Structures Formation in Extragalactic Astrophysics and Cosmology: numerical approaches G. Murante SAIT, Pisa, May 7th.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course III. Structure Formation in the Non-Linear Regime Chris Power.

Advertisements

SZ effects by using high-resolution simulations Lauro Moscardini Dipartimento di Astronomia Università di Bologna, Italy Orsay,

PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.

Cosmic Baryons: The IGM Ue-Li Pen 彭威禮. Overview History of Cosmic Baryons: a gas with phase transitions Missing baryons simulations SZ-Power spectrum:

GALAXIES IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS: VOIDS TO CLUSTERS:  Simulations will require to model full physics:  Cooling, heating, star formation feedbacks…

Andrey Kravtsov Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics (KICP) The University of Chicago Simulating galaxy formation at high redshifts.

Finding the First Cosmic Explosions with JWST and WFIRST Daniel Whalen McWilliams Fellow Carnegie Mellon University.

Diffusion and accurate hydrodynamics in SPH and grid codes James Wadsley (McMaster) Tom Quinn (Washington), Fabio Governato (Washington), Hugh Couchman.

G. Murante – INAF OATo P. Monaco – Univ. Ts M. Calabrese – SISSA Ts G. De Lucia - INAF OATs S. Borgani – Univ. Ts K. Dolag – Obs..Munchen Heidelberg, May.

Numerical issues in SPH simulations of disk galaxy formation Tobias Kaufmann, Lucio Mayer, Ben Moore, Joachim Stadel University of Zürich Institute for.

Anatoly Klypin New Mexico State University Also: Stefan Gottloeber (Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam ) Gustavo Yepes (UAM, Madrid) Andrey Kravtsov.

Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)

Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course

Ben Maughan (CfA)Chandra Fellows Symposium 2006 The cluster scaling relations observed by Chandra C. Jones, W. Forman, L. Van Speybroeck.

ASCI/Alliances Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes Simulating Self-Gravitating Flows with FLASH P. M. Ricker, K. Olson, and F. X. Timmes Motivation:

Module on Computational Astrophysics Professor Jim Stone Department of Astrophysical Sciences and PACM.

Observing galaxy cluster simulations with an X-ray telescope Elena Rasia Department of Physics, University of Michigan Chandra Fellows Symposium Harvard-Smithsonian.

An Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) Academic Strategic Alliances Program (ASAP) Center at The University of Chicago The Center for Astrophysical.

Prospects and Problems of Using Galaxy Clusters for Precision Cosmology Jack Burns Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy University of Colorado,

The Underdense Universe in Simulations of Cosmic Structure Formation Jörg M. Colberg (CMU) with Tiziana Di Matteo (CMU), Ravi Sheth (UPenn), Antonaldo.

A Multiphase, Sticky Particle, Star Formation Recipe for Cosmology

A Multiphase, Sticky Particle, Star Formation Recipe for Cosmology Craig Booth Tom Theuns & Takashi Okamoto.

By: Giuseppe Tormen. Heating Processes Adiabatic Compression Viscous Heating – Due to internal friction of the gas. Photoionization.

Gustavo Yepes Universidad Autónoma de Madrid KNAW International Colloquium on COSMIC VOIDS Amsterdam 2006.

X-Ray Group Scaling Relations: Insights for Galaxy Formation Romeel Davé (Arizona) Neal Katz (UMass) David Weinberg (Ohio State) (work in progress)

Module on Computational Astrophysics Jim Stone Department of Astrophysical Sciences 125 Peyton Hall : ph :

Cosmological MHD Hui Li Collaborators: S. Li, M. Nakamura, S. Diehl, B. Oshea, P. Kronberg, S. Colgate (LANL) H. Xu, M. Norman (UCSD), R. Cen (Princeton)

PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY

Modelling Dwarf Galaxies with a Multi-Phase ISM Stefan Harfst 1,2 with: Ch. Theis 3,2 and G. Hensler 3,2 G. Hensler 3,2 1 Rochester Institute of Technology,

A Critical Role for Viscosity in the Radio Mode AGN Feedback Cycle Paul Nulsen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2014 July 9X-ray View of Galaxy.

박창범 ( 고등과학원 ) & 김주한 ( 경희대학교 ), J. R. Gott (Princeton, USA), J. Dubinski (CITA, Canada) 한국계산과학공학회 창립학술대회 Cosmological N-Body Simulation of Cosmic.

AREPO – V. Springel Adaptive, moving, unstructured hydrodynamics, locally adaptive time-steps, self-gravity + Galilean Invariance i.e. Everything you ever.

J. Cuadra – Accretion of Stellar Winds in the Galactic Centre – IAU General Assembly – Prague – p. 1 Accretion of Stellar Winds in the Galactic Centre.

