1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
Advertisements

21M062007D The Shaw Group Inc. ® An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study.
Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
1 Atmospheric models for damage costs TRADD, part 2 Ari Rabl, ARMINES/Ecole des Mines de Paris, November 2013 There are many different models for atmospheric.
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
1 AirWare : AirWare : C OMPREHENSIVE A IR QUALITY M ODEL WITH E X TENSIONS VERSION 4.30, PBM DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352.
Session 8, Unit 15 ISC-PRIME and AERMOD. ISC-PRIME General info. PRIME - Plume Rise Model Enhancements Purpose - Enhance ISCST3 by addressing ISCST3’s.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Weather and X/Q 1 Impact Of Weather Changes On TVA Nuclear Plant Chi/Q (  /Q) Kenneth G. Wastrack Doyle E. Pittman Jennifer M. Call Tennessee Valley Authority.
Session 2, Unit 3 Atmospheric Thermodynamics
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
AERMET 8 TH Modeling Conference RTP, NC September 22 – 23, 2005 Presented by: Desmond T. Bailey
Will Pendergrass NOAA/ARL/ATDD OAR Senior Research Council Meeting Oak Ridge, TN August 18-19, 2010 Boundary–Layer Dispersion Urban Meteorology 5/20/2015Air.
University of Aveiro Final Meeting and Project Review 23/24 June 2003 Gdansk University of Aveiro Emissions and Air Quality Modelling Department of Environment.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
Lecture 7-8: Energy balance and temperature (Ch 3) the diurnal cycle in net radiation, temperature and stratification the friction layer local microclimates.
ENAC-SSIE Laboratoire de Pollution de l'Air Model Strategies Simplify the equations Find an analytical solution Keep the equations Simplify the resolution.
WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
Calculation of wildfire Plume Rise Bo Yan School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – A&WMA AB3 Comments on Nonstandard Modeling Approaches By Ron Petersen, CPP Inc Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Assessment of the vertical exchange of heat, moisture, and momentum above a wildland fire using observations and mesoscale simulations Joseph J. Charney.
CHAPTER 5 Concentration Models: Diffusion Model.
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Page 1© Crown copyright Distribution of water vapour in the turbulent atmosphere Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer & Richard.
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Verification and Case Studies for Urban Effects in HIRLAM Numerical Weather Forecasting A. Baklanov, A. Mahura, C. Petersen, N.W. Nielsen, B. Amstrup Danish.
Combining HYSPLIT and CMAQ to resolve urban scale features: an example of application in Houston, TX Ariel F. Stein (1), Vlad Isakov (2), James Godowitch.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar University of Toledo Introduction.
1/26 APPLICATION OF THE URBAN VERSION OF MM5 FOR HOUSTON University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Sylvain Dupont Collaborators: Steve Burian, Jason.
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence MCIP2AERMOD: A Prototype Tool for Preparing.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
Estimating the Optimal Location of a New Wind Farm based on Geospatial Information System Data Dec Chungwook Sim.
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
Dispersion conditions in complex terrain - a case study of the January 2010 air pollution episode in Norway Viel Ødegaard Norwegian Meteorological.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Air quality models DETERMINISTIC MODELS EULERIAN MODELS
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Meteorology for modeling AP Marti Blad PhD PE. Meteorology Study of Earth’s atmosphere Weather science Climatology and study of weather patterns Study.
Air Pollution Meteorology Ñ Atmospheric thermodynamics Ñ Atmospheric stability Ñ Boundary layer development Ñ Effect of meteorology on plume dispersion.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
Transport Simulation of the April 1998 Chinese Dust Event Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel And Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend.
AERSCREEN Status and Update James Thurman, Ph.D. U.S. EPA/OAQPS/AQAD Air Quality Modeling Group 2009 NESCAUM PMC Annual Meeting Mystic, CT.
Roger W. Brode U.S. EPA/OAQPS/AQAD Air Quality Modeling Group AERMET Training NESCAUM Permit Modeling Committee Annual Meeting New London, Connecticut.
1 DUST modeling AirWare AQMS: urban/industrial and regional air quality modeling and management: DUST modeling DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software and.
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
Modeling of heat and mass transfer during gas adsorption by aerosol particles in air pollution plumes T. Elperin1, A. Fominykh1, I. Katra2, and B. Krasovitov1.
Boundary-Layer Meteorology and Atmospheric Dispersion
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Meteorological Site Representativeness and AERSURFACE Issues
TEM – Lectures 21 to 23.
WindNinja Model Domain/Objective
AERLINE: Air Exposure Research model for LINE sources
Air Pollution and Control (Elective- I)
Models of atmospheric chemistry
September 9 to 13, 2013; Reading, United Kingdom
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
Institute for Nature Management, Minsk, Belarus
Presentation transcript:

1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA

2 AERMODAERMOD EPA REGULATORY MODEL, developed from ISC-ST2/ISC3 AERMOD is a steady-state Gaussian plume model Basic assumptions: Homogeneous meteorological conditions in time and space over the aggregation period; Constant emissions Aggregation period: minimally the time needed to reach steady state (function of domain size and wind speed) EPA REGULATORY MODEL, developed from ISC-ST2/ISC3 AERMOD is a steady-state Gaussian plume model Basic assumptions: Homogeneous meteorological conditions in time and space over the aggregation period; Constant emissions Aggregation period: minimally the time needed to reach steady state (function of domain size and wind speed)

3 AERMODAERMOD Model provide an analytical solution to the dispersion equations in 3D; Horizontal and vertical concentration distributions are assumed to follow Gaussian (bell shaped) distribution. Vertical “complications”: –Terrain following or impacting; –Partial reflection at mixing height. Model provide an analytical solution to the dispersion equations in 3D; Horizontal and vertical concentration distributions are assumed to follow Gaussian (bell shaped) distribution. Vertical “complications”: –Terrain following or impacting; –Partial reflection at mixing height.

4 AERMODAERMOD Basic principle: conservation laws

5

6

7 turbulenceturbulence ISC used tabulated stability classes (Pasquill) defined by wind speed, cloud cover, day/night (heat flux) AERMOD uses boundary layer physics, Roughness length (Monin-Obukhov Length, L) surface roughness length, z 0 surface friction velocity, u surface heat flux, H convective scaling velocity, w. ISC used tabulated stability classes (Pasquill) defined by wind speed, cloud cover, day/night (heat flux) AERMOD uses boundary layer physics, Roughness length (Monin-Obukhov Length, L) surface roughness length, z 0 surface friction velocity, u surface heat flux, H convective scaling velocity, w.

8 turbulenceturbulence Roughness length (Monin-Obukhov Length, L) Measure of “surface roughness”, approximately 1/10 of obstacle physical vertical dimensions, varies, also seasonally (vegetation), from m (water surfaces) to 1 m (cities) 1.3 m (forests) Roughness sub-layer: wind speeds deviates from a vertical logarithmic profile. Roughness length (Monin-Obukhov Length, L) Measure of “surface roughness”, approximately 1/10 of obstacle physical vertical dimensions, varies, also seasonally (vegetation), from m (water surfaces) to 1 m (cities) 1.3 m (forests) Roughness sub-layer: wind speeds deviates from a vertical logarithmic profile.

9 turbulenceturbulence Surface friction velocity, u Wind speed at reference height corrected by a vertical logarithmic profile to the roughness sub-layer and Monin-Obukhov length. Surface friction velocity, u Wind speed at reference height corrected by a vertical logarithmic profile to the roughness sub-layer and Monin-Obukhov length.

10 turbulenceturbulence Monin-Obukhov length, L, A function of temperature, wind speed and heat flux. Monin-Obukhov length, L, A function of temperature, wind speed and heat flux.

11 turbulenceturbulence Surface (sensible) heat flux, H Bowen ratio: Related to soil moisture: 0.1: wet 10: very dry Surface (sensible) heat flux, H Bowen ratio: Related to soil moisture: 0.1: wet 10: very dry

12 turbulenceturbulence Convective scaling velocity, w. Now: Deardorff velocity, scale of wind speed In the convective mixed layer: typically 1 m s -1 ….. Convective scaling velocity, w. Now: Deardorff velocity, scale of wind speed In the convective mixed layer: typically 1 m s -1 …..

13 Performance:Performance: Needs to be solved for each source (but offers the possibility for source apportioning) Needs to be solved for each receptor point (grid cell, but can be solved for any arbitrary location) Steady state solution: provides an upper estimate of concentration Needs to be solved for each source (but offers the possibility for source apportioning) Needs to be solved for each receptor point (grid cell, but can be solved for any arbitrary location) Steady state solution: provides an upper estimate of concentration

14 Data requirements: Emission data (stack properties) Meteorology: –Single station data (episode, or 24 hours, one year (hourly)): wind speed/direction, air temperature (plume rise) –Vertical profile (mixing layer) one morning sounding (value) –Solar radiation, cloud cover (heat budget) Emission data (stack properties) Meteorology: –Single station data (episode, or 24 hours, one year (hourly)): wind speed/direction, air temperature (plume rise) –Vertical profile (mixing layer) one morning sounding (value) –Solar radiation, cloud cover (heat budget)

15 AERMET pre-processor: AERMET operates on data from: National Weather Service (NWS) hourly surface observations, NWS twice-daily upper air soundings, data collected from an on-site measurement program such as from an instrumented tower. AERMET operates on data from: National Weather Service (NWS) hourly surface observations, NWS twice-daily upper air soundings, data collected from an on-site measurement program such as from an instrumented tower.

