S-CMM for phase-1 upgrade ?
Uli Schäfer 1 Production modules Status Plans JEM: Status and plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM1: Status and plans Hardware status Firmware status Plans.
Hardware status GOLD Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM Test Strategies Current plan: no JTAG tests at R&S  initial tests done at MZ Power-up / currents Connectivity tests (JTAG) per (daughter)
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans RAL test results Hardware status Firmware Plans.
Uli Schäfer JEM1 In input modules T,S probably mix of φ-bins 5,6 due to routing problems of high-speed LVDS links With current algorithm rounding errors.
Uli Schäfer JEM hardware / test JEM0 test programme Mainz standalone RAL sub-slice test JEM re-design Heidelberg slice test.
Uli Schäfer 1 Production and QA issues Design Modules have been designed, with schematic capture and layout, in Mainz (B.Bauss) Cadence design tools, data.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM1: Status and plans power Jet Sum R S T U VME CC RM ACE CAN Flash TTC JEM1.0 status JEM1.1 Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans Firmware Hardware status JEM1 Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM: Status and plans Production / commissioning Plans.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans Algorithms Hardware JEM0, JEM1 Tests Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 Production modules Status Plans JEM: Status and plans.
FDR of the End-cap Muon Trigger Electronics 1/Mar./04 1 Slice Test (SLT) of TGC electronics Introduction Simulation Trigger part SLT Wire Wire and Signal.
FEX Uli Schäfer, Mainz 1 L1Calo For more eFEX details see indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=73&sessionId=51&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=
Status and planning of the CMX Philippe Laurens for the MSU group Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger General Meeting, CERN May 24, 2012.
David Cussans/Scott Mandry, NIKHEF, October 2008 TLU v0.2.
14/November/2002 CF NSS2002 in Norfolk, Virginia, USA 1 The First Integration Test of the ATLAS End-cap Muon Level 1 Trigger System Introduction Overview.
JEP HW status and FW integration plans Uli Schaefer and Pawel Plucinski Johannes-Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Stockholm University.
Topology System Uli Schäfer 1 B.Bauß, V.Büscher, W.Ji, U.Schäfer, A.Reiß, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge, V.Wenzel.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM configurator progress FPGAs are RAM-based programmable logic devices Need to be loaded with a ‘configuration’ after power-up, so as to.
Status of Global Trigger Global Muon Trigger Sept 2001 Vienna CMS-group presented by A.Taurok.
HBD FEM Overall block diagram Individual building blocks Outlook ¼ detector build.
CPT Week, April 2001Darin Acosta1 Status of the Next Generation CSC Track-Finder D.Acosta University of Florida.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM Status and plans Hardware -JEM1 -Status Firmware -Algorithms -Status Plans.
Ideas about Tests and Sequencing C.N.P.Gee Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 3rd March 2001.
ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1. Constraints & Numerology Assumption: one crate, several modules. Each module covers full phi, limited eta range Data sharing with.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz. L1Calo Phase-1 System Uli Schäfer 2 CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo ROD JMM PPR From Digital Processing System CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo.
Samuel Silverstein Stockholm University CMM++ firmware development Backplane formats (update) CMM++ firmware.
ZPD Project Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Design Overview Progress and Changes since CDR Current Status Plans.
Hardware status GOLD Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Uli Schäfer 1.
CF 16/Feb/20031 H8 Beam Test in 2003 ─ Preparation status TGC-Japan electronics group.
IT3002 Computer Architecture
New digital readout of HFRAMDON neutron counters Proposal Version 2.
Samuel Silverstein, SYSF ATLAS calorimeter trigger upgrade work Overview Upgrade to PreProcessor MCM Topological trigger.
Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz R&D activities. Uli Schäfer 2 MZ R&D BLT has been built and tested (backplane transmission only). A few minor issues were found. Possible.
ATLAS calorimeter and topological trigger upgrades for Phase 1
Online Software Status
Generic Opto Link Demonstrator
CPM plans: the short, the medium and the long
Presentation transcript:

Uli Schäfer 1 JEM PRR Design changes Post-FDR tests FDR issues

Uli Schäfer 2 Post FDR JEM design changes JEM modifications 1.1  1.2: Increase PCB layer count : 14 layers (FIO cross talk) Increase FIO track spacing : minimum.45mm (FIO cross talk) Improve input daughter connector grounding by adding vias (FIO noise) Increase merger track spacing :.45mm (cross talk on merger lines) Upgrade jet processor to XC2V3000 to use external voltage reference on FIOs (FIO noise) Connect Vbatt of processors to ground (change of device specifications) JEM modifications 1.2  1.3: New TTCdec mounting holes (specification change) Add missing FIO track (design error) Supply VME bus buffers from separate 3.3V regulator to allow for control of the switching regulators via CAN (pre-caution to deal with non-reproducible issue of FPGAs not configuring up, seen exactly once) Increase CAN TX/RX track spacing (design error)