Subgrid models of active galactic nuclei in clusters of galaxies Paul Matthew Sutter Paul M. Ricker Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Frontiers in.

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

Superbubble Driven Outflows in Cosmological Galaxy Evolution Ben Keller (McMaster University) James Wadsley, Hugh Couchman CASCA 2015 Paper: astro-ph:

A Hybrid Particle-Mesh Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multiphase Flows Jie LIU, Seiichi KOSHIZUKA Yoshiaki OKA The University of Tokyo,

Lecture 3 - Formation of Galaxies What processes lead from the tiny fluctuations which we see on the surface of last scattering, to the diverse galaxies.

Cosmological Reconstruction via Wave Mechanics Peter Coles School of Physics & Astronomy University of Nottingham.

Dark Matter and Dark Energy from the solution of the strong CP problem Roberto Mainini, L. Colombo & S.A. Bonometto Universita’ di Milano Bicocca Mainini.

Benedetta Ciardi MPA Reionization Nucleosynthesis ‘Dark Ages’ Big Bang Fluctuations begin to condense into first stars and protogalaxies Decoupling matter-radiation.

THE ROLE OF BLACK HOLES IN GALAXY EVOLUTION Tiziana Di Matteo Carnegie Mellon University Volker Springel, Lars Hernquist, Phil Hopkins, Brant Robertson,

Nick Gnedin FCPA Retreat Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology.

Alyson Brooks Fairchild Postdoctoral Fellow in Theoretical Astrophysics Caltech In collaboration with C. Brook (JHI), F. Governato (UW), L. Mayer (ETH,

Low Frequency Background and Cosmology Xuelei Chen National Astronomical Observatories Kashigar, September 10th 2005.

AS2001 Chemical Evolution of the Universe Keith Horne 315a

Sean Passmoor Supervised by Dr C. Cress Simulating the Radio Sky.

X-RAY CLUSTERS IN CONFORMAL GRAVITY Antonaldo Diaferio Universita' degli Studi di Torino Dipartimento di Fisica Generale “Amedeo Avogadro” Edinburgh, April.

Renaissance: Formation of the first light sources in the Universe after the Dark Ages Justin Vandenbroucke, UC Berkeley Physics 290H, February 12, 2008.

Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.

Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)

Large-scale Structure Simulations A.E. Evrard, R Stanek, B Nord (Michigan) E. Gaztanaga, P Fosalba, M. Manera (Barcelona) A. Kravtsov (Chicago) P.M Ricker.

Simulating the SZ Sky Predictions for Upcoming Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Galaxy Cluster Surveys Eric J. Hallman CASA, University of Colorado 16 February,

PART II Simulations of Shocks in Clusters of Galaxies ALMA Users Workshop 8 February, 2010 Sándor M. Molnár, Patrick Koch Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,

Scientific Motivations for the VO Historical Remarks on Massive Data Collection Projects. (Obvious) Potential Virtues and Defects of the VO for Observations.

Energy Balance in Clusters of Galaxies Patrick M. Motl & Jack O. Burns Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy University of Colorado at Boulder X-ray.

The influence of baryons on the matter distribution and shape of dark matter halos Weipeng Lin ， Yipeng Jing （ Shanghai Astronomical Observatory ， CAS.

OWLS: OverWhelmingly Large Simulations The formation of galaxies and the evolution of the intergalactic medium.

Improved Chemical Evolution Model for the Early Galaxy Evolution 中里直人東大天文.

Radiative Feedback by the First Stars Dan Whalen, T-2, LANL Whalen et al 2008, ApJ, 679, 925 Hueckstadt & Whalen, ApJ, in prep.

Hydrodynamics Continuity equation Notation: Lagrangian derivative

Dynamics of Multi-Phase Interstellar Medium Shu-ichiro Inutsuka (Kyoto Univ.) Collaboration with Hiroshi Koyama (Univ. Maryland) Tsuyoshi Inoue (Kyoto.

The Physics of Galaxy Formation. Daniel Ceverino (NMSU/Hebrew U.) Anatoly Klypin, Chris Churchill, Glenn Kacprzak (NMSU) Socorro, 2008.

Arman Khalatyan AIP 2006 GROUP meeting at AIP. Outline What is AGN? –Scales The model –Multiphase ISM in SPH SFR –BH model Self regulated accretion ?!

A novel approach to visualizing dark matter simulations

Reionization of the Universe MinGyu Kim

Towards Realistic Modeling of Massive Star Clusters Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan) graduate student Hui Li.

The History of the Baryon Budget Yann Rasera Supervisor: Romain Teyssier and Jean-Pierre Chièze Horizon Project Cosmological simulations Analytical model.

