Quantum Observations in Optimal Control of Quantum Dynamics Feng Shuang Herschel Rabitz Department of Chemistry, Princeton University ICGTMP 26 th, June,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Local Hamiltonians in Quantum Computation Funding: Slovak Research and Development Agency, contract No. APVV , European Project QAP 2004-IST- FETPI-15848,
Advertisements

Non-equilibrium dynamics in the Dicke model Izabella Lovas Supervisor: Balázs Dóra Budapest University of Technology and Economics
An Introduction to Parahydrogen Projects in the Pines Lab David Trease Special Topics... March Chip Crawford.
A Painting Interface for Interactive Surface Deformations Jason Lawrence Thomas Funkhouser Princeton University.
II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. II.1 Weinberg’s chair Hamiltonian rotational invariant Why do we see the chair shape? States of different IM are so.
Small Josephson Junctions in Resonant Cavities David G. Stroud, Ohio State Univ. Collaborators: W. A. Al-Saidi, Ivan Tornes, E. Almaas Work supported by.
Understanding Strong Field Closed Loop Learning Control Experiments PRACQSYS August 2006.
Quantum Feedback Control of Entanglement in collaboration with H. M. Wiseman, Griffith University, Brisbane AU University of Camerino, Italy Stefano Mancini.
Quantum Computation and the Bloch Sphere
Activation energies and dissipation in biased quantum Hall bilayer systems at. B. Roostaei [1], H. A. Fertig [2,3], K. J. Mullen [1], S. Simon [4] [1]
Continuos-variable and EIT-based quantum memories: a common perspective Michael Fleischhauer Zoltan Kurucz Technische Universität Kaiserslautern DEICS.
Strongly Correlated Systems of Ultracold Atoms Theory work at CUA.
Laser Cooling of Molecules: A Theory of Purity Increasing Transformations COHERENT CONTROL LASER COOLING QUANTUM INFORMATION/ DECOHERENCE Shlomo Sklarz.
Optical spin transfer in GaAs:Mn Joaquin Fernandez-Rossier, Department of Applied Physics, University of Alicante (SPAIN) CECAM June 2003, Lyon (FR) cond-mat/
Quantum dynamics with ultra cold atoms Nir Davidson Weizmann Institute of Science Billiards BEC I. Grunzweig, Y. Hertzberg, A. Ridinger (M. Andersen, A.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Quantum Computation Using Optical Lattices Ben Zaks Victor Acosta Physics 191 Prof. Whaley UC-Berkeley.
Strong-field physics revealed through time-domain spectroscopy Grad student: Li Fang Funding : NSF-AMO May 20, 2009 DAMOP Charlottesville, VA George N.
Philipp Hauke, David Marcos, Marcello Dalmonte, Peter Zoller (IQOQI, Innsbruck) Brighton, Phys. Rev. X 3, (2013) Experimental input:
Single atom lasing of a dressed flux qubit
. Random Lasers Gregor Hackenbroich, Carlos Viviescas, F. H.
Quantum Beating In Photosynthetic Systems using Noisy Light Darin Ulness Department of Chemistry Concordia College, Moorhead, MN.
David Wilcox Purdue University Department of Chemistry 560 Oval Dr. West Lafayette, IN
Imperial College London Institute for Mathematical Sciences & Quantum Optics and Laser Science Group Blackett Laboratory Imperial College London
Dynamic response of a mesoscopic capacitor in the presence of strong electron interactions Yuji Hamamoto*, Thibaut Jonckheere, Takeo Kato*, Thierry Martin.
Quantum Monte-Carlo for Non-Markovian Dynamics Collaborator : Denis Lacroix Guillaume Hupin GANIL, Caen FRANCE  Exact  TCL2 (perturbation)  TCL4  NZ2.
V. Brosco1, R. Fazio2 , F. W. J. Hekking3, J. P. Pekola4
© Copyright National University of Singapore. All Rights Reserved. ENHANCING THERMOELECTRIC EFFICIENCY FOR NANOSTRUCTURES AND QUANTUM DOTS Jian-Sheng Wang.
Kinetic Investigation of Collision Induced Excitation Transfer in Kr*(4p 5 5p 1 ) + Kr and Kr*(4p 5 5p 1 ) + He Mixtures Md. Humayun Kabir and Michael.
Nonlinear Dynamics in Mesoscopic Chemical Systems Zhonghuai Hou ( 侯中怀 ) Department of Chemical Physics Hefei National Lab of Physical Science at Microscale.
Many-body quench dynamics in ultracold atoms Surprising applications to recent experiments $$ NSF, AFOSR MURI, DARPA Harvard-MIT Eugene Demler (Harvard)
Nonequilibrium Green’s Function and Quantum Master Equation Approach to Transport Wang Jian-Sheng 1.
Meet the transmon and his friends
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
In-medium QCD forces for HQs at high T Yukinao Akamatsu Nagoya University, KMI Y.Akamatsu, A.Rothkopf, PRD85(2012), (arXiv: [hep-ph] ) Y.Akamatsu,
Quantum Measurement Theory on a Half Line
Quantum pumping and rectification effects in interacting quantum dots Francesco Romeo In collaboration with : Dr Roberta Citro Prof. Maria Marinaro University.
Lecture IV Bose-Einstein condensate Superfluidity New trends.
A Study of Error-Correcting Codes for Quantum Adiabatic Computing Omid Etesami Daniel Preda CS252 – Spring 2007.
1.5 Population inversion and laser operation
Haobin Wang Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Squeezing generation and revivals in a cavity-ion system Nicim Zagury Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Rio de Janeiro, Brazil colaboradores: R.
Nonlinear optical effect in the soft x-ray region by two-photon ionization of He + Nonlinear optical effect in the soft x-ray region by two-photon ionization.
Laser Noise, Decoherence &Observations in the Optimal Control of Quantum Dynamics 双 丰 Department of Chemistry, Princeton University Frontiers of Bond-Selective.
Quantum Zeno dynamics induced by Temperature B. D. Militello 44th Symposium on Mathematical Physics (Torun)June 2012 Dipartimento di Fisica Collaboration:.
CONTROLLING QUANTUM DYNAMICS WITH ASSISTED ADIABATIC PROCESSES Shumpei Masuda and Stuart A. Rice James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago,
For long wavelength, compared to the size of the atom The term containing A 2 in the dipole approximation does not involve atomic operators, consequently.
Stochastic Description of Quantum Dissipative Dynamics Jiushu Shao Beijing Normal University 11 August 2010 Physics and Chemistry in Quantum Dissipative.
1 Laser noise and decoherence are generally viewed as deleterious in quantum control. Numerical simulations show that optimal fields can cooperate with.
Phonon mediated spin relaxation in a moving quantum dot: Doppler shift, Cherenkov radiation, and spin relaxation boom Xinyu Zhao 1, Peihao.
International Scientific Spring 2016
Heavy Flavor Theory Yukinao Akamatsu (Nagoya/KMI) 2013/07/30PHENIX PHENIX Workshop on Physics Prospects with Detector and Accelerator.
Dynamics of complex quantum systems Denis Lacroix –CNRS-GANIL ESNT “Les Jeunots…”, Saclay 4-7 Feb Phenomenology of nuclear reactions.
Tunable excitons in gated graphene systems
QUANTUM TRANSITIONS WITHIN THE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION REAL FUNCTIONAL
Quantum Effects in Compton Backscattering
Promotion of Tunneling via Dissipative Molecular Bridges
Dynamics of coupled cavity arrays embedded in a non-Markovian bath
dark matter Properties stable non-relativistic non-baryonic
Adiabatic Green’s function technique and
Marco Polo, Daniel Felinto and Sandra Vianna Departamento de Física
Efimovian Expansion in Scale Invariant Quantum Gases
Nonlinear response of gated graphene in a strong radiation field
Hole Spin Decoherence in Quantum Dots
Using Randomness for Coherent Quantum Control
Hiroyuki Nojiri, Department of Physics, Okayama University
Topic 14 Algorithm Families.
II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking
Dynamics and decoherence of a qubit coupled to a two-level system
Dynamics of a superconducting qubit coupled to quantum two-level systems in its environment Robert Johansson (RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical.
Presentation transcript:

Quantum Observations in Optimal Control of Quantum Dynamics Feng Shuang Herschel Rabitz Department of Chemistry, Princeton University ICGTMP 26 th, June, 2006, NY

2 Overview Introduction: Optimal Control of Quantum Dynamics Quantum Observations Optimal Observations: w/o Control Field With Control Field

3 Control: Coherence + Decoherence Coherence: Decoherence:  Laser Noise: Cooperate and Fight (1)  Dissipation: Cooperate and Fight (2)  Observations: A tool to assist control (3) 1.F.Shuang & H.Rabitz, J.Chem.Phys, 121, 9270 (2004) 2.F.Shuang & H.Rabitz, J.Chem.Phys, 124, (2006) 3.F.Shuang et al, In progress

4 Optimal Control of Quantum Dynamics  Hamiltonian:  Control Field  Objective Function  Closed-Loop Feedback Control: Herschel Rabitz Genetic Algorithm

5 Quantum Observations Instantaneous Observations: Von Neuman General Operator A: Projection Operator P Continuous Observations: Feynman & Mensky Master Equations

6 Quantum Zeno and Anti-Zeno effect Quantum Zeno Effect (QZE) –Repetitive observations prohibits evolution of quantum system Quantum Anti-Zeno Effect (QAZE) –Time-dependent observation induces state change of quantum system

7 Optimal Observations w/o Control Field Two-Level: Initial state and Final state, Projection Operators Adiabatic Limit: 100% Population Transfer (1) Number of Instantaneous Observation, N   Strength of Continuous Observations:    When N and  are finite, What’s the best? (1). A.P.Balachandran & S.M.Roy, PRL, 84, 4019(2000)

8 Optimal Instantaneous Observations N Observations. Interaction Picture After Optimization: Yield of N Observations: (QAZE)

9 Optimal Continuous Observations Weak Observation: Strong Observation: no analytical solution for general  linear form:  (t)= B opt +A opt t

10 Optimal Observations with Control Field N-Level system Control Field: Two Models: –Cooperate & Fight –Symmetry-breaking

11 Optimal Control Field with Observations Model 1 Five-level system: Population 0  4 Control field is fighting with observations of dipole, energy, population at T m =T f /2 Operator Value of observationYield with observation  % H0H % P0P % P1P % P2P % P3P % P4P %

12 Optimal Observations with Control Field : Model 1 Cooperating with the observation of dipole 

13 Optimal Observations with Control Field: Model 2 High symmetry system: Only 50% population is possible from 0 to 1

14 Optimal Control Field with Observations: Model 2 Instantaneous observation: Partial Symmetry Breaking P O [E(t),P] O [E(t),0] F % P066.90%46.04%0.76 P149.99%50.00%0.96 P266.66%46.37%0.49

15 Optimal Observations with Control Field: Model 2 Continuous observation: Symmetry Breaking, QZE Optimize: A, T 1,T 2,Gama P=P 0 P=P 2

16 Conclusions 1. Control field can fight and cooperate with observations 2. Observation can assist optimal control 3. Quantum Zeno and Anti-Zeno effects are key Question: How to implement the observations in experiments ?

17 Acknowledgements Herschel Rabitz Alex Pechen & Tak-san Ho Mianlai Zhou Other colleagues Funding: NSF, DARPA, ARO-MURI