R. Pain9/18/2008 LSST-SNAP complementarity Reynald Pain IN2P3/LPNHE Paris, France Page 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUCLID : From Dark Energy to Earth mass planets and beyond Jean-Philippe Beaulieu Institut dAstrophysique de Paris Dave Bennett University of Notre Dame.
Advertisements

SNAP vs. Ground-based Supernova Missions Alex Kim For the SNAP collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 2003.
JDEM Update 1 Richard Griffiths (NASA HQ) JDEM Program Scientist Neil Gehrels (NASA GSFC) JDEM Project Scientist February 3, 2010.
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Paris - Apr29, 2005Reynald Pain : Concordance model Today’s question :  Cosmological Constant, Vacuum Energy  or Dark Energy ? SNe Ia prefer.
WFIRST & Euclid Jason Rhodes NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Copyright 2011 California Institute of Technology. Government.
CLASH: Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble ACS Parallels WFC3 Parallels 6 arcmin. = 2.2 z=0.5 Footprints of HST Cameras: ACS FOV in.
ELT Stellar Populations Science Near IR photometry and spectroscopy of resolved stars in nearby galaxies provides a way to extract their entire star formation.
Cosmic Shear with HST Jason Rhodes, JPL Galaxies and Structures Through Cosmic Times Venice Italy March 27, 2006 with Richard Massey, Catherine Heymans.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
September 22, 2006 Natalia Kuznetsova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The Super/Nova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Natalia Kuznetsova Natalia Kuznetsova.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical I: Big Apertures Geoff Bower.
The SNAP Project at SLAC Phil Marshall SLAC/KIPAC Slide 1.
B12 Next Generation Supernova Surveys Marek Kowalski 1 and Bruno Leibundgut 2 1 Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn 2 European Southern Observatory.
LSST and the Dark Sector: Image processing challenges Tony Tyson University of California, Davis ADASS September 25, 2007.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Future Observations of SN IA Geoff Bower.
The Nearby Supernovae Factory: Spectrograph Calibration Ben Dilday Advisor: Rick Kessler, CfCP Physics 335 Autumn 2003.
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure Alexandre Refregier (Cambridge) Collaborators: Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (Cambridge) Richard.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni Martin Kilbinger Andisheh Mahdavi.
Cosmic shear results from CFHTLS Henk Hoekstra Ludo van Waerbeke Catherine Heymans Mike Hudson Laura Parker Yannick Mellier Liping Fu Elisabetta Semboloni.
20 Nov Jean-Paul KNEIB - prospective spatial PNG 1 A wide field imager for dark energy … and more ! SNAP-L Jean-Paul KNEIB LAM, Marseille, France.
Supernova Legacy Survey Mark Sullivan University of Oxford
THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY Science Goals: Perform a 5000 sq. deg. survey of the southern galactic cap Map the cosmological density field to z=1 Constrain the.
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
PAU survey collaboration: Barcelona (IFAE, ICE(IEEC/CSIC), PIC), Madrid (UAM & CIEMAT), València (IFIC & UV), Granada (IAA) PAU survey Physics of the Accelerating.
Decelerating and Dustfree: Dark Energy Studies of Supernovae with the Hubble Space Telescope Kyle Dawson March 16, 2008 For the SuperNova Cosmology Project.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy DETF Recommendations I 2.1Science (Charge questions 1, 2, 7) Andy Albrecht & Nicholas Suntzeff 2.1.2Comments.
DARK ENERGY IN SPACE: WFIRST AND EUCLID RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) ON BEHALF OF THE PHYSPAG DARK ENERGY COMMUNITY Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit:
Weak Lensing from Space with SNAP Alexandre Refregier (IoA) Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (IoA) Richard Massey (IoA) Gary Bernstein (Michigan) Tim.
Cosmic shear Henk Hoekstra Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Victoria Current status and prospects.
Surveying the Universe with SNAP Tim McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Seattle AAS Meeting: 1/03 For the SNAP collaboration.
Introduction to cosmology Today results on dark energy Future experiments Search for dark energy.
The WFIRST Microlensing Exoplanet Survey: Figure of Merit David Bennett University of Notre Dame WFIRST.
Cosmology with Gravitaional Lensing
Michael Levi (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), M. Lampton (UCBerkeley Space Sciences Lab), and M. Sholl (UCBerkeley Space Sciences Lab) WFIRST:
A. Ealet, S. Escoffier, D. Fouchez, F. Henry-Couannier, S. Kermiche, C. Tao, A. Tilquin September 2012.
The SNLS has been allocated large amount of spectroscopic follow-up time at the VLT, Gemini North and South, Keck and Magellan. Example of a spectrum of.
Wide Field Astronomy from Space Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute January 9, 2002.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
LSST and Dark Energy Dark Energy - STScI May 7, 2008 Tony Tyson, UC Davis Outline: 1.LSST Project 2.Dark Energy Measurements 3.Controlling Systematic Errors.
1 A French participation to SNAP A.EALET. 2Outline Scientific interest Supernova in the world The French expertise in SN Historical participation The.
The Instrument The focal plane is like an HEP detector, larger than any present astronomical camera, but smaller than a vertex detector. ½ Billion pixels.
Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.
Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Effects Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Observational evidence for Dark Energy
Gravitational Lensing
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
Cosmological Weak Lensing With SKA in the Planck era Y. Mellier SKA, IAP, October 27, 2006.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
R. PainEDEN, Dec Reynald Pain LPNHE, Univ. Paris, France Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae.
CTIO Camera Mtg - Dec ‘03 Studies of Dark Energy with Galaxy Clusters Joe Mohr Department of Astronomy Department of Physics University of Illinois.
COSMIC MAGNIFICATION the other weak lensing signal Jes Ford UBC graduate student In collaboration with: Ludovic Van Waerbeke COSMOS 2010 Jes Ford Jason.
The Euclid Mission Jason Rhodes (Caltech/JPL) March 7, 2013 © 2013, government sponsorship acknowledged.
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
TR33 in the Light of the US- Dark Energy Task Force Report Thomas Reiprich Danny Hudson Oxana Nenestyan Holger Israel Emmy Noether Research Group Argelander-Institut.
The Dark Energy Science Collaboration Andy Connolly (DESC Computing Coordinator), Rachel Bean (DESC Spokesperson)
Gina Moraila University of Arizona April 21, 2012.
January 29, 2003 Science Center 308 3:00 p.m.
DEEP LENS SURVEY Long term dual hemisphere campaign
C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014
LSST : Follow-up des SN proches
Complementarity of Dark Energy Probes
KDUST暗能量研究 詹虎 及张新民、范祖辉、赵公博等人 KDUST 宇宙学研讨会 国台,
Presentation transcript:

