Geographic Scale -The explicit physical scale of an air quality model affects more abstract levels of scale of data inputs Atmospheric Chemistry -The dynamic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cell Model of In-cloud Scavenging of Highly Soluble Gases A. Baklanov Sector of Meteorological Model Systems, Research Department, Danish Meteorological.
Advertisements

Urban Meteorology I October 10, Urban Meteorology Special concerns –Severe weather –Air quality –Urban runoff –Climate change.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Introduction & Outline Particulate Measurement 1) PM10 – Particulate Matter < 10 microns 2) PM2.5 – Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns - Measured with different.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Discussion Space Research Centre. Urbanization and Industrialization: in 2008, more than half of humans live in cities UN Population Report 2007.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Map of the Guadalupe Mountains Region NEW MEXICO TEXAS Guadalupe Mtns. Park Map To Carlsbad To El Paso To I-10 Visibility Degradation in Guadalupe Mountains.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright URBAN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING AT THE METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE Dick Derwent Climate Research Urban Air Quality Modelling.
Aerosols and climate Rob Wood, Atmospheric Sciences.
Application of synoptic typing to an investigation of nocturnal ozone concentration at a maritime location, New Zealand B. A. Khan 1, C.R. de Freitas 1.
1 1 Model studies of some atmospheric aerosols and comparisons with measurements K. G e o r g i e v I P P – B A S, S o f i a, B u l g a r i a.
October 17, 20065th Annual CMAS Conference1 Photochemical Modeling Investigation of an Extended Winter PM Episode in Central California 1. Air Resources.
APES Get out lab – keep at table. SMOG Ch. 18 Smog Localized air pollution in urban areas, mixture of pollutants that form with interaction with sunlight.
Air Quality, Atmospheric Deposition, and Lake Tahoe October 15, 2003 Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network Grannlibakken, Lake Tahoe Jim Pederson.
Xuexi Tie Xu Tang,Fuhai Geng, and Chunsheng Zhao Shanghai Meteorological Bureau Atmospheric Chemistry Division/NCAR Peking University Understand.
Urban Air Pollution IB syllabus: AP syllabus Ch 17, 18.
1
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
Aim: What are the major outdoor air pollutants?
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Alex Cuclis Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC) Particulate Matter: What Floats in the Air?
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Air Pollution Anti-Lecture
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Atmospheric Particulate Matter: Chemical Composition and Basics of Concentration Estimation Mike Bergin, Ted Russell, Jim Mullholland, Sangil Lee CEE 6319:
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
UNECE-CLRTAP and EMEP Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling 26th session, Brussels, May 2001 Integrating the environmental effects of Particulate.
October 1-3, th Annual CMAS Meeting1 Effects of Liquid Water on Secondary Inorganic Aerosol in Central California During a Winter Episode 1 Planning.
Chapter 20 Air Pollution.
 QUIZ…how well are we reading.  “Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we’ve been ignorant.
Department of Chemistry CHEM1020 General Chemistry *********************************************** Instructor: Dr. Hong Zhang Foster Hall, Room 221 Tel:
Importance of chemistry-climate interactions in projections of future air quality Loretta J. Mickley Lu Shen, Daniel H. Cusworth, Xu Yue Earth system models.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Air Quality and Seney National Wildlife Refuge Jill Webster June 14, 2007.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Exceptional Events: Complexity for Ozone
Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality PM Hour NAAQS Modeling Issues in the State of Utah WRAP Workshop on Regional Emissions.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
number Typical aerosol size distribution area volume
October 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Glossary1 Glossary and Acronyms This section provides definitions of acronyms and terms used in the workbook. A.
Atmospheric Deposition Unit 4451 Research on Air Pollution Distribution and Effects in California Mountains Andrzej Bytnerowicz, Michael Arbaugh, Nancy.
Informed NPS Air Quality Management Decisions in Response to a Changing Climate.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
The major air pollutants
AQ Data Collection and Monitoring Emissions. Learning Objectives After this activity, you should be able to: List the products of complete and incomplete.
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
A Basis for Control of BART Eligible Sources
AIR POLLUTION AIR POLLUTION Air pollution occurs when harmful substances including particulates and biological molecules are introduced into Earth's.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL: suspension of condensed-phase particles in air
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Fine particulate matter and ozone pollution in China: recent trends, future controls, and impact of climate change Daniel J. Jacob A typical day in Beijing.
Presentation transcript:

Geographic Scale -The explicit physical scale of an air quality model affects more abstract levels of scale of data inputs Atmospheric Chemistry -The dynamic interaction of chemicals and meteorology Modeling Visibility in the National Parks -Modeling at the regional scale – Long range transport in addition to chemistry Using the Results, Dealing With Uncertainty -Modeling complex systems rarely yields definitive results Tyler Cruickshank Patrick Barickman 4/5/05

