Analyzing data using AMS analysis procedures Qi Zhang June 22, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tutorial 3 Refractor assignment, Analysis, Modeling and Statics
Advertisements

Introduction to Formatting VistaPHw Charts Brought to you by: The Vista Partnership February 2007.
Experiments and Variables
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Mass spectroscopy. In a typical MS procedure:  1- a sample is loaded onto the MS instrument, and undergoes vaporization.  2- the components of the sample.
Squirrel Overview Donna Sueper Aerodyne, University of Colorado, Boulder.
The main tools and functions of the system can be accessed via this side bar Allometric equations editor can be accessed under utilities, and user.
Soot Particle Aerosol Mass Spectrometer: Development, Validation, and Initial Application T. B. Onasch,A. Trimborn,E. C. Fortner,J. T. Jayne,G. L. Kok,L.
Lecture 8. GC/MS.
Squirrel Overview Donna Sueper June, 2007 Aerodyne, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Atomic Mass Spectrometry
Control Charts for Variables
Monitoring and Pollutant Load Estimation. Load = the mass or weight of pollutant that passes a cross-section of the river in a specific amount of time.
Squirrel Tutorial Post – Pre-Process Steps Airbeam correction PToF DVa, DC markers Fragmentation checks Donna Sueper Aerodyne, University of Colorado,
The Calibration Process
1 Seventh Lecture Error Analysis Instrumentation and Product Testing.
Microsoft Office Word 2013 Expert Microsoft Office Word 2013 Expert Courseware # 3251 Lesson 4: Working with Forms.
Revisions To Heavy Duty Validation Report General Numerous clarifications to text as requested at December meeting Partial flow systems referred to consistently.
Validation of Analytical Method
Chapter 8 – Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry The mass spectrometer can be used for: – Quantitative analysis – as a sophisticated and very sensitive.
Flame Photometry Flame atomic emission spectrometry
Statistical Methods For Engineers ChE 477 (UO Lab) Larry Baxter & Stan Harding Brigham Young University.
The Scientific Method Ms. Pettit Step 1: Question Who? What? Where? Why? How? When? Sometimes called “The Problem”
Forecasting and Statistical Process Control MBA Statistics COURSE #5.
Molecular mass spectrometry Chapter 20 The study of “molecular ions” M + e -  M e -
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Sparrow Light Scattering (LS) Analysis Tool The first flight ver March 26, 2010.
1 Chemical Analysis by Mass Spectrometry. 2 All chemical substances are combinations of atoms. Atoms of different elements have different masses (H =
Quality Control Lecture 5
Calibration & Measurements. Calibrating the System Before we can make any measurements we need to calibrate our imaging system to create real world numbers.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Statistics. Statistical Methods Were developed to serve a purpose Were developed to serve a purpose The purpose for each statistical.
Organic Mass Spectrometry
An Internet of Things: People, Processes, and Products in the Spotfire Cloud Library Dr. Brand Niemann Director and Senior Data Scientist/Data Journalist.
Uncertainties Using & Calculating Uncertainties for Electrical Measurement.
Squirrel Tutorial Pre – Pre-Process Steps Modify Single Ion (SI) M/z Calibration Fitting Baseline Fitting Donna Sueper ToF AMS Training, Aerodyne, Nov/Dec.
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Chapter 6. Control Charts for Variables. Subgroup Data with Unknown  and 
MS Calibration for Protein Profiles We need calibration for –Accurate mass value Mass error: (Measured Mass – Theoretical Mass) X 10 6 ppm Theoretical.
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
Chemistry Topic: Atomic theory Subtopic : Mass Spectrometer.
Combining and Choosing Analytical Techniques Chapter 8.
Starter: Spec links 1.06–1.10. Green pens out! Spec links 1.06–1.10.
Donna Sueper Aerodyne, University of Colorado, Boulder Unit Mass Resolution and High Resolution ToF-AMS Analyses Squirrel and Pika Analysis Comparisons.
Statistical Process Control04/03/961 What is Variation? Less Variation = Higher Quality.
Advanced Analytical Chemistry – CHM 6157® Y. CAIFlorida International University Updated on 9/26/2006Chapter 3ICPMS Interference equations Isobaric.
Fort Sill - POOF Tim Onasch, Mike Timko March 18, 2007 (day 0) LOG Day 1 – co-adds 2, used 1 multiply data by 2 Day 2 – IE used 34, should be 15, multiply.
Mass Spectroscopy Introduction.
Squirrel Tutorial Pre – Pre-Process Steps Modify Single Ion (SI) M/z Calibration Fitting Baseline Fitting Donna Sueper Aerodyne, University of Colorado,
Chapter 3 Response Charts.
Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies AMS Data Analysis Training Amy Sage and Andy Grieshop March 7, 2007.
1 Module One: Measurements and Uncertainties No measurement can perfectly determine the value of the quantity being measured. The uncertainty of a measurement.
CONTENTS Prior knowledge Background information The basic parts of a mass spectrometer The four stages of obtaining a spectrum How different ions are deflected.
Emission source sampling and monitoring Topic 6 Ms Sherina Kamal May
CHAPTER 2.3 PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. 2.3 GAUSSIAN OR NORMAL ERROR DISTRIBUTION  The Gaussian distribution is an approximation to the binomial distribution.
Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor ACSM Instrument description and sample data N.L. Ng, T. Onasch, A. Trimborn, S. Herndon, M. Canagaratna, D. Sueper,
WELCOME STUDENTS Mobile : Skype: aamarpali.puri.
Data Editing Strategies Common edits Invalidation vs. contamination? What is a considered a spike? What not to edit! Automatic edits Reasons for edits.
Workflows to set up acquisition methods for scheduled sMRM-HR on the TripleTOF 5600 Start from a data dependent acquisition (DDA) Perform data base search.
Chapter 1: The Nature of Analytical Chemistry
이 장 우. 1. Introduction  HPLC-MS/MS methodology achieved its preferred status -Highly selective and effectively eliminated interference -Without.
THE MASS SPECTROMETER WHAT IS A MASS SPECTROMETER
Probability and Statistics
The Calibration Process
KNOCKHARDY PUBLISHING
Strategies for Eliminating Interferences in Optical Emission Spectroscopy Best practices to optimize your method and correct for interferences to produce.
Tuesday March 27, 2012 Clicker questions.
1) Adding new ions into PIKA to account for
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
KNOCKHARDY PUBLISHING
Presentation transcript:

Analyzing data using AMS analysis procedures Qi Zhang June 22, 2004

Download the Latest AMS Analysis Template Latest version from James’ website: –Analysis Toolbox version1.30 Load data, apply corrections to the data and to generate relevant plots –Diagnostics version 1.1.7a Plot important m/z ratios for each specie of interest. These plots are used to optimize fragmentation waves to ensure accurate mass concentration calculations –Delta Analysis version 5.3.7b Analyze the organic components of the measured mass spectra. –Batch file fragmentation, batch, and color waves for use with the AMS analysis toolbox (more info see James’ website) –ARI's preferred default values (e.g., in corrections tab).

Loading Data Load data without applying corrections (uncheck “Invoke corrections”) Look at diagnostics plot: –multiplier voltage/gain –Heater Bias –Ionization effieciency –Duty cycle –flow rate –MS & TOF air beam.

Corrections (MS) Airbeam correction –Set “Air beam reference runs” –Check all 3 check boxes in the section –Smoothing (by judgment) usually: Smooth MS air beam (4pts), TOF air beam (6pts), and Flow rate (4pts) –Flowrate offset is instrument dependent and needs to be checked per instrument. If the offset is unknown, enter 0.0 –Click “Recalculate” –Look at the correction factors plot Correction factor = signal t / signal 0 (The correction factors for the full experiment are referenced to the signal over the selected air beam range) –unclick the ‘Auto-set’ checkbox under “Reference Values”

Corrections (MS) Generate a time series –Under “MS” tab; Time Series” subtab –Check and uncheck the “Use MS correction factors” checkbox, see the difference. (When MS correction is checked, time series plot should shift in agreement with the ‘MS’ correction factor values). –Closely examine the filtered air period. Modify frag table (e.g., frag_CO2 [mz 44], frag_RH[m/z 18] Check mass spec. (org 27, org 29 …)

