High-Multiplicity Events Analysis Group March 28, 2005 Leon R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Pi0 Mass recon in the NCC R. Seto Oct 17, What I did Ran pisa – took hits file which gives dedx in each Si layer Partitioned the dedx into cells.
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
LAV contribution to the NA62 trigger Mauro Raggi, LNF ONLINE WG CERN 9/2/2011.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
A Study on Cluster Resolution Neighborhood hit density gradients are proposed as a means for -- identifying cluster boundaries -- implementing a cluster.
Surplus Hits Ratio Leon R. C&A Meeting Oct. 31, 2001.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park. Reference (old plot, full minerva)
CC analysis progress This talk: –A first attempt at calculating CC energy sensitivity using the Far Mock data MC files with full reconstruction. –Quite.
24-28 May, 2010 S. Mastroianni - 17th Real-Time Conference, Lisboa, Portugal ARGO-YBJ is a cosmic ray air shower detector based on a single layer of RPC.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
November 30th, 2006MAPS meeting - Anne-Marie Magnan - Imperial College London 1 MAPS simulation Application of charge diffusion on Geant4 simulation and.
1 First look at new MC files First look at reconstruction output from the newly- generated “mock-data” MC files. –These contain the following improvements:
TkrRecon Status Perugia Software Workshop May, 2003.
Modeling TKR Readout Effects Part 2 Leon R. Analysis Group 12 September 2005.
GLAST LAT Project LAT Instrument Analysis Meeting – May 26, 2006 Hiro Tajima, TKR Efficiency Trending 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Efficiency Trending.
GLAST LAT Project Analysis Meeting March 22, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/8 LAT Instrument Test Analysis Eduardo do Couto e Silva March 23, 2004.
Modeling TKR Readout Effects Leon R. Analysis Group 14 March 2005.
Surplus Hits Ratio, etc. Leon R. C&A Meeting &
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
TriggerLatchingEffLAT_ ppt1 Status report of overall Trigger and Latching Efficiencies study Instrument Analysis meeting, May 13, 2005 Tsunefumi.
Geometry of the Tracker in the Flight Instrument The following slides present an overview of the geometry of the tracker. Dimensions corresponding to constants.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
Status of TPC experiment ---- Online & Offline M. Niiyama H. Fujimura D.S. Ahn W.C. Chang.
Ian Ross Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Mentor: Dr. Richard Teuscher University of Toronto ATLAS Group ATLAS Calorimetery: Cosmic Ray Commissioning.
Brought to you by powerpointpros.com Reading a Thermometer.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
XXXI International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2009 Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009 Time structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO-YBJ experiment.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: EM Mini-Tower Robert Johnson.
1 BFEM Trigger Diagnostics Mar 12, 2002 Tsunefumi Mizuno Note: For reference, this document includes some works already reported (pages 2-5 and 7). The.
TRD straws status report from 14/03/ AMS-02 acceptance for lepton flux N. Nikonov.
The ORCA Letter of Intent Oscillation Research with Cosmics in the Abyss ORCA Antoine Kouchner University Paris 7 Diderot- AstroParticle and Cosmology.
Geant4 for GLAST BFEM -Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, S. Ogata, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima/SLAC) M. Roterman, P. Valtersson.
The ZDD data structure Each ZDD channel produces a positive “waveform”, one 8-bit sample every 2 ns This waveform is then splitted in “fragments”: a sequence.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
10/10/2005 Alex Moiseev 2006 LAT Beam test 1 Suggestions to 2006 LAT prototype beam test plan Alex Moiseev, NASA/GSFC.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’
Nearly vertical muons from the lower hemisphere in the Baikal neutrino experiment Zh. Dzhilkibaev - INR (Moscow) for the Baikal Collaboration ( Uppsala,
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Study of tt production at NLO Stan Bentvelsen Edwin Bos.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Tower 1 TVAC tests Bad ladders issues.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 1st October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  Looking at the same data as Hideyuki, but using G4MICE.  Have not yet had.
A proposal for the KM3NeT Computing Model Pasquale Migliozzi INFN - Napoli 1.
Can we detect a marble tomb with cosmic muons ? Corinne Goy, Max Chefdeville, Jean Jacquemier, Yannis Karyotakis 21 December 2015.
Mark Dorman – UCL/RAL – Calibration Workshop Talk Update on ND Strip-to-Strip Calibration Work Mark Dorman Calibration Workshop Fermilab, September 7-9.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
 discrimination with converted photons
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Studies with PandoraPFA
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Downlink rates The next slide was presented to Jonathans’ flux review
Multicore Cosmic Shower in the ARGO-YBJ experiment
Imaging crystals with TKR
EVENT PROJECTION Minzhao Liu, 2018
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
Studies of the Time over Threshold
Presentation transcript:

High-Multiplicity Events Analysis Group March 28, 2005 Leon R.

In Each Plane (GTRC) <= n hits <= m hits Only the first m or n hits are kept, where m, n <= 64 This is adjustable by plane (maybe even end?) (Currently handled in MC, with n = 64)

On Each Cable (GTCC) Buffer There are 8 cables on each tower. Each cable reads out one-half of one face of every other tray. No more than 128 hits can be stored in each cable buffer. The hits are read into the buffer from the bottom up. In a high-multiplicity event, info from the top (i.e. interesting) planes may be lost. (Not in MC) Buffer

The event sample Flight instrument 515-GeV simulated gammas 1000 events generated; 284 triggered Pictures from the old event display –For now, slightly better than new one, since it sometimes works, with a bit of coaxing

First, GTRC Readout Truncation occurs at 63 strips, each end, Already in simulation

Same, log scale

Layer Number of Truncated Plane

Next, the Cable Controllers Truncation here! Hits in each CC; no truncation yet in simulation

Number of Truncated CC’s per Event No truncation for 85% of events But, of remaining 39 events: - 11 convert below tracker - 26 are truncated in a different tower from the conversion - only 2 have a truncated conversion

Lowest Truncation Layer For each truncated event, the layer number of the lowest layer in which CC truncation occurs. (Spike should be in layer 3, but sample was generated with a max of 63 at each end, instead of 64) bottom 4 layers full

A saturated event

Another

An Air Shower (real data from TkrFMA) In x view, hits at top and bottom of shower are mostly on different cables. In y view, they are on the same cables, and the top hits are lost.. Pink squares mark truncated planes.

Conclusions There is some truncation in each GTRC. –Not a big problem by itself, since any plane that truncates is not likely to be useful in reconstruction anyway. About 15% of the events have at least 1 truncated GTCC. –But in most cases, conversion is in a different plane than truncation. We will know when truncation occurs. Contouring of plane truncation (limiting maximum # of strips in the lower layers) may be useful. This effect should probably be included in the simulation.