Interpreting Geophysical Data for Mantle Dynamics Wendy Panero University of Michigan
Chemical Constraints on Density Distribution
olivinewadsleyiteringwooditecpx garnetMg-perovskiteCa-pv (Mg,Fe)O il Stacy Geotherm
Cold Slabs, Clapeyron Slopes and Whole Mantle Convection exothermic reaction 440 km olivine -MgSiO endothermic reaction pv+mw -MgSiO km
Clapeyron Slope Equilibrium: G 1 = G 2
Cold Slabs, Clapeyron Slopes and Whole Mantle Convection endothermic reaction pv+mw -MgSiO km Clapeyron slope must be greater than… ask a geodynamicist
Determination of Clapeyron Slopes Phase Equilibria ex-situ in-situ Thermodynamic
Determination of Clapeyron Slopes Phase Equilibria ex-situ in-situ Thermodynamic Ringwoodite (Smyth)
Multi-Anvil Press
Determination of Clapeyron Slopes Phase Equilibria ex-situ in-situ Thermodynamic Ringwoodite Only Perovskite + MW Only All present Ito and Takahashi 1989 Clapeyron slope = -2.8 MPa/K
Determination of Clapeyron Slopes Phase Equilibria ex-situ in-situ Thermodynamic Ringwoodite (Smyth)
The Laser-Heated Diamond Anvil Cell X-ray Heating laser X-ray diffraction (pressure, structure, density) Spectroradiometry (temperature) 2 cm 0.1 mm Pressure = Force/Area
Techniques X-ray Diffraction Diffraction condition: 22 d =2dsin(2 ) incoming x-rays, 22 reflected x-rays, e.g. Cullity
Techniques X-ray Diffraction Ringwoodite Perovskite + periclase
hotspot O2O2 ruby gasket (Benedetti et al, unpublished) Temperature Measurements top viewside view T=1700±75 K Kavner and Panero, PEPI 2004
Pressure Measurements: Equations of State Lee et al., 2004
Constant Temperature Equations of State Bulk Modulus
Constant Temperature Equations of State Lee et al., 2004
PVT Equations of State
Model for internal energy: e.g. Debye Thermodynamic definition
Determination of Clapeyron Slopes Shim et al., 2001 Phase Equilibria ex-situ in-situ Thermodynamic Clapeyron slope = -3 MPa/K (Irifune et al., 1998) Clapeyron slope = no constraint (Shim et al., 2001; Chudinovskikh et al., 2001)
Sources of Error Non-hydrostatic stresses Pressure standards Temperature and pressure gradients Incoming x-ray V hydrostatic <V non-hydrostatic diamond Diffracted x-ray
Sources of Error Non-hydrostatic stresses Pressure standards Temperature and pressure gradients Kavner and Duffy, 2003
Sources of Error Non-hydrostatic stresses Pressure standards Temperature and pressure gradients Gold relative to Platinum Shim et al., 2001
Sources of Error Non-hydrostatic stresses Pressure standards Temperature and pressure gradients hotspot O2O2 ruby gasket (Benedetti et al, unpublished) top viewside view Kavner and Panero, PEPI 2004
Determination of Clapeyron Slopes Phase Equilibria ex-situ in-situ Thermodynamic Ito et al., 1990 Clapeyron slope = -4±2 MPa/K
Interpretation of Tomography: Thermal Variations
Interpretation of Tomography: Compositional Variations
Perovskite CompositionK 0 (GPa) (Mg/m 3 ) MgSiO 3 MgSiO 3 ~10% FeO MgSiO 3 ~3.25% Al 2 O 3 MgSiO 3 ~3.25% Al 2 O 3 +H 2 O (km/s)
Theory Quantum mechanical or classical –effects of a priori assumptions –size of calculation, time for calculation General approach: G of each phase PT-space for lowest energy Limitations: Temperature Multi-component systems
Theory MgSiO 3 perovskite Wentzcovitch et al., 2004
? Zhao et al., 1992