Corrections (MS) Create average MS for the entire period. –Type in the run number interval –Type in “Species” (Air,Water,NH4,NO3,SO4,Org,Chl) –Check the ‘Add Discrepancies’ checkbox to determine if the fragmentation waves over predict signal at any given m/z (black sticks) to determine the MS signal that is not assigned to a particular species via the fragmentation waves (yellow sticks). –Ensure that the checkbox ‘Plot new graph’ is checked –Click ‘Calculate!’ button to generate an Average MS plot. Examine the Mass spec specifically for black and yellow sticks. Examine the Mass spec of the filtered air period. –Choose the run number interval (can use the marquee function on the ‘MS Time Series’ plot). –Look for problems, pay special attention to the organics

Corrections (MS) Error analysis. –The ‘sigma’ and ‘background’ (background electronic noise level) values are instrument dependent and can be determined experimentally when sampling through a particle filter. Typical values are Sigma factor = 1.2 and Background = 1e-5. Recalculate sticks –The default list “14,18,28,149,182,184,186” is for “open + closed”. –You have to take out 149, 182, 184 and 186 from the list of m/z's used if you do the stick recalculation but only apply it to the difference spectra. This is because these peaks only feature in the background and not the sampled aerosol. Watching the correction factors plot for large changes that may indicate mass scale issues –Check time series, Mass spec for changes –(How to undo recalculate sticks without reloading the data) Baseline correction: –usually unchecked. Only use when some funny thing happened to baseline Pre vs. Post corrections –The 'pre correction' box specifically for the wire analysis. It is mainly for functions to perform before the corrections are made, but after any data has been loaded. –The 'post correction' box is most useful for overwriting the ioneff_ref wave in James’ program (talk to me later for details)

Corrections (MS) Check for bad points Discard bad/unwanted points –Find the point number(s) on the correction factors plot (use ctrl-i). –Read off Run Number(s) (use “List” button to bring up a table of the Run Numbers (rn_series) and the Save Times (t_series). –type this Run Number into the ‘Run number(s)’ input string –Click the ‘Discard’ button. –Click ‘Recalculate!’ button to update the “Correction Factor” plots

Corrections (TOF) Recalculate Da –Type in right values from your size calibration –“t=0 offset” to correct for the situation (not often but could happen) when the chopper starting time was not set right. The value can be measured. Check “Clean TOF signals” (to remove bad points) Check “override DC Markers” (to set the right zero level) E.g., those have big gas phase contribution need to be included in “Region 2 only Channels” correction; those suffer slow evaporation need to be included in “Region1 only Channels” Force DC Marker position (talk to me later for details)

Batch Table and Calibration Factors Batch table defines the calibration factors (CAL_Fac, wname = CALfac_list) for species. –IE_fac (wname = IEfac_list): ionization efficiency. –CE_fac (wname = CEfac_list): collection efficiency CAL_fac = 1 / (IE_fac * CE_fac) –The mass concentration for a given species =  nitrate equivalent mass concentration signal for each of its fragments) * CAL_fac. –Read Jose’s Ambient paper and James’ JGR Quantitative paper (I) for details

Fragmentation Table Fragmentation table defines the matrix that is used to deconvolve the average ensemble mass spectra obtained by the AMS into partial mass spectra for distinct (and groups of) chemical species. –Read James’ Technical note for details –The fragmentation waves have been carefully defined based on mass spectra taken under high and low loadings in each case. –But there are four main parameters, defined as separate fragmentation waves (frag_NH4_16, frag_CO2, frag_O16, and frag_RH), that must be optimized by users to ensure accurate mass concentrations for the water, ammonium, nitrate, SO4, and chloride. –The best method for checking and optimizing these parameters is to use the Data Diagnostics panel to generate and plot the relevant m/z ratios for each species (use Alice’s Diagnosis routines).

Fragmentation Pattern of Species Water: –The purpose of understanding H2O fragmentation patterns very well is to establish accurate measurements for NH4. –H2O signals in the AMS can come from four sources: gas-phase water (RH species) sulfate or sulfuric acid Organics Particle bound water –m/z 17/18 ratio gets larger for pure water particles and is a function of the ambient relative humidity. –Typical values 17/18 ratio for water = /18 ratio for water = 0.04, and these values are defined in elements frag_RH[17] and frag_RH[16], respectively –If the relative humidity was monitored during an experiment, these factors in frag_RH can be adjusted to account for the changing ambient RH.