R. Pain9/18/2008 LSST-SNAP complementarity Reynald Pain IN2P3/LPNHE Paris, France Page 1

R. Pain9/18/2008 True: 1.Target Dark Energy (and Dark Matter) as primary science 2.Use wide field imager as (main) instrument 3.Hope to start operating in ~ Are competing for (some of) the same money But … LSST vs SNAP (and vice-versa) Page 2

R. Pain9/18/2008 LSST & SNAP apparatus Primary mirror : ~2m Field-of-view : ~ 1 deg 2 6 filters in the visible : 320 nm -> 1100 nm 3 filters in NIR (->1700 nm) low-z spectrograph Primary mirror : 8.4 m Field-of-view : ~ 10 deg 2 6 filters in the visible : 320 nm -> 1100 nm Page 3

R. Pain9/18/2008 LSST & SNAP surveys SNAP Survey Area(sq.deg) Depth(AB mag) n gal (arcmin -2 ) N gal Deep/SNe Wide Panoramic LSST Survey Page 4

R. Pain9/18/20085 SNAP & LSST strategies for Supernovae SNAP: Area : 2x7.5 sq. deg. Cadence : 4 days Imaging and spectroscopy Total nb of SN : ~ 2000 Need for “nearby” SN (ground) Light curve modeling requires lots of SN LSST: full sky, twice a week => SN/yr ! well measured subsample at z<1 Some DE models require SN at z>1 Dust modeling requires IR meas.

R. Pain9/18/20086 SNAP & LSST strategies for Weak Lensing 9-band photometry (incl NIR) helps for phot-z LSST: 200 exposures per sky patch will yield negligible PSF induced shear systematics SNAP: increase the number of resolved galaxies (spatial resolution) and PSF stability Cosmic shear signal Stars SNAP and LSST will have very different systematic uncertainties

R. Pain9/18/2008 Rely on the same techniques (SN, WL, BAO,..) to constraint DE but use a very different instrumental approach DE is a difficult measurement. Improving on current (+ near future) constraints will be extremely difficult and will in fine come to how well one does on controlling the systematic uncertainties LSST and SNAP are complementarity in particular when dealing with systemactic uncertainties Combined, they will yield improved constraints on Dark Energy LSST and SNAP Page 7

R. Pain9/18/2008Page 8

R. Pain9/18/20089 Cosmological parameters (1st year) 68.3, 95.5 and 99.7% CL Green SNLS, Blue SDSS/BAO 2005  M = / (stat) +/ (syst) w = / (stat) +/ (syst)