16 AERMET data requirements: Hourly Surface Observations: wind speed and direction; ambient temperature; opaque sky cover; in the absence of opaque sky cover, total sky cover; station pressure is recommended, but not required, Upper Air Soundings: morning sounding (the 1200 GMT sounding for applications in the United States). Hourly Surface Observations: wind speed and direction; ambient temperature; opaque sky cover; in the absence of opaque sky cover, total sky cover; station pressure is recommended, but not required, Upper Air Soundings: morning sounding (the 1200 GMT sounding for applications in the United States).

17 AERMOD implementation: For City/local domains (< 30 km), Hourly now-cast runs; Daily 24 hour forecast runs; Interactive scenario analysis: –24 hours daily runs (domains) –Annual runs (domains); –EIA for domains (24 hours) –EIA for single sources (annual, hourly) –Monitoring station location (annual, hourly) For City/local domains (< 30 km), Hourly now-cast runs; Daily 24 hour forecast runs; Interactive scenario analysis: –24 hours daily runs (domains) –Annual runs (domains); –EIA for domains (24 hours) –EIA for single sources (annual, hourly) –Monitoring station location (annual, hourly)

18 AERMOD implementation: High-resolution (10 m) convolution model (kernel), for all models that include traffic emissions (large number of segments). Includes a mixing-zone approach over the street surface. Unit emission kernel scaled for each road segment (10 m elements). Transparently integrated with all AERMOD runs. High-resolution (10 m) convolution model (kernel), for all models that include traffic emissions (large number of segments). Includes a mixing-zone approach over the street surface. Unit emission kernel scaled for each road segment (10 m elements). Transparently integrated with all AERMOD runs.

19 AERMOD configuration: For each mode of operation (nowcast, forecast, interactive scenarios, single source EIA, MS location, traffic) the model needs: A model scenario A meteorological scenario An emission scenario For each mode of operation (nowcast, forecast, interactive scenarios, single source EIA, MS location, traffic) the model needs: A model scenario A meteorological scenario An emission scenario

20 AERMOD scenarios: Nowcast scenarios are organised by domain, and shown for the current (latest) run; Configuration of a nowcast scenarios: Select NEW from the scenario list; Edit the scenario (domain, meteorlogy, emissions) Edit the shell script entry (ADMIN only) Nowcast scenarios are organised by domain, and shown for the current (latest) run; Configuration of a nowcast scenarios: Select NEW from the scenario list; Edit the scenario (domain, meteorlogy, emissions) Edit the shell script entry (ADMIN only)

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 AERMOD implementation Interactive scenarios: 24 hour runs including comparison of scenarios (domain level impact assessment); High-resolution 1 hour runs for individual street segments Annual runs for monitoring station location (single source) Annual runs for single source impact assessment. Interactive scenarios: 24 hour runs including comparison of scenarios (domain level impact assessment); High-resolution 1 hour runs for individual street segments Annual runs for monitoring station location (single source) Annual runs for single source impact assessment.

28 AERMOD interactive: 24 hour runs including comparison of scenarios (domain level impact assessment); ready to runListing of scenarios with name, simulation date, pollutant simulated, run status (results, ready to run, running). NEW button for creating a new scenario 24 hour runs including comparison of scenarios (domain level impact assessment); ready to runListing of scenarios with name, simulation date, pollutant simulated, run status (results, ready to run, running). NEW button for creating a new scenario

29

30

31

32 AERMOD implementation Interactive scenarios: High-resolution 1 hour runs for individual street segments High resolution kernel/convolutions for 24 hourly runs, transparently combined with AERMOD for point and area sources. Interactive scenarios: High-resolution 1 hour runs for individual street segments High resolution kernel/convolutions for 24 hourly runs, transparently combined with AERMOD for point and area sources.

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52 AERMOD implementation Interactive scenarios: Annual runs for monitoring station location (single source): Finds the N locations (for possible monitoring stations) with a user defined minimum distance AROUND an emission source with the highest annual average concentration over populated areas. Interactive scenarios: Annual runs for monitoring station location (single source): Finds the N locations (for possible monitoring stations) with a user defined minimum distance AROUND an emission source with the highest annual average concentration over populated areas.

53

54

55

56

57 AERMOD implementation Interactive scenarios: Annual runs for single source impact assessment: Computes annual average concentration on an hourly basis around a single source, at user defined or automatically located simulated monitoring stations. Interactive scenarios: Annual runs for single source impact assessment: Computes annual average concentration on an hourly basis around a single source, at user defined or automatically located simulated monitoring stations.

58

59

60

61

62

63

64