Quenching, blackhole feedback and anisotropic thermal conduction

Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter

Presentation transcript:

Structures Formation in Extragalactic Astrophysics and Cosmology: numerical approaches G. Murante SAIT, Pisa, May 7th

Why Non linear evolution of Dark Matter density fluctuations (gravitational instability): no general analitic solution..adding baryons: hydrodynamics required, even worse Subgrid astrophysical processes (radiative cooling, star formation, Sne energy feedback, AGN feedback…): not even understood in full details

Where Cosmology: LSS Cosmology: high redshift structures (Damped Ly , high Z galaxies, protoclusters..) Galaxy cluster formation, evolution, properties; AGN/cluster connection Early type galaxy formation and evolution; DSC Disk galaxy formation

How N-Body (particle) codes for following gravitational instability from CMB on.. Vlasov-Poisson (Boltzsmann) equations Hydro codes for the gas evolution Euler equations Subgrid parametric models for a number of astrophysical processes HPC required!

N-Body codes A density field is sampled with massive particles Gravitational forces evaluated in a newtonian way General relativity enters in the background evolution ( cosmological model a(t) )

N-Body methods Direct summation Particle-Mesh Particle-Particle/ Particle-Mesh Tree Codes Adaptive P 3 M, Tree-PM…..

Hydrodynamical methods Eulerian (grid-based) methods: evolution of hydrodynamical quantities at fixed spatial (grid) position, by directly solving the Euler equation. Disadvantage: limited resolution (overcome with AMR codes) Advantage: Euler equation directly solved Lagrangian methods (SPH): hydrodynamical quantities attached to gas particles; evolution followed along the particle orbits; hydro forces exchanged along with gravitational forces Disadvantage: it’s a mimic to true hydrodynamics Advantage: high resolution achievable thanks to Lagrangian treatment (not bounded to the mesh size).

SPH

Other (astro)physical processes Star formation/feedback – subgrid, but: bruteforce Chemical enrichment / SNIa - subgrid Metal/Atomic/Molecular cooling - exact Magnetic field – exact (simpler cases) BH/AGN feedback - subgrid Cosmic rays - subgrid Thermal conduction - exact Navier-Stokes - exact Radiative transport – approximate! …..

Available codes GADGET (Springel 2001, 2005) HYDRA (Couchman & Pearce 1995) FLASH (Fryxell et al 2000) ENZO (O’Shea et al 2004) GASOLINE (Wadsley, Stadel, Quinn 2004) RAMSES (Teyssier, 2002) ART (Klypin, 1997; Kravtsov 1999) …and many others…

An example (GADGET2)

Code validation Standard gravity/hydro tests Code comparison (e.g. Santa Barbara Cluster Comparison, Frenk et al, 1999, ApJ, 525, 554) Eulerian Lagrangian

Open questions GRAVITY: ok, except softening/resolution (BUT: full GR treatment, probably not needed; modified gravities..) …60 order of magnitude in mass approx… Boltzsmann codes?? SPH: artificial viscosity; turbulence not well resolved EULERIAN: not Galilean invariant? Numerical viscosity/mixing not well controlled..and of course, SUBGRID processes…

FLASH PPM moving FLASH ppm not moving Wadsley, Veeravally & Couchman 2008

SPH SPH, turbulent diffusion SPH, turbulent diffusion HR SPH, reduced visc

Mixed schemes: AREPO (Springel 2009) Voronoi tassellation, centered on gas particles

Mixed schemes: AREPO (Springel 2009) Fluxes evaluated through the cell interfaces, resolving the corresponding Riemann problems KH instability: comparison between AREPO and an Eulerian code (ATHENA) Note: SPH would perform miserably here

Mixed schemes: GPH Riemann problem solved between all particle couples P*, v* found and put in SPH equations (can be derived..) Artificial viscosity dropped Imaeda & Inutsuka 2002 Inutsuka 1994, 2002 Inutsuka & Imaeda 2001 Cha 2002 Cha & Withworth 2003 Fluid mixing!

GPH in GADGET: SOD tube test (Murante, Borgani, Brunino,..in prep?) “blip” “whiggles” No whiggles! Blip reduced! mixing

Star formation, feedback… simpler schemes Dark Matter Gas Stars Star formation Gravity only Gravity + hydrodynamics Density/temperature threshold UV heat. SN Radiative Cooling Kinetic FB

Star formation, feedback… MultiPhase schemes Dark Matter Hot gas Cold gas Stars Radiative Cooling Star Formation Gravity SN UV heat. Gravity only Gravity + Hydro

MOLECULAR GAS = = = MUPPI MUPPI Murante, Monaco, Giovalli, Borgani, Diaferio STAR FORMATION RESTORATION COOLING EVAPORATION M H2 -> SF On hot phase! On cold phase!

Conclusions Simpler the physics, more robust the code …gravity:  OK …hydro: quite ok, but work in progress …subgrid: phenomenological, many recipes, something missing As always: more computing power needed!