Oregon Reading First Cohort B Leadership Session March 3, 2008 Checking in on Lesson Progress Reporting Systems (LPRs)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
1 Progress Monitoring Content developed by Wayne Callender and Jeanie Mercier Smith The Link Between Instruction and Reading Proficiency.
DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.
Ongoing Progress Monitoring and Determining Instructional Level JRF! Leadership Academy July 2006 Randee Winterbottom, Tricia Curran, Stacey Fisher.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.
Oregon Reading First Lesson Pacing (C) 2007 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
90-Minute Reading Block Scheduling Cohort B August 23, Minute Reading Block Scheduling Cohort B August 23, 2005 Examples from William Walker
Survey Level Assessment
What is RTI? Purpose  How a school responds to students who are not progressing.  Organized into three Tiers in order to provide intervention at various.
Department of Special Education August 3, 2010 iSTEEP Follow-up & Training Presented by: Raecheal Vizier, M.Ed. Special Education Program Effectiveness.
1 Reading First at Oak Grove Elementary School Medford School District 549C Julie York – District Person Julie Evans – Principal Barbara Low – Reading.
What To Do When A Student Does Not Respond To An Academic Intervention Brian Lloyd Ed. S., NCSP May 2 nd, 2013.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Statewide Coaches’ Training Session February 27, 2007 Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. University of Oregon.
Cohort A Project-wide Data “Our goals can only be reached through a vehicle of a plan, in which we must fervently believe, and upon which we must vigorously.
Oregon Reading First IBR V - Cohort B Introduction to Lesson Progress Reports (LPRs)
1 Data-Based Leadership Cohort B March 2, 2006 (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Supplemental and Intervention Programs
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Statewide Coaches’ Session September 14, 2006.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting December 10, 2009.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph. D. Oregon Reading First Center March 22, 2006
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting November 12, 2009.
1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
1 A Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Presentation Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Richard White and Bob Algozzine Integrated Systems for.
School Improvement Specialist Meeting
Using a Comprehensive Assessment Plan to Meet All Students’ Instructional Needs Leadership Conference 2005 Orlando, Florida Pat Howard and Randee Winterbottom.
Implementing Structured Data Meetings Middle of Year (MOY) Meetings.
100 % Data Meetings 100% Data Meetings turn data into ACTION FOR ALL students.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Grade-level Data Team Meetings.
DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6 th Edition A guide for Parents.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Cohort 4 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
EOY DIBELS Benchmark Data for Intervention Programs Oregon Reading First Schools June, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
What Do I Do With My DIBELS Data? Aligning Student Needs and Instruction source: Tracy Cormane:
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
Cohort B Observation Cycle for © 2007 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
Presented by: Rhonda Zobrak And Teresa Sprague Welcome!
Data-Based Leadership
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Reading Updates Madelin Garcia, Reading Coach
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Oregon Reading First Cohort B Leadership Session March 3, 2008 Checking in on Lesson Progress Reporting Systems (LPRs)

What are the components of a LPR System? 1.setting lesson goals and tracking lesson progress 2.______________________________________ 3.______________________________________

It all starts with a goal: What outcomes do we want for our students?

Clear Goals and Expectations for Each Grade Second Grade DIBELS Measures with Benchmark Levels DIBELS MeasureFallWinterSpring Oral Reading Fluency 44 Words Read Correctly Per Minute 68 Words Read Correctly Per Minute 90 Words Read Correctly Per Minute

How do we link these goals to program completion? To read at least 90 correct words per minute by Spring of second grade, what level (or specific lesson) of a program must a second grader complete? Houghton Mifflin, Grade 2? Horizons, Level B? Read Well Plus? Reading Mastery Plus, Level 2?

What exact lesson do students need to complete? What lesson did each of these benchmark students complete at the time of Spring DIBELS testing?

What exact lesson do students need to complete? StudentORF ScoreProgram / Lesson Completed Student 193 Student 294 Student 394 Student 495 Student 5101 Student 6102 Student 7110 Student 8114 Student 9124 Student Student Student 12141

What exact lesson do students need to complete? Educational Resources, Inc. 2002

Lesson Pacing Goals Now, we have a lesson pacing goal. The goal for second grade students placed in RM Plus is to complete, at a minimum, the last lesson of RM Plus, Level 2 (Lesson 160) by the end of second grade.

