Cognitive Modelling Experiment Clodagh Collins. Clodagh Collins.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M&Ms Statistics.
Advertisements

Conceptual Clustering
What is Science?. Activity b On your own (5 min)  Write down in one or two brief sentences, what the word “Science” conveys to you b In pairs  Compare.
Naïve Bayes. Bayesian Reasoning Bayesian reasoning provides a probabilistic approach to inference. It is based on the assumption that the quantities of.
Single category classification
Cognitive Modelling – An exemplar-based context model Benjamin Moloney Student No:
Cognitive Modelling Assignment Suzanne Cotter March 2010.
How to Understand and Interpret Reports in the IBTP Heather P. Wright Polk County Schools Created by Heather P. Wright, Polk County Schools.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY NEW STUDENTS: PROGRESSION AND AWARD How do I progress between levels? How is my final award calculated?
Image Analysis Phases Image pre-processing –Noise suppression, linear and non-linear filters, deconvolution, etc. Image segmentation –Detection of objects.
Naïve Bayes based Model Billy Doran “If the model does what people do, do people do what the model does?”
A methodology for translating positional error into measures of attribute error, and combining the two error sources Yohay Carmel 1, Curtis Flather 2 and.
Assuming normally distributed data! Naïve Bayes Classifier.
Lecture 6 Topics Observation Observation Sampling STROBE.
Conjunctive classification. What is conjunctive classification? In single-category classification, we want our model to give each test item to be classified.
Single Category Classification Stage One Additive Weighted Prototype Model.
Cognitive Modelling Assignment 1 MODEL 6: MSc Cognitive Science Elaine Cohalan Feb 9 th 2005.
Categorization vs. logic in category conjunction: towards a model of overextension Dr. Fintan Costello, Dept of Computer Science, University College Dublin.
LECTURE 5 TRUE SCORE THEORY. True Score Theory OBJECTIVES: - know basic model, assumptions - know definition of reliability, relation to TST - be able.
Assessing cognitive models What is the aim of cognitive modelling? To try and reproduce, using equations or similar, the mechanism that people are using.
Timed. Transects Statistics indicate that overall species Richness varies only as a function of method and that there is no difference between sites.
Exemplar-based accounts of “multiple system” phenomena in perceptual categorization R. M. Nosofsky and M. K. Johansen Presented by Chris Fagan.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 8 Slide 1 Tools of Software Development l 2 types of tools used by software engineers:
Discriminant Analysis Testing latent variables as predictors of groups.
Classification and Prediction: Regression Analysis
Classroom Assessment Reliability. Classroom Assessment Reliability Reliability = Assessment Consistency. –Consistency within teachers across students.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Statistics
@ 2012 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning Chapter 5 Description of Behavior Through Numerical 2012 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Project Life Cycle Lecture - 18.
Lecture 5 “additional notes on crossed random effects models”
Descriptive Statistics Anwar Ahmad. Central Tendency- Measure of location Measures descriptive of a typical or representative value in a group of observations.
Measures of Central Tendency & Spread
Representing variables according to the ISO/IEC standard.
Two Categories of Responders  Type 1 - Combinations of A and B treated as a fourth category (strategy evident in complete rejection of proposed categories.
Coricelli and Nagel (2008) Introduction Methods Results Conclusion.
Conjunctive classification. What is conjunctive classification? In single-category classification, we want our model to give each test item to be classified.
Thinking Mathematically
Vocabulary of Statistics Part Two. Variable classifications Qualitative variables: can be placed into distinct categories, according to some characteristic.
Prediction of Influencers from Word Use Chan Shing Hei.
Modeling Visual Search Time for Soft Keyboards Lecture #14.
Modeling Information Navigation : Implication for Information Architecture Craig S. Miller 이주우.
Categories What are categories? The internal structure of categories Rule-based approaches Similarity-based approaches Theory-based approaches.
Network Community Behavior to Infer Human Activities.
DESIGNER & DEVELOPER ORIENTATION Blackboard 9.1. The Grade Center Introduction The Blackboard Grade Center is more than just a way to record students’
Introduction to advertising strategies. COMMUNICATION OBJECTIVES Often when we think of advertising, we just think of great ads that make us laugh or.
Chapter 6 Indexes, Scales, And Typologies Key Terms.
Lesson 65 Addition of Radical Expressions Weighted Average.
Approaches to Converting Assessment Data to OSEP Outcome Categories Jim J Lesko, Ed.D. Delaware Department of Education
Model Classification Model by Barry Hennessy. Model Basis My model was based on the Prototype model: that previously seen examples are combined into a.
GCSE Computing#BristolMet Session Objectives#8 MUST add two 8-bit binary integers SHOULD explain overflow errors COULD provide solutions to limit overflow.
Organization of Semantic Memory Typical empirical testing paradigm: propositional verification task – rt to car has four wheels vs. car is a status symbol.
Advanced Gene Selection Algorithms Designed for Microarray Datasets Limitation of current feature selection methods: –Ignores gene/gene interaction: single.
Combining Multiple Measures What are the indicators/ components? What are the priority outcomes? What are the performance expectations? How can we evaluate.
Two Approaches to Estimation of Classification Accuracy Rate Under Item Response Theory Quinn N. Lathrop and Ying Cheng Assistant Professor Ph.D., University.
Questionnaire-Part 2. Translating a questionnaire Quality of the obtained data increases if the questionnaire is presented in the respondents’ own mother.
1 Measuring Agreement. 2 Introduction Different types of agreement Diagnosis by different methods  Do both methods give the same results? Disease absent.
Lt Col Dieter A. Waldvogel, PhD
Lt Col Dieter A. Waldvogel, PhD
Multiple Regression.
A nationwide US student survey
Helping Children Learn
September 1, 2013.
Multiple Regression.
Vocabulary of Statistics
Learning to Classify Documents Edwin Zhang Computer Systems Lab
5.5 The Marketing Concept The marketing concept is the idea that consumers and competitors should be considered in every important business decision.
Color Value >+1SD above the mean >mean <mean
An Overview of the Achievement Profile Data
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 8 Slide 1 Tools of Software Development l 2 types of tools used by software engineers:
Label propagation algorithm
Presentation transcript:

