Simulation for a volcano monitoring network Rainer Mautz ETH Zurich, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry November 22 nd, 2008 Session 9: Natural hazards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Exam Review 1 1.
Advertisements

Coverage in Wireless Sensor Network Phani Teja Kuruganti AICIP lab.
Review on Modern Volcanology
1 ECE 776 Project Information-theoretic Approaches for Sensor Selection and Placement in Sensor Networks for Target Localization and Tracking Renita Machado.
Yang Yang, Miao Jin, Hongyi Wu Presenter: Buri Ban The Center for Advanced Computer Studies (CACS) University of Louisiana at Lafayette 3D Surface Localization.
Role of Space Geodesy In GEOSS Timothy H. Dixon University of Miami/RSMAS and Center for Southeastern Advanced Remote Sensing (CSTARS)
Fault-Tolerant Target Detection in Sensor Networks Min Ding +, Dechang Chen *, Andrew Thaeler +, and Xiuzhen Cheng + + Department of Computer Science,
Institute for Software Integrated Systems Vanderbilt University Node Density Independent Localization Presented by: Brano Kusy B.Kusy, M.Maroti, G.Balogh,
Los Angeles September 27, 2006 MOBICOM Localization in Sparse Networks using Sweeps D. K. Goldenberg P. Bihler M. Cao J. Fang B. D. O. Anderson.
Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning 21 April 2008.
Mobile Assisted Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks N.B. Priyantha, H. Balakrishnan, E.D. Demaine, S. Teller MIT Computer Science Presenters: Puneet.
A Beacon-Less Location Discovery Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks Lei Fang (Syracuse) Wenliang (Kevin) Du (Syracuse) Peng Ning (North Carolina State)
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
Analytical and Numerical Modelling of Surface Displacements due to Volcanism Olivia Lewis Supervised by Prof. Jurgen Neuberg School of Earth and Environment.
1 Localization Technologies for Sensor Networks Craig Gotsman, Technion/Harvard Collaboration with: Yehuda Koren, AT&T Labs.
Ad-Hoc Localization Using Ranging and Sectoring Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Amit Dhariwal, Ramesh Govindan, Gaurav Sukhatme Computer Science Department,
Jana van Greunen - 228a1 Analysis of Localization Algorithms for Sensor Networks Jana van Greunen.
Mesoscale ionospheric tomography over Finland Juha-Pekka Luntama Finnish Meteorological Institute Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer University of Bath 4th.
Ad-Hoc Wireless Sensor Positioning in Hazardous Areas Rainer Mautz a, Washington Ochieng b, Hilmar Ingensand a a ETH Zurich, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry.
Speed and Direction Prediction- based localization for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks Imane BENKHELIFA and Samira MOUSSAOUI Computer Science Department.
Geodetic Metrology and Engineering Geodesy Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry C URRENT I NVESTIGATIONS AT THE ETH Z URICH IN O.
Fault Tolerant and Mobility Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Wireless Sensor Network Name : Tahani Abid Aladwani ID :
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Sensor Positioning in Wireless Ad-hoc Sensor Networks Using Multidimensional Scaling Xiang Ji and Hongyuan Zha Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,
LOCALIZATION in Sensor Networking Hamid Karimi. Wireless sensor networks Wireless sensor node  power supply  sensors  embedded processor  wireless.
A novel gossip-based sensing coverage algorithm for dense wireless sensor networks Vinh Tran-Quang a, Takumi Miyoshi a,b a Graduate School of Engineering,
College of Engineering Non-uniform Grid- based Coordinated Routing Priyanka Kadiyala Major Advisor: Dr. Robert Akl Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Network Computing Laboratory Radio Interferometric Geolocation Miklos Maroti, Peter Volgesi, Sebestyen Dora Branislav Kusy, Gyorgy Balogh, Andras Nadas.
Distributed Anomaly Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks Ksutharshan Rajasegarar, Christopher Leckie, Marimutha Palaniswami, James C. Bezdek IEEE ICCS2006(Institutions.