Activity 1: Checking on Lesson Pacing Goals Highlight second grade students on your winter DIBELS class list report who read 68 cwpm or more. List the program and last lesson completed as of January 2008 for each of these students.

Activity 2: Checking on Lesson Pacing Goals Large Group Discussion: 1.What are the lesson completion goals you identified for second grade students at the beginning of the year for the various intervention programs (e.g., Reading Mastery, Reading Mastery Plus, Horizons, Phonics for Reading)? 2.Does the winter data indicate that your lesson completion goals were good ones? 3.Do you need to adjust any lesson completion goals for second graders?

Setting Lesson Pacing Goals on the Web-based LPR System

Setting Lesson Pacing Goals on the Web- based LPR System - COACH VIEW

“A goal without a plan is just a wish.” Antoine de Saint-Exupery ( )

What is our plan for meeting the lesson pacing goal? MonthWeek ofPacing Goal September3rd 10th 17th 24th October1st 8th 15th 22nd 29th November5th 12th 19th 26th December3rd 10th 17th January7th 14th 21st 28th

What is our plan for meeting the lesson pacing goal? MonthWeek ofPacing Goal February4th 11th 18th 25th March3rd 10th 17th Spring Break 31st April7th 14th 21st 28th May5th 12th 19th 26th June2nd 9th RM Plus, Level II, L160

What is our plan for meeting the lesson pacing goal? MonthWeek ofPacing Goal September3rd 10th 17th 24thRM Plus, Level II, Lesson 15 October1st 8th 15th 22nd 29thRM Plus, Level II, Lesson 40 November5th 12th 19th 26thRM Plus, Level II, Lesson 60 December3rd 10th 17thRM Plus, Level II, Lesson 75 January7th 14th 21st 28thRM Plus, Level II, Lesson 95 Goal for Winter Break

What is our plan for meeting the lesson pacing goal? MonthWeek ofPacing Goal February4th 11th 18th 25thRM Plus, Level II, Lesson 115 March3rd 10th 17thRM Plus, Level II, Lesson 130 Spring Break 31st April7th 14th 21st 28thRM Plus, Level II, Lesson 155 May5th 12th 19th 26th June2nd 9th RM Plus, Level II, L160 Goal for Spring Break

Tracking Lesson Progress MonthWeek ofPacing GoalLesson Completion September3rdLesson 2 10thLesson 6 17thLesson 10 24thRM Plus, Level II, L15Lesson 14 October1stLesson 18 89thLesson 22 15thLesson 26 22ndLesson 30 29thRM Plus, Level II, L40 November5th 12th 19th 26thRM Plus, Level II, L60 December3rd 10th 17thRM Plus, Level II, L75 January7th 14th 21st 28thRM Plus, Level II, L95 Lesson 34 The group is off pace!

Tracking Lesson Progress Lesson Progress Report (LPR) Teacher: School:LPR Period GradeGroupSize of Group Instruc t Rec (I, S, B) Reading ProgramsCurrent Lesson Lessons/ Instruct Days In-Program Test Summaries Test or Check-Out Passing Students Absent Students Failing Students Comments

Tracking Lesson Progress on the Web-Based LPR System - TEACHER VIEW

Tracking Lesson Progress on the Web-Based LPR System - COACH VIEW

Tracking Lesson Progress on the Web-Based LPR System - A GRAPH

How do we get back on pace? Structural ItemsQuality of Implementation Schedule adequate? Group size appropriate? Students placed correctly? Lessons implemented with fidelity? Pacing appropriate? Behavior management in place?

“To will is to select a goal, determine a course of action that will bring one to that goal, and then hold to that action till the goal is reached. The key is action.” Michael Hanson

Lesson pacing goals should not be met at the expense of student mastery! A Focus on Student Mastery

Activity 3: Tracking Lesson Progress Using Table 2, track the lesson progress of a group of intensive second graders. Be prepared to share the following information with a partner: Lesson pacing goal for the group Current lesson as of February, 2008 Net pacing (+/- lessons)

Activity 4: Tracking Lesson Progress Large Group Discussion: How often are you tracking lesson progress of instructional groups at your building (e.g., weekly, monthly)? What type of Lesson Progress Report are you asking your teachers to fill out? When/how is information from LPRs used? What are some actions you have taken when a group has been off pace?

