CUSP134: Icarus’s Parachute Writing and Argument Today 1.Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going 2.Discussion of Critical Moves (handout) 3.Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relate text to background knowledge to enhance comprehension and retain key ideas.
Advertisements

Using reasons and evidence to support arguments
Narrative Research Designs
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Summaries.
CUSP134: Icarus’s Parachute Technology and Media(tion): The Senses Today’s Agenda 1.McLuhan: Understanding Media Discussion of Reading Preparation #1 Questions.
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning Learning Reflective Collaborative Communities 17 November 2005.
CUSP134: Icarus’s Parachute Techniques of Argument Today 1. Final Papers: Discussion & Reminders 2. Evaluating Sources 3. Argumentation: Structuring Inquiry.
CUSP134: Icarus’s Parachute Technology and Media(tion): The Senses Today’s Agenda: Writing (1-2) & Reading (3-4) 1.Academic Disciplines 1.“discourses”
CUSP134: Icarus’s Parachute Writing and Reflection Today 1.SP1, General Comments on Reading 2.Known-New Contract 3.Transition: Nye, McLuhan >> Bertman,
Principles of Powerful Teaching and Learning for Social Studies
Math 490 Undergraduate Research in Mathematics What does research constitutes of? Creative thinking Scientific inquiry Knowledge of the field Productive.
5E INQUIRY LEARNING CYCLE. EngageExplore ExplainElaborate Evaluate.
What are some instructional strategies that support inquiry?
Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing Norm Friesen May 6, 2006.
Tuesday, January 8, 2013, 12:30pm-3:30 pm Hollywood Road Education Services - Room 2.
Todd Wehr Memorial Library Viterbo University Humanities and Social Science 1.
Beena FEF college Bannu Township. Topic : Quran Class XI year College FEF Bannu Town ship Duration : 40 min.
Distance Learning Foundation With support from the U.S. Embassy RELO and TOT Public Company Limited Bangkok, Thailand.
NYCSS Summer Institute C3 Inquiry & the Inquiry Design Model (IDM)
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Moving to LDC in Chemistry. What is LDC? An Instructional Framework that builds in the instructional shifts that move us toward common Core Implementation.
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
Contact Profile
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
FAEA Conference October Art Teachers will….. * understand the importance Visual Arts participation has on academic performance. * understand the.
Join a6psrbwww.classroom.google.com Critical Reading Strategies Achieving Rigor through Reading, Writing, and Collaboration Mathew.
Academic Writing Rumessa Naqvi Lahore School of Economics.
DPI Conference April 7, 2015 Eric Kuennen University of Wisconsin Oshkosh.
Content Area Reading, 11e Vacca, Vacca, Mraz © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 0 Content Area Reading Literacy and Learning Across the.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
 Inquiry is a multifaceted activity that involves making observations; posing questions; examining…sources of information to see what is already known;
Foundations for C3 Inquiry & the Inquiry Design Model (IDM) Kathy Swan & John Lee Arkansas June 2015 Foundations for C3 Inquiry & the Inquiry Design Model.
Lesson Study Opening Activities (Movement Activity) Grouping Subgroup Article Sharing –Subgroup Reporting.
Professional Growth Systems And Nevada Academic Content Standards Strengthening teacher capacity through powerful feedback March 20, 2015.
Close Reading of Complex Texts in the 3-8 Modules
AIMS: writing process, research skills Review in class research project Parts of an essay –Lecture/notes –Handouts –Application Homework –Rewrite introduction.
Learning Through Inquiry: A workshop by Kathy Short
Don’t move firewood it bugs me! An Inquiry Based Lesson Cycle on Invasive Species By Jeff Anderson & Leslie Silbernagel.
Development Team Day 4B Connecting Learning Jan/Feb 2009.
Unit 2 – Visual and Performing Arts: Key Topic 5http:// 1.
Science: Learning Experience 6
Writing Informative Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a substantive.
Theme Four: Developing a Unit Plan Shen Chen School of Education The University of Newcastle.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 ELA/ELD Framework A Focus on Making Meaning.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
“A change of heart about animals” By jeremy Rifkin
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Reading for Effective Arguments LINDA DENSTAEDT CRWP LEADERSHIP TEAM OAKLAND WRITING PROJECT (MI)
The IB History Test What does Paper 1 look like?.
While you’re settling in, think about this question: What kinds of writing projects do you assign to your students?
Inquiry Road Map A Guidance System for 21 st Century Learning By Mary Ratzer.
KLC Meeting Explore the two samples provided considering the following questions: What are some of the possible similarities you see in how you.
Exploring the Literacy Standards: CCSS & Main Idea.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
Drafting Paper Two Friday, October 16.
Writing - Grade 3.
Informational Unit Test Review
Follow on Follow on “Like” EngageNY on Facebook #NTIny.
Setting Writing Goals in Science The Living Environment
Topic sentence: idea, claim, insight
Get into the groups of 3 indicated
Feedback 2017 Part A.
Presentation transcript:

CUSP134: Icarus’s Parachute Writing and Argument Today 1.Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going 2.Discussion of Critical Moves (handout) 3.Group Workshop: Analyzing & Relating (handout) 4.Discussion: Developing Inquiry 5.Browsing Reserves, Exploring Topics

CUSP134: Icarus’s Parachute The Foundation: Reading & Understanding* The Trajectory: From Information to New Knowledge Trust the Process – You have to walk before you can run! 1. SP1* – Developing a Consultable Ground 2. SP2* – Developing a Place in Discourse 3. SP3* – Developing a Insight from a Ground in Discourse 4. SP4 – Developing an Inquiry for Argument 5. Researching 6. FP – Provisional Argument: focus on inquiry and analysis 7. Conferencing 8. FP-R – Revised Argument: better organization, more precise analysis, more focused claim, formatting

CUSP134: Icarus’s Parachute Group Workshop: Analyzing, Relating Groups of 3-4; ~25min General Goal: To collaboratively develop points of interest out of key ideas in the readings, and to form critical connections across texts around those interests Consider your writing in SP3, as well as the handout with key passages/idea listings… 1. Analysis: What would be a good point of departure for further exploration? 2. Relation: What themes show up across texts? What concepts or claims are complicated or made problematic by those in other texts?