Uli Schäfer 3 Post FDR daughter module design changes Input Module modifications 1.0  1.1: Improve ground blade connection (FIO noise) Add SMB voltage sensor Connect Vbatt to ground (change of device specifications) Readout Module modifications 1.0  1.1: Go for 4-layer PCB (FDR) Add link ready / laser-on LED 1.1  1.2: Use impedance controlled tracking Control module initial design 6 layers auto routed CPLD, CAN controller, buffers

Uli Schäfer 4 Tests : signal integrity : merger lines Due to cross talk and noise on JEM1.1, the current version JEM1.2 was thoroughly tested for signal integrity issues. Merger lines: cross talk down to 50% of previous figure: ~300mV into 2.5V signal (source terminated victim line, all others switching) JEM1.1JEM mV/div 100mV/div

Uli Schäfer 5 Tests : signal integrity : FIO lines FIO lines use 1.5V signalling Noise 320mV into signal (series terminated victim line, all others switching) Use HSTL sensing on jet FPGA : +/-100mV sensitivity 100mV/div 12.5ns/div

Uli Schäfer 6 Latency measurement Jet : 256.6nsSum : 182.2ns Latency measured from LVDS input pins to backplane connector: TDR figures almost met: ns rather than 250 ns for jet processing ns rather than 200 ns for sum processing

Uli Schäfer 7 System tests 4 post-FDR test sessions at RAL. Aim: Test a JEM with all of its LVDS inputs populated from an LSM, and measure bit-error rates in the presence of backplane FIO traffic. Repeat the backplane fan-in/fan-out test with heavy backplane traffic and LVDS inputs present. Extend other tests to use more data patterns, making them as ‘stressful’ as possible. Setup: 2 CMMs 2 JEMs1.0 1 JEM1.2 (central position) 1 LSM supplying JEM1.2, all 88 channels Readout into 9U ROD DAQ outputs of 2 CMMs and 2 JEMs (1 JEM1.0 DAQ-out broken) ROI outputs from all 3 JEMs

Uli Schäfer 8 System tests : setup Try and cover all required tests in a single system test rather than individual interface tests. Test setup optimised for maximum of noise and sensitivity: Generate VME traffic (read CMM continuously) : this activity was running for fraction of the tests only Fill 2 JEM’s playback memories with special pattern Fill 1 LSM with special pattern (Almost) all channels switching 1/0/1/0 on all FIO lines concurrently One jet per JEM Jet thresholds tuned such that we are sensitive to bit errors Read out the full setup and compare to simulation Read error counters on input modules to check for parity errors in events that couldn’t be analysed in software Read CMM error counters

Uli Schäfer 9 System tests : results Result: It took a while to persuade the 9U ROD / the online software to do runs over several hours Eventually we were successful: 1 overnight run of 141 million events with no data transmission errors on any of the interfaces. Error counters didn’t show any parity errors EXCEPT A single LVDS input channel generating errors. Seen on parity error counters and in software comparison This was the last night of the November test session. No chance to do further measurements. However Channel confirmed to be broken back home. Was on a module that had been swapped just before that run. Seems we replaced a working input daughter by a defective one.

Uli Schäfer 10 System tests What’s missing ? Never tested traffic between two ‘low noise’ modules (1.2) ‘low noise’ input module 1.1 is not yet existent JEM 1.3 carries a few bug fixes That’s minor modifications only. Should have improved noise figures Tests would require a few JEMs to be built (minimum of two) Pre-production of four required anyway  Build pre-production modules NOW  Repeat all tests within the scope of the required ‘full crate test’  Have a test with a jet merger  Have well-prepared semi-automated tests since there is little time to waste

Uli Schäfer 11 Other FDR issues Make readout and control module multilayer Improve extraction handles Slot keying Leave unused LVDS inputs open Turn off parallel buses on TTCrx Improve speed margin on processor FPGAs Sort out backplane grounding Sort out Pre-processor LVDS specifications Work on latency Power inrush / power sequencing Power consumption during configuration Provide documentation / update specifications