Energy and Coverage Aware Routing Algorithm in Self Organized Sensor Networks Jakob Salzmann INSS 2007, , Braunschweig Institute of Applied Microelectronics.
Dynamic Fine-Grained Localization in Ad-Hoc Networks of Sensors Weikuan Yu Dept. of Computer and Info. Sci. The Ohio State University.
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
Location Estimation in Ad-Hoc Networks with Directional Antennas N. Malhotra M. Krasniewski C. Yang S. Bagchi W. Chappell 5th IEEE International Conference.
788.11J Presentation “Deploying a Wireless Sensor Network on an Active Volcano” Presented by Ahmed Farouk Ibrahim Gaffer.
Relative Accuracy based Location Estimation in Wireless Ad Hoc Sensor Networks May Wong 1 Demet Aksoy 2 1 Intel, Inc. 2 University of California, Davis.
APPLICATION OF GPS TECHNOLOGY TO ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP PROJECT.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
A Passive Approach to Sensor Network Localization Rahul Biswas and Sebastian Thrun International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2004 Presented.
Differential Ad Hoc Positioning Systems Presented By: Ramesh Tumati Feb 18, 2004.
Localization and Secure Localization. Learning Objectives Understand why WSNs need localization protocols Understand localization protocols in WSNs Understand.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
Geography 70  Basic Geodesy  Map Projections  Coordinate Systems  Scale Locating Positions on the Earth.
M. Gende, C. Brunini Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Improving Single Frequency Positioning Using SIRGAS Ionospheric Products.
University “Ss. Cyril and Methodus” SKOPJE Cluster-based MDS Algorithm for Nodes Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks Ass. Biljana Stojkoska.
Evaluating Wireless Network Performance David P. Daugherty ITEC 650 Radford University March 23, 2006.
A Biologically-Inspired Approach to Designing Wireless Sensor Networks Matthew Britton, Venus Shum, Lionel Sacks and Hamed Haddadi The University College.
C. Savarese, J. Beutel, J. Rabaey; UC BerkeleyICASSP Locationing in Distributed Ad-hoc Wireless Sensor Networks Chris Savarese, Jan Beutel, Jan Rabaey.
2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann1/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group,
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
Group Members Usman Nazir FA08-BET-179 M.Usman Saeed FA08-BET-173
Modeling End-to-end Distance for Given Number of Hops in Dense Planar Wireless Sensor Networks April Chan-Myung Kim
Xiaoyuan Liang, Jie Tian, Guiling Wang New Jersey Institute of Technology Deploying Mobile Survivability-Heterogeneous Sensor Networks for Barrier Coverage.
Parameter Reduction for Density-based Clustering on Large Data Sets Elizabeth Wang.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant, G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, H. Brenot, J. Spits, S. Stankov.
Experimental Ranging With Mica2 Motes M. Allen, E. Gaura, R. Newman, S. Mount Cogent Computing, Coventry University The experimental work here makes use.
Wireless Access and Networking Technology (WANT) Lab. An Efficient Data Aggregation Approach for Large Scale Wireless Sensor Networks Globecom 2010 Lutful.
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
1 Using surface deformation data to investigate pressure and volume changes in magma chambers What factors control the magnitude of surface deformation?
How to minimize energy consumption of Sensors in WSN Dileep Kumar HMCL 30 th Jan, 2015.
Medium Access Control. MAC layer covers three functional areas: reliable data delivery access control security.
Location of mobile devices in the Ad Hoc Network
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
Dynamic Fine-Grained Localization in Ad-Hoc Networks of Sensors
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Early Warning Flood Detection
Wireless Sensor Networks: nodes localization issue
Mobile-Assisted Localization in Sensor Network
Overview: Chapter 4 Infrastructure Establishment
Presentation transcript:

Simulation for a volcano monitoring network Rainer Mautz ETH Zurich, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry November 22 nd, 2008 Session 9: Natural hazards and risks

1.Motivation 2.Positioning Algorithm 3.Simulation Setup 4.Simulation Results 5.Conclusion & Outlook Contents Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Volcanoes experience pre-eruption surface deformation Reason: internal magma pressure cause surface bulge displacements  direction: upwards and outwards  horizontal: radial pattern up to 10 cm  vertical: uplift of cm / year (typical)  area: over 10 km 2 goal  spatially distributed position based monitoring system for early warning  positioning for spatio-temoral referencing of additional sensors e.g. seismicity, geothermal, gravity, geomagnetic data 1. Motivation Mount St. Helens, Washington Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

 SAR interferometry: update rate 35 days  Geodetic GNSS: expensive, energy consuming Feasibility of a positioning system with deployed location aware sensor nodes 1. Motivation  tiny nodes  low cost  battery-powered  self positioning  ranging capability  high density short range – low power Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

1. Motivation Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook GPS (anchor nodes) tiny nodes inter-node distances Tiny Node GPS Station

Principle of Wireless Positioning: Multi-Lateration 2. Positioning Algorithm known node unknown node range measurement Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Iterative Multi-Lateration: 2. Positioning Algorithm Initial anchors Step 1 : Step 2 : Step 3 : becomes anchor Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Ambiguity problem when creating the smallest rigid structure 2. Positioning Algorithm Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Positioning Strategy find 5 fully connected nodes free LS adjustment return refined coordinates and standard variations return local coordinates failed no input ranges achieved input anchor nodes yes volume test ambiguity test assign local coordinates Expansion of minimal structure (iterative multilateration) Merging of Clusters (6-Parameter Transformation) Transformation into a reference system Coarse Positioning anchor nodes available? failed achieved failed achieved Creation of a robust structure 2. Positioning Algorithm Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Object of study: Sakurajima Stratovolcano, summit with three peaks, island 77 km m height extremely active: strombolian, plinian densely populated: Kagoshima, on island monitored by Sakurajima Volcano Observatory (levelling, EDM, GPS) 3. Simulation Setup Landsat image, created by NASA Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Data provided by Kokusai Kogyo Co. Ltd 3. Simulation Setup Sakurajima Mountain – Digital Surface Model 10 x 10 m grid Central part of volcano Area 2 km x 2.5 km Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Parameters for Simulation ParameterDefault ValueRange Number of tiny nodes – 1000 Number of GPS nodes (anchors)101 – 5 % Maximum range (radio link)400 m200 – 500 m Inter-nodal connectivity Range observation accuracy1 cm0 – 1 m Node distributiongrid / optimised 3. Simulation Setup Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

400 nodes on a 100 m x 125 m grid lines of sight with less than 500 m 4. Simulation Results Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Optimised positions lines of sight with less than 500 m 4. Simulation Results Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Maximum radio range versus number of positioned nodes 4. Simulation Results Maximum radio range versus number of range measurements Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Number of located nodes in dependency of the number of anchor nodes Number of anchors Anchor fraction Number of located nodes Success rateNumber of ranges 30.8 % 3 1 % %19148 % %35488 % %37193 % % % Simulation Results Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Correlation between Ranging Error and Positioning Error + true deviation ● mean error (as result of adjustment) 4. Simulation Results Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

Mean errors of the X- Y- and Z-components sorted by the mean 3D point errors (P) 4. Simulation Results Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

 Feasibility of a wireless sensor network shown  Direct line of sight requirement difficult to achieve  10 % GPS equipped nodes required  Error of height component two times larger  Position error ≈ range measurement error Outlook  Precise ranging (cm) between networks to be solved  Protocol & power management 5. Conclusions Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook

End Motivation Positioning Algorithm Simulation Setup Simulation Results Conclusions & Outlook