TRADITIONAL COMPENSATION SYSTEM PAYMENT BASED ON TASKS ASSUMES STABILITY OF EMPLOYMENT REWARDS INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS PRIMARILY WAGES, SALARIES, BENEFITS, SOME BONUSES RIGID, RESISTANT TO CHANGE
EQUITY ISSUES INDIVIDUAL EQUITY COMPARE MY OUTCOME/INPUT RATIO WITH SOME OTHER’S OUTCOME/INPUT RATIO INTERNAL EQUITY WITHIN RELATIVE WORTH OF JOB WITHIN ORG JOB EVALUATIONS EXTERNAL EQUITY MARKET FORCES SUPPLY/DEMAND CONDUCT SALARY SURVEYS
TRADITIONAL COMPENSATION: PAYING JOBS (A) JOB ANALYSIS JOB DESCRIPTIONS JOB RELATED INFORMATION ONLY JOB SPECIFICATIONS PERSON RELATED INFORMATION ONLY KSAs, EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATIONS JOB EVALUATION IDENTIFIES THE RELATIVE WORTH OF THE JOB TO THE ORGANIZATION NOT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
TRADITIONAL COMPENSATION: PAYING JOBS (B) PAYING JOBS JOB EVALUATION FOR PAY RANGE (HOURLY, WEEKLY, MONTHLY, YEARLY) INDIVIDUAL SALARY DETERMINATION SENIORITY COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENTS MERIT/PERFORMANCE BONUSES (ALL TYPES) SOME GROUP PLANS SECRECY/MANAGERIAL DISCRETION RELATIVELY STATIC MODEL
TRADITIONAL COMPENSATION: PAYING JOBS (C) JOB EVALUATION ASSUMES “PAY JOBS,” NOT “PAY PEOPLE” SYSTEMATIC METHOD OF COMPARING JOBS CREATES PAY RANGE FOR JOB, NOT PERSON TIE TO JOB DESCRIPTION LEGAL, PRACTICAL SUPPORT MAY BREAK JOB INTO COMPONENTS, OR JOB FACTORS SKILL, EFFORT, RESPONSIBILITY, WORKING CONDITIONS (from EPA (1963)/FLSA (1938) EXTERNAL SALARY SURVEYS IDENTIFY MARKET RATES SUPPLY AND DEMAND FOR SKILLS
JOB EVALUATION SYSTEMS TYPE OF COMPARISON PART OF JOB JOB vs. JOB JOB vs. STANDARD WHOLE JOB RANKING (p. 247) CLASSIFI- CATION (p. 250) SPECIFIC JOB FACTORS FACTOR COMPAR- ISON (p. 255) POINT FACTOR (p. 263)
JOB EVALUATION SYSTEMS COMPARES WHICH PART OF JOB WHOLE JOB RANKING CLASSIFICATION SPECIFIC JOB FACTORS FACTOR COMPARISON POINT FACTOR TYPE OF COMPARISON MADE JOB vs. JOB RANKING FACTOR COMPARISON JOB vs. STANDARDS CLASSIFICATION POINT FACTOR