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Logan, Utah Particulate Air Pollution NH 3 NO 2 NO NH 3 +HNO 3 NH 4 NO 3 83% -21° 250m SO 2 NO 2 +O 3 NO 3 OH+NO 2 HNO 3 Emissions Meteorology Chemistry A Box Model Approach

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling

Dirty pix

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling News conference pix Source: M. Lipsett, California Office of Environmental Health Assessment Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 )

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling This image shows a magnified view of aerosol particles collected in the industrial city of Port Talbot, England. Many of the particles measure roughly 2.5 microns across, small enough to easily enter and damage human lungs. (Micrograph adapted from Sixth Annual UK Review Meeting on Outdoor and Indoor Air Pollution Research Sixth Annual UK Review Meeting on Outdoor and Indoor Air Pollution Research 15th–16th April 2002 (Web Report W12), Leicester, UK, MRC Institute for Environment Institute for EnvironmentInstitute for Environment and Healthand Health) and Health

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling

Bad news when your town is a USA today feature!

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Even worse when your town is USA today graphic!

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Me??

Yes, You!!

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling … and us …

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling

Open Valley Closed Valley

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Brief Chemistry Background PM 2.5 typically consists of: Ammonium Nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ) Ammonium Nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ) Ammonium Sulfate (NH 4 SO 4 ) Ammonium Sulfate (NH 4 SO 4 ) Organic Carbon Organic Carbon Elemental Carbon Elemental Carbon Sodium, Potassium, Calcium, … Sodium, Potassium, Calcium, … Logan PM 2.5 is ~90% Ammonium Nitrate Lots of chemistry going on. Lots of chemistry going on.

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Brief Chemistry Background Ammonium Nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ) NH 3 + HNO 3 NH 4 NO 3 NH 3 + HNO 3 NH 4 NO 3 (Ammonia + Nitric Acid) Ammonium Nitrate Particle Agriculture Chemical transformation of NO x from Cars/combustion Depending on temperature and humidity ammonium nitrate will exist as a: 1)Solid particle (cold and dry) 2)Aqueous droplet (high humidity) 3)Dissociate into gas (warm)

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Brief Chemistry Background In a strong Cache Valley inversion: 1)Ammonium nitrate concentration rapidly increases when: Temperature < 0° C (Dissociation) Temperature < 0° C (Dissociation) Humidity < ~80% (Deliquescence point) Humidity < ~80% (Deliquescence point) 2)Ammonium nitrate concentration decreases when: Humidity > ~80% (Aqueous droplets larger than PM 2.5 ) Humidity > ~80% (Aqueous droplets larger than PM 2.5 ) 3)Indoor ammonium nitrate concentration rapidly decreases. Temperature is warm (> 0° C ) Temperature is warm (> 0° C )

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling What Kind OF Model Should I Use? Cache Valley: Interested in secondary chemistry (90% NH 4 NO 3 ) Interested in secondary chemistry (90% NH 4 NO 3 ) - NH 3 + HNO 3 NH 4 NO 3 - NH 3 + HNO 3 NH 4 NO 3 - Model must treat this and “lead-up” chemical reactions - Model must treat this and “lead-up” chemical reactions Cache Valley is small and contained. Cache Valley is small and contained. Transport by wind is limited. Weather data is limited. Transport by wind is limited. Weather data is limited. PM 2.5 concentrations uniform throughout valley. PM 2.5 concentrations uniform throughout valley. What is my goal?: 1)Represent average airshed conditions. Valley concentrations are uniform. Valley concentrations are uniform. Don’t need to tie results to widely spaced monitors. Don’t need to tie results to widely spaced monitors. 2) Test NO x, VOC, NH 3 control strategies Basic control strategies are needed. Basic control strategies are needed.

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Two model options: 1)Complex grid based model. Gridded emissions, meteorology, chemistry. Gridded emissions, meteorology, chemistry. Spatially and temporally oriented. Spatially and temporally oriented. 2) Simple box model. Single volume, no transport, “shake the box”. Single volume, no transport, “shake the box”. Provides average conditions. Provides average conditions. What Kind OF Model Should I Use? Results can be tied to the Logan monitor. Valley concentrations seem mixed and uniform. Valley PM 2.5 problem tied to NO x, VOC, NH 3 dynamics.

