INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery. INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Vision The Northern Maritime Corridor - a means of efficient, safe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

BARENTS Interreg III B – Work-package 2: Industrial development Sub-group Oil & Gas Supplier.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Presentation of Actions Visby, 11 June 2009 Colin Wolfe European Commission DG Regional Policy, Territorial Cooperation.
1 Report on the Implementation of the EUSBSR Anders Lindholm European Commission Directorate General for Regional Policy.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
Project part-financed by the European Union Stockholm 18 May 2010 Bengt GUSTAFSSON Region Blekinge Project part-financed by the European Union BSR Interreg.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Russia’s Arctic Development Plan Strategy to 2020 Caitlyn Antrim Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans The Road to Nuuk CSIS-WWF April.
Building a Resilient Natural Environment Aberdeen City Council SUMMARY Aberdeen City Council is working with European partners on two green themed, innovative.
INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Northern Maritime Corridor – The Motorway of the Northern Seas NMC Achievements Februar 2006 Olav Hauge, Project.
INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Maritime transport in the petroleum sector Strand 4 priorities Petroleum Related Transport in the Barents Sea.
1 115 million people 14 countries EU STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION.
 Dr. Ibrahim Togola The challenges of African Energy Policy in the 2010 Berlin,14th June 2010.
Dubai Government Policies for Enhancing the Competitiveness of Multimodal Transportation and Logistics Cluster June 2014.
Ministry of Petroleum and Energy Norway - British Colombia Offshore Oil & Gas November 18th Oil and gas development from an environmental perspective by.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
BSSSC AND COOPERATION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION ANN IRENE SAETERNES, International coordinator EASTERN NORWAY COUNTY NETWORK.
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
CABRI-Volga Cooperation Along a Big RIver: Institutional coordination among stakeholders for environmental risk management in the Volga basin International.
Page 0 Confidential – for Internal Use Only Financial Acumen Ability to understand and apply internal and external business drivers and metrics to produce.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Project presentation at the TransBaltic foresight debate, Stockholm, 18 May 2010 Wiktor.
1 Todays Challenges for transport corridors The perspective of the Interreg IVC project PORT Integration Michael Stange.
Alpine Space Prospective Study T. Bausch (D) T. Dax (A) U. Janin Rivolin (I) F. Parvex (CH) S. Praper (SLO) M. Vanier (F) © INTERREG IIIB The.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG IIC Community Initiative concerning Transnational Co-operation on Spatial Planning
Trafikdage 06 Anders Langeland. INTERREG IIIB project REMARCC WP1 North Sea Logistic Cluster A situation analysis of each port region has been performed.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Presentation at the IX All-Russian Forum, ‘Strategic Planning in the Regions and Cities.
Central Baltic Area in the EU Baltic Sea Strategy
Workshop 3 – Territorial integration in cross-border and transnational functional regions North Sea STAR Lynne McGowan, University of Liverpool ESPON Internal.
The Draft Operational Programme Objective 3 Transnational territorial cooperation North West Europe IIIB NWE Joint Technical Secretariat, Lille,
____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT June 2005 Birgit Hegerding, Hartmut Beyer, UNICONSULT Universal.
Roadmap to Bogor Goals Industry Report Roadmap Taskforce – Australia, Brunei Darussalam and Singapore.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
The Perspectives and Challenges of Transnational Cooperation in the next European Funding Period Fontwell Park, 17 October 2006 Julia ERIPRET,
Objectives, Priorities and Concepts. OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Operational Programme outlines the framework, strategy and management of the programme for.
The European Community –Environment –Agricultural –Competition- trade policies –Economic and social coheison –Public procurement.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European.
EU Structural Funds Presentation to Chief Executives 9 May 2006 Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan.
Transnational cooperation in North-West Europe today: a first appraisal Joint Technical Secretariat.
OPPORTUNITIES IN THE NORTH SEA INTERREG IVB PROGRAMME FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS Jon Jordan UK Contact Point Peterborough - October 2007.
ALPINE SPACE Margarita Jančič MOP - DEZI Kranj,
____________________________________________________________________________________ UNICONSULT March 2005 Birgit Hegerding, Hartmut Beyer, UNICONSULT.
Working Group of Transports Inter Mediterranean Commission. CPMR Working Group of Transports Declaration on the transport policy in the Mediterranean Genoa,
BMT Transport Solutions GmbH 1 Third BSR INTERREG III B partner search forum in Gdansk Actors perspective on pan-Baltic transport development Lars Källström.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
HST Region High Speed Trains and Regional Development ”HST Region” Updated PP-Presentation October/December2008.
PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 13 OCTOBER 2015 RATIFICATION OF THE AFRICAN MARITIME TRANSPORT CHARTER 1.
HST Region High Speed Trains and Regional Development ”HST Region” Updated PP-Presentation October 08/January 09.
Directorate general for Energy and Transport European Commission 4rth working group on maritime policy, ports and SSS 19 December 2006-Brussels Euro-Mediterranean.
ICZM & the Marine Bill the local authority perspective Brian Shipman LGA Coastal Special Interest Group.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
Key factors in the transport policy to encourage better integration Sixty-Third Session of UNECE, Geneva, 30th March 2009 "Economic Integration in the.
European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.
Natuurwetenschap & SamenlevingScience, Technology & Society Large Scale International Bio-energy Trade - Perspectives, Possibilities and Criteria; introduction.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations Michel Viaud and/or Ingrid Weiss EPIA, Brussels,
StratMoS Strategic Demonstration Project for Motorways of the Sea StratMoS - An arena for cooperation.
he transport development progress in Slovenia the EASYCONNECTING hint
cbss. st/documents/cbsspresidencies/10russian/dbaFile263
Go LNG LNG Value Chain for Clean Shipping, Green Ports and Blue Growth in Baltic Sea Region.
South-East European Space
Informal Water Directors Meeting Dublin, 22nd June 2004
The Draft Operational Programme
Territorial Co-operation
The EU on the agenda in Norwegian municipalities and counties
Presentation transcript:

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Vision The Northern Maritime Corridor - a means of efficient, safe and sustainable transportation, - connecting coastal areas and - enhancing regional development in the North Sea Region and the Northern Periphery area.

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Objectives of the NMC To transfer goods from truck to ship by:  Promoting intermodal systems  Improving the direction balance  Establishing regular/daily/speedy services that meet the need of the industries  Concentrating goods to relevant hubs

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery The Participants 20 coastal regions in 8 countries around the North Sea and Northern Periphery In addition 3 Russian regions - associated partners (Murmansk, Arkangelsk and Nenetsia) Supported by 2 INTERREG III B programmes: North Sea and Northern periphery. Lead partners: Rogaland County Council, and Executive Committee of Northern Norway (”Landsdelsutvalget”)

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery INTERREG IIIB North Sea Overall strategy: Progress towards a spatially developed, integrated region which offers a good quality of life for all its citizens in a balanced and sustainable way

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery INTERREG IIIB Northern Periphery The vision: The people of the Northern Periphery working together to secure prosperous and sustainable development of their communities, and wise management of distinctive cultural and natural resources, in a manner that contributes to the attainment of joint European objectives

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Economy Total budget 4,8 mill Euros, 50% from the regions/partners and 50% from INTERREG III B programmes Project period: June Dec 2005

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Opportunities for Maritime Regions in the Northern Waters The NMC is an arena for the industries, ports, transporters and ship owners to develop consistent decisions NMC connects the resources of the North to the consumers of the South The exploitation of oil and gas resources in Northern Norway and especially the huge resources in North West Russia, represents major commercial possibilities

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Challenges in the NMC Transfer of goods from road to sea: Intermodality Direction balance Concentration of goods, hubs Regular/daily/speedy services Decision making backlog, “the hen and the egg” Risks of ship wreckages and accidents in vulnerable areas Cooperation and competition at the same time

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery The Core of the NMC Project To provide an arena for -key actors that can -take and/or influence the variety of decisions to be taken -in order to implement competitive intermodal maritime transport -in a door-to-door perspective

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Activities divided into 6 Strands: 1.Regional maritime clusters (one in each region) 2.Promotion of SSS (short sea shipping) and develop new services in the corridor 3.Seafood transport and logistics 4.Maritime transport in the petroleum sector 5.Development of a sustainable maritime corridor 6.Management and technical assistance

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Relations between Strands

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Core Activities Review the present situation, utilising existing knowledge Conduct SWOT analysis Assess potentials, and develop scenarios and transport concepts Assess impacts Facilitate networking and negotiations of new services etc. Develop action plans

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Defined Expected Results Each region: Developed and agreed on a regional action plan for promoting short sea shipping Business negotiations and agreements on new services and routes Increased awareness on the possibility of intermodal maritime transport in the corridor among ”truck” and land based goods owners Policy recommendation from NMC regarding harmonising risk management

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Tangible Results NB: Achieve more than new studies and talking! Key actors in the regional clusters agree on strategies for SSS (intermodality, local port structure, new routes, types of vessels etc.) Network established between key actors in the –regional clusters in the different countries –NMC area (industries, transporters, ship owners, ports) NMC web-portal facilitating contact and communication between different actors Increased awareness about intermodal maritime transport

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Tangible Results (cont.) Agreed action plans for promoting and implementing competitive maritime transport: Routes (with relevant frequency, good direction balance etc.) Set of hubs for optimal concentration of goods Intermodal door-to-door solutions Particular action plans for seafood transport Particular action plans for petroleum sector transport Decision by transporter(s) to open new routes, in cooperation with goods owners and ports Strategy document for risk management in the NMC area, basis for national level regulations

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Longer Term Impacts Increased market share for sea transport Reduced emission of CO2 etc. Risk management system implemented for the NMC area Industrial cooperation and development within and between the North Sea Region and Northern Periphery Area

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Discuss in groups What are the cargo owners most important requirements when they choose transport solution? Discuss the Strength and Weaknesses of shipping as cargo transport (seen from the cargo owners point of view)

INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Essays Discuss for and against one logistical hub at the continent for the industry in Møre and Romsdal How can sea transport operators contribute to value adding activities for the cargo owners (during storage/ transport etc) Is it possible to increase the competitiveness of sea transport by reducing administrative work between the different operators?