What are the components of a LPR System? 1. setting lesson goals and tracking lesson progress 2.collecting information on student performance/ program mastery 3.______________________________________

In-Program Assessments

Horizons, Level B - Test 1 Example Test 1 (Parts 1-3) Teacher:Part 1: Writing WordsPart 2: Story ReadingPart 3: Sounds baitreadpailmeanSubtotal orolSubtotal Criterion5/5 20/20Total Errors (-5 per error) 25/402/2 4/4 NameDate Julia B.2/ /20230/40224 Susie Q.2/ /20420/40202 Sam T.2/ /25325/40224

In-Program Assessments Horizons, Level B, Test 1 Example (cont.) Test 1 (Part 4) Teacher:Part 4: Reading Words sinkbrothershurryweretastedtiredrollhardgettingdressedbestyellowSubtotalTotal Criterion3/3 30/3679/100 NameDate Julia B2/ /3673/100 Susie Q2/ /3662/100 SamT2/ /3684/100

In-Program Assessments Horizons, Level B - Test Summary Example Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 Test 5 Test 6 Test 7 Test 8 Test 9 Test 10 Test 11 Test 12 Test 13 Test 14 Test 15 Criterion79/ / / / 100 Student Julia B Susie Q Sam T

In-Program Assessments Houghton Mifflin 2003, Second Grade, Theme Test 1 Example Short Vowels (a, I) Short Vowels (o, u, e) Long Vowels CVCe (a, I) HF Words Story Structure Fantasy & Realism Predicting Outcomes VocabularyTotal Percentage Points Possible /50 80% Student Julia B /50 = 78% Susie Q /50 = 60% Sam T /50 = 82% Teacher: __________________________Group: __________________Date: _________________

In-Program Assessments Houghton Mifflin 2003, Second Grade Test Summary Example Test 1Test 2Test 3Test 4Test 5Test 6 Criterion40/50 = 80%48/60 = 80%64/80 = 80%48/60 = 80%60/75 = 80%40/50 = 80% Student Julia B. 39/50 = 78% Susie Q. 30/50 = 60% Sam T. 41/50 = 82%

In-Program Assessments A LPR System provides: √ a record of student performance on in-program assessments (summary and details) √ a list of in-program assessments administered in the last instructional period (e.g., month) √ a list of students who passed the assessment(s), a list of students who failed the assessment(s), and a list of students who were absent on the day of testing √ a summary of retesting procedures (i.e., who needs to be retested, who was retested, who passed the retest)

In-Program Assessments on the Web-Based LPR System - TEACHER VIEW

In-Program Assessments GradeGroupSize of Group Instruct Rec (I, S, B) Reading ProgramsCurrent Lesson Lessons/ Instruct Days In-Program Test Summaries Test or Check-Out Passing Students Absent Students Failing Students Comments Lesson Progress Report Teacher: _______________________Group: ________________LPR Period: ____________________

In-Program Assessments on the Web-Based LPR System - TEACHER VIEW

Activity 5: In-Program Assessments Using in-program assessment data, determine student mastery of your group of second grade intensive students. Did all of the students pass the last mastery test? If not, who failed and on what skills? Did the teacher remediate and retest? What is the pattern of performance for the students on the last three mastery tests?

Activity 6: In-Program Assessments Large Group Discussion: How are your teachers recording student performance on in- program assessments (e.g., Excel spreadsheets, tables copied from the program’s Teacher Guide, ORFC forms, etc.)? How do you, as a coach, access and track this information? How do your teachers address failing scores on subtests/ tests?

What are the components of a LPR System? 1. setting lesson goals and tracking lesson progress 2. collecting information on student performance/ program mastery 3. monitoring group progress toward important literacy benchmarks

DIBELS Progress Monitoring

√ Clip booklets by instructional group. √ Flag booklet if student is three data points below aim line.

DIBELS Progress Monitoring The web-based LPR system will automatically farm progress monitoring data from the DIBELS website. DIBELS progress monitoring data will be organized by instructional group. A graph of performance of students in the instructional group will be provided.

DIBELS Progress Monitoring on the Web-Based LPR System

DIBELS Progress Monitoring Josh Mary Sarah Aiden Nathan

DIBELS Progress Monitoring

Activity 7: DIBELS Progress Monitoring Large Group Discussion: How do your school teams integrate DIBELS data with lesson pacing and in-program assessment data? How are instructional decisions made?

A New Data Report

What are the components of a LPR System? 1.______________________________________ 2.______________________________________ 3.______________________________________ QUIZ