Fragmentation Pattern of Species NH4: –NH417/16 ratio is conserved throughout an experiment (~1.1). –16 is the best for NH4, may have a contribution of 16(O+). –The 16(O+) contribution is variable due to changes in the air beam intensity and may be instrument dependent. –The 16O+ contribution must be set using the factor in element frag_O16[16], where the contribution is tied to the variations in the 14N signal through frag_air[14] –m/z 17 signal is a combination of H2O and NH4 intensities. –Its best to use both m/z 16 and 17 to derive NH4 concentrations by defining the element: frag_NH4[16]= frag_NH4_16[16], 0*1.1*frag_NH4[16] –With this definition for NH4, adjust the factor in element frag_O16[16] until the NH4[17]: NH4[16] data falls on the 1.1:1 line. This adjustment accounts for instrument variability in air beam intensity and ensures accurate ammonium and water signals. –If the H2O signal is compromised by complications, its best to use m/z16 to establish NH4 concentrations by defining the element: frag_NH4[17]= 0*frag_NH4_16[16], 1.1 * frag_NH4[16]

Fragmentation Pattern of Species NO3: –Nitrate mass concentrations is derived from 8 fragments, including nitric acid, NO2, NO, and 14N+. –The nitrate m/z 46/30 ratio is typically between 3 and 6. SO4: –Due to different mechanisms for the evaporation and ionization of SO4 from particles (evaporation of sulfuric acid vs. SO3 from the oven), two fragmentation waves have been defined for SO4 (frag_H2SO4 and frag_SO3). These fragmentation waves are combined using the frag_SO4 wave, and take into account some 25 m/z signals. –The purpose of being so thorough on the SO4 fragmentation is to ensure accurate organic signals at each m/z. –Because of the different mechanisms, the m/z 48/64 ratio is not conserved for SO4. –Evaporated H2SO4 will fragment with 81/48 and 81/64 ~ 1.0 to 1.5, –whereas evaporated SO3 will fragment with 81 / 48 and 81/64 ~ 0.2

Fragmentation Pattern of Species Chl: –Currently, chlorides mass concentrations are derived from the signal intensities at m/z 35, 36, 37, and 38. The two evaporation and ionization mechanisms for chlorine is either through evaporation of HCl from the oven surface and the formation of HCl+ ions (m/z 36 and 38). –This mechanism most likely occurs when the chlorine is bound up in volatile or semi-volatile inorganic compounds such as NH4Cl. –Chloride ions can also be generated in the gas phase from chlorine containing organic compounds (m/z 35 and 37).

Fragmentation Pattern of Species Other Metals: –Due to unique fragmentation patterns, metal ions are usually fairly easy to identify within a mass spectrum and thus can be accounted for by generating a fragmentation wave for the metal. –Although metal ions are not observed in large quantities in ambient aerosol, there are several specific cases where they are important: (1) variable oven temperature experiments, and (2) source characterization. –Variable oven temperature experiments are carried out to investigate the evaporation kinetics of semi-volatile components in ambient aerosol. The oven consists of tungsten, and thus under high temperature conditions, tungsten, tungsten oxides, and potential tungsten chlorides must be account for as an experimental contamination. –Source characterization experiments, such as incinerator emission experiments, can potentially measure many different metal compounds, which again can be identified and taken into account by generating relevant fragmentation waves.

Data Analysis (MS) Generate Time Series –Check “use MS correction factor” –Simple Time Trends (note: you can plot any mass ratio, e.g., 28/44 to plot 28m/z over 40m/z) –Mass Calculation Species Graph option Diurnal plots

Data Analysis (TOF) 4 choice, x waves dsig and tsig. Smooth along the diameter axis Smooth along the time axis Gives the area under the plot. Ask me for the macro that can calculate mass conc. in a given size range The noise is calculated by looking at the standard deviation of the data points within the TOF regions while the data is in TOF space and mapped accordingly to log(d) space (see James JGR Quantitative paper). This noise is based on the electronic noise and the ion counting statistics of the background, so is really best suited to calculating detection limits rather than absolute uncertainties. Delete the intermediate waves that have been produced.