Higgsless Theories, Electroweak Constraints, and Heavy Fermions Carl Schmidt Michigan State University July 18, 2005 SUSY 2005 Based on hep-ph/0312324,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM IN SUSY AND LITTLE HIGGS
Advertisements

What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 4 TASI, 2006.
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from D-branes Joshua Erlich College of William & Mary Title U Oregon, May 22, 2007 w/ Chris Carone, Marc Sher, Jong Anly.
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from the D4-D8-D8 System Joshua Erlich College of William & Mary Budapest, June 25, 2007 w/ Chris Carone, Marc Sher, Jong.
Hep-ph/ , with M. Carena (FNAL), E. Pontón (Columbia) and C. Wagner (ANL) New Ideas in Randall-Sundrum Models José Santiago Theory Group (FNAL)
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Higgs Quadruplet for Type III Seesaw and Implications for → e and −e Conversion Ren Bo Coauther : Koji Tsumura, Xiao - Gang He arXiv:
Spåtind The WIMP of a minimal walking Technicolor Theory J. Virkajärvi Jyväskylä University, Finland with K.Kainulainen and K.Tuominen.
Early LHC bound on W’ mass in nonuniversal gauge interaction model Kang Young Lee Konkuk University Seoul, Korea 양재교육문화회관
Little Higgs Dark Matter and Its Implications at the LHC Chuan-Ren Chen (NTNU) XS 2014, 5/6/2014 In collaboration with H-C Tsai, M-C Lee, [hep-ph]
Enriching the Standard Model With a family of CP even and odd Higgs fields IAS School Jan 13, 2012 Nanyang Technological University Singapore.
Enriching the Standard Model With a family of CP even and odd Higgs fields IAS School Jan 10, 2012 Nanyang Technological University Singapore.
Work with M. Carena, E. Pontón, C. Wagner NPB (06) [ph/ ] and hep-ph/ work in progress Phenomenology of Warped Models with Custodial Symmetry.
The Top Quark and Precision Measurements S. Dawson BNL April, 2005 M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnikas, in preparation M.-C. Chen and S. Dawson,
1 Way Beyond the SM G.F. Giudice IoP meeting on the Physics of the ILC Oxford, 23 May 2007 Original work with C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi.
CUSTODIAL SYMMETRY IN THE STANDARD MODEL AND BEYOND V. Pleitez Instituto de Física Teórica/UNESP Modern Trends in Field Theory João Pessoa ─ Setembro 2006.
Jose E. Garcia presented by: Jose E. Garcia (IFIC-Valencia) on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration XXXIXth Rencontres de Moriond.
Life at the LHC without the Higgs: Models Giacomo Cacciapaglia (UC Davis) 2007 Eötvös-Cornell Workshop Budapest June 28, 2007.
Introduction to Gauge Higgs unification with a graded Lie algebra Academia Sinica, Taiwan Jubin Park (NTHU)  Collaboration with Prof. We-Fu.
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
Minimal SO(10)×A4 SUSY GUT ABDELHAMID ALBAID In Collaboration with K. S. BABU Oklahoma State University.
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute.
A Composite Little Higgs ZACKARIA CHACKO UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK Puneet Batra.
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
Texture of Yukawa coupling matrices in general two-Higgs doublet model Yu-Feng Zhou J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.30 (2004) Presented by Ardy.
Hep-ph/ , with M. Carena (FNAL), E. Pontón (Columbia) and C. Wagner (ANL) Light KK modes in Custodially Symmetric Randall-Sundrum José Santiago Theory.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
Electroweak Precision Measurements and BSM Physics: (A) Triplet Models (B) The 3- and 4-Site Models S. Dawson (BNL) February, 2009 S. Dawson and C. Jackson,
Oct, 2003WIN'03, Katri Huitu1 Probing the scalar sector with ZZH outline: Introduction Models: higher representations radion (nonSUSY/SUSY) Conclusions.
April 3, 2003LCWS Amsterdam, Katri Huitu1 Probing the scalar sector with ZZH outline: Introduction Models: higher representations radion (nonSUSY/SUSY)
1 Summary talk for ILC Physics Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) November 12, 2004 ACFA LC7, Taipei.
WHAT BREAKS ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY ?. We shall find the answer in experiments at the LHC? Most likely it will tells us a lot about the physics beyond the.
Paweł Pachołek IFT UW Scalars 2011 Warsaw
Effective Lagrangians and Physics Beyond the Standard Model S. Dawson TASI06 Lecture 5.
Family Symmetry Solution to the SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Plan of talk: I.Family Symmetry II.Solving SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Work with and Michal.
Quark Mass Matrix from Dimensional Deconstruction Academia Sinica Andrea Soddu Taipei November 17, 2004 National Taiwan University P.Q Hung, A.S., N.-K.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Presice measurement of the Higgs-boson electroweak couplings at Linear Collider and its physics.
STANDARD MODEL. Precision Electroweak data?? Higgs coupling blows up!! Higgs potential collapses Higgs coupling less than in Standard Model viXra Blogger’s.
X ± -Gauge Boson Production in Simplest Higgs Matthew Bishara University of Rochester Meeting of Division of Particles and Fields August 11, 2011  Simplest.
SUSY and Superstrings Masahiro Yamaguchi Tohoku University Asian School Particles, Strings and Cosmology (NasuLec) September 25-28, Japan.
New Physics search via WW-fusion at the ILC Koji TSUMURA (Osaka Univ. → KEK after April ) in collaboration with S. Kanemura & K. Matsuda KEK Theory Meeting.
Sally Dawson, BNL Standard Model and Higgs Physics FNAL LHC School, 2006 Introduction to the Standard Model  Review of the SU(2) x U(1) Electroweak theory.
Nobuchika Okada The University of Alabama Miami 2015, Fort Lauderdale, Dec , GeV Higgs Boson mass from 5D gauge-Higgs unification In collaboration.
No Higgs Models Giacomo Cacciapaglia (UC Davis) The LHC Early Phase for the ILC, No Higgs Working Group Fermilab, April 12, 2007.
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
The Importance of the TeV Scale Sally Dawson Lecture 3 FNAL LHC Workshop, 2006.
BEYOND MFV IN FAMILY SYMMETRY THEORIES OF FERMION MASSES Work done with Zygmunt Lalak and Graham Ross Based on existing ideas but, hopefully, contributing.
SUSY GUT Predictions for Neutrino Oscillation Mu-Chun Chen Brookhaven National Laboratory DUSEL Workshop, January 4-7, 2005 University of Colorado at Boulder.
Lecture 7. Tuesday… Superfield content of the MSSM Gauge group is that of SM: StrongWeakhypercharge Vector superfields of the MSSM.
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 12 Chapter 15: The Standard Model of EWK Interactions A large part of today’s lecture is review of what we have already.
Hunting for Hierarchies in PSL 2 (7) MICHAEL JAY PEREZ PHENOMENOLOGY 2015 MAY 5, 2015 ARXIV : /
Kaluza-Klein Electroweak Dark matter Dong Woo Kang (SKKU) T. Flacke, DWK, K. C. Kong, G. M. Mohlabeng, S. C. Park arXiv:1503.xxxxx Exploring the Dark Sector.
Hong-Jian He Tsinghua University 9th ACFA ILC Workshop Physics Session Summary Feb. 4-7, 2007, IHEP, Beijing.
Some remarks on Higgs physics The Higgs mechanism Triviality and vacuum stability: Higgs bounds The no-Higgs option: strong WW scattering These are just.
Charged Higgs boson decay in supersymmetric TeV scale seesaw model
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
125 GeV Higgs and BSM physics
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
The Flavor of the Composite Twin Higgs
Radiative Flavor Violation
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
The Flavor of a Little Higgs with T-parity
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Flavour and Non-universal Gauge Interaction
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Physics beyond the SM in Kaon decays --Theory--
Analysis of enhanced effects in MSSM from the GUT scale
Presentation transcript:

Higgsless Theories, Electroweak Constraints, and Heavy Fermions Carl Schmidt Michigan State University July 18, 2005 SUSY 2005 Based on hep-ph/ , Roshan Foadi, Shri Gopalakrishna, and CS hep-ph/ , Roshan Foadi, Shri Gopalakrishna, and CS hep-ph/0507xxx, Roshan Foadi and CS

Introduction Motivation: New physics must restore the unitarity apparently lost by breaking electroweak symmetry (ex. W L W L  W L W L ) Options: Restore through scalar channel -> Higgs, SUSY,.... or Restore through vector channel -> Technicolour, Higgsless,... Question: Is the second option viable? (Until Higgs is discovered, must consider it) Higgsless models in extra-dimension/theory space offer a new framework to address this question. [Csaki, Grojean, Murayama, Pilo, Terning/ others...]

Outline 1)Introduction 2)SU(2) 5-dim Theory Space Model* 3)Problems with fermions (and solutions) A.Electroweak S-parameter B.FCNC C.Top quark mass 4)Unitarity and limits on parameter space 5)Conclusions *view as both effective theory and toy model

SU(2) 5-dim Theory-Space Model Gauge sector: with boundary conditions: W ± (  R) = 0 * for others 5D SU(2)gauge theory with explicit breaking to U(1) on boundary. Results in: *Move  -function in by amount   Impose ∂ 5 W=0 on boundary. Take  0. gg’

Delayed Unitarity Violation in W L + W L -  W L + W L - m W’ = 500 GeV N = 0 to 100

Adding Fermions (1) Simplest choice: Brane fermions with Note:  L  lives at y=0 but also couples to W 3 at y=  R. -Okay in theory space. It just couples to both W N+1 and B. Fermions massless.

