2008 Nominations And looking ahead to 2012…. Delegate Allocation StateClintonObamaHuckabeeRomneyMcCain AL25272619 AK3106123 AZ312550 AR2782111 CA20316715155.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Party Nominations. Important questions Why are nominations important to a party? What should a party want in a nominee? Who in the party should decide.
Presidential Nominations. Who selects the nominee? Historically… Members of Congress State party leaders Primary voters –(Or just those in Iowa and New.
Presidential Nominations. Who selects the nominee? Historically… Members of Congress State party leaders Primary voters –(Or just those in Iowa and New.
Who does the President Represent?. The United States? Dual role –Head of Executive/Head of State Honeymoon period.
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
And how does he get to be president in the first place?
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
1 Washington, WA 2 Oregon, OR 3 California, CA 4 Arizona, AZ 5 Nevada, NE 6 Utah, UT 7 Idaho, ID 8 Montana, MT 9 Wyoming, WY 10 Colorado, CO 11 New Mexico,
House Price
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 240 sessions with 8,187 participants
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 250 sessions with 8,352 participants
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 401 sessions with 11,639 participants
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 416 sessions with 11,878 participants
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

2008 Nominations And looking ahead to 2012…

Delegate Allocation StateClintonObamaHuckabeeRomneyMcCain AL AK AZ AR CA Percent of popular vote in state AL42%56%41%18%37% AK25%75%22%44%15% AZ50%43%9%35%47% AR70%26%61%14%20% CA52%43%12%35%42%

Why the chaos? Extreme frontloading gets rid of momentum in the press/polls Extreme frontloading gets rid of momentum in the press/polls Proportional rule encourages second- place finishers (who have the money to compete) Proportional rule encourages second- place finishers (who have the money to compete)

Date Jan wk1 IA, WY Jan wk2 NH, Jan wk3 MI, NV Jan wk4 SC, FL AK, HI Feb wk1 ME, CA, NY, IL, NJ, MA, GA, MN, MO, TN, CO, AZ, AL, CT, AR, OK, KS, NM, UT, DE, ID, ND, AL, MT LA Feb wk2 LA, NE, WA, ME, DC, MD, VA, HI, WI IA Feb wk3 NH Feb wk4 DE, AZ, ND, SD Mar wk1 OH, RI, TX, VT CA, CT, GA, ME, MD, HI, MN, ND, MA, NY, OH, RI, VT

Why the chaos? Extreme frontloading gets rid of momentum in the press/polls Extreme frontloading gets rid of momentum in the press/polls Proportional rule encourages second- place finishers (who have the money to compete) Proportional rule encourages second- place finishers (who have the money to compete) Other thoughts? What went wrong or right in this nomination process? Other thoughts? What went wrong or right in this nomination process?

Pros and Cons of a National Primary Fairness Fairness Simplicity Simplicity Role of the media Role of the media Electoral rule choices Electoral rule choices Role of money Role of money Implementation Implementation

Is that the only way to reform the nomination system?

Republicans’ problem Selected a nominee who is not the favorite of the base Selected a nominee who is not the favorite of the base Winner take all rule in early states: Florida, Maine, Colorado, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York Winner take all rule in early states: Florida, Maine, Colorado, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York

Potential solution?

Democrats’ Problem Historically divisive nominating contest Historically divisive nominating contest Potential solution? Potential solution?