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Fixed X Fixed Y Emissions In Model Prediction Chemistry Performed NOx SO4 H2O NH3 NO VOC NH3 SO4 NOx Box Model Variable Z

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Emissions NO2 NO2 NO NO VOC VOC NH3 NH3 Predictions NO2 NO2 NO NO O3 O3 Model Volume How big a box? How big a box? Meteorology Temperature Temperature RH RH Photolysis Photolysis Are my emissions reasonable? Are my emissions reasonable relative to the box size? Meteorology is measured and hence, fixed. How does the meteorology impact the chemistry? Represent the whole valley? Just the populated portion? Do my predictions look reasonable? No? Why not? Try again …

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Model Chemistry – How, exactly, does it work? Inputs: Initial Concentrations: NO, NO 2, CO, etc... Hourly Emissions: NO, NO 2, CO, etc … Chemistry: Carbon Bond-IV Chemical Mechanism - Used for urban smog modeling - About 80 different reactions ie. NO 2 + Sunlight NO+O NO 2 + Sunlight NO+O O 3 + NO O 3 O 3 + NO O 3 NO 2 + O 3 NO 3 NO 2 + O 3 NO 3

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Results !!!

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling NO appears to be progressively depleted. Some Problems …

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling NO 2 appears to be progressively depleted. Some Problems …

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling O 3 progressively increases. O 3 depleted at night. Some Problems …

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling What Might Explain My Problems? #1 : NO 2 appears to be progressively depleted. Is our “box” too big relative to emissions coming in? Is our “box” too big relative to emissions coming in? Is there too much photochemistry happening – NO 2 depletion? Is there too much photochemistry happening – NO 2 depletion? #2 : O 3 progressively increases. Is the “box” not big enough – too much VOC? Is the “box” not big enough – too much VOC? Is the photochemistry happening too quickly? Is the photochemistry happening too quickly? What else is increasing to allow O 3 to build? What else is increasing to allow O 3 to build? #3 : O 3 depleted at night. Is there a reaction happening too fast? Is there a reaction happening too fast? Does subtle meteorology explain the discrepancy? Does subtle meteorology explain the discrepancy?

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling I must remember that: The model cannot capture the subtleties. The model cannot capture the subtleties. I shouldn’t expect to match the observations exactly. I shouldn’t expect to match the observations exactly. The model results represent average airshed conditions. The model results represent average airshed conditions. What Might Explain My Problems? Considering the above: I want my ratios to be reasonable - NO x :NH 3, NO:NO 2 I want my ratios to be reasonable - NO x :NH 3, NO:NO 2 Trends match observations. Trends match observations. Does it make sense? Does it make sense?

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling Identify dynamics behind AQ problem. Identify dynamics behind AQ problem. Identify scale of AQ problem. Identify scale of AQ problem. Select model as appropriate to above and goals. Select model as appropriate to above and goals. Understand uncertainty. Understand uncertainty. AQ modeling is not a research project – it is applied modeling. AQ modeling is not a research project – it is applied modeling. What’s the Skinny?

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling What’s the Skinny?

Geographic Scale -The explicit physical scale of an air quality model affects more abstract levels of scale of data inputs Atmospheric Chemistry -The dynamic interaction of chemicals and meteorology Modeling Visibility in the National Parks -Modeling at the regional scale – Long range transport in addition to chemistry Using the Results, Dealing With Uncertainty -Modeling complex systems rarely yields definitive results Tyler Cruickshank Patrick Barickman 4/5/05

Overall Goal of the Regional Haze Rule (CAA, 1990)

MM5 Modeling at the Continental Scale

Emissions Inventory

What is the model trying to evaluate? Light Extinction (B ext ): The attenuation of light due to scattering and absorption as it passes through a medium Benefit: Light extinction can be directly related to gaseous and aerosol concentrations. Drawback: Light extinction is non-linearly related to a person perception of changes in haze. How is it done? The model converts concentrations of pollutants into the extinction coefficients These are based on known relationships between the type of particle and its effect on visibility How is the evaluation made?

Observations in the National Parks and Wilderness Areas

Geographic Scale -The explicit physical scale of an air quality model affects more abstract levels of scale of data inputs Atmospheric Chemistry -The dynamic interaction of chemicals and meteorology Modeling Visibility in the National Parks -Modeling at the regional scale – Long range transport in addition to chemistry Using the Results, Dealing With Uncertainty -Modeling complex systems rarely yields definitive results Tyler Cruickshank Patrick Barickman 4/5/05

The Weight of Evidence Approach The Causes of Haze Data for each state’s Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (RH SIP) Sulfates and Nitrates Uncertainty in the model results require supporting evidence Two models used Tagged Species Source Apportionment (TSSA) Trajectory Regression Attribution Method

Back Trajectory Analysis

Utah Emissions Inventory S0 2 + NH 3 = SO 4 No x + NH 3 = NH 3

Weight of Evidence This is a descriptive approach that is narrative and qualitative rather than purely quantitative

Tyler Cruickshank Patrick Barickman 4/5/05 Summary Complex System – “One not describable by a single rule. Structure exists on many scales… not reducible to only one level of description.” Usually not possible to give definitive answers – a conceptual model puts the results in context

Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling