SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Privacy By Design Sample Use Case
Advertisements

Company vehicle safety. Safety program goals: Save lives Reduce injuries Protect resources Reduce liability 1a.
Driver Behavior Models NSF DriveSense Workshop Norfolk, VA Oct Mario Gerla UCLA, Computer Science Dept.
National Safety Council Driver Improvement Programs.
The History of Idaho Driver Education In 1946 the AAA reported that in 1946 there were 1,370 drivers under the age of 18 in Idaho, and 9,700.
Chapter 1-3 Test Review Driver’s Education. List the 5 restrictions you must follow while on you special learners permit.
B4 U Drive. We’re Not Kids Anymore  We’re not kids anymore, so people expect more of us – even when it comes to riding in a car.  The challenge is knowing.
STOPPING THE #1 KILLER OF TEENS IN AMERICA. TOO MANY TEENS ARE DYING Motor vehicle crashes are the #1 killer of teens in America About 400 junior high.
Child/Youth Protection Policies and Procedures. Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such.
Why Wear Seat Belts? Why wear seatbelts?.
Annual IRB Member Training October 2010 Research Participant Compensation John Stillman Director Institutional Review Board University of Utah.
STOPPING THE #1 KILLER OF TEENS IN AMERICA. TOO MANY TEENS ARE DYING Motor vehicle crashes are the #1 killer of teens in America About 3,500 teens per.
Introduction to SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study and Roadway Information Databases CUTC Summer Meeting May 2014.
NJ GDL Graduated Driver Licensing by Amy Dalgewicz.
Protecting Our Young Riders Child Restraints Name Prosecuting Attorney.
VicRoads Powerpoint Template 28TH FEBRUARY 2008 VicRoads Powerpoint Template Maternal and Child Health Services Conference 2009 Helen Lindner Senior Project.
® © 2013 National Safety Council Safe Teen Driving Distractions Support for this project was provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Volunteer Registration & Protection Paul Brown Associate Director, Ag & Natural Resource Programs Arizona Cooperative Extension Master Gardening Planning.
SHRP 2 Safety Implementation: Strategic Planning Using the Data Meeting with AASHTO Safety Management August 30, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway.
Driver Distraction: Results from Naturalistic Teenage Driving Studies Charlie Klauer, Ph. D. Research Scientist Group Lead: Teen Risk and Injury Prevention.
As employees you are Colby’s most valuable asset and represent the College to the public and students. The way that you drive can reflect either positively.
SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,
The Driver and Pedestrian Distraction Challenge Diane Wigle Safety Countermeasures Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) April.
Texting while driving, To do or NOT to do? By: Jennifer M. Richards.
Motor Vehicle Collisions: Planning for the Provincial Health Officer’s Report Prepared by Dr. Eric Young Deputy Provincial Health Officer.
1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &
You are part of a system Your Driving Task Your Driving Responsibilities Your Driver’s License.
SUVs and Public Affairs Issues Company attempts to manage stakeholders What tactics were used and were they successful? What company stakeholders were.
Managing Risk When Driving. All Licensed Drivers – 191,275,719 All Drivers Involvement Rate in Fatal Crashes/100,000 Licensed Drivers – (37,795.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
NHTSA’s Federal Perspective What’s Big Now? and What’s Coming? 60 th Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference May 11-13, 2009 – Columbia, MO.
Teens and Trucks and Defeating Distracted Driving July 2011.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Activity 6A Writing an Argumentative Essay (p. 33)
National Press Foundation Teen Safety June 14, 2005.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
Task Force on Safe Teen Driving Joint Transportation Committee January 10, 2013.
IIHS 2 nd Annual Regional Safety Conference Emerging Vehicle Safety Technology October 18, 2007 Stephen Oesch.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
Prepared for Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security Office of Grants and Research, Highway Safety Division Traffic Safety Forum Presented.
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A BRIEF SUMMARY.
Accident Scene Safety Module 1 – Vehicle Safety Section 1 - Driving Safety.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
Safety Belt Use. Goals Increase recognition of high risk situations. Improve your decision-making skills. Help you create a support network in your community.
2010 SCOHTS Annual Meeting Ken Campbell SHRP2 Chief Program Officer Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity.
AASHTO Standing Committee on Research July 26, 2011 Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity Update.
Did You Know?. AA A BB B CC C DD D EE E Statistics - A TRUE OR FALSE: Teens who are texting while driving, have the reaction time of a seventy-year-old.
Fall  The central goal of SHRP 2 Safety research is to address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety. This includes developing.
Teen drivers, What is YOUR responsibility? Jackie Stackhouse Leach Health Educator Morristown Medical Center Jefferson High School Seniors October 21,
Your Driver License: How to Get One, Keep One & Afford One.
PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION & OVERSIGHT WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD Update on TRB Activities July 29, 2015 PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION.
Grab BagData General Information Laws $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
MICHIGAN MERIT HEALTH LESSON PLAN UNIT 4:SAEFTY LESSON 1:WHAT IS KILLING US? By: Sam Tallidis.
Teen Safe Driving: A Peer Education Program. On An Average Day In the U.S. …every 12 minutes someone dies in a traffic crash …every 10 seconds an injury.
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
SHRP 2 Safety Databases: Continuous Observations of Seat Belt Use Jim Hedlund APHA Annual Meeting November 18, 2014 Accelerating solutions for highway.
 Be a Good Role Model  Understand the GDL Law  Fit in Practice Driving  Effectively Enforce the GDL at Home  Control the Keys and Lower Your Teen’s.
STOPPING THE #1 KILLER OF TEENS IN AMERICA. Motor vehicle crashes are the #1 killer of teens in America About 400 junior high teens die each year in car.
TRB Update AASHTO SCOHTS Annual Meeting April 2016.
SEATBELTS. Overview: seatbelts > What are seatbelts? > Seatbelt use in Canada > Myths and misconceptions about seatbelts > Solutions.
Unit 4 Lesson 1 What Is Killing Us?. d d d d d d d d d d Leading Cause of Death What is the leading cause of death for people ages 1-34 in the US? 1.Injuries.
Chapter 3: Drivers Under Age 21. Most students under the age of 18 learn how to drive in a high school or commercial Driver Education School Most students.
Cell Phones and Driving
Staff Family Day: understanding safe road use
Understanding safe road use
Understanding safe road use
Steve Bloch Auto Club of Southern California
Signing the Pledge Vision Zero UNHCR Safe Road Use campaign.
Let’s stop accepting death and serious injury as part of using our roads For most of us, road safety is the last thing on our minds when we hop in the.
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Presentation transcript:

SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity

SHRP 2 SHRP 2 was authorized by Congress in the 2005 highway legislation $170 million, 7 years ( ) Four Research Focus Areas: SafetyReliability Renewal Capacity

Why is Highway Safety Important? Improving highway safety is a very important issue in the United States: – 411,000 people were killed on our nation’s roads in the past 10 years, – 27,153,000 people were injured during the same time period, and – Highway fatalities are the leading cause of death for young people aged 15 to 20. Almost everyone here knows someone who was injured or killed in a motor vehicle crash – so… How can you help?

Why is Highway Safety Important?

The SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Will collect driving data from 3,100 people driving their own vehicles, going about their daily routines for either one or two years Data will be used for decades to come by researchers seeking to improve highway and driving safety The study needs more volunteer drivers, and that is why we are here today.

What is a Naturalistic Driving Study? Install inconspicuous cameras and sensors on people’s own vehicles Participants drive normally for an extended period SHRP 2 is the largest, most diverse, most ambitious study of this type – in the world!

Why do a Naturalistic Driving Study? Provides a unique view into the circumstances surrounding a crash or other safety event –More accurate and useful than police reports Can compare these events with ordinary driving data –To determine crash risks for different driver, vehicle, and environmental factors

Why is the SHRP 2 NDS Special? Size (3,100 drivers) Duration (two years) Geographic extent (six locations) Includes roadway data Long-term access to data for ongoing research

SHRP 2 NDS Study Sites

Participants (You?) Men and women in 7 age groups: 3,100 participants in all Some participate for 1 year, some for 2 years Minor Teen (16-17)Younger Older Driver (51-65) Adult Teen (18-20)Middle Older Driver (66-75) Young Adult (21-35)Older Older Driver (76+) Middle Adult (36-50)

Vehicles 1,950 vehicles on the road at one time 3,900 years worth of driving data Passenger cars, vans, SUVs, pickups Cooperation from car companies: –Selection of makes, models, years –Advanced technologies

12 DAS System Components

Head unit (as seen from passenger seat) DAS (mounted under passenger shelf) Front radar

Accelerometer Data –Braking –Accelerating –Swerving GPS Forward Radar Cabin alcohol indicator Incident push button (opens audio channel for 30 seconds) Video (4 camera views) Turn signals Vehicle network data –Accelerator –Brake pedal activation –Speed –Horn –Seat Belt Information –Airbag deployment What Data will be Collected?

15 Camera Views

What Would I Have to Do? Part 1 Take a screening questionnaire to see if you (and your vehicle) are eligible –Phone or online options Schedule a [four] hour time period: –Consent process –Get the vehicle instrumented –Undergo an assessment (vision, driving history, sleep habits, etc.)

Driver Data/Assessment Demographics Driving history Driving knowledge Driving behavior Medical conditions Sleep habits Risk perception and risky behavior Sensation seeking Vision, strength, mobility

What Would I Have to Do? Part 2 Drive as you normally would (1 or 2 years) Occasional data downloads –Done by project personnel at your convenience If in a crash, let us know –Interviews conducted for selected crashes At end of study: –Return vehicle to site to have DAS removed –Answer a few final questionnaires –Receive final payment

Payment There is compensation in the amount of [$300 or $500] per year –[$300 or $500] total for one year participants –[$600 or $1000] total for two year participants Paid via [check or direct deposit] –At 3 points in time for one year participants –At 5 points in time for two year participants [Also entered into a drawing for $1000 for every six months enrolled in the study –Odds of winning are 1 in 150]

Expected Uses of SHRP 2 NDS Data Roadway: improved design, operations, signage, hardware, etc. Distracted driving: policies, laws on use of hand- held devices, texting, etc., for teens or broader population Drowsiness: policies, regulations for commercial drivers Vehicle design/technologies: integrate advanced technologies to minimize or reduce distraction, evaluate crash warning algorithms Other: planning, highway operations, fuel efficiency, environmental effects

Expected Data Sharing After SHRP 2 In order to provide long term safety benefits, we need to provide researchers widest possible access to all data But we must also protect privacy of participants Methods: –Data sharing agreements consistent with privacy protections in approved consent form –Security: physical, hardware, firmware, software, and encryption –Institutional Review Board(s) oversight –External oversight committee for all processes

We Take Your Privacy Seriously Legal protections: –We have obtained a Certificate of Confidentiality from the Department of Health and Human Services Technical and logistical protections: –Identifying data and information highly protected Contact information Face video Audio (if incident button was pressed) GPS coordinates of home, work, school locations Must be viewed in a secure data enclave by qualified researchers who have received approval to use the data

[Add Other Slides As Appropriate] [Customized slides for site, intended audience, special age groups, etc.]

Questions? Go to: For more information To see if you are eligible To see how your vehicle will look To view a study video and consent forms Or call to get screened