Cognitive Modelling Experiment Clodagh Collins. Clodagh Collins.

Model Type Single category classification: Additive weighted prototype model. Single category classification: Additive weighted prototype model. Conjunctions: Interactive approach to conjunctions. Conjunctions: Interactive approach to conjunctions.

Stage 1 Single category classification for categories A, B and C. Single category classification for categories A, B and C. Prototype weightings were computed. Prototype weightings were computed. Weights of the new item’s attribute values were added. Weights of the new item’s attribute values were added. Prototype score was calculated. Prototype score was calculated. W(,C)= no. of occurances of in stored members of C W(,C)= no. of occurances of in stored members of C total no. of occurances of across all categories total no. of occurances of across all categories

Spreadsheet

Stage 2 Conjunctive classification for ANDED-PAIRS, A and B, A and C, B and C. Conjunctive classification for ANDED-PAIRS, A and B, A and C, B and C. In each case the list of attribute weights from the two constituents were combined to form the prototype. In each case the list of attribute weights from the two constituents were combined to form the prototype. Combined using average((A+B)/2). Combined using average((A+B)/2). Items were then classified by comparing them to these integrated prototypes. Items were then classified by comparing them to these integrated prototypes.

Prototype for A Prototype for B Dim 1 Dim 2 Dim 3 Dim 1 Dim 2 Dim3 A= 0.8 X= 0.25 C= 0.2 Z= 1 B= 0.75 B= 0.71 Y= 0.5 Y= 0.25 Y= 0.66 X= 0.5 X= 0.25 X= 0.33 X= 0.33 X= 0.25 A= 0.5 X= 0.66 Y= 0.5 Y= 0.25 C= 0 Z= 0 B= 0.25 B= 0.14 A= 0.2 A= 0.16 Y= 0

Prototype for A and B: Av((A +B)/2) Dim 1 Dim 2 Dim 3 A= 0.5 X= 0.25 C= 0.1 Y= 0.5 Y= 0.25 Y= 0.33 X= 0.38 A= 0.33 X=0.5 Z= 0.5 B= 0.5 B= 0.43

Analysis The model’s classification scores were a reasonably good fit to participants’ average classification scores for items as members of single categories ( A: r= 0.87, B: r= 0.92, C: r= 0.91 however some variation was observed in the scores for members of category conjunctions (A and B: r= 0.97, A and C: r= 0.45, B and C: r=O.86). Overall correlation score was r= 0.86.…