Confronting EW constraints (1) The real problem: By extracting couplings of W and Z to fermions, we find T ≈ 0 but U ≈ 0 (at tree level) Limits on the S parameter from EW data require Too large to cure unitarity problem. (Important: Limits from direct production of W 1 ’ or Z 1 ’ are weaker, because coupling of heavy gauge bosons to light states are suppressed by a factor proportional to.) ~

Details Couplings: Parametrize with S,T,U with model 1 fermions: comparing gives:

Adding Fermions (2) Try Bulk fermions with Brane kinetic terms with *Technical point to define  -functions: 1)Move  -function in by amount  2)Impose ∂ 5  L =0 at y=0, ∂ 5  R =0 at y  R  3)Take  0. Bulk mass

Adding Fermions (2) Try Bulk fermions with Brane kinetic terms with  (y)  for all y couples to W 3 (  R). -Still okay in theory space. 2)Mass of lightest fermions: Different t R to fit each fermion mass. Heavy fermions have m n ≈ (n+1/2)/R (or larger for bulk mass M >0) Bulk mass

Confronting EW constraints (2) Now must extract couplings of W and Z to light fermion eigenstate. We find T ≈ 0 U ≈ 0 and if we chose (for bulk mass M = 0) then also S ≈ 0  Although it requires tuning, we now have a Higgsless model with all S,T,U zero (at tree level). [Cacciapaglia, Csaki, Grojean Terning] [Foadi,Gopalakrishna,CS]

Details Recall in model 1: : In model 2, couplings obtained from convolution of fermion wave functions (  with W and Z wave functions (f and g): : Identical suppression factor for and can precisely cancel gauge contribution to S.

Fermion mixing Now with three families: In general, M and t L -2 are 3x3 matrices ==> FCNC! Impose U(3) flavor symmetry on Bulk and Left-Brane. The K u and K d matrices diagonalized by separate U(3) transformations. Result: with V is the CKM matrix! t L and M universal t R determines fermion mass

Top Quark Mass Problem: Not possible to obtain m t =175 GeV for reasonable R. Lightest fermion mass for t L fixed to cancel S, for, and various t R.

Top Quark Mass Solution: Separate Gauge Radius R g and Fermion Radius R f Scales R f =R/ , while R g = R Natural in theory space models: - gauge & Yukawa couplings unrelated All fermion masses proportional to 1/R f Can obtain top mass

Limits on Parameter space If we set M = 0, the model is determined by 2 parameters: 1/R g ~ m W1 ~ m Z1 and 1/R f ~ 2m f1 (t L fixed to cancel S, various t R ’s used to obtain fermion masses) Upper limit (crude) on 1/R g from unitarity in W L + W L -  W L + W L - scattering Lower limit on 1/R g (~500 GeV) from limits on production of W 1

Limits on Parameter space Similarly, Upper limit on 1/R f from unitarity in tt  W L + W L - scattering [Schwinn] Only occurs in same-helicity channel Only linear growth in energy, which cancels exactly due to b n tower of states Amplitude may still become too large if 1/R f ~2m b1 too large Minimally, lower limit on 1/R f (~2.5 TeV) needed to give top quark mass. SM Higgsless

Limits on Parameter space Upper limits require a 0 <1/2 for s 1/2 <10 TeV From W L + W L -  W L + W L - From tt  W L + W L - From top mass From W’ limits

Limits on Parameter space Lower limit on 1/R f is actually stronger. Right-handed tbW coupling To make this coupling smaller (while allow top mass): -decrease t tR and increase 1/R f Limits from b->s  give Gives 1/R f > 3.8 TeV for 1/R g = 550 GeV Perhaps even stronger constraints from right-handed ttZ coupling, but phenomenological analysis more subtle [Larios, Perez, Yuan]

Conclusions We’ve presented a toy Higgsless model, which appears viable as an effective theory up ~10 TeV –S-parameter canceled by delocalization of light fermions into bulk –Global SU(3) flavor in bulk and left-brane suppresses FCNC and leads to CKM matrix –Top quark mass allowed by separating R f from R g Parameter space given by R f and R g (for M =0) –Approximate upper bounds from unitarity –Approximate lower bounds from experiment Limits from W’ search Limits on right-handed tbW coupling